User talk:Auguel

November 2015
Hello Auguel! I saw that you reverted my edit on List of countries by level of military equipment, it is true that my changes was without support in the source used in the article. However, I do wonder whether the source is correctly quoted or if the information in it is wrong, the information I changed was obviously wrong. The official website of the Norwegian Armed Forces says Norway has five frigates but no destroyers, furthermore the information about Denmark is also wrong, they haven't got any destroyers either (Official website of Danish Defence). Best regards, Rasmus 28 (talk) 20:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. The current source for all the data is the IISS 'Military Balance 2015', they compile data on the military capabilities of all countries and release annual reports. There are several reasons for the discrepancies between their data and the data on the official websites. For one the data could have changed since the publication of the reports. However, I think a likely reason is that the specifics by which they assign classes to ships may differ slightly from the ones used by Norway or Sweden. In the end, I think following the official websites may be better than following the IISS document, so feel free to remake the changes but please add a reference next to each figure pointing to their respective sources. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auguel (talk • contribs) 1:33, 10 November 2015

Return
Please vote here. 177.182.217.236 (talk) 15:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Graphics lab
Hello Auguel, and thanks for your contributions at the Graphics Lab! Just a few things to remember: Always make sure your contributions are properly sourced and are OK by copyright. One of the flags you vectorized is currently up for deletion at Commons because of this issue. You should also tag requests with  when you are working on them, and you should use   when you have finished the request. Using these messages gives the requesting users a clear indication when their request is being worked on, keeps other graphists from duplicating your work, and makes it easier for me to archive stale/completed requests. Again, thanks for your contributions, and happy editing! --AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 02:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. Is there anything I can do about the copyrighted flag. Auguel (talk) 02:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 2016–17 Biathlon World Cup – Overall Men
 * added links pointing to Nathan Smith, Sean Doherty and Tim Burke


 * 2016–17 Biathlon World Cup – Overall Women
 * added a link pointing to Yan Zhang

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

2017–18 Biathlon World Cup – Overall Women
I have submitted the article a month ago (see its categories). Since then the "Review waiting" box is shown at the bottom of the page (can only I see that?). From my perspective there is nothing more I can do than to wait for this review. Belstomir (talk) 08:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alon Greenfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grandmaster ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Alon_Greenfeld check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Alon_Greenfeld?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Opaque
Hi! Please don't remove opaque without addressing the problem, as you did in Special:Diff/1054081947 and at many other places. Also, I see no point in adding should be PNG as opaque implies that conversion to a different file format is necessary if it's a JPG file. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It is not appropriate to add the opaque template to jpg images, since the issue cannot be addressed without first converting to PNG or another format which supports transparency. By adding the opaque template to jpg images nothing is achieved except polluting the Images that should have transparent backgrounds category. As you said, opaque implies that a conversion to PNG is necessary, but it is the conversion which is the more difficult task, so it should be presented to contributors who are willing to do that task (e.g. in the category Images which should be in PNG format). As it is the Images that should have transparent backgrounds backlog will never be addressed because contributors looking to perform the background removal task, are instead met with the much more demanding task of format conversion. Auguel (talk) 17:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It is not appropriate to leave out opaque and only tag with should be PNG as users willing to address the problem risk addressing only the second problem but not the first problem. Conversion to PNG is easier: just tell the image editing software to save as PNG and upload under a different file name. Add artefacts if necessary. If the file has been reduced per WP:NFCC, it is better to start from the high-resolution source image to get less visible compression artefacts. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * "users willing to address the problem risk addressing only the second problem but not the first problem" that is unlikely in my opinion. "Conversion to PNG is easier" yes saving as a png is trivial, but this is not good practice and will always leave artifacts. Anyway as I said my main point is that marking jpgs with opaque just pollutes the category and leads to less efficient work, as evidenced by the huge backlog. But I will not go against the concensus. Auguel (talk) 18:44, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I came here to leave you the same comment that left. Opaque is a tag signifying a problem which background transparency. Artefacts and bad JPEG are tags signifying specific quality issues. should be PNG is the worst tag of the four since it suggests a solution without pointing out the problem. This results in editors uploading either an opaque png or a transparent png with artefacts and quality issues. Pointing out the problem is mandatory for getting a better solution. Besides, for almost all logos, should be SVG is preferable. --Muhandes (talk) 20:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, opaque, artefacts, and bad jpeg are specific quality issues, but they all originate from the same root cause which is that an image was innapropriately saved as JPG when it should have been a PNG. The problem is that opaque can also occur on PNGs, and the steps to resolving it are not the same. After thinking about it some more I think that my desired outcome would be for jpg and png with opaque backgrounds to be placed into seperate categories so that they can be efficiently addressed.
 * While I agree SVGs are generally better for this type of work, it does not seem worthwhile to recreate SVGs from scratch for non-free works. Ideally, an image of adequate quality can be obtained from the source, with optionally some minimal (e.g. removing background). Auguel (talk) 20:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The desired outcome should not be for jpg and png with opaque backgrounds to be placed into seperate categories. It should be that better images are supplied. The first step in getting a better solution is pointing out the problem. --Muhandes (talk) 20:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes exactly the goal is for better images to be supplied. For a JPG that does not mean removing the background as implied by opaque but getting an original PNG version. For PNGs (assuming the PNG is of good quality) the image can be improved by removing the background. That's actually exactly my point. Auguel (talk) 20:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Our point is that your tagging scheme is detrimental to the goal you state. We are repeating our own arguments. I guess we agree on the goal, but will probably not agree on the means to achieve it, so I would have to point out the situation.
 * There is a status quo (which probably reflects the consensus), that is, many/most logos are tagged with opaque and artefacts/bad JPEG as appropriate. You are changing this by removing these tags, replacing them with should be PNG, which you believe is better. Both and myself believe that your changes are detrimental, and ask you to stop them. I think it would be prudent to undo the changes you made, but that is up to you. In any case, you are requested to seek wider consensus before you continue these changes. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 08:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If the problem is that opaque sorts PNG and JPG images into the same category, then that is trivial to fix. Just look at non-free reduce which sorts into different categories depending on the file format. However, opaque should not be replaced by the less informative should be PNG. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Graph:Vetoed UN Resolutions
Template:Graph:Vetoed UN Resolutions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Confederation of European Baseball logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Confederation of European Baseball logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Union Internationale Motonautique logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Union Internationale Motonautique logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Angelo Herndon photo
Hey Auguel, nice job finding that Angelo Herndon source! I thought you might be interested that I found a link to the image in a higher resolution! Here it is: https://d1lfxha3ugu3d4.cloudfront.net/images/opencollection/objects/size4/82.65.366_PS2.jpg PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)PequodOnStationAtLZ


 * Unfortunately the guideline for non-free images is that they should have a resolution of less than 100,000 pixels (WP:IMAGERES). Auguel (talk) 14:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Phantom of the Range (1928 film).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Phantom of the Range (1928 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:European Society of Aesthetic Gynecology logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:European Society of Aesthetic Gynecology logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Association of IOC Recognised International Sports Federations logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Association of IOC Recognised International Sports Federations logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Central Bank of West African States logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Central Bank of West African States logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yee no  (talk) 07:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:World Land Trust logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:World Land Trust logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)