User talk:Bloopyfloop

February 2024
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  livelikemusic   ( TALK! ) 04:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

personal life, timothée chalamet
it is highly unnecessary to include a multiple paragraph quote from a barely 1 year relationship, in his personal life section. Not a single editor has ever done that, kindly leave the section as is. Soe743edits (talk) 19:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * This is not unnecessary, it is a direct quote from Chalamet about the relationship which he viewed as significant. This is very normal across personal life sections in many celebrity's pages. Bloopyfloop (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleasing (May 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraxmoira was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pleasing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Pleasing Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jeraxmoira&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pleasing reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Pleasing (brand) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pleasing (brand). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleasing (brand) (June 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheTechie were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pleasing (brand) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Pleasing_(brand) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheTechie&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pleasing_(brand) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

thetechie@enwiki :  ~/talk/  $  23:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Much appreciated! Thank you for all you do too! Bloopyfloop (talk) 09:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cultural impact of Harry Styles (June 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cultural impact of Harry Styles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Cultural_impact_of_Harry_Styles Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cultural_impact_of_Harry_Styles reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Cultural impact of Harry Styles
Hello, Bloopyfloop,

Thank you for creating Cultural impact of Harry Styles.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"As currently written, this - really well constructed article - is more about the "fame level" of Harry Styles that his objective "cultural impact". I think he is probably notable for his cultural impact, but it is not obvious what he has impacted (apart from being mega famous). Sorry, but given well constructed the article is, it would be worth considering this further. thanks."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 12:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your thoughts! I appreciate that you called it well constructed. I agree parts of the article need to shift from overall fame to objective cultural impact, I will look into it further with what you have suggested. Bloopyfloop (talk) 13:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)