User talk:Bilorv

Off to San Junipero
I'm Bilorv and I edited Wikipedia from December 2013 to June 2024.

I've had one foot in and one foot out for a while, overcommitted to projects, and some big news means that (effective tomorrow) I won't have free time to do things properly here. I may intermittently be able to read this page or my Wikipedia emails.

I'm proud of the small part I've played in this encyclopedia. I've been thinking a lot lately about legacy and just looking at URFA/2020 shows you that when things are not actively maintained, they will be conquered by time. No thing beside remains. Round the decay / Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare / The lone and level sands stretch far away.

I'm sad this will happen to what I've written but hopefully some of it has already been useful to some people. If you are one of those people maybe you would consider looking after something I worked on with a very small bus factor:


 * Give out Four Awards (watchlist the nomination page)
 * Give out Triple Crowns
 * Review requests at WikiProject Television (which has had sadly little participation as of late) or some other WikiProject
 * Watchlist something in Featured topics/Black Mirror
 * Watchlist a few random things from here (you find particularly bad creep in synopses as the length steadily increases—see MOS:TVPLOT/MOS:FILMPLOT)
 * Sign up to be a mentor answering newcomer questions
 * I haven't opted out of most bot/semi-automated messages so friendly talk page stalkers are welcome

Good article nominations currently require nominators to be "significant contributors" but sometimes this is waived if a significant contributor is consulted (see here)—this is me giving blanket permission for any articles where I am one.

Yours faithfully, (as one editor once called me) a "far-left extremist, mentally-ill tranny freak". — Bilorv ( talk ) 18:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Oh, I'm so sorry to see you go! I hope this big news is good news, and I wish you all the best. -- asilvering (talk) 18:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 * We're losing so many people recently. I think there is hope of a legacy being left behind, and at least with a handful of our articles, they might stand the test of time for decades. If you want I could shepherd your articles and I'll try to help out in some of the areas you were active in, hopefully when I get back. Take care okay? You'll be remembered.  The Night Watch     (talk)   21:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You've been a good, positive presence for years-- take care Bilorv! Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 21:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all your work! I hope at some point in the future you'll have the time again. Same as asilvering, hope that the news are good and that your soul grows brighter ^u^ — ♠ Ixtal ( T / C ) &#8258; Sign up for the 2024 DCWC! — Non nobis solum ♠ 10:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to see you go as well. You have made a lot of good contributions to the site over the years, and hopefully we will cross paths again some day. – Epicgenius (talk) 23:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Congratulations on your new assignment, Bilorv, and thank you for your extensive coverage of women and their works. I hope that one of these days you'll find time to continue contributing. Bon voyage!--Ipigott (talk) 09:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I'll miss you, Bilorv! Best of luck in your future endeavors. DanCherek (talk) 04:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Bilorv. Hoping to see you back one day; but in the meantime, fly high and enjoy! House Blaster  (talk · he/they) 02:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Your innovative challenges have empowered Wikipedians alike for years. Take care.  TWOrantula  TM (enter the web) 06:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Apocalypse Clown
The article Apocalypse Clown you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Apocalypse Clown for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 09:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Question from Orsgaba (10:17, 1 July 2024)
Hi, thanks for mentoring me!

Recently I've added some links to implementations of quantum algorithms in several pages, in the 'external links' section. Someone ('Fawli') has removed most of my edits. Here is my discussion with him: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fawly#c-Fawly-20240630185600-Orsgaba-20240630084800

All links are valuable in my opinion, they are to an open-source software with full implementations of the algorithms, which is a content that was not existing in the page itself.

do you think it was indeed a problem to add them? or is it arguable?

thanks a lot in advance! --Orsgaba (talk) 10:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


 * @Orsgaba: I am afraid this editor is no longer active anymore. Your question cannot be answered.  TWOrantula  TM (enter the web) 06:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Question from BadEditor92 (08:43, 12 July 2024)
Hey, can I use an article about a company as a source even if it's written like an ad? --BadEditor92 (talk) 08:43, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * @BadEditor92: I am afraid this editor is no longer active anymore. Your question cannot be answered.  TWOrantula  TM (enter the web) 06:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @BadEditor92, typically an article that is "written like an ad" isn't a reliable source. Can you share the particular article with us? -- asilvering (talk) 19:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)