User talk:Canti60

This is my talk page. Don't vandalise it. Please. Thanks. --Canti60 (talk) 08:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, We Are Number One, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 19:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

We are venom moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, We are venom, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Flooded  with them hundreds 11:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Note on adding unsourced content
Hey, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I noticed that you added content to an article but didn't provide a reliable source. You should cite a reliable source for all of your edits so that they can be verified. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Adding unsourced content contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.

Wikipedia does not publish original research, which refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Articles should be based on reliable and published sources (see Neutral point of view) and if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Flooded  with them hundreds 11:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Where did I do this? --Canti60 (talk) 19:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (SS John and Monica Catholic Primary School) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating SS John and Monica Catholic Primary School.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, I have redirected this.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 15:30, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Use:Cant60:Your Wikipedia Name/subpage


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Use:Cant60:Your Wikipedia Name/subpage, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Csgir (talk) 11:37, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Question
Are we getting close to a time when your contributions to wikipedia will outweigh the cleanup work you're making for other users by your careless creations such as User:Cant60:Your Wikipedia Name/subpage, & Use:Cant60:Your Wikipedia Name/subpage ? Cabayi (talk) 12:17, 21 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Forgive me if I'm wrong but I get the impression from your edits that I should be pointing you at Guidance for younger editors. Being an Aston Villa fan comes close to uniquely identifying you   Happy editing, Cabayi (talk) 13:19, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you
 * --Canti60 (talk) 14:03, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Moseley Park


Hello, Canti60. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moseley Park".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 10:20, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

 * Can I ask what were the reasons for my block? --Canti60 (talk) 15:11, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * This is shown higher up in this section of your talk page. The specific technical evidence won't be shared. --Yamla (talk) 16:01, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * When you say that, do you mean the reason listed in the block notice?--Canti60 (talk) 16:53, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The bit starting with "Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively." We have no additional information to share with you. --Yamla (talk) 17:37, 25 November 2019 (UTC)