User talk:Brookmount

Speedy deletion of Success University
A tag has been placed on Success University requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 23:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Success university
A tag has been placed on Success university requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 23:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Success university, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gaffertape (talk) 23:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Success university
I'm sorry to inform you that an article which you created, Success university, was recently deleted. When reviewing whether an article is appropriate for Wikipedia, administrators follow certain guidelines based upon things such as encyclopedic notability, the ability to verify accurate information, and conflicts of interest. Your article didn't match one or more of these criteria, and as such, it was erased.

Please don't let this discourage you from taking part in Wikipedia — nearly every editor here has had contributions removed at one time or another. If you're new and would like some help on getting used to the encyclopedia, there's some useful resources at Introduction and New contributors' help page.

Thanks for your understanding. Tijuana Brass (talk) 23:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Redfarmer (talk) 23:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. Redfarmer (talk) 00:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Success University, please read this
I have again deleted the page in question on the basis of it not asserting sufficient notability and of it reading like advertising. Can I suggest that if you wish to give another go at writing the article you do so in your own user space, for example User:Brookmount/Success? If you wish, I will restore the deleted content to there for you to work on, and then you can leave me a message or email me when you feel it's ready, and I'll move it back. It's worth reading WP:NPOV, WP:CORP, WP:COI and WP:RS as well (sorry for alphabet soup there!). Feel free to ask any questions on my talk page. Thanks, Martinp23 01:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Regretfully, if you continue to recreate the article, you may be blocked from editing. Martinp23 01:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC)