User talk:Ahmad123987

Edit summaries
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. A8 UDI  21:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

unexplained edits on Bocelli
You keep undoing my edits with no explanation other than that what I change "have been here for years." This is not a valid reason for undoing other people's edits. That sounds more like you don't like my edits. I looked under wikipedia rules and what you are doing counts as edit warring if you do it three times without a just explanation. You did it twice already. Do it once more and I will report you and you WILL be blocked. You can count on it. Consider this fair warning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scondilo (talk • contribs) 02:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Ahmad. I have restored your edits to the discography section because the reasoning you provided on Scondilo's talk page is valid. I have requested Scondilo not to undo the changes without a valid reason. As for the other changes under contention, I believe the reasoning he provided is valid. Many of the text he has removed relate to a nonworking link which is appropriate. As for the removal of content from the lead, the reason is valid there as well, as we should avoid clutter there and only include information provided on the identity of the person, that he is a singer, not all the accolades he has accomplished. That information is amply provided in the body of the article. I can understand the frustration of putting a lot of time and work into an article only to see some of your contribution removed but I'd like to remind you of avoiding the trap many people fall for of viewing Wikipedia as a personal workspace. Having put a lot of time and effort into something unfortunately does not qualify it for inclusion. What this means is that sometimes you will see someone remove one of your edits which may be painful but it may also be correct. I have sent Scondilo a similar message. This should end the dispute between you and Scondilo. --Tonalone (talk) 07:11, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Andrea Bocelli. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. BaronLarf 03:30, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Popstar to Operastar
I've taken this here as it's inappropriate for the article talkpage Yes, I think of all of them Marcella Detroit and Bernie Nolan should be the final two. You say "older ladies"; interestingly (or perhaps not!) they bracket me in age - Detroit was 50 in June 2009, Nolan turns 50 in October 2010 and I was 50 last Wednesday! However even Kym Marsh seems to be improving week by week - she seems to be gaining in confidence. The female singers seem altogether more confident than the men. Somebody please tell Danny Jones that it's much harder to sing quietly than loudly - he always improves in the second half of an aria when he gains confidence and puts more power into it.

As for Detroit and Nolan, though, they've both been in the music business for a very long time, and it shows. Detroit has one hell of a voice (to sing that Queen of the Night aria is a challenge for anyone, let alone a soprano turned 50, and she really looked the part) and Nolan's acting skills made that "Voi, che sapete" a delight, IMO - all that about "I have to act like a 15-year-old boy!" stuff and then she actually acted like one... Talent will out! I guess Darius will win, though. Cheers Tonywalton Talk 02:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Damn. Wish I'd put money on it. Tonywalton Talk 02:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Trouble is it's down to the Public Vote (unless you're a complete cynic and believe that it's down to whose management company greased whose palm the most); Darius is a modern pop star, Nolan is a has-been joke (not my view at all, but that's what the Voting Public were likeliest to say). As for Marcella Detroit - who? (Again, per the Voting Public - no matter that she's written songs for Clapton and has been performing for longer than some of the Voting Public have lived). Agreed, Darius has a good voice, once they realised his range is more bass than baritone, and he came across as a very likeable chap, but to me Nolan and Detroit were the two technically best at both acting and singing. As for rumours of Bocelli and Boyle, it's always best to report rumours (or to report reported rumours) as such, not as fact, IMV. Regards, Tonywalton Talk 02:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Bocelli
Hi Ahmad. The reason I took off the opera link in the template is because it is unnecessary. Also, there does not need to be separate articles for each of his opera recordings. There are countless opera recordings by many singers but we do not have a page for every single one. This is different from albums because the albums are unique of Bocelli. The opera recordings are not. The reason I took off the awards page was because it is excessive. We do not need that much detail about every single award he has won ore been nominated for.--Tonalone (talk) 03:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

yes classical and opera are the same thing. opera is a type of classical music. take it from me. i'm an opera singer and have sung with joan sutherland--Tonalone (talk) 03:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Seth Aaron Henderson


The article Seth Aaron Henderson has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 03:17, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

I added a reference.--Ahmad123987 (talk) 03:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Andrea Bocelli.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Andrea Bocelli.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 10:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Andrea Bocelli 1999.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Andrea Bocelli 1999.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 10:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Andrea Bocelli and The Muppets.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Andrea Bocelli and The Muppets.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 10:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Bocelli at Concert.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bocelli at Concert.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 10:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:31, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Justin Taylor.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Justin Taylor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Romanza
Hello, it is fine, but those sales need to be sourced. We cannot just place random figures there.-- Peter Griffin  &bull;  Talk2Me   23:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

tb
C T J F 8 3 chat 21:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Too-short articles
Hi! Please avoid writing articles whose text consists of litte more than an introductory sentence. Thanks. PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:05, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Russell-hantz.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Russell-hantz.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Strange Passerby (talk • contribs) 17:15, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Sales figure WP:OR on My Christmas
Hello, Ahmad. I hope you have started 2011 well.

I have reverted your insertion of sales figures on the My Christmas article. The reason is that you did not provide references for the 2010 totals (usual is to provide the current aggregate totals, at whatever time you can find them). Instead, you took some figures from Billboard/Nielsen and then added a number from SoundSpike to get some number for United States sales. In fact, the time periods of the two sources appear to overlap. There's also the serious problem that the two sources may well have differing methodologies of gathering information. For the Canada numbers, SoundSpike didn't report anything, so you just guessed and added a plus-sign to the 2009 total.

This kind of work is original research and is not useful here on Wikipedia. If (or when) Nielsen/BusinessWire publish the figures for 2010, you can just add those numbers into the article, replacing the 2009 totals currently there. In the meantime, you can expect similar attempts to add WP:OR material to get reverted. WP editors don't accept non-verifable data like that (it's against WP policy), which is why I removed it. I hope you understand. Happy editing (anyway)! &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 06:25, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

I'll do that then, Nielsen/BusinessWire should publish the 2010 numbers very soon.--Ahmad123987 (talk) 06:29, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Recent changes to Gandalf
Hi, Ahmad123987. I noticed you recently made some revisions to Gandalf. The changes you made pertain to an ongoing discussion in Talk:Gandalf and Portal_talk:Middle-earth. Please refer to and participate in these discussions to build consensus before making major edits to these articles.

Thanks a bunch. 74.109.214.27 (talk) 00:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Just to clear things up, he/she means Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Middle-earth, not Portal talk:Middle-earth. Harry Blue5 (talk) 12:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Minor characters of Days of our Lives
Please read WP:PLOT, and WP:NOTE regarding the character of Sonny Kiriakis on Minor characters of Days of our Lives. Plot trivia and useless info clutters up the pages and does not fit in the scope of an encyclopedia. Minor characters such as Sonny also do not deserve their own article per WP:NOTE. Rm994 (talk) 06:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The only thing I'm struggling with is your definition of a minor character. What makes Sonny a minor character? I don't see how he is; he first of all has significance in the show's history as the first openly gay character, and secondly the actor who portrays him is under contract. If the article name would be changed to "Minor and Recurring Characters", or just "DOOL Characters" then it would make more sense. Also Sonny isn't the only one that doesn't belong in an article titled so; Melanie has been a character for a few years and is heavily present on the show. Chad also is heavily present on the show, yet they are defined as minor character by you, when the three characters in question are all defined as recurring by the show, and the actors who portray them are all under contract. Finally, if "Plot trivia and useless info clutters up the pages" then remove it for all the characters in the article not just Sonny's. Having more articles on Wiki is a good thing not a bad one, so when there are many things to say about a character why not give him his own page, he is notable enough, otherwise he would't have enough story-lines to even mention.--Ahmad123987 (talk) 07:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Truth be told, most of the characters aren't notable to warrant separate articles. And that's not MY definition, it's the rules of the site. Notability comes from outside the realm of soap operas and to be honest, none of the these have it. Melanie and Chad have already had separate articles created about them, and have already been deleted in discussions. A majority of editors agreed that these characters did not warrant separate articles. I assure you, the same thing would happen to Sonny. It's not personal...Personally, I believe they all should have articles, especially Sonny, because of the gay thing, but that's not how this site works. Rm994 (talk) 17:39, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough--Ahmad123987 (talk) 19:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:2010 Kennedy Center Honorees


A tag has been placed on Template:2010 Kennedy Center Honorees requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulwersator (talk) 04:58, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Template:Olympic champions artistic gymnastics Men TC
I have created Olympic champions artistic gymnastics Men TC when Footer Olympic Champions in Artistic Gymnastics - Men's Team All-Around was still named Footer 2008 Olympic Gold Medalists Gymnastics Men. I have now replaced it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:20, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

The Template is too long so I separated it in 5.--Ahmad123987 (talk) 03:31, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I had forgotten to post that option at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Olympics. I had considered splitting them, but it does not seem to be a common thing to do for international sporting events. It is common to split a template such as Template:Academy Award Best Actor because many actors would have dozens of templates with about hundred links and their bios are interwiki link heavy, causing them to approach the upper bound of interwikilinks allowable on a page. If all the templates at Jack Nicholson, Meryl Streep or Barbra Streisand had the full list they would probably go over the limit of links in a page. Even the most decorated Olympian (Michael Phelps) has mostly templates with about a dozen names and then a few relay templates. This template is more like Kentucky Derby Winners or Tour de France Yellow Jersey where even though the template itself presents more than 100 links, it is not likely to be included on any page that would have upwards of two or three thousand links in templates. Thus, we lose a lot of the navigation usage without the need to do so based on interwiki overload. I personally, think we should go back to the long single page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Look at the footer at the bottom, it makes it very easy to go from one template to the other. Also it's much clearer now and less busy, which is a good thing. It's organized, and just because another template isn't doesn't mean it's better, maybe the other one needs to be updated too. On Wiki whenever something is too long or busy it's always encouraged to split it. This is like the kennedy center template, where each year you have multiple winners, so it becomes extremely long when all are in one. I think it's much better now. (I created a category linking all of them together as well)--Ahmad123987 (talk) 06:32, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Also it isn't relevant the have all in the same one, since it's different periods, it's unlikely for someone to medal in more then one, except those who medals on the limit years of course.--Ahmad123987 (talk) 06:34, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

And the links you provided are a lot less busy then the way this used to be, I mean you have groups each time, not one individual or a couple, so the template itself becomes pointless if you're just gonna have 100 names not neatly organized.--Ahmad123987 (talk) 06:38, 7 August 2012 (UTC)


 * This is the only Olympic Gymnastics template that is split. It might even be the only Olympic template that is split. I think, we should have uniformity and most of the others don't need to be split. Even something like Footer Olympic Champions 4x200 m Freestyle Relay Men doesn't need to be split. I think we should get comments at the Olympics talk page. What do you think.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:39, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry but the Footer Olympic Champions 4x200 m Freestyle Relay Men is about a fourth of the size of the way this template used to be. This is a unique case since it consists of very large groups in the past, which is what makes it impossible to have them all in one. You start with years where there were 20 people, who's names need to be listed, and then you end up with 2012 when 4 people were part of the team. If from the beginning about 4 people won each time, then I would agree about keeping it all together, because it would still be presentable and not that long, but that is not the case. All the templates you've showed me are MUCH shorter then the way this was.--Ahmad123987 (talk) 06:47, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes I think more people weighing in would be an exellent idea, but please don't make any big edits for now, cause it took me a long time to organize all the templates, so if we go back I wanna make sure it's by popular vote. And even if we go back to all in the same template, it must be represented differently, because it really looked like unfinished work--Ahmad123987 (talk) 06:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Follow along at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Olympics.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:18, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Credo: John Paul II


The article Credo: John Paul II has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 19:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pasha Kovalev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tango (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Passione (Andrea Bocelli album)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Passione (Andrea Bocelli album), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.olografix.org/krees/dfnet2/?p=1201.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 16:04, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pasha Kovalev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ITunes Festival: London 2012 (Andrea Bocelli EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conductor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pasha Kovalev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tango (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Passione (Andrea Bocelli album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Unwin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Passione.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:Passione.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of ITunes Festival: London 2012 (Andrea Bocelli EP) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ITunes Festival: London 2012 (Andrea Bocelli EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Festival: London 2012 (Andrea Bocelli EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Status  ( talk  ·  contribs ) 12:49, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bocelli iTunes EP.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Bocelli iTunes EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Con te partirò.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Con te partirò.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films
Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. I'm Lukas!  --Talk  11:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:OlivierAward RevivalActor
Template:OlivierAward RevivalActor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Land of Stories.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Land of Stories.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Bocelli Concert Central Park Poster.jpeg


The file File:Bocelli Concert Central Park Poster.jpeg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-free concert poster being used in a WP:DECORATIVE manner in Concerto, One Night in Central Park. The article when the file is being used is about the album that was recorded live at the concert and there's already a non-free image of the album cover being used for primary identification purposes in the main infobox. The use of the poster would be fine if used for a similar purpose in a stand-alone article about the concert itself, but it's basically be used in the album's article to 'illustrate' the 'Background' section. There's no real additional and significant encyclopedic value gained from seeing this poster since it itself isn't the subject of any sourced critical commentary and it pretty much contain basic descriptive information about the date, place and time of the concert superimposed over a photo of Bocelli and the New York city skyline. It's a nice poster perhaps, but it doesn't meet the standard of WP:NFC required by WP:NFCC to justify its non-free use in the article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Credo: John Paul II


The article Credo: John Paul II has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  01:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andy Herren


The article Andy Herren has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Won a season of Big Brother in 2013 and nothing since then; is winning one reality series a decade ago sufficient to establish notability?"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgsu98 (talk) 21:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Andy Herren for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Herren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Andy Herren until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Bgsu98 (talk) 04:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Bocelli and Blige on Oprah.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bocelli and Blige on Oprah.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 18:06, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Andrea Bocelli audio samples


A tag has been placed on Category:Andrea Bocelli audio samples indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)