User talk:Bkissin/Archive 1

Re:Friend
I suggest you first try talking to him. From a superficial glance at his edits, I really can't see anything too bad, and I think he's just testing it out. Anyway, tell him to read some Wikipedia guidelines and such, so he can get more experienced with the concept of the wiki, and the policy and guidelines of Wikipedia.  Nish kid 64  23:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Arrested Development
No need to apologize, I know edit summaries often seem brisk. The reason I removed it was simply that one of the main goals in maintaining the quality and readability of the article is avoiding endless lists of examples, and a show like Arrested Development does warrant lots of examples, which can become problematic. So I didn't remove the example because it isn't accurate (since it is), but simply because there are already pleanty of examples of political topicality. Hope that clears things up. --TM 09:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:1989 unprotection
Unfortunately, you cannot protect an article for an extended period of time, unless it's a high-traffic article such as George W. Bush, RuneScape, etc. Usually, admins protect pages per requests at WP:RFPP, and I believe that's how I first heard about the page. I saw that their was a high level of vandalism, and I hoped protecting the page temporarily would discourage vandals from coming back and editing the page. However, there are some good IP and newly registered users, who lose out when pages are protected. They cannot add their contributions to the page, and this is one of the reasons why pages cannot be protected for long periods of time. We want to stop vandalism, but we also want to keep the page open for everyone to edit. I mean, that's the point of Wikipedia, right? Hope that answers your question, Bkissin.  Nish kid 64  23:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That was my reasoning exactly.--Scimitar 15:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you're allowed to renominate the page for protection if it gets too out of hand. However, I am expecting that the page won't be too heavily vandalized in the near future.  Nish kid 64  22:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * If you're gonna sprotect 1989, are you going to do the other 1980s articles? I watchlist them and frequently revert redlinked vandalism...you might want to do them, as well. Akradecki 00:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Communitarian Nation of Moskitia
I made some edits, but overall, it looks like a nice start to the article. Nishkid64 (talk) 14:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Conservative Party candidates, 41st Canadian federal election
I don't understand. It's the same sort of list that we have down for the Liberals, the Bloc, the NDP, and the Greens. What is the correct way of doing so, in your opinion? Bkissin (talk) 20:16, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Your text is absolutely massive, and dosen't look like a list, which it is. It is not an article. Here are some Canadian Politics lists that are Featured Lists, the cream of the crop of lists. Look at them and make yours look similar. Nezzadar (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Premiers of Alberta · Premiers of British Columbia · Premiers of Manitoba · Premiers of New Brunswick · Premiers of Newfoundland and Labrador · Premiers of Northwest Territories · Premiers of Nova Scotia · Premiers of Ontario · Premiers of Prince Edward Island · Premiers of Quebec · Prime Ministers of Canada · Prime Ministers of Canada by time in office


 * Hi, thanks for discussing this with me. All of this is of course, a work in progress. I'd like to have the results on the pages, so that we can have sortable tables, enabling us to rank candidates based on their votes. I started working on New Democratic Party candidates, 2008 Canadian federal election a while ago to show you what I mean. -- Earl Andrew - talk 23:19, 15 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, cool. It's a work in progress, so bare with me. BTW, I'm sorry about my impromptu reverts, if they may have offended you. -- Earl Andrew - talk 21:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Alberton-Roseville.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:Alberton-Roseville.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Where did you get the blank map and what was its licence? ww2censor (talk) 05:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm unsure of what the license would be, truthfully enough. I didn't create the blank map, but the highlighting of the riding in question was my doing. Does it count as my work? I took the map from a previous election page, and just blanked it out. Could you help me figure out this situation?
 * Bkissin (talk) 05:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)


 * It really depends on the copyright of the original image and whether the work you did is regarded as enough to be though of as a new artistic work or if it is still considered to be a derivative work. I need to know the source first before I can help you. I am watching this page for a while, so there is no need to post on my talk page. ww2censor (talk) 05:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I noticed that at the end of your talk page directly after I posted, sorry about that. The original image is [[File:Pei2007.PNG]], which I got to through Prince Edward Island general election, 2007. Bkissin (talk) 06:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

NB elections page
Thanks for the comments on the People Alliance Party. I think you're right; I double-checked, and I may have gotten a little ahead of myself. When (if?) they do become "official", I think we should add them if they become recognized by Elections NB. Thanks for fact-checking me! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shawnrouse (talk • contribs) 14:04, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I understand your take on the Leaders infobox, but I'm not sure it's factual to exclude PANB since they are (as of today), officially recognized as a party by Elections NB (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2010/06/09/nb-panb-official-party-status-221.html). If we start to pick and choose which facts to put up, aren't we distorting the truth? In my view, it's not for us to decide whether or not they deserve it; you are either a registered party or you aren't. In this case, they are. You used the example of the Alberta election, but that page has the Wild Rose party in the leaders infobox, and they have never won a seat. In any case, thanks for the feedback; I appreciate a good discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shawnrouse (talk • contribs) 23:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. I absolutely see where you are coming from. I think I see the gap between you and I now. You are using Wikipedia conventions of which I'm not aware (because I'm a newbie editor), while I'm just relying on what I consider to be the facts. I'm okay with leaving them out if that's how things are done around here, but I'm not sure it does reflect the facts. Even though PANB is a new party, they are officially registered in NB unlike the Animal Alliance Party or the Canadian Action Party.

By the way, I did a mini-Twitter survey on this question last night on the #nbvotes hashtag. It didn't get a big response, but two people (one NDP and one Tory) thought they should be added. I'm okay with leaving them out if that's the Wikipedia way to do it, but I don't think we have heard the last of this question. I plan to add the PANB candidate names in the "Other" column on the page. I'm sure you wouldn't have a concern with that.

Thanks again for the good discussion; it's great we can talk these things out. Shawnrouse (talk) 15:27, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Reply to your message
Please take a look at this revision of the article, and scroll down to the Historical Service section. You'll see that there were two identical copies of the list. All I did was remove one of them. The original list is still there, untouched. Another user copied it and pasted it, creating two lists, without giving an explanation. All I did was revert that user's mysterious unexplained duplication of the list. –BMRR (talk) 00:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

New Brunswick general election, 2010
I like the very  polite way  you  handled that. I hope the IP will assume good faith  and join   your discussion. --Kudpung (talk) 12:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

David Karwacki excluded from 2007 election infobox
If the leader of a party with no seats in the Legislature got to participate in the one-and-only 2007 Election TV debate, I think he should be in the infobox. The support that David Karwacki got in Saskatoon Meewasin also significantly decreased the margins separating the NDP and the SK Party, IMHO. - Jwkozak91 (talk) 17:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Clean-up templates
Just to let you know that most clean-up templates, like "Unreferenced", "Fact" (Citation needed) and etc., are best not "subst"ed. See WP:SUBST for more details. Regards,

Gordon Campbell (Canadian politician)
FYI - Campbell is still the Premier of BC until such time his party elects a new leader. Due to our parliamentary system (i.e. the leader of the majority forms government) and our Constitution, the Office of Premier cannot be vacated as it would otherwise trigger a consitutional crisis for our Lieutenant Governor. --Cahk (talk) 22:18, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Canadian Federal Election Candidate List
Template:Canadian Federal Election Candidate List has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 15:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Leif Erikson Day
Just fyi. I noticed you reverted a date vandalism by 220.238.133.104 but there were two edits by this IP and you only reverted one. It's been fix by another IP. Slightsmile (talk) 18:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Formatting Canadian electoral district articles
I am soliciting opinions on how percentages should be shown in electoral district results tables here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Electoral_districts_in_Canada. Your opinion would be welcome. Regards, Ground Zero | t 02:28, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

"Target Seat" sections on Provincial elections pages
I have reverted the deletions I made on the election pages in question, and changed the titles to Marginal Seats per discussion on the Ontario election talk page. Sorry for falsely accusing you of reverting my edits, I should have double checked that before I said what I said. Also sorry for not clarifying the comment I made following my response to you, that comment was not directed at you at all but it very much appeared that it was. As you are probably aware, I have commented on the Ontario election page in support of the suggestion made by Vale of Glamorgan. Happy editing. Vietminh (talk) 02:14, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Upload your free images to Commons, please!
Thank you for uploading free images/media to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Moving images to the Commons (you may view previous uploads by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'file' namespace from the drop down box (or see ). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading! :Jay8g Hi!- I am... -What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 02:43, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Mount Allison University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Lynch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Nova Scotia Parliamentary Expenses Scandal
Hi there, I just wanted to let you know the reason I edited the information you added to Nova Scotia Parliamentary Expenses Scandal in this edit. I read the reference article you used to source the claim that Hurlburt had pleaded guilty, and found that this wasn't exactly the case. His lawyer appeared in court and stated his client will plead guilty when he appears in court on April 12. Therefore a guilty plea hasn't been entered, so the article shouldn't be stating that he has already pleaded guilty. I figured you probably only misread the article, but we're dealing with WP:BLP which is why I wanted to explain to you here why I corrected the info before you seen it changed in the article.
 * Hey, no worries. It was my goal to update the legal situation of the four of them, but I wasn't sure how to best put into prose. Thanks for your help! Bkissin (talk) 15:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Parties in infobox
The Green Party is included in the infobox on Ontario general election, 2007, so you are wrong when you say we only include parties that win seats. I think having such a large share of the vote should be enough to include them. --Noname2 (talk) 21:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * 5% was determined the threshold at Talk:Ontario general election, 2011. 117Avenue (talk) 21:23, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Consensus was not reached. YOU determined that 5% was a proper threshold. This has become a very divisive issue, with both sides implicitly accusing the other of trying to manipulate the electoral results. On the Ontario talk page, there was no administrator or uninvolved editor who made a final decision on the matter. I am not interested in reopening this debate, but I will revert recent edits and bring this back to the talk page if necessary. While this was an issue during the election itself, when Green Party (and other minor party supporters) want their party advertised in the leader's infobox, as soon as the election occurs and the party does not win any seats, then it seems logical that they are not mentioned in the infobox. Bkissin (talk) 21:34, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * An infobox is for summarizing the article. When a party receives more than five percent of the vote, or in the case of New Brunswick 2010 over ten percent, they played a significant part in the election, and should be mentioned. I don't see the logic you refer to. 117Avenue (talk) 22:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, if the logic is that the infobox summarizes the article, then no one needs to know that minor parties played a part (at least in the infobox). If you want to argue that minor parties, (like the NDP, which had no representation in the previous legislature) played an important role in the election but didn't win seats, then that can be mentioned in the article itself. In the United States House of Representatives elections, 1912, the Progressive Party won 9 seats and 2% of the vote, but are not mentioned in the infobox. It is, however, mentioned in the prose of the article. Bkissin (talk) 22:31, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Cotler
Hey, no need to apologize for asking for another source. Your reasoning made sense, and it wasn't at all a problem. About the polling calls, I think it was more that the Conservatives were implying he'd step down and force a by-election, but I'll admit at the time it was kind of hard to tell if he was running again or not. Tholden28 (talk) 01:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:DavidBertschiPhotograph.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DavidBertschiPhotograph.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 21:49, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Bertschi


The article David Bertschi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable person, apparently failing WP:POLITICIAN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/United Party/row


A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/United Party/row requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 19:05, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/United Party


A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/United Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 19:06, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Next Nova Scotia general election
Hi Bkissin, I have cleaned up a significant amount in the nominated candidates section as you asked for in template. The new ridings are now included, I fixed the party order and added a number of candidates. One problem I ran into is Elections Nova Scotia lists a new riding as "Halifax Armdale" but because it was not already listed somewheres, I have no idea which of the Halifax sections it's supposed to be listed in. Also, the new "Sackville" riding, I wasn't sure what to link as there was previously a Sackville riding up to 1993. I was hoping you could check these problems out, as I think I have probably taken the section as far as I can for now. I'll keep checking the nominated candidates and add them as they become available. Cmr08 (talk) 22:51, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=575044251 your edit] to Pontiac (provincial electoral district) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maria Mourani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quebecois (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Belfast-Murray River.PNG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Belfast-Murray River.PNG

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Albert (provincial electoral district).PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Belfast-Murray River.PNG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Borden-Kinkora.PNG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:03, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Charleswood--Saint James--Assiniboinia.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Copperbelt.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:10, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Next Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario leadership election, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Baird and Doug Ford. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Charlesbourg (provincial electoral district)
 * added a link pointing to François Blais


 * Lac-Saint-Jean (electoral district)
 * added a link pointing to Émile Moreau


 * Roberval (provincial electoral district)
 * added a link pointing to Émile Moreau

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Louis-Hébert (provincial electoral district)
 * added a link pointing to Claude Morin


 * Portneuf (provincial electoral district)
 * added a link pointing to Union nationale

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=624622969 your edit] to Champlain (provincial electoral district) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:55, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Re: WRP
No problem, and thanks. Everyone loves to be first. ;) But the speculation has ranged from anywhere between 4 and 9 people, and some others possibly sitting as independents, and who knows what else will emerge from this bizarre story.  I'm actually surprised we haven't had to protect several articles from all the speculation yet!  Cheers! Resolute 20:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bellechasse (provincial electoral district), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alphée Poirier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Commission scolaire des Sommets
Hello, Bkissin,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Commission scolaire des Sommets should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Commission scolaire des Sommets.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, (talk to) TheOtherGaelan('s contributions) 23:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Portland, Maine mayoral election, 2011, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Brennan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iraqi Kurdistan presidential election, 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Bridge Party of Canada


A tag has been placed on The Bridge Party of Canada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:23, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Irish government formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labour Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

42nd By-elections Re: Mauril
I totally get your reasoning, and I really wouldn't be shocked if there does end up being a by-election in Ottawa-Vanier. I just think that at this point it might be a bit premature, given all the other things that could happen; for instance, his health could theoretically remain well enough (relatively speaking) where he's still serving as an MP by the time the next election is held (whether it be in 2019 or theoretically earlier if a snap election is held).

It wouldn't shock me, I just think including it now is a bit too presumptive. Tholden28 (talk) 03:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

History of the Jews in Africa
Your addition to History of the Jews in Africa has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please also note that legal action may be taken for severe copyright violations. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 15:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Language tags
Hi Bkissin. I'm very new to using language tags myself - I'll hunt around for a solution to the links being broken if used within a template. Thanks for spotting the issue and reverting. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 13:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

14:13:10, 31 January 2018 review of submission by Cougarsurf
Hi Bkissin, thanks for taking a look at my draft. Could you help me identify which lines in particular you believe sound too subjective? Thanks! Cougarsurf (talk) 14:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

19:00:02, 31 January 2018 review of submission by Ehammer1408
Ehammer1408 (talk) 19:00, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

I'm the author, and I'm not yet requesting a re-review. I do intend to revise further. Robert B. Barr is notable in two ways as a Rabbi: his congregation has been controversial with the official Reform Judaism movement in that it takes a humanistic perspective. I can document that significance. Barr has challenged conventional thought within American Judaism. He is also credited with being one of the first online congregations - again, documentable. He is well-published and a regular lecturer on notable topics. Finally, his candidacy itself is notable and well-cited in the draft article. There have only been two rabbis who have ever run for Congress, and neither we active pulpit rabbis with actual congregations. Were he to win, Barr would be the first rabbi to serve in the US House. The very notability of these items can sound promotional, but these are established facts which are notable. Can you highlight particular phrases that either need rewording or need a citation? That would help.

Ehammer1408 (talk) 19:00, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reaching out, and I definitely get where you are coming from. If you can find information from the Forward or from Tablet or from non-religious publications about Barr's controversial stances, those might count as reliable sources. In terms of sounding less promotional, take a look at Jimmy Kessler, Raphael Evers, and Barbara Borts for ideas on how to make the article sound more encyclopedic. The article's focus should be on his current position as a Rabbi, with a section that can go into a small amount of factual detail on his congressional aspirations. Bkissin (talk) 20:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Request on 02:12:53, 1 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Ehammer1408
Ehammer1408 (talk) 02:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I will develop the page further, taking your suggestions. Ehammer1408 (talk) 02:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Merci
Merci d'avoir approuvé mon premier article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RomanskiRUS (talk • contribs) 15:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

10:27:29, 7 February 2018 review of submission by Ketikh
Ketikh (talk) 10:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I added a lot of sources that repeat the facts that I have provided in the article. can you please let me know exactly what part of the references is not satisfactory??
 * What you wrote is not set up as an encyclopedia article. It's set up like a resume. Look at an article like Kakha Bendukidze on how to format the article. Additionally, I don't see Notability (people) here. Familiarize yourself with those guidelines and see whether Mr. Khazaradze meets any of those guidelines for notability. Bkissin (talk) 14:33, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Great, I will take a look and update the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketikh (talk • contribs) 09:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

09:55:13, 7 February 2018 review of submission by Wdmguk
Hi. I am confused by the refusal. LO3 Energy has been reported by numerous major media sources and the references in the article include in-depth reports from the New York Times, the Guardian, New Scientist and Fox Business. If required, I can also add in reports from Wired, the Daily Telegraph and Scientific American and many others.

The Brooklyn Microgrid, which enabled the first peer-to-peer transaction of energy, is a key marker in the development of new transactive energy network developments which are of great interest to popular science. Having this information on Wikipedia - and I plan to also write an informative article on the Brooklyn Microgrid - is of benefit to the public realm.

I am happy to work on content to ensure it reads impartially if you feel it doesn't, but I do strongly dispute the claim that the references do not show the company's notability.

Please could you give a response as I would like to progress this page quickly. I really need to know what I have to do as I do believe the credits in global media make this a viable company to have a wikipedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wdmguk (talk • contribs) 17:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Wdmguk (talk) 09:55, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

16:51:53, 11 February 2018 review of submission by Lruddy6493
Lruddy6493 (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Can you provide specifics of what is not acceptable? It says "should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed." I've provided 14 different sources including newspapers and government pages. I've not included the organization's website, press releases, social media etc. The last citation is an online blog so in re-reading the guidelines, that one probably doesn't carry weight. I didn't include any op-eds, opinion pieces, letters to the editor etc. It would be helpful to know which sections and which citations don't meet the standards. Thanks. Lruddy6493 (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It doesn't seem like you read my reasoning at all! The page itself is written like an informal advertisement or article about the organization, and not an encyclopedia entry about the organization. Wikipedia is not a business or nonprofit directory. Wikipedia articles need to have a Neutral point of view on the topic. This article for a Canadian version of Furniture Bank in Toronto is not perfect, but it is perhaps a starting point on proper writing and notability. Additionally, I'd look over Notability (organizations and companies) again to make sure that the organization fits those requirements. Bkissin (talk) 17:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Please remember to check for copyvio
Hi  and thanks for your work reviewing new articles. Please remember to check for copyright violations. The particular one I saw was Draft:Napoli v Red Bull Leipzig Live Video Stream, which was copied from http://www.sofascore.com/rb-leipzig-msv-duisburg/TabskCo. Thank you, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks I didn't even consider the copyvio issues on that page. I deleted it because it was inherently WP:NOT. Thanks for letting me know! Bkissin (talk) 16:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Declined drafts are kept for a minimum of 6 months, so it's important to check them even if you plan on declining for other reasons. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Zach Parker
Clearly you do not understand notability rules for professional boxers.

Dealing with crap like this was the reason I left Wikipedia after editing for years. Obviously things have not improved.

Want to see another boxing article I started about another boxer at a similar stage of his career that someone like you thought was not notable?

Carl Froch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:4781:EA00:D1C1:C44A:B412:3FF3 (talk) 23:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Re: Yamaha PS-55 review
You said that I didn't add any more references, but actually I added two more references. I really don't understand how it's possible to overlook that.

It's fine if you reject the article, but if you do so, you have to explain me exactly why.

That first guy simply said 'you have not shown that this model is particularly famous or significant.' and 'All you've done is cite the manual'.

Why do I have to show that the model is particularly famous or significant? There's no rule that says Wikipedia may only contain articles about famous or significant things. That keyboard may not be very famous, it's a really old 80s keyboard... But I researched about it, watched several videos, read the entire manual and collected all information I could find in the internet and combined them into one article, so it can be improved by other people later on with new information, that aren't yet available. I'm a 90s kid, I can't know how famous that keyboard was back then in the 80s. It was only covered in some very old music magazine and I cited that one in the latest revision. However, I know that there are other pages on Wikipedia about other keyboards by Yamaha with equivalent information and they didn't get rejected.

I don't only cite from the manual anymore and am referring to other sources, too. There's just not much more that I can include. If you disagree, please try yourself to find more information (which is hardly possible) and help me improving it. But please don't reject it without any tips on how to improve it.

Reditec (talk) 22:15, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi ! I'm sorry if you are upset about your article being rejected. Let me try to go into a little more detail.
 * There's no rule that says Wikipedia may only contain articles about famous or significant things. Actually, that is indeed a rule. Notability discusses at length what counts as significant enough for a wikipedia article. One of the general notability guidelines is If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. In the case of the manual you cited, that would not be independent of the subject. As for the additional coverage you cited, I don't know if that would apply as significant coverage in a reliable source.
 * Of all the products that Yamaha makes, why does this deserve an article? We don't make articles for every model year of a car (unless a particular model year has significant coverage that would warrant its own article. But even with the Ford Pinto and the Chevrolet Corvair, the issues with each of these vehicles is mentioned in an article about the car itself). We don't make individual articles about each baseball bat made by Louisville Slugger.
 * I noticed in looking at the List of Yamaha products that there are some keyboards that have their own articles, and most of them are poorly put together and have not been "improved" by other editors. This however is not a justification that because other stuff exists, that means that every electric keyboard should have its own article. There are a lot of things that don't end up on Wikipedia because it's just not what Wikipedia is for. Those are my particular reasonings behind rejecting the article. By all means attempt to resubmit, but I can't promise that another reviewer won't also reject the article. Bkissin (talk) 03:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Movement For!
Hey!

Thanks for the feedback on my article Draft:Movement For!. Some parts indeed were translated from the Latvian page, but some where added. You mentioned that the article needs a little work on article grammar. I edited a few mistakes that I noticed, but can you let me know if there are any more and if so, can you please point them out?

Thanks in advance! --Svx101 (talk) 08:20, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Help with Removing Promotionalism
Hi you recently left a comment on the Page Draft:Motty Steinmetz. The main feedback was to remove promotionalism from it-I've tried to do this but I'm still very unsure if I have done enough. Would it be possible for you to have a look at it?

Thank you Adam Bernstein (talk) 09:48, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

12:01:46, 28 February 2018 review of submission by Elisemercy
HI, I cannot find any other, external and reliable references, outside the MPS. I've checked several other MPIs and they have no or only a few references, most of them really to the MPS (mother). So, could you please help us? Any idea what kind of references could match? best, Elisemercy

Elisemercy (talk) 12:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Portland Lumberjacks


The article Portland Lumberjacks has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG. Only source is no longer working."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 23:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

00:40:06, 7 March 2018 review of submission by Enguerrandvidor
Hi Bkissin, I just reviewed the article and added more references from newspapers and reliable sources. Leezair is the biggest marketplace of Tours & Activities across the world according to AFR, Qantas, Startup daily and Travel weekly. Regards, Angus

Enguerrandvidor (talk) 00:40, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Paludiavis
Thank you for cleaning up and moving the Paludiavis stub to main space. --2600:1700:FB00:9C00:F046:37C4:F403:F894 (talk) 17:57, 7 March 2018 (UTC)