User talk:Alexschmidt711

Nomination of Screamer video for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Screamer video is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Screamer video until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 19:07, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=585345652 your edit] to Central Park may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC) I knew, but I didn't know how to fix it, or where the problem was.Alexschmidt711 (talk) 23:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ] as it was feared they would be used for food by impoverished Depression-era New Yorkers. htt

Care to explain?
...why you overrode the green tick at Template:Did you know nominations/Fugging?  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 20:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Rules for Fools mentions a discussion saying inappropriate hooks will not work. This joke is not appropriate by most standards,and it would not be interesting or funny if it was appropriate. Alexschmidt711 (talk) 20:08, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * From that same page "it is not a policy or guideline itself". Thus is not binding as a policy on DYK, it is just an essay and is not a valid reason to override a green tick given after a review. Also, precedence such as: "Polish girls (pictured) are getting wet and spanked today, but will have their revenge tomorrow?" from last year proves that hooks like Fugging are fine.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 20:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

That DYK hook was from before the consensus was reached. Although the Rules for Fools is just information, the consensus indicates that this joke shouldn't fly. The hooks should be like the featured article, funny only because of their wording and not immature humor. Alexschmidt711 (talk) 20:36, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It is not immature because the village was called Fucking and then changed it's name to Fugging. There is no such consensus against this. If you feel that strongly against it, take it to WT:DYK.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 20:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Because of your determination and sound reasoning, I will downgrade my overturn to comment. Alexschmidt711 (talk) 20:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Vishwanath Tiwari
Hello Alexschmidt711. I am just letting you know that I deleted Vishwanath Tiwari, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 14:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I knew about this criterion, but it didn't seem to be a perfect fit,as it was created before the block. Alexschmidt711 (talk) 14:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, but the puppet-master was blocked when he created the article. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 14:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

User:JohnCD/Hoaxes
Thanks, but I have removed your addition, because this page is a personal list of hoaxes I have actually myself identified or helped to get rid of. There is the general WP:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia, but that is only for hoaxes that lasted more than a month or got external notice, and Dipanshu Tiwari was very properly detected and zapped within a few days. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Hoax list
In this edit you mentioned a hoax list? What and where is it? --Bejnar (talk) 05:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC) WP:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia Alexschmidt711 (talk) 13:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Euronetpol
Funny, I didn't even read the "at least one year" heading on that table. Oh well, it was a good one, shame it couldn't be included. Note that there is at least one other entry on that list that doens't make the one-year mark. Cheers, —  Noah  18:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Edward L. Hedden
Hello! Your submission of Edward L. Hedden at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 16:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 15:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve George R. Bidwell
Hi, I'm Sadads. Alexschmidt711, thanks for creating George R. Bidwell!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Though you have a few references tha refer to teh person: it is unclear what makes this person of enduring interest to a general public. The lead should include this, but also, it should be clearer throughout the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Sadads (talk) 00:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Edward L. Hedden
Mifter (talk) 00:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Recommendation
While I am appreciative of fixing the error I had with Huggle, do not call such things vandalism. Thanks. — nihlus kryik   ( talk ) 01:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Alexschmidt711, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Ruda Real
The List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Ruda Real page has been renominated for deletion. You are being notified because of your participation in the previous discussions. Should you desire, any comments to the discussion are welcome at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Ruda Real (2nd nomination). Thank you — Cactus Writer (talk) 03:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)