User talk:Cgord

The thumb, etc.
Thanks for chipping in. This is a very big job. 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 01:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Stan


 * The list of events is great. Thanks for doing that.  Other sections, such as a Museum or an Arts and culture section would be good additions.  Or history or geology.  Good examples of some of that stuff (and even at least some general references, cross references) are in Cadillac, Michigan, Traverse City, Michigan and Northern Michigan

Best. 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 18:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Stan


 * Dear Cgord:
 * FYI, I imagine you noticed that one of our esteemed Michigan contributors eliminated the Thumb from the See also. I put it back.7&amp;6=thirteen7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 23:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Stan

Sarnia to Alpena sailboat race
In connection with the Northern Michigan and Alpena, Michigan articles, I wanted to list this Sarnia to Alpena sailboat race. However, going on line,I can't seem to find it. Did it cease to exist?

Any information would be appreciated. 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 17:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Stan


 * I sailed that race several times in the 70s. It was for boats smaller than those in the Port Huron to Mackinaw.  I also earlier posted my thoughts (or lack thereof) about M-25.  I've contacted a road guru from WIki, too.  7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 17:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Stan

Your edits and additions

 * Your edits and additions (IMHO) are very cool. Thanks for the help.  I think we've turned this in to a real article.  BTW, if you follow the link I added about Michigan museums, etc., if we added those to the individual cities (including notes about and links to the real museums), I thin that we would really turn the Thumb into something that was fairly well documented by Wikipedia.  Just a thought.  I know nobody notices (or appreciates) what we've accomplished, but I do.  Best regards.
 * I think it's very funny. There is this whole culture of confrontation over in the Michigan article, and they seem to be locked into a culture of preserving the status quo.  You and I, on the other hand, have chosen to work the fringes, and make a difference in articles that are 'off the radar screen'  I've reworked (to some extent) all the Michigan regional articles (See Michigan discussion for what I believe is a complete list.)  In particular, I reworked the Northern Michigan article substantially.  I think that The Thumb and Northern Michigan are really good.  The Upper Peninsula article is very good, but I think could be improved.  Anywayz, its good to have the help of a kindred spirit.

I don't have the authority to hand out laurels for Wikipedia, but if I could you would surely get one. 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 02:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Stan

7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 01:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Stan


 * It's nice to get recognition, albeit it's mutual. I think the Thumb article is really good.  You did great work.  We did great work.  It shows.  Part of the resaon we could get away with this is that these are the little fringey articles, without an invested following.  If we tried doing this stuff on Michigan it would get totally bogged down.  Southeast Michigan is not nearly as good an article as the Thumb or Northern Michigan, but I'd bet it's got more of a following, and there will be issues.


 * I'm really gratified that The Thumb looks as good as it does. It's a fabulous area that is really underrated.


 * Hoever, I think that the thumb article could be vastly improved if we just used two websites (Michigan Counties on the web) and Michigan attractions (see List of museums in Michigan and the external link at the bottom of the page), and post-holed those sources and put them into the article with the information that ai there. Concurrently, we could do the towns as they would be revealed, plus the counties.  We would find something to say, find the source, and get two or three or four article improvements with  coupounded results.


 * That's a lot of what I've done with the towns and the whole coast of the northeast lower peninsula.


 * I would suggest that Flint/Tri-Cities would be a relatively easy fix, as nobody has ever worked on it. Plus, there is a whole lot of material there.  Midland, Saginaw, and Bay City are troves of undiscovered stuff.  Take a quick gander at List of museums in Michigan and the external link at the bottom of the page.


 * Stay in touch. Thanks for your contributions, even if nobody else notices.  I know.  7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 03:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Stan


 * In terms of playing with towns, I like the articles at Traverse City, Michigan (It was a really good article before I touched it, and it's better now), Manistee, Michigan (I really beefed it up, Alpena, Michigan, Oscoda, Michigan, Grayling, Michigan one of my favorites -- it was almost not an article when I started on it, Forbush, Michigan, a really small town with not much there, but a few assets, and [Harrisville, Michigan]], which I and another fellow really substantially rewrote. Cadillac, Michigan has a really well done article and some good sections that I've not seen elsewhere.


 * Doing these little towns would be not real hard, and could be very rewarding. 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 03:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Stan


 * Here's one of my favorite all time sources for just general information on Michigan and all the little gunk holes that make it up. *A more comprehensive (and interactive with geographic locations) listing of Michigan lighthouses and museums, complete with pictures and descriptions  Another great thing to put into every article is the Clarke Historical Library, Central Michigan University, Bibliographies by county name.  They have something on every little town and valley in there.  7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 03:39, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Stan


 * Here's a table way I've been putting it in articles:

Bibliography and further reading
Gives the reader someplace useful to go, and to find a lot of sources really quick and easy. 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 03:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Stan
 * Clarke Historical Library, Central Michigan University, bibliographies organized by county and region.

Some other thoughts
http://www.michmarkers.com/Frameset.htm
 * Glad that it was useful.
 * MIchigan cities on the web
 * http://www.infomi.com/city/
 * they also have a similar page for Michigan counties
 * And you've probably tried this, but you can do it by county and region. Have to kind of click through different kinds of museums.
 * http://www.michigan.org/travel/city/index.asp?city=G3323
 * I'm really pleased with The Thumb. I think the article is getting reasonably informative.  If you can work it, and do it as part of a system to the counties and the towns, then it can really begin to work.
 * I've been working a number of different regions and cities (e.g., Monroe, Michigan. We can do these.  Heck, Southeast Michigan suck so bad (as an article) that it should be relatively easy to improve.  It didn't mention Warren, Michigan, which I've also worked on a little.
 * BTW, if you run into museums, don't forget to add them to the List of Museums in Michigan, which is still pretty sparse, even as I've doubled it. It needs work.
 * The Terry Pepper website on lighthouses is easily the best. See, e.g., Fort Gratiot Light.  However, he changed the format on his webpage, and the older links on the Lake Huron lighthouses to his webpages in articles are messed up.
 * The Michigan HIstorical marker is so searchable and easy to use, and you can find out a lot about particular locales.
 * I hope you don't mind me being pushy, but I've learned a lot about sources of information, and do like ot share with somebody who is eager to put them to good use.
 * Keep up the good work. God bless you and your effort.  it's a mitzvah.  7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 01:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Stan
 * I thought your use of the External Link *Info Michigan, detailed information on 630 cities in The Thumb was so insightful that I put it in all the Michigan regions and the two peninsula articles.  Hell of a site.  Very useful to readers, since we probably won't get to all the cities and villages they've listed.  7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 02:11, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Stan

A suggestion
Dear Cgord: You might want to go to your user page (not the talk page) and write something on it, however short it might be. Then your name will not appear in red in the "history" of edit sections, which I think would be a good thing. Then you won't be looking like your a newbie, when you aren't. 13:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Stan

Here is a link I think is awesome.
http://www.phmuseum.org/links.html This is a link from the Fort Gratiot light, and it has lots a great and useful information that could be put into The Thumb. 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 19:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Stan

Mackinaw City, Michigan and St. Ignace, Michigan
Glad you liked the pattern. We make a good team. Best regards. 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 00:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Stan

Tables
I don't know how to do those at all. Sorry. I would suggest that you take a look in the history section of one of the articles, find out who put in tables, and recruit them to help. That's what I did with Long Lake (Alpena), for example. BKConrad might be a good source of advice on this stuff -- he's older&wiser, as his signature reminds us.  I think the Thumb is really shaping up.  BTW, I did post something on the Michigan talk page, and also on the personal page of the esteemed editor who dropped [[The Thumbfrom the Michigan article.  7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 00:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Stan

Port Sanilac lighthouse
New article. I'm sure you can assist when you find the time. 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 01:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Stan

The Thumb Radio Stations
You recently added a template of radio stations in the thumb. The template has been edited and many stations have been changed. (One station I know about has been removed -- WLEW.) I'm not familar enough to edit this Template. Maybe, you have a backup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HB Edit (talk • contribs) 10:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Thumb Radio
A tag has been placed on Thumb Radio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please note, the template you were attempting to create already exists. Milonica (talk) 16:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Michigan sugar processing
I think you should research this more, as I know beet processing takes place soon after harvest, starting roughly in October. I live a couple miles from a Michgan Sugar plant, so I can attest to when the processing starts. You can smell the sweet odor for many miles.Asher196 (talk) 04:14, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Thumb lighthouses
I've been puttering around the Thumb (not so much Saginaw), and have done quite a bit of work on these. I would appreciate it if you would take a look-see and put in your 2 cents. You're doing a great job (from my perspective). The Thumb is looking really good. Thumbs UP!! 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 22:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC) Stan
 * Glad that you're happy with Northern Michigan. I think it worked out.  We were lucky, as it is far enough off the radar that we don't have the incessant edit wars and nattering about edits the way they do in Michigan.  I stay largely away from there.
 * I'm sitting in the hospital waiting for my son and daughter-in-law to have their first baby deivered. The screen here in the waitin room is kinda small -- not ideal for the hockey game.
 * Surely there are other things than Wikipedia. Enjoy the game.  It is definitely important that they win tonight and at home
 * Have a happy evening. Best regards.  7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 01:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC) Stan

WSGW
Are both WSGW-AM and WSGW-FM broadcasting the same lineup? If not, they don't need to share a single article. JPG-GR (talk) 04:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

South Michigan
I left you a message here. I have lived in Waterford in Oakland County for over 30 years and never heared anyone use the term "Southern Michigan". If we're going to have an article with that title, I think we should at least have a map that uses that name, and the current map does not. --Thomprod (talk) 19:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * [Copied from User talk:Thomprod to keep the thread together:] Sorry if I haven't gotten back to you sooner. Oakland county is in Southeast Michigan, not Southern Michigan. The latter term is used to describe the south central part of the state, not Mid-Michigan, but Southern Michigan. This includes Hillsdale, Coldwater, and Jackson.Cgord talk 15:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I am aware that Oakland County is in Southeast Michigan. My point was that if we have an article called Southern Michigan, the article should at least have a map that uses that name, and the current map does not. The article also mentions that "Southern Michigan is a subregion of Central Michigan" but the map does not illustrate either area. The map should be changed. --Thomprod (talk) 23:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Schedule on WSGW
Please do not readd radio schedules to any page. They are in clear violation to WP:NOT and should not be added under any circumstances. -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 05:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Thumb Radio
I have nominated Thumb Radio, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Thumb Radio. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 06:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 06:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I replied to you on my page, and have posted responses to the nomination for deletion. I would think you might want to put in your 2 cents.  7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 18:12, 20 August 2009 (UTC) Stan

Orphaned non-free image File:Viking head.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Viking head.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:41, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Request
Cgord, I'd like to send you an e-mail. You do not seem to get wiki e-mail. Please e-mail me through wikipedia. Thanks. 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2010 (UTC) Stan

File:DTE St Clair.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DTE St Clair.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Slon02 (talk) 17:21, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:DTE St Clair.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:DTE St Clair.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:38, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Tri Cities Michigan Map.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Tri Cities Michigan Map.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Lambton Generating.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lambton Generating.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.78.53 (talk) 01:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WHLSGoodTimesLogo.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:WHLSGoodTimesLogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blue Water Council CSP.png
Thanks for uploading File:Blue Water Council CSP.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Thumb Counties.png


The file File:Thumb Counties.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bargabroadcasting.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bargabroadcasting.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Thumb Area Michigan Map.jpg


The file File:Thumb Area Michigan Map.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wsgw fm am.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Wsgw fm am.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sanilac/GB Broadcasting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanilac/GB Broadcasting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sanilac/GB Broadcasting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Let&#39;srun (talk) 18:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)