User talk:Bravehm

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Hazaras. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 16:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello respected administrator These edits, ,  of mine were to improve the article, but you blocked me because of edit warring. I edited to improve the article, not edit warring and I did not delete any content related to the previous edit warring. On the contrary, I added references to improve the article. As a user, I edited the article to improve it, not what @HistoryofIran reported.
 * User:HistoryofIran had already taken a very strong stance against me and even reverted my first edit without any accurate reason. And this edit of mine was a restoration of the previous stable revision that @KoizumiBS had changed without edit summary or discussion. Bravehm (talk) 19:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Your first claim about not edit warring is more typical dishonesty/manipulation which already has been addressed. And unlike you (eg ), I don't revert "without any accurate reason". Furthermore, you're linking a diff which the succeeding diff is of KoizumiBS restoring sourced info under the edit summary "restored sourced info", so where is the proof that they "changed without edit summary or discussion."? Dishonest as usual. This is not the first time you have engaged in dishonesty to try to make KoizumiBS look bad (WP:ASPERSIONS) . HistoryofIran (talk) 19:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


 * This is called dishonestly, pay attention once.. They brought changes without discussion and consensus under the pretext of "restored sourced info".--Bravehm (talk) 20:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * They (KoizumiBS) have restored the sourced info, which is not a problem, but along with it, they have made other changes without discussion and consensus, which have nothing to do with the edit summary "restored sourced info". Bravehm (talk) 20:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The article has been tampered by various socks with the exact behaviour as you (Sockpuppet investigations/Iampharzad/Archive), KoizumiBS merely restored the info removed by them. The only one being dishonest is you. Also, you not liking the sourced info about the Mongolian aspect of the Hazara (as seen here where your prefer your "facts", i.e. personal opinion over WP:RS) does not mean that there is no WP:CONSENSUS. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You don't have an answer for the fact that "KoizumiBS" brought changes without discussion and edit summary, you just repeat that they restored sourced info, while this can be dishonest.
 * Please tell about the changes made by "KoizumiBS" without discussion and consensus. Bravehm (talk) 21:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Bravehm, this "discussion" isn't helping you and is an inappropriate use of your Talk page. If you continue, you may lose access to this page., I'd prefer that you cease to engage with Bravehm. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request
Bravehm (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC) I was blocked for two weeks because of edit warring, but these edits of mine, , were not edit warring that I was blocked for.--Bravehm (talk) 06:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

These edits by me, , are not related to the previous edit warring but is completely different and should not be considered as edit warring. The reason I was blocked was defined as edit warring, when there was a misunderstanding and I only edited to improve the article and I added sources to the article, not to revert edits related to the previous edit warring.--Bravehm (talk) 10:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Bravehm (talk) 21:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)