User talk:Captainj

'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Captainj&action=edit&section=new Please click here to leave me a new message. ]  Archive 1: 1st March - 6th June 2006 '''

Thank You


Anarchism
I haven't breached WP:3RR. My sourced edits have been repeatedly deleted, and I'm just reinserting them. If you look into the matter more thoroughly, you'll see that this has nothing to do with reverts and much more to do with a few users trying to delete edits that don't conform to their POV. --AaronS 21:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Good call. Thanks for your concern, too. This article is a terrible mess, and I commend anybody who tries to take a stab at it. I had taken a long hiatus from it, and I think I shall do the same, again. --AaronS 21:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Hogeye
I'm very convinced that's Hogeye, for a whole slew of reasons. It's very clear that a number of IPs are being used to make the same edit, suggesting someone is using multiple IPs. Hogeye has an extensive history of using open proxies, maybe the most extensive on record (see suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hogeye) and has a mountain of disregard for 3RR and other policies (just as a few quick examples,     ). The pattern of these "random IP" edits are also very much Hogeye's style, (i.e. reverting to a very old version that supports his ideology, and attacking specific users through edit summaries). Also, some of the edits have been very clearly made through open proxies, as indicated by the slashes some open proxy sites generate. I'm highly convinced that all these IPs are the same user, and that that user is Hogeye. He doesn't do much to hide it, and one of the IPs made dialogue in the anarchism talk page under "H." In the past he has actually signed explicitly under "Hogeye", even when he was banned. I appreciate other administrators becoming involved with this article, because I'll freely admit I have my own POV of the subject, and one that is contradictory to Hogeye's. I try to intervene as little as possible, but often it's not a page looked after by many other administrators. I actually wasn't involved in Hogeye's ban, which was related to violation of the 3RR, I've just been resetting it after it's been violated. But to be sure, there is a clear pattern to Hogeye's editing. As for the article, the version being used by the IPs is old, maybe a week, and some of the text that is inserted was written by Hogeye months ago. Such reversions are highly controversial, and as they clearly do not have consensus of most editors of the article, should be reverted. Some of his individual points are certainly worthy of discussion on the talk page, but should not be made unilaterally. Sarge Baldy 22:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Irony
While I sympathize greatly with your frustration over the edit war over Anarchism (been there, done that, got the Tshirt), I do find it somewhat ironic that there is somewhat a state of Anarchy in the page. It just appeals to my twisted sense of humor - 22:32, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Comment requested on Emancipation
I've been reverting the addition of what seems to me to be a fairly obvious idiosyncratic entry on the Emancipation disambiguation page (diff). I'm trying to get some additional comment on this - please also see User_talk:FredrickS. - David Oberst 00:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Dear Captainj,

Thank you for being involved with the emancipation brawl. I must take responsibility for not conducting this better, but I can also only function at the max of my capabilities (as I hope is the case for all of us). I need to address something you addressed incorrectly about my first entry. I quote you: "And then, to make it worse, your first quotation, still don't explicitly mention PR (I didn't even bother to read the rest)."

[] on suffrage of blacks, emancipation, and proportional representation. See point 2 in respect to the third paragraph under heading 'Improving Race Relations.' This link contains the words Political Representation as the header to the 12 point delivery. It explains what the 12 points are about (the benefits of PR). It is an edited delivery (but not by me), so the reader will understand what this manifest is talking about:

"[Proportional representation's] advantages over the majority vote may be roughly stated as follows:"

(which is then followed by those twelve points). Point number two states:

"2. It secures nearly complete representation of the whole body of voters in plural elections, by permitting each considerable interest of political society to take to itself its just share of representation by its own votes."

Then: in reference to every person being able to elect their own representatives, the (racist) complaint is addressed that blacks would then also get their own representatives. It is referred to later in the third paragraph under heading 'Improving Race Relations:'

"Unquestionably there is a large mass of honest opinion in the country opposed to colored suffrage, and many of those who support it in Congress and out of Congress put their support of it upon the ground of necessity -- upon the ground that in order to secure the fruits of emancipation it is necessary that the emancipated be armed with the power of self defense."

As a last note: Foreign dictionaries are of importance for a Disambiguity page. When many European articles are translated into English (for it is the current global language) then the reader should be helped to understand the immediate translation.

I pride myself in having put 'suffragettes' on this page. I am currently trying to place 'marxism' on this page. According to me, if there is a need to explain a version of a word, it should be noted on the disambiguity page. Since marxism is such a stark delivery of the political context, I expect that nobody will dare to touch it (though maybe the emancipation of women will get pushed back to 'history.'

It is okay if you do not want to communicate on this any further. I understand that I have stressed you to the max already. Best regards. FredrickS 16:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, &mdash;Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Proposal
Hi, I am posting this message to everyone who has edited on animal rights or animal welfare related articles in the last couple of months. I have just created a proposal for a WikiProject to help co-ordinate editors on the many articles under the mentioned subjects. If you would like to find out about it or show your support for such a project, please visit User:Localzuk/Animal Rights Proposal and WikiProject/List of proposed projects. Cheers, Localzuk (talk) 10:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Peer review/Socialist Studies (1989)/archive1
I note from WikiProject Politics that you're a member of WikiProjects Politics and are based in the UK. I was wondering if you might be able to contribute to a peer review of Socialist Studies, a political group in the UK active since 1991. The request for peer review can be found at Peer review/Socialist Studies (1989)/archive1. —Psychonaut 05:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

This needs to be solved
I have taken the "List of Companies" problem (what to do with an entire class of articles that get repeatedly submitted for deletion en mass?) for debate to two different places. This really needs to be solved once and for all (we can't keep debating the same stuff for eternity). Would you take a look at either the discussion on the Village Pump or the relevant wikiproject? Aditya Kabir 15:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Global Brain
Hello Captainj,

I am rewriting the Global Brain article that has been deleted because of its poor quality. I did get the history of the edits, and I noticed that you once cleaned the article up, noticing some copyright issues (many things were copy-pastes of the "Global Brain FAQ"). It was true of course; but the ironic thing is that the author who made this copy-paste is the author of this FAQ (Francis Heylighen, my collaborator)!

Do you have any idea of what could have been done to avoid this absurd situation?

Best regards, Clément Vidal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clementvidal (talk • contribs) 15:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Invitation
{| class="plainlinks"
 * colspan="3" valign="left" style="width: 100%; background:Navy; padding: 10px;" |

Introducing WikiProject United States Government...

 * valign="top" style="border: 2px Red solid; background: white; padding: 1em; width: 20%; " |[[Image:US-GreatSeal-Obverse.svg|200px]]
 * valign="top" style="border: 2px Red solid; background: white; padding: 1em; width: 20%; " |[[Image:US-GreatSeal-Obverse.svg|200px]]


 * valign="top" style="border: 2px Red solid; background: white; padding: 1em; width: 60%; " | Hello Captainj,

Are you interested in Politics, Law or the United States? Do you enjoy expanding, creating or maintaining articles relating to those subjects? Or do you enjoy the small stuff? Or maybe you like learning about the United States Congress or the Commander in Chief.

Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying.

Thanks in advance, «  Diligent Terrier  Bot    (talk)   21:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

This message has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot on behalf of WikiProject United States Government.

You have received it because you are a member of a related WikiProject or you have said you are interested in your userspace.

Message written by Leonard^Bloom and Diligent Terrier. Help us get the project off the ground and flying.
 * valign="top" style="border: 2px Red solid; background: white; padding: 1em; width: 60%; " |[[Image:Air Force One over Mt. Rushmore.jpg|200px]]


 * }
 * }
 * }
 * }

Circle packing on a strip
I'm not sure if you're still interested, but you asked a question here about 5 years ago, and it's finally been answered :). --99of9 (talk) 04:59, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

List of prominent members, Savile Club
Your comment about plausibility....I knew all these members personally and their membership can be vouched for in the irregularly published membership Lists of the Savile Club.

John Turtle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.142.65 (talk) 11:52, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)