User talk:Booyahhayoob

Welcome!

Hello, Booyahhayoob, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Wipsenade (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Thanks.

Booyahhayoob (talk) 02:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tgeairn (talk) 21:06, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Tgeairn (talk) 21:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of O Music Awards for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article O Music Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/O Music Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RadioFan (talk) 23:55, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Gravity hills
Oops - I made a bad edit reverting you. Sorry. (I hit the wrong "rollback" link which is why there was no Edit Summary) I thought you had inserted the item, which has no reference, instead of fixed its markup. I have removed it, which is what I meant to do. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 00:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

February 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. &mdash; kikichugirl  speak up! 06:08, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Was this meant to be given to 202.82.17.237? I don't ever remembering making any "vandalism" edits, much less any time this month. Plus, I noticed you were reverting vandalism by them on a page where I fixed up some minor vandalism that got left there. Booyahhayoob (talk) 17:31, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, sorry... &mdash; kikichugirl  speak up! 21:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Right to life. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:19, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Please explain to me how restoring an intro paragraph that has stayed on the page for years and was only removed because an IP's only edit decided to violate "Blanking, illegitimate" of WP:VANDTYPES is unconstructive. And why would this constitute a level two warning when this could just as easily be resolved by a simple written out message? Booyahhayoob (talk) 21:51, 19 May 2015 (UTC)


 * My mistake! I should have realized that the article needs its intro paragraph. I focused instead on the three-year-old fact tag, which should not have been restored if the text was part of the article body. However, the text is the lead section and should be a simple summary supported by the article body text. I will revert myself, except that I will remove the fact tag.
 * I settled upon a level 2 warning because I saw another level 2 warning given to you a few months ago. Sorry about that. Binksternet (talk) 22:41, 19 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh, okay. Don't worry about it, mistakes happen. Twice in a row now, with the exact same warning level! XD Booyahhayoob (talk) 22:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright Violation Detection - EranBot Project
A new copy-paste detection bot is now in general use on English Wikipedia. Come check it out at the EranBot reporting page. This bot utilizes the Turnitin software (ithenticate), unlike User:CorenSearchBot that relies on a web search API from Yahoo. It checks individual edits rather than just new articles. Please take 15 seconds to visit the EranBot reporting page and check a few of the flagged concerns. Comments welcome regarding potential improvements. Thanks for you help with this edit. We are at Wikimania improving this bot, please keep checking it out.--Lucas559 (talk) 17:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 24 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * On the The Afters page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=716961396 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) and a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F716961396%7CThe Afters%5D%5D Ask for help])

CSD tagging
While tagging an article for WP:CSD, make sure that it meets the CSD criteria. This tag is inappropriate, because "insignificant show" is not a valid CSD criterion, and in fact I don't think the article meets any of the CSD criteria. SST flyer 10:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks. Just wasn't sure what to tag it as, 'cause it looks like it can be tagged as an article for deletion. Just didn't know which deletion tag to use. Booyahhayoob (talk) 10:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Leave Vipers page Alone
I'm callin Beef with U — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tha Hornace (talk • contribs) 23:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @Tha Hornace, fine. I'll just let the admins deal with it. Booyahhayoob (talk) 23:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @Booyahhayoob, You clearly never had to wear THOD. Tha Hornace —Preceding undated comment added 23:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @Tha Hornace, you're right. I haven't. Because "THOD" is absolute crap. Booyahhayoob (talk) 23:19, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @Tha Hornace, also, you properly sign your comments with four ~s. Booyahhayoob (talk) 23:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @Booyahhayoob, Blasphemy! THOD will get you Tha Hornace ~s~s~s~s —Preceding undated comment added 23:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @Tha Hornace, good luck with that. Also, I meant four of the character ~ put together. WITHOUT the S's. And please stop posting what I do in the Facebook group, please. Booyahhayoob (talk) 23:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @Booyahhayoob, I'll stop posting in the group man, don't worry Tha Hornace (talk) 23:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @Tha Hornace, thank you. Though can you tell Roo to quit acting like a three-year-old? Booyahhayoob (talk) 23:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @Booyahhayoob, will do Tha Hornace (talk) 23:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited My Wish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Target. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Disciple Long Live the Rebels Artwork.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Disciple Long Live the Rebels Artwork.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

List of Republicans Opposing Trump Notability Standard
Hi, please express your opinion on this subject on its talk page. Thanks! — Andy Anderson 05:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion nomination of Robert Izsak
Hello Booyahhayoob. Speedy deletion work is important and I do appreciate the effort. I would just ask that you please review the criteria carefully because accuracy is also important. On that issue, I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of Robert Izsak as an article that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the topic under CSD A7. That criterion did not apply because to have played for notable teams is a credible indication of "importance or significance". Remember that CSD A7 is a lower standard than what is required to demonstrate notability – it does not, for example, require that the article's text already contain citations to reliable sources that would be necessary to prove notability, but only that it contain a claim that, were it true, might reasonably make the subject a valid encyclopaedia topic (if proper sourcing could later be found). Adam9007 (talk) 01:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi
You have an obnoxious userpage. Cheers Ethanbas (talk) 05:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Camp Camp
Hello, Booyahhayoob,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Camp Camp should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Camp Camp.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Steve Quinn (talk) 02:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Affluenza teen listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Affluenza teen. Since you had some involvement with the Affluenza teen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KIIX FM&#39;s &#34;shrunk&#34; logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:KIIX FM&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

May 2018 with EDITOR685422
Well, sir, there is already an article about the same topic. Care to explain that? Thank you. EDITOR685422 (talk) 13:39, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Re: your message
I see. I apologize for that very stupid and rather blatant disregard for Wikipedia rules (you know I'm new). Perhaps you can do that, since you were the one who raised that proposal (too stupid to deal with complicated stuff). Thank you and, again, I apologize. Mea culpa. EDITOR685422 (talk) 13:48, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proclamation_No._1081 — Preceding unsigned comment added by EDITOR685422 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Manuel Miranda


The article Manuel Miranda has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Incidental political player in the news a little bit at the moment. BLP-1E and NOTNEWS."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Carrite (talk) 03:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Take part in a survey
Hi Booyahhayoob

We're working to measure the value of Wikipedia in economic terms. We want to ask you some questions about how you value being able to edit Wikipedia.

Our survey should take about 10-15 minutes of your time. We hope that you will enjoy it and find the questions interesting. All answers will be kept strictly confidential and will be anonymized before the aggregate results are published. Regretfully, we can only accept responses from people who live in the US due to restrictions in our grant-based funding.

As a reward for your participation, we will randomly pick 1 out of every 5 participants and give them $25 worth of goods of their choice from the Wikipedia store (e.g. Wikipedia themed t-shirts). Note that we can only reward you if you are based in the US.

Click here to access the survey: http://ucla.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bI9nxWdVDoNZZKR

Thanks

Avi

Researcher, MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy --Avi gan (talk) 22:59, 11 November 2018 (UTC)