User talk:BenEsq

Welcome!
Hello, BenEsq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Tucana
Sorry Ben, I had to remove the Brazilian origin - the reference talks of this as being about the origin of the word "toucan", not of the constellation. Also, some subsequent researchers have found problems with Allen's work, so one needs to be cautious at times (the explorers were half a world away in the East Indies, so nowhere near South America.....cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

NB: Glad you found the saucepan bit for Pavo as I was having trouble with that one. Incidentally, I did format the ref. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Are you sure it says this? I have not seen it elsewhere and Pavo is pretty far south to be seen from Greece. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Casliber--I have the book and am quoting from it directly (I can send you a pdf of the page). I used the direct quote rather than a paraphrase to make sure it was clear that I was not adding my two cents. Given Chartrand's credentials and his expertise in the history of constellations, I find this to be a fascinating footnote. As to whether the ancient Greeks would have been able to see Pavo, this is a fair point. I would simply note that Pavo roughly lies along the same celestial path as Crux, just slightly more toward the south, although I believe its more "northern" stars are technically higher than those of Crux. -Ben


 * Ok - cool. Attirbution is good (I did it for Allen too) - also see Template:Cite book - it formats the refs all nicely for lazy people like me :) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:25, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the citation tip... sorry about you having to clean up after my mess!

...err, regarding this, you might want to read Betelgeuse - another of Allen's assumptions reviewed years later.....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:14, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your 'copyedit'
I would recommend you bring up your edits on the talk page for further discussion rather than getting an edit war going.  Toa   Nidhiki05  23:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Samaria
Regarding this edit, your content says The biblicalarchaeology.org source says The AP source says Can you see the difference ? It needs to be rewritten to reflect what the sources actually say.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 04:43, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * "the once impressive ruins in Samaria have suffered under the control of the Palestinian Authority"
 * "In the 1990s, the West Bank site was managed by Israel’s National Parks Authority, but after the second intifada began in 2000, the site has been closed and has not received proper maintenance or protection."
 * "Caught between conflicting Israeli and Palestinian jurisdictions, the site has been largely neglected by both sides for the past two decades"
 * "Most of the ruins lie in areas under full Israeli control, with some in areas under Palestinian civilian control but shared security responsibilities under the 1990s peace deals that divvied up the West Bank into zones of authority."
 * "Technically, the Israeli-controlled part of the archaeological zone, centered on the hill, is under the authority of Israel's Nature and Parks Authority. But there's little sign of a park, with no staff visible, and there's no fence around the site, leaving it open for people to enter. The parts under Palestinian control, centered on the village and up to the foot of the hill, have also had little supervision or care."

File:Grus and Piscis Austrinus from Atlas Coelestis.jpg
Is there any chance you could get this plate to a scanner? Even if it has to be done in pieces, that would be an incredible resource for southern constellations, and the Atlas Coelestis is gorgeous. Scan at as high of resolution as possible - 800 dpi would be nice.

Cheers,

Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Argo Navis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hydra ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Argo_Navis check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Argo_Navis?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Celestial photograph of Bootes.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Celestial photograph of Bootes.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Melchizedek
Noticing your most recent edits, I thought the following link might interest you. Hope I'm not being presumptuous.

[Machiventa Melchizedek] Dayirmiter (talk) 10:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)