User talk:Arijeet Patil

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Arijeet Patil! Thank you for your contributions. I am Jaaron95 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! JAaron95 Talk   14:30, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

February 2017
Hello, I'm AdventurousSquirrel. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Draco Malfoy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 05:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm AdventurousSquirrel. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Death Eater without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 05:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 14 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * On the List of supporting Harry Potter characters page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=765451695 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F765451695%7CList of supporting Harry Potter characters%5D%5D Ask for help])

February 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Places in Harry Potter, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Boomer Vial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Death Eater without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball 06:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Death Eater, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Death Eater. Serols (talk) 08:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Death Eater, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Twitbookspacetube 11:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   11:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Death Eater to List of supporting Harry Potter characters (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Order of the Phoenix (fictional organisation). If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  02:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Places in Harry Potter. - Happysailor  (Talk) 16:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your edit to List of characters in mythology novels by Rick Riordan
Hi there, Arijeet Patil. Just letting you know why I reverted your edit to List of characters in mythology novels by Rick Riordan. This is the second time you've attempted to remove the character Percy Jackson from this list, presumably because he has his own page. I see your point. However, he still belongs on the comprehensive list of characters - albeit with an abbreviated description. We want readers with no background on the series to be able to find a list of all the characters in one place. The same is true for Carter Kane. If you still feel that the entry for Jackson on the full list is inappropriate, you may try shortening his entry somewhat. You may also leave a post on Talk:List of characters in mythology novels by Rick Riordan or my own talk page if you'd like to discuss this matter further. Thanks! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 18:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC) (Please either leave a Talkback on my talk page or ping me if you respond here.)
 * -- Once again, Arijeet Patil, I have restored the page to its previous version. I abbreviated the section; it's now half the length of any other main character's section. PLEASE, read and respond to this message before you take any further action. I have no desire to get in an edit war with you or take this before arbitration. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 06:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Arijeet Patil and long-running pruning on young adult fiction". Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for generally disruptive editing and an apparent refusal to communicate. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC) .

You can consider this summarily denied due to the disruptive editing of other user's comments here on your talk page while blocked. See below for details on how to proceed from here. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing the same sort of behavior here on your talk page even after being blocked. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 14:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 10:46, 19 April 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 13:29, 26 April 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 06:47, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Regarding your emails
The reason your are blocked from making further appeals either here or via UTRS for the next 6 months is to 1) give yourself time to (hopefully) mature and 2) to prove to the community that you can abide by their standards by staying away for a specific amount of time and (perhaps) proving yourself elsewhere. See standard offer. Note also that accounts cannot be deleted; you can simply stop editing. Do not create additional accounts while blocked, however, as that will only delay any possible return.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:32, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Each time you evade your block the clock resets. The earliest you can appeal your block is December 5, 2017.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Regarding your email - you cannot edit Wikipedia under any account or IP as long as this account remains blocked. You, the individual sitting at the computer, is blocked from editing until such a time as the block is lifted no matter where you are editing from.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:52, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Again, regarding your emails, the reason your IP has a set limit on the block expiry is that we don't block IPs indefinitely. At some point your IP address will likely change so there is no benefit in blocking indefinitely. Since you still state that you don't understand what you are being told about being blocked I will again attempt to make it crystal clear: You can never edit Wikipedia under any account or IP unless and until you successfully appeal the block of this account. The only possible way you could achieve a successful appeal would be to follow the standard offer. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:39, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 21:43, 30 December 2017 (UTC)