User talk:Adwiii/Archive 1

My Edits
I would like to apologize, I often forget to use the edit summaries. Almost all of my minor edits are to remove dead links or fix small things. I generally try to go back in and put in an edit summary if i forget but if you ever need any help clarifying please feel free to post a question. Thanks.  @ d \/\/ | | | ,~Adwiii -[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Adwiii| Questions? Comments? ] 22:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

About barnstars
Anyone can award them, see BARNSTARS. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Naming references
See if you can use "name" with references so that you only need to give the full reference once, and then after that refer to it just by the name. This means that the reference will only appear once in the "References" section, but each statement cited to it will still have the footnote number related to it.

A random example to see how it works: Keep Calm and Carry On - the Guardian article is cited three times in the article, and the New York Times magazine article is cited twice, but each of them is only listed once in the References section.

Let me know if you need any help with it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Academy at Lincoln
 Tide  rolls  12:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Your next challenge
... or in fact, two challenges.

You have done a great job on The Academy at Lincoln so far, but there are two really big issues that put it at risk of being deleted, or at least "redirected" so that the page just takes the reader to the page about your school district.

First, you need to make a strong statement in the lead of the article about why the school is unique, special and/or notable. You must make a clear claim as to why the school might meet the general notability guideline.

Second, and this is very much related to the first item, you need to find sources about the school that are independent of the school. So that means not the school website, not a teacher's website, and not the school district website. Check the link I posted on the talk page for the article, scroll through the pages, and see what's the best you can find. Or, ask a teacher or school librarian for help. Any printed newspaper - or electronic copy of one, or webpage from one - is a big step in the right direction. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Early College at Guilford
I looked around The Early College at Guilford and it led me to this reference.

So, that URL would be a good reference to support your sentence in the lead about The Early College at Guilford (although it lists it at 18th, not 17th.)

See if you can use the "cite web" ref format to include it. Here's an example of how it's used:

 

(Just replace each item after the = with the information for the Guilford reference - if any item isn't available, just miss that item out.)

This would be the first third party (independent) reference for the article. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Image
Although you've done well to get an image of the school in place, there is a possibility that the fair use rationale you've given won't be accepted.

So if you have a digital camera, or know someone that does, try to take a photo of your own and upload it to Wikimedia Commons with a free license. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 07:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Categories
Categorization is a bit long, but this bit is relevant: "Pages are not placed directly into every possible category, only into the most specific one in any branch. This means that if a page belongs to a subcategory of C (or a subcategory of a subcategory of C, and so on) then it is not normally placed directly into C. For exceptions to this rule, see Eponymous categories and Non-diffusing subcategories below."

I'm not even going to try and summarize Eponymous and Non-diffusing, but I think you may be putting your article into too many categories. So if it's in "Schools in North Carolina" then it doesn't need to be in "Schools in the United States". Or something like that. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:29, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Warning
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Syrthiss (talk) 15:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * OK I will :)
 * Sorry I did not know about content forks but I do now I will try better next time thanks Syrthiss.~Adwiii

Bullet point lists
In The Academy at Lincoln, I think it would be better if all of the current bullet point lists were re-written as prose. I think each of these can be summarised in one or two (or maybe three) sentences. Give it a try. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:33, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

--Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

James morrison
why when on your page it says you don't care about football, do you feel the need to keep editing correct information about something you don't have a clue about. Or are you one of those people who gets their kicks by being a nazi on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danwba (talk • contribs) 9:30 am, Today (UTC−4)
 * Ok so if its on soccer base then put in a tag for it and it wont be removed bc if you put in different info with out citing refs for it it appears as vandalism. I admit i probably should have assumed good faith, but just to clarify an external link does not count as a reference.  @ d \/\/ | | |  Talk to Me! ~Adwiii  13:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I have gone in and added soccer base as a tag where i though applicable you may need to further add in more tags and revise where i put some in. i apologize for being a "nazi" although you need to properly reference your information.  @ d \/\/ | | |  Talk to Me! ~Adwiii  16:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Signature broken
Your Wikipedia signature seems to be broken - it has one too many of these | in it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks Demiurge i believe i have fixed it and added a few more things to it thanks for your help @ d \/\/ &#124; &#124; &#124; - Questions? Comments? ~Adwiii  22:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Ummm I'm not sure that's an improvement :-) The talk page link seems not to work. Also I think light blue on dark blue is not a good choice... it's quite eye-melting. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I reall dont know why its different on m preference page ill work on it and see what i can do... @ d \/\/ &#124; &#124; &#124; - Questions? Comments? ~ Adwiii  10:56, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah i dont know i can change the color but the link works elsewhere ( on my preferences page) so i dont really know what to do about the link. @ d \/\/ &#124; &#124; &#124; - Questions? Comments? ~Adwiii 11:00, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Test --  @ d \/\/ &#124; &#124; &#124; - Questions? Comments?  ~Demiurge1000 15:19, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK you want something like  @ d \/\/ &#124; &#124; &#124; - Questions? Comments? ~Adwiii . The only part I can't work out is how you manage to get the white text to be bold. (I'll fix my own sig in a moment, lol.)--  @ d \/\/ &#124; &#124; &#124; - Questions? Comments?  ~Demiurge1000 15:25, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * About the bold thing, you can probably put ''' before and after the relevant part of the sig. I've not tried it though. Demiurge1000 (talk) 15:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah thanks i had the tag on the inside of the brackets i hope moving it out helped, although apparently not and i still cant understand why the link will work properly in the preview on my preferences page but not here :( @ d \/\/ &#124; &#124; &#124; - Questions? Comments?  ~Adwiii 21:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Puzzling. Try copying exactly what I said above, after "something like", and don't add the bolding to it. If that works, then try it with the bolding. Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * copying exactly doesnt work either @ d \/\/ &#124; &#124; &#124; - Questions? Comments?  ~Adwiii 23:01, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Never mind, we can come back to that later I guess :) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe i have fixed it now  @ d \/\/ | | |  Talk to Me! ~Adwiii  01:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * So this is what i dont get it works in all of my warnings such as the one found here, but if i directly copy the code in it doesnt work   and i for the life of me cant figure out why the code works everywhere but here.  @ d \/\/ | | | <font color="#FFFFFF"> Talk to Me!  ~Adwiii  13:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC) (see talk to me is bold and it should be a link like @d\/\/ &#124; &#124; &#124; is :

Thanks for all of your help Demiurge1000 i cant believe i didnt think about that of course it wont link to the page its already on (unless you specify where on the page) but thanks, i changed it to take up less room as i understand some people do not like large siggys <sub style="color:#FFFFFF;"> @ d \/\/ | | | <sup style="color:#FFFFFF;">Talk 21:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Procrastinator userboxes
To complete the set, you could do a "Procrastinator neutral" userbox which uses "themself" instead of "himself". Interestingly, there are some editors (including a few administrators) who have never disclosed what gender they are. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * K I made it.

Reviewer permission
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   02:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks HJ :) <sub style="color:#FFFFFF;"> @ d \/\/ | | | <sup style="color:#FFFFFF;">Talk 20:32, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:
 * Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
 * Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
 * Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
 * Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
 * Please read Help:Reverting and Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
 * You can test Rollback at New admin school/Rollback
 * You may wish to display the User wikipedia/rollback userbox and/or the Rollback top icon on your user page
 * If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   02:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks HJ I will be sure to let you know if I need help, thanks. <sub style="color:#FFFFFF;"> @ d \/\/ | | | <sup style="color:#FFFFFF;">Talk 15:28, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Resilience

 * Thanks, Demiurge, and thanks for all of your help too! :) <sub style="color:#FFFFFF;"> @ d \/\/ | | | <sup style="color:#FFFFFF;">Talk 10:48, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for James B. Dudley
The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Francis A. Dales
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Removing dead links
Please don't remove dead links like you did in Cantons of the Gironde department. If you wish to join WP:FR and help to create these articles, please feel free to do so. Kiwipete (talk) 03:05, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I thought that it would be more appropriate to unlink the dead links since the section headers have links to the most appropriate related article. <sub style="color:#FFFFFF;"> @ d \/\/ | | | <sup style="color:#FFFFFF;">Talk 23:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanksfor the welcome.
Hello Adwiii, Thanks for the welcome Message, its greatly appriciated. Im not 100% sure how to reply back to you, but I hope im doing it right, still trying to get used to wikipedia. Anyway, if I have any questions I will be sure to ask you. Thanks :)

XDebby (talk) 15:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

SuicideGirls
I removed unsourced information from 2007, took out promotional charity stuff with no source, removed original research about traffic from 2008, and cleaned the formatting up. Azhuras (talk) 19:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC): Okay so not all of it was vandalism, however the pictures, the part about the origin of the name, and the part on the web traffic should not have been removed.
 * Yes the part about the Image removal did need to be either taken out or sourced/reworded. <sub style="color:#FFFFFF;"> @ d \/\/ | | | <sup style="color:#FFFFFF;">Talk 19:26, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I probably shouldn't have tagged you for vandalism. However the removal of the pics would count as censorship which i could tag you for. <sub style="color:#FFFFFF;"> @ d \/\/ | | | <sup style="color:#FFFFFF;">Talk 19:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh, okay. Well you can put them back I guess if it's been discussed before. I just thought they seemed unnecessary but it's a matter of personal opinion and I didn't mean to be disruptive. Azhuras (talk) 19:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

About Shri Mataji Nirmala Devi's Wiki Page
Dear Adwii, You are definitely not a Sahaja Yogi or a devotee of Shri Mataji Nirmala Devi.You have added a lot of unnecessary and untrue things about her in her page.The Ragneesh Osho thing that you have added is not true at all and that stuff about the national flag is absolute unnecessary.This may confuse the new seekers and they might change their mind about Sahaja Yoga and Self Realization.You see that whenever someone reads about Sahaja Yoga on the Internet they search for it for detailed explanation on Wikipedia and this might be misleading to them.You have also not added many important facts like incurable diseases cured by her etc.Me and my friends have decided to reedit this page in such a way so that it will be more acceptable and understandable for the new seekers and it will also provide a more detailed information about her.I hope for your cooperation.Thanking you in anticipation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SameerTelkar (talk • contribs) 17:14, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

you got it wrong
is wrong. I invented the silly goose and its not the crazy goose, its the silly goose. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T/S 23:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry its fixed (my sources were wrong). Hope you enjoy it! <sub style="color:#FFFFFF;"> @ d \/\/ | | | <sup style="color:#FFFFFF;">Talk 23:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Hello, monkey. I think there is a misunderstanding. The (new) Goose userbox is created by Adwiii, but it's designed to be displayed on your userpage, since you invented the silly goose. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Userbox cleanup
I see that you make userboxes, and I have a special request (if you'll take me up on it). I am an avid fan of the Duke Blue Devils, and I was wondering if you would be willing to make me one. :) — Rsteilberg  talk  01:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * As much as it defies all of my beliefs as a Carolina Fan i will make you one. i will have it too you shortly. <sub style="color:#FFFFFF;"> @ d \/\/ | | | <sup style="color:#FFFFFF;">Talk 02:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Much thanks, just give me the full template for it and I'l implement it into my userpage! — Rsteilberg  talk  02:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Stephanie Courtney
I have removed the image that you added to this article. Per the non-free content criteria screen caps of characters, while permissible in articles about the relevant character, are not allowed in articles about the actor who portrays them. – ukexpat (talk) 15:49, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks for catching me I had not idea about that... Thanks, <sub style="color:#FFFFFF;"> @ d \/\/ | | | <sup style="color:#FFFFFF;">Talk 20:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, and talkback
By the way, I may have another idea for a userbox concerning Deadliest Catch which I may pose to you. Thanks for the userbox again! — Rsteilberg  talk  22:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Signature
Hi, FYI, here's how your signature looks for me: http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/3079/adwiii.png Presumably not what you intended. Amalthea 10:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I've got to say, it is a horrible signature IMO... I can offer a little help designing something better if you like <font color="#000">WormTT  &middot; &#32;(talk) 10:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No, no I know how to do siggy work, I will fix it. Just give me some time, <sub style="color:#FFFFFF;"> @ d \/\/ | | | <sup style="color:#FFFFFF;">Talk  10:28, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure - it may be worth taking into account accessibility - @ d \/\/ | | doesn't automatically make me think adwii. Also, I'm not keen on unbordered blocks of colour, though I'm probably being a bit fussy, it's the website designer in me. <font color="#000">WormTT  &middot; &#32;(talk) 10:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all your help WormTT I personally like this one a lot better. Again thanks all for your help, <font style="color:#ffffff;background:#0080FF;"> Adwiii <font style="color:#0080FF;"> Talk 13:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree, it looks a lot more asthetically pleasing - doesn't cause any of the issues I had with your old one. Glad I could help :) Let me know if you make a decision about the mentoring/adoption.  <font color="#000">WormTT  &middot; &#32;(talk) 13:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Deadlist catch userbox
Well for the Deadliest catch userbox it could be modeled like this

but somewhat different wording and with a picture. Some good ones I've found include the photo on Deadliest Catch and the picture currently on my userpage. And for the background, it could be like a grayish-blue since it's Deadliest Catch and it's fishing in the ocean. Anything is fine with me, — Rsteilberg  talk  04:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Beware that non-free images can't be used in userboxes... remember to check the licensing on every image before you use it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 10:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Adoption school?
Hi Adwiii. I was chatting to User:Demiurge1000 about some work I'd been doing at my adoption school and was wondering if you would be interested in running through it? It gives an overview of what I feel are the most important Wikipedia areas, you can do it in your own time, and it might help you with your future on Wikipedia. Totally up to you, of course. Oh yes, and I've had an idea for a series of userboxes - might run it by you and see what you think ;) <font color="#000">WormTT  · &#32;(talk) 10:23, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I will look into it. And I would be glad to do a UBX (or series of UBXs for you :) ), Thanks <sub style="color:#FFFFFF;"> @ d \/\/ | | | <sup style="color:#FFFFFF;">Talk  10:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, it's just an idea at the moment, but I thought you could have an amusing set of editcountitis userboxes using these sort of facts. I'd rather have a few more facts first though! As for the school, feel free to take your time over considering it, I'll be around to offer any help I can whether or not you decide to. <font color="#000">WormTT  &middot; &#32;(talk) 10:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Adwiii. I'm very glad you've decided to take me up on my offer of the adoption school. I've created your own personal page, which is where I'll put lessons and tests. Let me know whenever you're ready for more, and I'll pop along and update it for you. It also has an associated talk page, which you can use to discuss anything you like with me, be it about the school or about any other problems you come across. <font color="#000">WormTT · &#32;(talk) 09:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Colour UBXs
Hi, thanks for the message. Is there an option of doens't mind the colour..., because I would like to have the following:


 * Doesn't mind the colour red
 * Really likes the colour pink
 * Likes the colour purple
 * Likes the colour sky blue
 * Is not a fan of the colour dark blue

Thanks <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  18:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, Well I could either make it so there are a few ways I could do that. I could either make that one of the Parameters or I could make multiple different UBXs each with a different message. Which would you rather? Thanks, <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  18:08, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually I decided it would be much to hard to make it a parameter so I decided to make different UBXs. I am still working on them but you will be able to see them here as I complete them. <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  18:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * There you go I believe I have made every one you asked for. If there is anything else you need or want done to them please let me know. Again you can see them here

or here User:Adwiii/Adam. Also, keep in mind these are just example colors, it can be changed to be any color. <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  18:43, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Adwiii!!!

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Adam mugliston has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

<font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  18:53, 23 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Adwiii, could you please make the colour UBXs available in sky blue (RGB:00BFFF) and dark blue (RGB:000099). Thanks! <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  21:48, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And also, could I have a 'This user thinks London's articulated buses should not be removed' UBX and a 'This user thinks the (parameter for each of London's Tube Lines) is the best Underground line in London', please. Thanks Adwiii. <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  21:52, 23 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I believe if you put in the color code you want in it will display as such. But then also the id box will display that as well.
 * Or the alternative is the HTML for the Dark Blue you speak of (#000080) is "Navy" and the HTML for the sky blue you wanted (#00BFFF) is "DeepSkyBlue". For a full list of the colors and their names you can also check Web Colors. Hope that helps, <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  21:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And I will be glad to make the other as well. <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  21:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Here is the first one <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  22:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the bus one, the deepskyblue doesn't seem to be working. Could you check it on my userpage? <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  22:07, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Did you by any chance make 'doesn't like the colour...' UBXs? If not, would you mind making that and also 'hates the colour...'? Tell me if I'm showering you with so many userboxes at once, it's just I get ideas and then I forget about them. <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  22:10, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Here is the other UBX.

And I will check on the coloring. <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  22:13, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Ahhh Adam the Problem with the DeepSkyBlue is you arent doing it properly. you have it as and it needs to be  You are using a forward slash ( / ) instead of a pipe ( | ). I eill work on the other color UBXs too. <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk   22:17, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I kept on forgeting. Well, thanks for your help and what about the don't like and hate colour UBXs? <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  22:20, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

I have created both of them at User:Adwiii/UBX/colorhate and User:Adwiii/UBX/colornolike. hope you enjoy them, <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  22:24, 23 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, there isnt a UBX barnstar the closest i can find is the Graphic design Barnstar or the special one. Anyway thanks Adam, <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  22:49, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Adwiii, I was thinking if it would be possible to make a UBX, that said 'This user thinks route (parameter) is one of the best bus routes in London', but when you type in a route, the picture changes to a picture of that route? <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  16:53, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I assume you want like a map of the route? I am not sure if I can make this happen but I will try, <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  23:52, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Could you possibly find an example of one of the pictures you had in mind. Thanks, <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  23:55, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No, I meant a picture of a bus on the route. See Articulated buses in London, there's a couple there. <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  06:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Hows this,

Right now routes 12, 33, 337, 493, 190, 112, 143, (326 A), 394, (7 A), 171, (59 A), (68 A), 211, 36, 436, 360, 316, 19, 303, 204, 21, 141, 111, H32, 110, H98, 70, 162, 163, 93, ELS, H12, 376, 58, 297, 182, 15, 333, 57, 296, 394, R68, C1, 95, 177, 291, 386, 96, G1, and 18 work This is as many as I know that work there may be others that work but I do not know. Sorry for the spotty coverage of routes, but that is the best I can do given UBX parameter options. Hope you like it, <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  11:06, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * That's great, thanks. How did you work out what routes are available? I'm pretty sure 11, 23 and 73 would work. <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  06:48, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Well i used the File:London Bus route ___. jpg pictures, however not all of the bus routes are available under this format. <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  11:27, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

How's it going?
Was chatting to Demiurge and he mentioned there may be something I've missed. If so, I'm very sorry, I could well have overlooked something. Let me know how things are going and if there's anything I can do to help. <font color="#000">WormTT · &#32;(talk) 22:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No I was just ready for my test, and as far as I am aware you havent looked at the page yet. I am in no rush though as I am fairly busy myself in other areas (including real life) so no hurry. Thanks, <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  01:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, sorry about the delay - I've been terribly busy over the bank holday, and also will be next week with a big birthday coming up. I've added the test for now though :) <font color="#000">WormTT  &middot; &#32;(talk) 10:53, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for G. L. Pridgen
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

List of bus routes in Colchester colour
Hi Adwiii, there's a problem with the colour underlining. It's black. When I tried to make it back into colour the text also changed. Do you think you can fix it? <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  17:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * That's fine. Thanks Adwiii. It's weird, that on my laptop the colourof the underline doesn't come up... <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  07:12, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * @Adam: different browsers do behave differently for coloured underlining. Try this - hover your mouse over either the "Red" or the "rose64" in my signature and note which characters get underlined. When I do this in Internet Explorer (6 or 7), Opera or Google Chrome, all nine characters get underlined; but when I try it in Firefox or Safari, only the characters "rose64" are underlined, whereas the "Red" isn't. I think that Adwiii is a Firefox user, because at the top of the page the " &#160;Adwiii&#160; " shows up with round ends in Firefox, but square ends in IE, Chrome, Opera and Safari.
 * @Adwiii: I've seen what you have done for the colouring on List of bus routes in Colchester and I think it's a big improvement over what was there previously. The fact that the text is now all in the "normal" colouring (black on white, or near enough) certainly satisfies the accessibility issues. One small point: the coloured rectangles are a bit "in your face" - could they be smaller perhaps?
 * How do you feel about taking on the other bus-related pages in ? -- Red rose64 (talk) 12:21, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Haha, yes indeed you are right. That is one of the only reasons I use FireFox, it makes my pages look better (everyone else says chrome is better but indeed it is not). And yes I will look into the other over colored pages and try to fix the sizing in this one. <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  21:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * So right about Firefox. It is so much better! <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  06:23, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Something you were not quite expecting

 * Thanks Demiurge, I plan on continuing on through the rest of the Bus route pages too, although it may take me some time (wikitables are hard!). Thanks for the *, <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  00:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I should of given you a banstar too... Well, maybe they'll be an occasion for one later on :-) <font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;"> Adam mugliston Talk  06:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Just to let you know...
... that I've added you here. Sprinting faster (talk) 15:13, 12 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks, maybe more people will find me then and they will be satisfied "customers" to, <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk  21:22, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Test
Hi Adwiii. You're doing very well so far, but I'm afraid I'd like you to do a little more. I'm watching your contributions carefully for the week of the test, so I'm after you ACTUALLY doing it :P Not just linking to your old work. Get your rear out there and DO the test, not just link to your old stuff :P <font color="#000">WormTT  · &#32;(talk) 08:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Well done Adwiii! As far as I am concerned, you have passed with flying colours. Good luck with your future wikipedia work, I'm sure you will go far. Here's your barnstar to display proudly! 91% is an exceptional score :D

Re: Template:`` and Template:```
— Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 04:13, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Rollback not yet
I fixed it. -- The Σ talk<sub style="margin-left:-3.5ex">contribs 21:58, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the cookie! <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

My Precious has eaten your cookie! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

My Precious (talk) 01:10, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:07, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Field of Dreams
Hello. I'd like to make a request for a Field of Dreams userbox. I don't want a picture, just the name of the film. And you could make a good description. Please reply. <i style="font-family:Rockwell; font-size:medium; color:red;">Rusted AutoParts</i> (talk) 10:10 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * (Hope this saves, using computer in hotel room) umm, "This user loves Field of Dreams" or something clever with the famous line. <i style="font-family:Rockwell; font-size:medium; color:red;">Rusted AutoParts</i> (talk) 21:17 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You know, "If you build it, they will come". <i style="font-family:Rockwell; font-size:medium; color:red;">Rusted AutoParts</i> (talk) 18:51 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Otter
Hi, I'ld like to request a "This user likes Otters" userbox. Because it's a fact and there isn't one for otters (although they deserve one), thanks very much. Finest Scientist (talk) 14:07, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello Finest Scientist, I have made a UBX for you which you can see here. If you would like any changes made I will be glad to do change it to your liking. Also if you would like a different picture or the current picture cropped I can do that as well. Hope you like it, <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk 17:17, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

A Newbie with a question for you
'''

Bold text

 * Hello there User talk:Adwiii.......


 * Indented line

My name is Caroleenie1 (nickname "horselover") and I was referred to you by the kind fellows at the live help....... I decided yesterday to see what this encyclopedia business was about and immediately fell in love. My most favorite critter in the world are horses and the live help thought that maybe you could help me customize my User page....... I read through the tutorial last night and there is so much and any assistance would be greatly appreciated..... I've always wanted to while away my days doing nothing but learning, etc. I'd like to thank you in advance for your help, suggestions, etc. What a wonderful world we live in, eh?

--Caroleenie1 (talk) 19:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC)User talk:Caroleenie1--Caroleenie1 (talk) 19:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC) '''


 * Why don't you use a sandbox like I did? -- The Σ talk<sub style="margin-left:-3.5ex">contribs 00:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, you make me feel dumb... Sorry I kinda forgot I was doing it on the actual page... I'll put it back and move it to a sandbox, thanks for catching me. <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk 00:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Userbox Request
Hello, I recently made a WikiFauna page for the WikiPuma. I am not gifted at userboxes, so I would greatly enjoy it if you could make one for the page. I imagine it as using the puma picture in the userbox that states a cougar is one's favorite animal, and the text would be something like, "This user is a member of the endangered WikiPuma species. Approach with caution and professional grammar." Thank you in advance! <b style="color:dodgerblue; font-family:book antiqua;">Pumagirl7</b> Meow · Follow 23:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * User:Σ/UBX/WikiPuma -- The Σ talk<sub style="margin-left:-3.5ex">contribs 02:07, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

My humble request on userbox.
Sir, May I humbly request a userbox from you? The userbox will be use for my userpage. Any respond from you is greatly appreciated. Bonvallite (talk) 11:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I would be more than happy to make you a Userbox, what did you have in mind? <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk 11:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Sir, that you for very punctual respond. I never expect that one. Can i request userbox for the love of wikipedia, computer and internet security. Can can offer some help too. and I`m on learning stage of wiki.

Thank you Bonvallite (talk) 12:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Would you like it in one Userbox or would you like three separate Userboxen? <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk 13:54, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Sure. Thatw ill be no problem Bonvallite (talk) 00:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Well there are some Userboxen out there that may be what you want such as these:

And for Userboxen about safety youj might want to look here, if you don't find any you would like I would be glad to make another for you. <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk 12:35, 6 July 2011 (UTC) I love the userbox like you posted. To add this userbox

please also include the page I created, page edited,
 * I have found all of the Userboxen that you have requested and I have placed them here (also contains rest of your User Page as well). If you need any help with any of the Userboxen or with your User Page or anything else generally Wikipedia related I would be glad to help. <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk 22:25, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Request
Hi, Worm That Turned recommended me to you, he says you're good with this kind of thing. Do you know where i can get an Android version of this?: Or would i have to get one created and uploaded? Thanks  J e <font color="#FF0">n <font color="#0F0">o  v <font color="#F0F">a  20 08:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, Jenova, there are a few ways you can do this. I could make one for you that is meant for android, such as this one. If you want any changes made you can make them yourself or I will be happy to make them for you. <font style="color:#FFF;background:#08F;-moz-border-radius:2em"> Adwiii <font style="color:#08F"> Talk 17:13, 2 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for the userbox Adwiii, sorry about the wait for reply but i was on holiday.
 *  J e <font color="#FF0">n <font color="#0F0">o  v <font color="#F0F">a  20 09:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BTD (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on BTD (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Atterion (Talk |Contribs ) 18:10, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:36, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

userbox
please make a userbox with, this user is against IP editing, with the Picuture like this:  IP , white on a black background please reply on my talk page --''TheChampionMan1234 07:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

please make me another userbox
Text:

This user likes Wikipedia's Unusual articles

The image will be File:Cow-on pole, with antlers.jpeg and I would like the background to be purple with black or white text, whichever looks better to you.--''TheChampionMan1234 08:23, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:29, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Userboxes
Can you make a box that says this: "This user commonly uses the word they to talk about 1 person" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scientific Alan 2 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:20, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:14, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:15, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:00, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)