User talk:Angel670

Proposed deletion of Assassination of İsmail Erez


The article Assassination of İsmail Erez has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fork article of İsmail Erez. I have merged the the sources that were absent in the main article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Spurlin (talk) 12:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't think these articles qualify for merging, nor its a fork. Both the biography of a Turkish diplomat and the incident of Assassination of the Turkish diplomat are notable events. Wiki has a practice when the article about a person is dissociated from the event, although a person taken individually is not notable without event. For instance, biography of Varoujan Garabedian is not a notable event without Orly Airport attack, yet we have two articles repeating the same sources. I'd rather suggest that article about Turkish diplomat is suggested for improvement rather than for deletion. Thanks Angel670   talk  09:22, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for the reply. I'm not contesting their notability, I just believe that they should be merged into one article. I don't agree with you about Varoujan Garabedian and Orly attack. Of course Orly attack article is important, but Varoujan Garabedian also gained notoriety when he was extradited to Armenia. But if you were to nominate Varoujan Garabedians article to be merged into Orly attack, I will probably support it. I believe that I nominated the articles about the assassinations for deletions, not their personal ones. George Spurlin (talk) 12:09, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Same as Orly attack, the article about assassination of Ismail Erez is of more interest than the biography, therefore, I suggest we keep it. The biography article can be suggested for improvement. Thanks. Angel670   talk  15:15, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Assassination of Daniş Tunalıgil


The article Assassination of Daniş Tunalıgil has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fork article of Daniş Tunalıgil. There really is no need to have 2 articles about the same subject

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Spurlin (talk) 14:25, 7 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Please see my response above. Same is here. Thanks. Angel670   talk  09:23, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Garadaghly Massacre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Garadaghly Massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Garadaghly Massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--Markus2685 (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Shusha State Historical and Architectural Reserve for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shusha State Historical and Architectural Reserve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shusha State Historical and Architectural Reserve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BilledMammal (talk) 11:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)