User talk:Blairwal

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 02:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for dropping by to say hi. Here's a cute kitten picture. :) Please don't hesitate to ask if you need anything! All the best, Keilana&#124;Parlez ici 15:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Project, 10/6/2013
I left the following comment on the talk page for Cortical Reaction -- "It could be helpful to add to the page that during the well-studied sea urchin cortical reaction, the "elevation of the fertilisation envelope" is accomplished via glycosaminoglycans."

talk:Cortical reaction

I left the following comment on the talk page for Endoderm -- "Perhaps it would be helpful to note that endoderm gives rise to to notochord, and perhaps discuss the various functions of the notochord during development?"

talk:Endoderm

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Koller's Sickle at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 04:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014
Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 01:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Koller's sickle
Hello! Your submission of Koller's sickle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ChemLibrarian (talk) 21:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Comments: Length and date verified (4847 characters, Updated >5X on 11/02). Stub template removed. Hook is implied in the article but not clearly stated in the article with an immediate in-line citation. Please consider choosing another hook or edit the article. The references look good but could use a few more from the list of references on the Talk page from this editor. Since ref 2 and 3 are both article freely available online, please consider add links to the articles in the citations. First nomination, no QPQ needed.

DYK nomination of Koller's sickle
Hello! Your submission of Koller's sickle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! APerson (talk!) 20:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)


 * It is important that you communicate on the nomination template. Editing the article is good but not sufficient; you also need to explain how you have addressed the issues raised. Thanks; I hope to see your comments there soon. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:48, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Koller's sickle
The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Re Butoxyethanol: Welcome but be careful
I have left similar messages on other sites related to this project. Editors are very happy to help you and your students, but we expect you to cooperate with our editing traditions:
 * WP:MEDRS. Medical/health claims come from outstanding secondary sources not just ordinary journals.
 * WP:SECONDARY. Citations should emphasize reviews and books. Encylopedias seek sources for highly digested information, usually, not specialized stuff in specialized journals.
 * Chemistry articles are about chemistry. We do not replicate information in the MSDS.  Articles are not forums for recent events (WP:NOTNEWS) and our articles are not textbooks (WP:NOTTEXTBOOK).  We do not give advice WP:NOTMANUAL.
 * Finally, please make your edits incrementally: do not have rewrite an entire article and then dump it on Wikipedia in place of the existing content. Such behavior is unwelcome. Make your changes in parts so that experienced editors can guide the revisions. In this way, other editors can help you and, more importantly, our readers.  If the students are uncertain of technical details, they can ask at the relevant Talk pages, e.g., Talk:2-Butoxyethanol. Again, many editors can help you and your fellow students. Happy editing. Smokefoot (talk) 20:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Approximately 9939 publications and patents describe butoxyethanol
See my note at Talk:2-Butoxyethanol. --Smokefoot (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2-Butoxyethanol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CEPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

2-Butoxyethanol
Thank you for your additions, sources and all, to 2-Butoxyethanol. I do, however, have one caveat: Please avoid making connections between statements that are not supported by the individual sources. This may be mistaken for editorialising. For example, in this edit, you implied that the American Chemistry Council and the Soap and Detergent Association were actively resisting the addition of 2-Butoxyethanol to Schedule 1 of CEPA, which is not the case - as in, "no comments were received by the Department with respect to the proposed Amendments." Sometimes, you just need to read over your phrasing a second time before saving, things like this aren't always obvious at first glance. Yours, Tomásdearg92 (talk) 17:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)