User talk:Augur

Hi! Though I'm not gay, your "White Party" article caught my eye as there is a similar event each spring in Palm Springs, California. Same name, too. Thought you should know. - Lucky 6.9 06:12, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

This year's has come and gone, so I don't know what info I can forward. It really is a big deal here, so finding info shouldn't be too hard. If I find any links, I'll let you know. - Lucky 6.9 17:13, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:White_party_club.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:White_party_club.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Carnildo or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you.

I reverted your change. Make the case on Frame language Talk page if you think that merge should be undone
I think it was inappropriate to simply revert the merge without discussing it first. That merge proposal was there for several months and no one commented on it and you made no comment but simply reverted my edit. I see no reason to have two articles Frame and Frame language. They are exactly the same concept just stated two different ways. It is also quite obvious to me and I think any competent editor would agree that the Frame language article was in far better shape. Several solid references and it just made more sense and was clearly written. The Frame article had no inline references and was muddled. The "example" didn't really highlight how a Frame was different from any other abstract data type such as a Structure in C or a database table. Instead I added some text and a link to another article about a much more appropriate actual Frame example the FOAF ontology that is used by Semantic Web. And all the things in the frame article were said in the Frame language article and said more clearly and with references. If you disagree with any of that then make your case on the talk page where the Merge discussion was set up here: Talk:Frame_language --MadScientistX11 (talk) 12:44, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Frame (artificial intelligence). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 21:18, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Pregroup grammar
Hi ! Thanks for your contribution to the Pregroup grammar article. I am trying to add references and expand some parts of the article. I will probably focus on the categorical and distributional semantics. Do you have any hints where I could find appropriate references for your Purely formal semantics section? Cheers − Pintoch (talk) 14:42, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)