User talk:Annopnod

Speedy deletion nomination of JMemCache(software)
Hello Annopnod,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged JMemCache(software) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Knyzna1 (talk) 10:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of JMemCache(software) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JMemCache(software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/JMemCache(software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Re: deletion of JMemCache(software)
Hi Annopnod

Your article, JMemCache (software), was deleted as per WP:A7 - an article that does not indicate why the subject is significant or important (i.e. notable to those using Wikipedia). Take a look at this page and see if it helps. If not, do not hesitate to ask me for more specific guidelines.

Knyzna1 (talk) 11:24, 2 June 2014 (UTC)