User talk:Bsems

Welcome!
Hello, Bsems, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! IllogicMink talk about it 01:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Hello, I'm Agtx. An edit you recently made to Big Brother 17 (U.S.) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Agtx (talk) 18:16, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to The Bachelor (season 20), contributed colours that were not WCAG AAA Compliant, causing problems for users that have accessibility issues, which must be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about this at WP:COLOR and Template talk:Infobox television season, which provide further information about contributing compliant colours to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  21:44, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Fan death with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 06:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Big Brother 18 (U.S.). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 03:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm CCamp2013. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Big Brother 18 (U.S.) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Chase (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Big Brother 18 (U.S.) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chase (talk) 17:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Big Brother 18 (U.S.) does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Chase (talk) 02:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Big Brother 10 (U.S.), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop changing the 2nd veto winner to Jessie, when it was Michelle. VietPride10 (talk) 14:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Big Brother 19 (U.S.)
Hello after seeing your recent edits to Big Brother 19 (U.S.) tonight prior to the live eviction I thought it would be a good time to remind you that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball TheDoctorWho (talk) 01:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Big Brother 19 (U.S.), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Continuous addition of unsorced information, reminder Wikipedia is not a Crystal Ball TheDoctorWho (talk) 23:07, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Voice (U.S. TV series). ''Continuing to add Kelly Clarkson to the infobox is in multiple violations of the MOS. Refrain from adding her again.''  livelikemusic    talk!  13:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Voice (U.S. TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. It has been explained why Clarkson cannot be added; this is your final warning before you are reported.  livelikemusic    talk!  20:52, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Dan Smith (singer). Thank you.  General Ization Talk  03:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm Souravdas1998. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nikki Bella without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 10:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Souravdas1998. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Total Bellas have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 10:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WWE Tough Enough. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 10:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Celebrity Big Brother (U.S. TV series). ''Please stop reorganizing HouseGuests unless consensus is found otherwise. Visit the talk page for more information. Everyone continues reverting to the version where Ariadna was evicted BEFORE mark.'' The Doctor Who  (talk) 19:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Meant to leave the template for disruptive editing but the above still applies The Doctor Who  (talk) 19:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

SPI
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/9janedoe999. Thank you. The Doctor Who (talk) 03:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. — ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  07:36, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring at Celebrity Big Brother (U.S. TV series)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Your recent editing history at WrestleMania 34 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  JTP (talk • contribs) 01:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
ew this is gross. Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  JTP (talk • contribs) 02:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at WrestleMania 34. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 05:36, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Celebrity Big Brother 1 (U.S.), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Please do not change the positions of Mark and Ariadna again without having a discussion on the talk page first. The current order in the article was achieved by a discussion and should not be changed. This is the same type of edits you made earlier this year that lead to an edit war.''  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  06:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited World of Dance (season 2), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sam Smith and John Newman ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/World_of_Dance_%28season_2%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/World_of_Dance_%28season_2%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Color design WoD season 2
You edited the season 2 WoD color according season 1. Don't you think it would be better re-desin season 1 with less aggressive colors? It doesn't make sense reuse bad design over less aggressive one in Wikipedia.

WoD placement division finals
There placements in season 2. If you canceling the row Place. How do you want to display the places of the contestants in divisions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.63.252.115 (talk) 09:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on World of Dance (season 2). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 22:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 19:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at The Voice (U.S. season 15), may be confused with vandalism. Provide an accurate edit summary of every edit you make, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors. This is your third complaint about not leaving edit summaries and you're still not providing one. The summaries are helpful to editor's browsing an article's history. See also WP:UNRESPONSIVE. Isaidnoway (talk)  05:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Editing against consensus
Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
 * Decisions on Wikipedia are primarily made by consensus, which is accepted as the best method to achieve Wikipedia's goals. The continuous, aggressive pursuit of an editorial goal is considered disruptive, and should be avoided. Failure to cooperate with such simple requests may be interpreted as evidence of a bad faith effort to exasperate or waste the time of other editors.


 * Do not add a dot to the day or to an abbreviated month
 * X mark.svg Unacceptable - Sep.
 * Yes check.svg Acceptable - Sep
 * In addition, this RfC shows consensus in favor of using only the first three characters. If you would like to change the current consensus on abbreviated months, see WP:RFC, a process for requesting outside input concerning disputes, policies, guidelines or article content. Isaidnoway (talk)  06:02, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. located here Isaidnoway (talk)  09:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Contrary to what you think, you do not own any articles on Wikipedia, stop your disruptive editing. All Wikipedia content—articles, categories, templates, and other types of pages—is edited collaboratively. No one has the right to act as though they are the owner of a particular page Isaidnoway (talk)  23:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Please see this discussion for an explanation.  You need to stop reverting every edit that people make.  Instead, discuss issues on article talk pages. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)


 * I suggest you read about what kinds of edits are not vandalism. Given that you  on pages, I'd suggest you also read about article ownership.  You can't just revert anyone who tries to improve the article in a way you dislike and treat it like vandalism.  I'd suggest that you tell us, in your own words, what vandalism is. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:31, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Vandalism is malicious destruction of public or private property. I check the pages to see if people are changing the original ways. I try to keep by bias out of it but it seems to be showing. When I see malicious intents from people, I revert it. In the future, I will not be so harsh. If people are genuinely trying to improve the page, I'll respect it. Thank you (talk)&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''
 * There's no need to put every reply in a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry Boing! said Zebedee (talk) I just need to be unblocked by NinjaRobotPirate (talk) so I can continue to help out on my pages. I see information that needs to be added and all I meant to do from the first place is to help.
 * They are not your pages. This is part of the problem.  Did you read WP:OWN? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I know that, and that wasn't right to say. I just put my best effort into the pages I contribute in and try to stop vandalism and add information when needed. After reading WP:OWN I know I'm not a single contributor, but have a group of people they are trying to help out the pages. I feel like I was well intended, but my actions were not correct NinjaRobotPirate (talk). This not only is teaching me a lesson on Wikipedia, but in life as well. Don't also be so controlling and let other people help you out.

Disruptive editing November 2018
You were just blocked for this sort of disruptive editing. Did you read WP:OWN? Did you read MOS:DATESNO? Did you read the consensus discussion I linked above on date formats? Wikipedia has our own manual of style and we use WP:MOS, not MLA. Our manual of style on months says: (Abbreviations for months, such as Feb are used only where space is extremely limited. Such abbreviations should use three letters only, and should not be followed by a period (full point) except at the end of a sentence.) Section headings are not a space that is extremely limited. I can understand using abbreviations in the tables, as it is a little tight. Do you understand this guideline we use? If you are having difficulty understanding our policies and guidelines, please acknowledge that you are, so someone can help you to understand. If you continue to edit against policies and guidelines, especially if you are doing so intentionally and persistently, you may be temporarily or indefinitely blocked from editing (again). I really don't know how I can explain this any better than I already have, like I said, if you are having difficulty understanding, please reach out to someone, so they can help you to understand. Isaidnoway (talk)  06:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Isaidnoway  (talk) ! Why do you keep changing the dates on The Voice (U.S season 15)? You have had no one confirmed your way of changing the date. The proper MLA format of dates is three letters then a period. That has been the way the dates have been since Season 1 of the voice. For you to be changing every single Voice page now seems helpful, but unnecessary. As you can see all the work I put into the Voice page, so you know I/m not here for trouble, but I'm curious to why you are changing all the pages when you have received no confirmation and changing its original way. User:BsemsUser talk:Bsems 11:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
(For any admin reviewing, the forementioned statement to try to get consensus. No comments on the sockpuppetry issue. --M asem (t) 23:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note that this is a checkuser block. The request requires review by a checkuser. courtesy ping. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:20, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2019
As you just officially joined the project and this newsletter was just published less than twenty-four hours ago I'm personally delivering this one since it'll be about a month until the next publication. The Doctor Who (talk) 02:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television on whether we should use, abandon, or rewrite WikiProject Big Brother/Structure of series or season articles. Jayab 314  16:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – January 2020
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother 22 (American season). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''As per WP:ACCESS, important information is not to be conveyed only by colour. Please find another way.'' Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Hey Bsems, I saw the edit Sportsfan 1234 made to bring the table in compliance with MOS:ACCESS and why reverted the edit (due to loss of information.) In order to satesfy both sides I completely reformatted the table in a way to retain that information but also make the table compliant with MOS:ACCESS. Hopefully this change will please both sides. Thank you!    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    02:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

The Voice (Series Overview Table)
First and foremost, I never said that the page was mine and I wasn't even editing the entire page, just the series overview table. Secondly, before making any edits to the page, I consult with other collaborators who I've known been editing and moderating the page for a long time. I do not do anything with getting the green light from them first because I recognize that editing public wiki pages should be a public group effort, not just what I think is best. Thirdly, on the Voice talk page, a comment was made about the table being too cluttered, which is the problem I was directly trying to fix:

"Just do a short table listing each coach, the winners, and the season they won. Someone just went table crazy on this page. No other reality show page is this cluttered."

As per Wikipedia's guidelines, the table is meant to provide an overview, not an in-depth review of each season. Hence, I got rid of the season air dates. If readers for some reason wanted the exact season air dates (which I doubt they will), they can easily access the individual season pages that are hyperlinked to the series overview table. Another reason why I got rid of the season air dates was to have all of the finalists' names on one line, as opposed to two.

Disney1024 (talk) 03:13, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Well... I'm still trying to understand what you meant with "Alicia's colour should not overpower Blake's or Adam's"... Like, SERIOUSLY? Adam's and Blake's colours are SO faded! Literally every other darker colour (which are a lot of colours) will overpower them, including Shakira's purple, Miley's pink, Gwen's red, Kelly's blue, and John's green. That was a really dumb argument.

Disney1024 (talk) 16:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Another user (MarcioRob24) made this table on my talk page and I wanted to share it with you. This is what he thinks the table should look like, which I completely agree with:

Take care and have a great rest of your day/night! :D

Disney1024 (talk) 20:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Please note that all colour changes that were recently made on the series overview table (except for Team Alicia) were also implemented in the individual season pages. So that is not a valid argument against Team Alicia's new orange colour. I really don't see what's wrong with the brighter orange because it better complements Gwen's light red, Miley's pink, and Kelly's bright sky blue, thus making the page more aesthetically pleasing. Adam and Blake's colours are SO faded that literally every other darker colour (which are a lot of colours) will overpower them, including Shakira's purple, Miley's pink, Gwen's red, Kelly's blue, and John's green. I don't really see what's the problem with the brighter orange, assuming that that change is also implemented in the season 11, 12, and 14 pages. It's not like I'm drastically changing Team Alicia to purple or Team Blake to blue. It's literally the same shade of orange on the colour hex wheel, just a bit brighter. :)

Disney1024 (talk) 22:56, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
Disney1024 (talk) 16:18, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2020
User:TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Total Drama elimination tables' color key
Hi, I wanted to address your question about an "irregular elimination" regarding Leshawna in Total Drama Island. I understand the mechanic of her elimination is different, but that is one of the many methods of a regular elimination, which just didn't formally take place in the elimination ceremony. Freddy7GL (talk) 15:28, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Because eliminations can vary in Total Drama, it is important to maintain the wording as "eliminate," not "vote out."
 * By irregular elimination, it is implied that there was an evacuation, DQ, or quit.
 * Therefore, since Leshawna was voted out by a potential jury eliminated campers (a twist that has been seen in other international versions of Survivor), it is not an irregular elimination — though I do agree that the method is irregular.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)