User talk:Brojam/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 → Archive 7

A page you started (List of accolades received by Coco (2017 film)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of accolades received by Coco (2017 film), Brojam!

Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice job! Keep up the good work. Thank you. :-)

To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 05:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Redirects on One Tree Hill template

Hi,

I'm writing with regards to an issue going on with the One Tree Hill template. For whatever reason, this this user keeps putting redirects back in. A couple weeks ago, I removed said redirects but then he put them back in. I'm looking at the history of this template as I write this and I see he did the same to you and a couple other users earlier. I left a message on his talk page asking why he keeps doing this but for good measure I thought I would bring it to your attention. Shaneymike (talk) 17:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll make sure to keep an eye on it. - Brojam (talk) 17:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gorilla City (The Flash)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gorilla City (The Flash) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

"The Good Doctor"

Instead of tagging it, how about making it concise? You are allowed to do that. Tagging it is lazy. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 04:52, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

I put it on purpose (since 5 of the 11 episode plot summaries are actually over the limit) in hopes editors will see it and take it into account for the remaining episodes left. I do plan on cleaning up the plot summaries after the season has finished airing since there are some that are incomplete. - Brojam (talk) 05:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Four logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Four logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gorilla City (The Flash)

The article Gorilla City (The Flash) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gorilla City (The Flash) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Please Help with SummerPhDv2.0.

Brojam, i really need your help on dealing with SummerPhDv2.0. He has been preventing me from reverting some of awards and nominations which are mostly awards from film critic organizations and guilds within the accolades section of Beauty and the Beast (2017 film) and these were examples of these film critic organizations and guilds that he was banning it from being reinstated:

Despite that these awards were considered as notable and had the WP:MOSFILM to prove that they have Wikipedia articles, he keeps calling these awards as "Non-notable awards" and always reverted these awards from being included and not to mentioned he started a very biased and inaccurate consensus that awards that are notable should be included. Worse, he even applied the same method and action to Wonder Woman (2017 film)'s accolades section (although he only removed the awards that don't have a Wikipedia articles, the awards that have Wikipedia articles was also somehow removed as well). What I want to convince him is that removing of awards and nominations from the accolades section should only be based on those that don't have Wikipedia articles and not on removing these awards as "Non-notable awards". Saiph121 (talk) 04:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Beauty and the Beast (2017 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN talk to me 04:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

There's an extensive discussion on the talk page about these awards. I suggest you join it instead of just reverting. --NeilN talk to me 04:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Please note formulations such as "[[AARP|AARP's Movies for Grownups Awards]]". The organization, AARP, is notable. The award, AARP's Movies for Grownups Awards, is not.
The extensive discussion on the article's talk page resulted in a near unanimous consensus that only bluelink, non-redirect notable awards should be included. The lone holdout, Saiph121, is currently the subject of discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Saiph121:_Take_4.
It is entirely possible that other articles include these and other non-notable awards. Saiph121 (under that user name and various IP addresses) has added multiple non-notable awards in multiple articles (Beauty and the Beast, Wonder Woman, The Shape of Water, Get Out, etc.). It is likely that others have added non-notable awards in various articles. It does not mean they are correct. The MOS guideline says they are not. Following what you see in some articles in other articles does not ensure that any of the articles are consistent with Wikipedia's guidelines or policies, only that they consistently follow and/or violate those guidelines and policies. - SummerPhDv2.0 05:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
  • If someone canvasses you to help in an edit war again, your response had better be, "No, I don't want to get blocked by NinjaRobotPirate." NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
@NinjaRobotPirate: In fact, I had already reverted SummerPhD at Coco [1] and Wonder Woman [2] before being pinged by Saiph121. I had missed his edits at Beauty and the Beast since I don't watch that article. - Brojam (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Re: your recent reversion-edit to Beauty and the Beast (2017 film)

WP:MOSFILM does state in its "Accolades" section that

Awards included in lists should have a Wikipedia article to demonstrate notability.

But it then goes on to say

Because of the proliferation of film festivals and "award mills", festival awards should be added with discretion, with inclusion subject to consensus. [Bolding mine]

The present consensus at Talk:Beauty and the Beast (2017 film) is to not include all the awards that Saiph121 has been adding to the article. AARP Movies for Grownups Awards? The Golden Trailer Awards? The Hollywood Film Awards? Oh those Hollywood Film Awards are a right peach they are.... One unaffiliated reference in their WP article is from The Wrap which states "When are all these awards shows too much of a good thing?" plus the Hollywood Film Awards are run by a single person with the awards themselves being voted on by a grand total of 12 anonymous people (per this Grantland article). Anyway, thought you would want to know that present consensus is for the list of awards to be pared down. Shearonink (talk) 05:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

This should have been brought up at WP:MOSFILM. Also, you say Hollywood Film Awards and Hollywood Music in Media Awards are not notable yet they obey the current "consensus" at Beauty and the Beast that only bluelink, non-redirect notable awards should be included. - Brojam (talk)
All awards which are included must have articles. This does not mean that all awards with articles must be included. - SummerPhDv2.0 13:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Discretion: the freedom to decide what should be done in a particular situation.
Consensus: general agreement.
It doesn't need to be brought up at MOSFILM. Per the sentence above, the language governing this type of situation is already included in that Manual of Style WP guideline. There is no hard & fast "rule" that all film awards given by entities with Wikipedia articles must be included in the film-awardee's Wikipedia article. This issue is decided on an individual/case-by-case basis according to the consensus at individual articles. Editors are encouraged and are supposed to use discretion about which awards to include. I would say at least some of these awards should not be included...like the "AARP Movies for Grownups Awards" etc. This issue has been discussed many times over at the various articles' talk-pages. If the overwhelming consensus is to not include all of these various awards, and the editors that wish to not include all the awards are using their discretion according to WP Manual of Style guidelines then I am not sure what else needs to be discussed. Sometimes I am with the consensus on an issue and sometimes I am not - all of us who edit here at Wikipedia need to know when to back away from an argument otherwise we are in danger of becoming adherents of WP:IDHT. Shearonink (talk) 20:34, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

"The Good Doctor"

You can edit it. By reverting, you revert back to bad sentence structure in one part of it. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 07:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Stop WP:OVERTAGGING and fix it. Those tags might be removed otherwise. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 08:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
If you followed WP:TVPLOT then I wouldn't need to keep tagging the episodes. But since you consistently disobey it after being told by multiple editors, I'll continue adding them. - Brojam (talk) 05:53, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
You're the only one saying anything. Excuses, excuses. You are allowed to fix it. But that would be correct thing to do. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 07:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

"Characterization" in Draft:Iron Man (Marvel Cinematic Universe)

Can you clarify what you mean by "Characterization" as a section header? I have looked at comparable articles on fictional film characters (Han Solo, Max Rockatansky, Rocky Balboa, Michael Corleone, and Axel Foley) and I don't find such a section being used in these articles. It seems to me that this article should generally conform to the structure of articles like these. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

"Invasion!" (Arrowverse) copyedit


DYK for Gorilla City (The Flash)

On 3 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gorilla City (The Flash), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that filming of the two-episode event "Gorilla City" on the third season of the 2014 television series The Flash was moved south of the original filming location, due to prolonged snowfall in Vancouver? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gorilla City (The Flash). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gorilla City (The Flash)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hi. You should really apply for the Autopatrolled user right. I would be happy to apply on your behalf if you want. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:25, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Bennv3771: Alright. Thanks! - Brojam (talk) 05:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (List of American Housewife episodes) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of American Housewife episodes, Brojam!

Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Don't forget to add categories

To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bennv3771 (talk) 13:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

I wasn't the one who created the article. I simply created the original redirect. - Brojam (talk) 05:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Brojam, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 13:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

WP:SOURCE

Why do you think this information doesn't need a source, especially since it's evidently inaccurate? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:30, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

@Koavf: You're the one that's adding the inaccurate information that's he's French without a source. - Brojam (talk) 05:33, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
And pardon me for my obvious sloppiness. Thank you for correcting me and the article. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:02, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

The Bachelor Posters

Thanks for your contributions on uploading posters. I searched some of older seasons' posters: 11, 13, 14, 15, 17 and 18. Could you please upload them all as a non-free image? ApprenticeFan work 05:23, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

@ApprenticeFan: All done! - Brojam (talk) 06:51, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deception (2018 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

List of This Is Us characters family tree

Hey Brojam nice fix on the family tree. I might suggest mentioning the dotted line indicates loss of a partner due to divorce or death/widowing, and put a dotted line between Jack and Rebecca Pearson, since Rebecca was a widow before marrying Miguel. Thanks for reading. -- Bwefler (talk) 05:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

@Bwefler: Thanks for the change to specify this. I wasn't exactly sure how that should be displayed/worded. Also, the lines to the adopted children are not exactly the best. It goes from straight line to dotted line awkwardly. Not sure if you know how we can fix that. - Brojam (talk) 22:02, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Rise

I think you should report that problematic editor on the Rise page. Esuka323 (talk) 22:37, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Call me by your name choreographer

I'm the agent of the Choreographer who worked in the movie "Call me by your name" by Luca Guadagnino. You had "undone" my contribution to the movie page as you can see [[3]]. If imdb is not a valide source, what could I provide to certify his role in the movie?

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Likeyoudo (talk • contribs) 21:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

You need to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Any newspaper or reliable, published sources will do. - Brojam (talk) 21:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Harrison Wells

What I feared, happened: the AfC was rejected, with the reason being that the draft was "described very intensively from an in universe prospective". Since you had agreed to help develop the article at one point, at least can you help expand one section you are comfortable with? I've done my part in "Fictional character biographies" and "Reception". ----Kailash29792 (talk) 03:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I am just about the start exams so I won't have time to look at it for a while. My plan is to finish up the drafts for the season articles first and then look at the characters' & episodes' articles since there's a lot of sources for those in the season drafts that I have haven't gone through yet. I would consider that you try to cut down more of the "Fictional character biographies" section (to around half); only keep the most important plot points. - Brojam (talk) 04:24, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:American Idol S16 poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:American Idol S16 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Reupdating

Hi Bro i see you changed those edits on American Idol (season 16) but it doesnt have 2 be similar 2 The Voice season page it needs 2 b different. That was the reason why i need 2 change it back 2 the way it supposed to be. See WP:VD. I bet this doesnt hurt u. Thnk U! :) TristanQuinn (talk) 06:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Answered at Talk:American Idol (season 16). - Brojam (talk) 05:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm Erik. I noticed that you recently removed content from A Quiet Place (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 14:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Also, please see WP:SEEALSO for guidelines that permit that "See also" content. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 14:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

The Good Doctor

I am not sure where exactly it says it's acceptable to include guest stars have only appeared in one episode on the main article. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 20:09, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

It is mentioned in multiple paragraphs the inclusion of guest starts. However, you are right that since The Good Doctor is a procedural with new guests every week, it is not really appropriate to have actors to only appear in one episode listed. Hence, why it's mentioned "Notable guests" rater than "Guests" as seen on most shows. I re-addded a note that was removed specifying that a character should appear at least twice to be included. I removed Graham Patrick Martin since he only appeared in the season one finale. The only exception is Irene Keng who only appeared in the pilot but was credited as a main actor in the first episode. - Brojam (talk) 22:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Black-ish (season 4)

I'll leave it up to any consensus formed from the messages I posted if you don't agree to this but you're edit summary didn't quite make sense. If you're only reason for reverting was because it's not included in the series episode numbers would you agree to including it in the episode list if we put "N/A" in the slot instead of including it in numbers? TheDoctorWho (talk) 01:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

I've replied on the season article talkpage. And, no it would not be okay to simply add "N/A" since it is never going to air or be released. Mentioning it as prose is all that should be done. - Brojam (talk) 03:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your response. Let me try and meet further in the middle what if we take IJBall's suggestion and expand the paragraph. Similar to the one I wrote in my original editTheDoctorWho (talk) 04:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
@TheDoctorWho: Oh I hadn't seen your changes to the paragraph in your original edit. Yes, you can definitely change it back to the expanded version. The only thing is that last source (TheFutonCritic) needs to be changed since it is no longer valid. This or the Variety source should work. - Brojam (talk) 04:12, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Alright I'll change it back shortly. Thank you for working with me on this, I've had issues with editors in the past refusing to participate in discussion. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Likewise! - Brojam (talk) 04:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Filemover granted

Hello Brojam. Your account has been granted the "filemover" user right, either following a request for it or due to a clear need for the ability to move files. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:File mover for more information on this user right and under what circumstances it is okay to move files. When you move a file please remember to update any links to the new name as well! If you do not want the file mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Alex Shih (talk) 15:18, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Wizarding World

WPOTHERSTUFFEXISTS also. It looks dumb beyond belief. The title is not "The Crimes of Grindelwald", it's the whole name, it looks even dumber next to the other films title.★Trekker (talk) 05:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Kinda hard to bring up WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS when that other stuff is in the same template. Shouldn't we be following how it is being done with the other films listed in the template. Also how is it dumb? The subsection clearly states that this is film is part of the Fantastic Beasts series, so there's no need to overcrowd the template by adding it in front of each upcoming film in the series. - Brojam (talk) 05:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blue Book S1 key art.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blue Book S1 key art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 05:46, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Series table

Hi User:Brojam, can you change to a proper table for series 1 of Save Me (UK TV series) please? It's not a standalone series ([4]). Cheers, --Theo Mandela (talk) 21:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

@Theo Mandela: Done. - Brojam (talk) 03:35, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Template talk:Television episode ratings

Please add an option to remove the word Share from the column heading as this is only used on broadcast network shows, not cable. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 11:28, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

 Done -- AlexTW 13:42, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
There also is no option to use any thing other that millions for the heading unit which isn't inline with the other template and stupid for a lot of cable shows that rate below the top ten. Also the template is badly designed using clunky numbered argument names to generate table rows. You also can't add simulcast channel ratings instead of less available DVR values. Also the templates uses xhtml br tags when wiki pages are clearly html. Also the CSS in the template should be subed for html where possible for compatibility with simple browsers that don't implement render intensive CSS. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 00:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
That's because the consensus is to use millions, regardless of is they're below or above a million. It seems I'm not the only person you're trying to argue that with... Your concerns on the template's layout have been noted. -- AlexTW 01:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem on A Million Little Things

Some of the content you included in the above article appears to have been copied from elsewhere online. Please see the article history for specific urls. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some of the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:56, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Need some advice on the "Harrison Wells" page

Greetings, Brojam, from Ooznoz.

I need some advice and assistance for the "Harrison Wells" page. I believe it needs some images, but the only pics in the Commons are of Tom Cavanaugh. But, I've found a Wiki site with several images of the different Wells that seem to be oaky to use. Here's a link to it:

http://arrow.wikia.com/wiki/Harrison_Wells

It's a wikia site, so it should be okay to use these images. But, I'm not entirely sure, and I'd appreciate any suggestions.

Thanks for any help you can give me. Hope to hear from you soon.

Ooznoz (talk) 13:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)Ooznoz

(talk page watcher) Wikias are not acceptable, as they do not own the copyright to those images. -- AlexTW 14:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Ooznoz, I second Alex, and I would have taken the screenshots from any source other than wikias. Also, too many non-free images in an article violate WP:NFCC; hence, I was waiting till season 5's Wells is introduced, then upload a single image showing all versions of Wells introduced so far, something similar to this image of Ernst Stavro Blofeld. --Kailash29792 (talk) 15:36, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
That's acceptable, as long as you have all of the original sources and copyrights on the file page. File:Versions of the Doctor.jpg is a great example of that. -- AlexTW 15:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Conners, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2600:8800:1880:91E:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 14:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

How is the show not about siblings when three of the main characters are in fact siblings? - Brojam (talk) 14:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) Unrelated to this discussion, the article has been moved to Draft:The Conners, until it has begun production. -- AlexTW 14:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlike Roseanne which had an explicit description of Jackie as Roseanne's sister, there was no supporting text nor a WP:RS in the Conners article to satisfy WP:CATV in regards to the categories which were applied. 2600:8800:1880:91E:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 14:43, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Darlene, Becky and D.J. are all siblings "repris[ing] their Conner characters". - Brojam (talk) 18:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Stranger Things

Hi. I see that it was you who added that section. Individual prizes are included in the pages of each actor. This page is for the awards received by the series in general (actors, directors, etc). For this reason there is the table "Total number of wins and nominations" received by the series. --Miaow 01:04, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

PS: why have you added that section without an explanation? --Miaow 01:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
To follow the other major awards and nominations articles on Wiki. American Horror Story (a FL), Game of Thrones, The Americans, The Walking Dead, Orphan Black, Once Upon a Time, similar to some noting the Emmy noms of the cast like 30 Rock (a FL), Modern Family, and Game of Thrones. - Brojam (talk) 01:23, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
It doesn't seem like a valid argument to had continued to undo my changes: It's not a guidelines as you can see List of awards and nominations received by Prison Break, List of awards and nominations received by Will & Grace, List of awards and nominations received by The Vampire Diaries (a FL), etc. As I said before, the table to indicate the prizes and noms of each actor is in the pages of each of them and not in "List of awards and nominations received by Stranger Things".--Miaow 01:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
I know WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a not a reason, but I figured if it was an issue of WP:OR or WP:POV it would have been addressed on those articles. Also, the reason why I added it afterwards was because of this sentence in the lead: Millie Bobby Brown is the most nominated member of the cast,..., which I realized was kinda OR without the table with the counts. Maybe it should be brought to WP:MOSTV. There seems to be a real lack of guidelines for List of awards and nominations in the MOS. - Brojam (talk) 02:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Yes because it's encyclopedic to mention these actors in the opening paragraph (Brown, Ryder and Harbour) cause they have received critical acclaim (They have been nominated for notable prizes (emmy's, golden globes)) and the opening paragraph always mentions some of the most relevant prizes and noms obtained by the series in general (writers, actors, etc)
The series has received critical acclaim and numerous accolades for its writing, acting, directing, production values, soundtrack, and visual effects. Stranger Things has been nominated for many awards, including nineteen Primetime Emmy Awards (five wins) [...] three Writers Guild of America Awards [...]
A separate table for only the actors does not make sense here. Why not a table for the writers or people who made the series? In any case, there is already a general table for all prizes and nominations (infobox), a separate actors table have no sense. :-S --Miaow 14:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
What I mean is that it's not clear that Brown is the most nominated cast member without the table. So that's why I added it. We don't single out any other crew member for being most nominated in the lead, hence why there's no table for them. - Brojam (talk) 01:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Arrow (season 3)

Since you seem to be an expert in finding sources, could you please do the same for the aforementioned draft? I intend to bring it to the mainspace, regardless of how much its creator wants to. John Diggle's reception section is also in dire need of sources. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:42, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the "ping". Still saw it, bud. Drafts do not get moved to the mainspace until they are a valid article. That's the WP:CONSENSUS of WP:TV. -- AlexTW 05:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Alex, please don't mistake me as having a grudge against you because I don't. I know drafts should only be moved to the mainspace until they are developed well enough, and that's just what I'm trying to achieve with Arrow season 3. But the one obstacle to my success is, I don't know of a search engine that searches only for reliable sources (something like this, but for American sources). Besides, how did you get notified despite me using noping? --Kailash29792 (talk) 06:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Look up one discussion, see the tag I used before my comment. -- AlexTW 06:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
@Kailash29792: I'll try but it might be hard, especially for John Diggle. (I also need to focus on the freaking Flash season articles. Keep getting distracted with other stuff on Wiki.) But you have a pretty good base already for his article. One comment for his character page and the others like Wells, the plot sections really need to be trimmed. We have entire season's summaries with much less words than that. Look at something like Phil Coulson#Television series. - Brojam (talk) 18:46, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Okay, I'll take care of Diggle with Autumnking2012 (the draft creator). But I'd like to see the first three seasons of Flash in the mainspace ASAP since abandoned drafts often get deleted without the creators being warned. --Kailash29792 (talk) 06:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Ongoing dispute over my editing.

Mr. Brojam, you left a message on my talk page that i am vandalizing Avengers: Infinity War. Well then, you tell what is my mistake and what is the right edit. I will then accept my mistake. Thank You. Shayaan Raza (talk) 18:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

I wrote it in the edit summary. Per WP:FILMLEAD, only the primary genre or sub-genre should be listed in the lead. Also you've already been reverted multiple times [5] [6] [7] [8]. Not to mention trying to move the page earlier today [9]. - Brojam (talk) 18:17, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Daryl Dixon

What's wrong? The Optimistic One (talk) 02:43, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

There's no reason to be changing the season numbers to letters like you did. The section headers should be such as "Season 1", "Season 2", etc. - Brojam (talk) 02:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

13 Reasons Why sources

You reverted my edit without explanation. Don't you think it makes more sense to include the official announcement from Netflix's official channel, rather than selected editorials from third parties as citations? Mosherdude91 (talk) 17:36, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

It's best not use YouTube as a source, especially when we have reliable sources available. - Brojam (talk) 13:10, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reverting my mess I made with the AFC. I have never dealt with a AFC accept against another article. Thank you so much. AmericanAir88 (talk) 21:04, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

No problem, I've properly moved the draft. - Brojam (talk) 21:16, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

List of Legends of Tomorrow episodes

Why did you delete so much information instead of editing the article? StrikoWriter1234 (talk) 21:16, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

@StrikoWriter1234: Because the first season now has a separate season article so we only need to transclude the episode table from the season article into the main episode list article. - Brojam (talk) 21:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Legends of Tomorrow team

I want to create an article on the team, but do not know what should be the bracketed term; should it be Legends of Tomorrow (team) or Legends of Tomorrow (superhero team)? Besides, even if an article does not seem possible, where should it redirect to? --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:37, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Could this information just be added to List of Legends of Tomorrow characters? -- AlexTW 06:34, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
You mean, create a section called "Legends" which mentions the team members? Sounds like a good idea, but I don't know how to add members in it, as in prose or tabular (at best I can create a table similar to this). I initially thought List of superhero teams and groups#L looked like a good target to redirect "Legends of Tomorrow (team)" to. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:57, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
@Kailash29792: I'm not sure why you would need to create a new article or even section for the Legends Team. The information can go in the casting/writing section of the main series article and information about the members can go in each member's section in the List of characters article. - Brojam (talk) 20:43, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
The reason is, I want to be able to link the team in other articles, in order to reduce the strain of finding a wording to introduce them. Eg: John Diggle's article mentions the Legends without introducing them, as Diggle aids Team Arrow, Team Flash and the Legends, without saying Diggle aids Team Arrow, Team Flash and the superhero team Legends. I believed linking on first instance is an easy form of introducing something than describing what they are beforehand. --Kailash29792 (talk) 04:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
But how is that different than with Team Arrow and Team Flash? Those two are not liked either. - Brojam (talk) 04:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

The Flash (season 1)

Can you please move the draft to the mainspace? I find it great enough to be there, but unlike you, I am not authorised to perform round robin moves. --Kailash29792 (talk) 13:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't see the rush in moving it. - Brojam (talk) 15:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Arrowverse articles

I feel like we (a team of editors) need to slowly go through the Arrow, Flash, Supergirl, etc. episode articles and find out which ones need to be redirected/merged and which ones should stay as stand alone articles. What are your thoughts?  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 15:21, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

@Bignole: Completely agree. All articles without a decent amount of production info should be redirected/merged. - Brojam (talk) 15:48, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I believe only those episodes which have some speciality should have articles, e.g.: Duet (The Flash) and Worlds Finest (Supergirl). I also think the same of The Scientist (Arrow) since it introduced Barry Allen to the Arrowverse, and Haunted (Arrow) which introduced Constantine (if you consider the NBC series disconnected). --Kailash29792 (talk) 16:03, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
I want to try to look at it objectively. It's easy to say "this episode is important so it should stay", but then there's nothing there actually supporting that. I don't think we have any guideline that effectively talks about this (we only recently added the bit about separating out pages based on WP:SIZE) at a level that is easy to point to for an objective rationale. I've always said, I think we get ahead of ourselves and create pages that either duplicate season pages, or are basically plots with some reviews. We may find quite a few of them that should stay, but (IMO) I think we should have an objective rationale as we look at them that's a bit more detailed than what we basically see at the GNG. Simply because, in a technically sense, it's not hard to argue that an episode page with 4 reviews meets the GNG. I would argue, is that the best way to present the information if it's really just about a few reviews?  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 17:00, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Jumping in on this thread. I would say from the start, most of the existing Supergirl episodes can probably go. They were created during the airing of season 1, every week, with no thought to notability or "importance". - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
LOL, yeah I didn't meant for this to look secretive. LOL. Obviously, we can move this to say the "Arrowverse" page or somewhere. I think Supergirl is the most egregious of the series, but this refueled my thoughts on an early discussion because of a good faith editor that started creating random Arrow episode pages with very little content (not even reviews in some cases) because of the importance of the episodes to the series themselves.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 18:18, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Yup, I think we should move this to the Arrowverse talkpage. - Brojam (talk) 02:00, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Done.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 13:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wizarding World

Template:Wizarding World has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 12:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

A year ago ...
for what
... you were recipient
no. 1720 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Drafts get deleted if not edited in a long time

In response to your statement "I don't see the rush in moving it", this is what I should have said. Draft:Supergirl (season 2) was recently deleted for this reason, and please see that the other Flash drafts don't meet such a fate. --Kailash29792 (talk) 12:42, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

The Bachelorette posters

Hello there! Could you upload those posters in The Bachelorette just what you did in The Bachelor?

https://www.eonline.com/photos/20673/look-back-on-all-of-the-the-bachelorette-posters/756241

Could you also upload the most recent season of The Bachelorette with its poster?

ApprenticeFan work 01:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

@ApprenticeFan: All done! - Brojam (talk) 06:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Brojam (talk · contribs) Hey, you forgot the season 3 poster. Link: [10] ApprenticeFan work 02:42, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Done. - Brojam (talk) 03:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Battles Lost and Won

Hi, what is wrong with my article? You've moved it back from the mainspace without giving details. It has more content than similar articles o I'm happy for it to be moved into mainspace. Matt14451 (talk) 21:14, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

@Matt14451: Adding two more review scores doesn't make it ready for mainspace. Apart from the three review scores, you are adding nothing new. The synopsis is a straight copy and paste of the one at List of Supergirl episodes and there's absolute no production info. - Brojam (talk) 21:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
@Brojam: What do you recommend I add? I also added categories, more ratings, guest stars, etc. As I said there are similar articles already in the mainspace with similar content. Matt14451 (talk) 21:25, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Add production info. Similar to Pilot (The Flash)#Production and expand the plot and critical reception sections. - Brojam (talk) 21:36, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Star Wars drafts

What do we need to move forward with your Star Wars drafts? --Gonnym (talk) 11:44, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

@Gonnym: If we are all good with the way they are split up and structured, then we can starting filling in the prose of the films draft, then the tv series draft, and then the franchise overview draft. - Brojam (talk) 14:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Well, 3 out of the 4 participants of the discussion have commented on your draft and were in favor. Only UpdateNerd has not done so, but did see it, as he's been editing the article itself. --Gonnym (talk) 19:19, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
@Gonnym: Alright. Then, work on finishing up the prose of these drafts can begin! How do you think we should proceed? I don't have too much time so maybe you can take a stab at completing the individual film sections, making sure we don't go too much into production details. I'll work on the other parts of that draft and then check what you've done. - Brojam (talk) 04:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Sure, I'll do that. --Gonnym (talk) 07:41, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Take a look at the first film's draft - Draft:List of Star Wars films#Star Wars (1977) and let me know if this is the direction, so I'll know how to focus on the next films. --Gonnym (talk) 09:50, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
@Gonnym: Okay, I've gone ahead and trimmed it. Not sure if I trimmed it a bit too much, but wanted to keep only the major production details. Only thing really missing is the casting of the main trio, but I wasn't sure how to write it since I can't find when they were actually cast. - Brojam (talk) 21:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, the film article didn't have that info so I didn't add it myself. --Gonnym (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Also, please don't revert if you are just going to restore 90% of what I added. That's not how a revert button works. Secondly, MOS Accessibility should be followed and proper scope usage with it, so not sure why you even reverted that. --Gonnym (talk) 21:56, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I reverted to remove the bold of those specific tables to follow List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films, not realizing you had also added the scope="row". - Brojam (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
That can be done with the use of "plainrowheaders". That article uses the row signage incorrectly per Help:Table#Pipe syntax tutorial. --Gonnym (talk) 22:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Separate question, how are you with references at the bottom instead of in the article? I personally would like to put them all down but don't want to start doing that and getting reverted. --Gonnym (talk) 22:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

I'm all for that. - Brojam (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

I found an ebook version of The Making of Star Wars but the ebook doesn't have page numbers and I can't manage to find an online version of this book with numbers. I've already marked in the file casting and filming dates and other development info. --Gonnym (talk) 21:42, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Supergirl (season 2)

Brojam, can you please help expand it further if you think it isn't yet worth being in the mainspace? The least you could do is dump sources (like you did on all the Flash drafts) while I expand from them. I have already solved one issue raised by Alex, "The Production section needs a great deal of expanding". His another concern is "Broadcast has one sentence", but I don't know what else to add. If you don't have the time to help, never mind. But can I move the draft using G6? Because I find it very-much worthy of being in the mainspace in its current state, maybe others can expand it later. --Kailash29792 (talk) 18:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

I'll have a look at what I can find, but it will take me a few days. - Brojam (talk) 02:29, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Both Matt and AussieLegend are now in favour of the draft entering the mainspace, unlike how Alex and you were on 21 September. Still the overall consensus is not in my favour, as its a 50-50 position. Have you read the draft (which has since been revamped) and changed your view? If so, please write your updated view on Talk:List of Supergirl episodes so that I get a feeling the consensus is getting somewhere. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:51, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for helping with splitting the Arrowverse nav-boxes! Matt14451 (talk) 15:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Call Me by Your Name (film

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild f Copy Editors of the article Call Me by Your Name (film) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Barry Allen (The Flash)

Hello, Brojam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Barry Allen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 10:08, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Voting Day

Hi, would you mind taking a look at Black Lightning (season 2) please where nearly exact changes have been made as The Flash (season 5) where you reverted. I have already reverted twice so AlexTheWhovian has quoted WP:EDITCONSENSUS. Matt14451 (talk) 08:03, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

The Conners

I disagree that this information is trivial. I do agree it needs a source, but I found it confusing that one minute Dan seems okay and the next he's falling apart again. This explained it.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:23, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

It’s pretty standard for sitcoms to be all over the place with their plot since the networks often don’t air the episodes in their production order. - Brojam (talk) 17:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
I just feel like if the episode list shows episode numbers out of order there should be an explanation. There's only one episode that had to air before Halloween, and yet two were shown. I also remember hearing certain plot details about the most recent episode when the show was advertised, suggesting the episode would air the next week. Instead, it took nearly a month.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Brojam. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Secondary sources on episode lists

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Secondary sources on episode lists. — Lbtocthtalk 06:34, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Flash Season 5

Here is source stating that Savitar and Eobard Thawne will return in Episode 8: https://wegotthiscovered.com/tv/classic-foes-return-promo-flashs-100th-episode/ Additionally, I feel as if they should be in cast section not in Casting. Grant Gustin and Tom Cavanagh are already main members of the cast so Savitar and Eobard should be right next to them. This is how it is done on movies and shows where the actor plays more than one role. Mystic Moore (talk) 04:56, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

That source really is just making assumptions based on the promo for the episode and has no mention of Gustin actually reprising the role of Savitar. For all we know, it could just be Savitar in costume the entire time. We'll know more after Tuesday's episode and get much more realible sources to use for the article. Having them listed in the main cast section makes it seem like they equally portrayed those characters when a simple "XX actor also potrays XX character" in the casting section would suffice. - Brojam (talk) 05:09, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
This is the exact same reason why Guardian-X and Overgirl are not listed in the "cast and characters" section of Supergirl (season 3), why Herr Wells is not in the same section of The Flash (season 5), and why Henry Stein is not in Legends of Tomorrow (season 3). On an unrelated note, Brojam you wrote "Helbing brothers joining" in Draft:The Flash (season 2) with no source; do you have one? Because I can't find any. Also, you put this link under "marketing" which is for subscribers only; can you rephrase it since I cannot access? --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
@Kailash29792: Okay, I think I addressed both your issues. I put the archived source for the adweek url and tried to find sources for the season 2 showrunners (wasn't that easy for the Helbing brothers). - Brojam (talk) 21:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

The Bachelor (season 23) poster

Hello there, could you upload with the poster for The Bachelor season 23 to do as the same with previous seasons.

Link: [11]

ApprenticeFan work 13:45, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

@ApprenticeFan: Done! - Brojam (talk) 15:05, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thank you for helping with all the Avengers: Endgame edits! Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:03, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Shazam film poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shazam film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

List of accolades received by A Star Is Born (2018 film)

Just wanted to say thank you for your cleanup of the list. Much appreciated :) —IB [ Poke ] 10:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Draft:The Flash (season 3)

I find it good enough to move to the mainspace, just I can't expand content from this under "Marketing". Once that is done, the move may happen. Could you help please? --Kailash29792 (talk) 18:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brojam/Archive_3&oldid=1140210910"