User talk:Anonymous Unregistered Guy

Welcome!
Hello, Anonymous Unregistered Guy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!  Rah ' io ' 1234  08:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Rahio1234 thanks Anonymous Unregistered Guy (talk) 08:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm Smuckola. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. ''Most edits you've done are pointless, they're all lacking an WP:EDITSUMMARY, and most are falsely labeled as WP:MINOR. Please stop editing until you understand what an encyclopedia is. If you've had any other Wikipedia accounts, you must name them.'' — Smuckola(talk) 15:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Yue 🌙 05:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * This is another of those robotic ones exactly like . Look at this! What on earth is this supposed to mean?! WP:NOTHERE WP:CIR — Smuckola(talk) 04:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Blocked
As mentioned before, you cannot just create a new account every time an old one gets blocked. See WP:STANDARDOFFER for the only real path to editing. Sergecross73  msg me  11:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Can we please add this account to the sock-puppet list of @JustYourImaginaryGuy? RegalZ8790 (talk) 19:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Yes, I find that admins almost always dutifully block but don't maintain a sockpuppet list. Like this; that's not a record! :) I don't see any sockpuppet template on User talk:JustYourImaginaryGuy listing his sockpuppets, or a link to an SPI case, for the benefit of everyone who's forced by WMF's insane open access policy to clean this up forever. I looked and couldn't find any. Also, sockpuppets tend to retain access to their talk pages, where you're letting him make unblock requests contrary to procedure. Sorry to have to bug you but we are bugged. Thank you. — Smuckola(talk) 18:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, I don't usually keep records, but if anyone wants to, as far as I'm concerned, they can. It largely doesn't take being an Admin to do things like that. However, revoking talk page access is much like page protection or the blocking policy - unless its something particularly disruptive, its not really supposed to happen until there's a pattern established of sorts. Editors are allowed to make a few unblock requests, even if they're poorly done. Sergecross73   msg me  18:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Again. I can't make a record of your non-record, my good sir. You made a non-record and called it a record. What is the account he used that you referenced in that edit? And what I said was that users are not allowed to use their sockpuppets to plead against sockpuppetry. You're saying they are? I've seen many admins instructing people to unconditionally cease all use of sockpuppets, and only make unblock requests using the main account. Just checking. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 18:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * This edit was in reference to my talk with Regal here.
 * Yes, one should generally go back to their original account if they wish to have a successful unblock. But none of my blocks have been situations where they openly admit to socking, nor have they been CU blocks (I'm not one), so it wouldn't be appropriate to revoke talk page access right off the bat, in my opinion. Sergecross73   msg me  19:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)