User talk:Brojam/Archive 7

The Walt Disney Company

 * Hi Brojam, this is a long article and I won't get it completed until next year; I hope that's okay. Cheers,  Baffle☿gab  20:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries. Take all the time you need. Happy new years! Brojam (talk) 08:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Brojam. I've marked the extra-long "History" section with too long because I think some of the material could be summarised and/or moved to other articles; particularly some of the material about films; feel free to remove the template if you think it's not needed. I moved one largely off-topic paragraph to the talk page; the text described the Disneyland theme park rather than the company itself. The article has gone from 353,331 bytes to 344,901 bytes, so it's a bit shorter now. Good luck with your planned GA nomination. Happy New Year and cheers,  Baffle☿gab  08:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your work! - Brojam (talk) 08:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023
I've been looking at the main Yellowstone article for the television and have been considering doing a nomination of it for GAN. Any interest is possibly joining in for doing a co-nomination of the article? ErnestKrause (talk) 15:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Special:Diff/1133284771
Hi Brojam! Can I ask how you sorted the citation parameters in the correct order in your edit to Elizabeth II? I have the scripts you mentioned in your edit summary but neither seems to be able to do this. Thanks! &#8209;&#8209;Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 08:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I used ProveIt then clicked the Normalize button. - Brojam (talk) 20:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! &#8209;&#8209;Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 13:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Party of Five 2020 logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Party of Five 2020 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 00:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Shall Euphoria have an awards article as a separate due to undue weight?
Hi, this needs an awards article in Euphoria that is need as a separate. This is due to undue weight. CastJared (talk) 22:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

HBO controversies draft
Hi, I made about some HBO controversies as Draft, called, "Draft:HBO controversies". I copied from multiple related series involved. CastJared (talk) 08:59, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Break Point (2023 TV series) titlecard.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Break Point (2023 TV series) titlecard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of awards and nominations received by Chris Evans
Hello, Brojam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of awards and nominations received by Chris Evans, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Places (franchise)


Hello, Brojam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Places".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

list of most followed twitch channels
Hey @Brojam, wanted to apologize for reverting your edit. I was on my phone when my cat jumped on my lap. She then bumped my hand and I reverted it by mistake.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 08:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)


 * No worries. - Brojam (talk) 08:17, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Good Doctor 2017.png
Thanks for uploading File:The Good Doctor 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 04:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Undoing edits
Can I ask why you keep undoing my edits regarding the sidemen xmas films. If you think they are just YouTube videos why is the naughty list one still in the filmography section? because surely that would be the same. Spooderman6920 (talk) 21:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


 * You need to cite a reliable source to include them; which you have repeatedly failed to do. I had missed the Naught List entry on KSI's article. Thanks for pointing it out; it's been removed. – Brojam (talk) 22:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * But my thinking is the direct source is reliable no? e.g. the post about ksi and Logan being in forntite. They announced that themselves so surely that is reliable? Spooderman6920 (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * No, that's not a reliable source either; WP:SOCIALMEDIA – Brojam (talk) 18:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for History of The Simpsons
History of The Simpsons has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)