User talk:CharlieMehta

Welcome!
Hi CGGCA201! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! -- 🐦DrWho42  👻  12:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I am truly grateful to be a part of Wikipedia, and I am eager to contribute and make a positive impact in any way I can. Thank you for your warm welcome and for sharing important tutorials and links. Your kindness will always be remembered. CGGCA201 (talk) 12:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Hello, I'm Dl2000. I noticed that you recently removed content from K. N. Pandita without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dl2000 (talk) 17:46, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

SPAs in Deletion Discussions
I saw you struck your comments on a couple if discussions on advice from Liz. Thanks for that. For note, however, there is a neutral way to bring the attention of the discussion closer to the fact that a Single Purpose Account is contributing to a discussion. Have a read of Single-purpose account. You can use the subst per the instructions there when, as here, a new user comes in and starts !voting on deletion discussions without having any other other edits. Just something to bear in mind in the future. Take care, and happy editing. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * @Sirfurboy Thank you for sharing this important tutorial on SPA. At the moment, I find myself overwhelmed by the multitude of Wikipedia rules. I believe I require some time to process and internalize them. CGGCA201 (talk) 08:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, we all do. But don't worry, new editors in good faith are given plenty of latitude as they become acquainted with the rules and guidelines. Good to see you here. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm Dahoru. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Adani Group have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Also requesting to explain, which policy has been violated Dahoru (talk) 05:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Including earnings reports in the lede is not relevant. Refer WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Charlie (talk) 05:36, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @User:CharlieMehta Thank you for responding. I have thoroughly reviewed the policy and believe that the information I provided meets the criteria for encyclopedic value. The policy says, In order to ensure encyclopedic value, it is important to provide data in context with explanations that are referenced to independent sources. I have taken utmost care to incorporate this requirement into the content I provided. Additionally, I have included the relevant references to support the information presented. Considering the above, I kindly request you to clarifying why you believe the content violates the policy? Dahoru (talk) 06:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, after waiting for your reply I have reverted your edits. I have cited sources that establish the policy as per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. If you think the edit is not constructive you can start discussion here Talk:Adani Group. Requesting to not revert the edit again without any proper explanation. Thank You. Dahoru (talk) 16:40, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Dahoru I have previously addressed your concern, citing the relevant rule. To delve deeper into this matter, kindly navigate to your talk page, where you can provide a response at your convenience. Charlie (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @User:CharlieMehta Thanks for your response, I will request you to understand what Wikipedia actually is. It's not just about updating negative things on the page, what exactly you are doing. It's a platform that strives to provide neutral and unbiased information to its readers. So, before you jump to conclusions and make changes, please take a moment to grasp this concept. It is not a tool for personal biases or agendas. However, I must remind you that Wikipedia is not controlled by any single individual or biased perspective. So, If you have any issues or concerns with the content, I kindly request that you discuss them on the talk page. It's always better to have a discussion and consider other editors' points of view. Dahoru (talk) 18:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello! This material is very poorly written, nearly useless, and borderline unintelligible. Consensus is for this hot garbage to not be included – especially not within the lede (MOS trumps you). If you want it in: you'll need to hammer it out on article Talk. Further attempts to shoehorn it without consensus after PP was lifted will be reported swiftly(-ish) to AIV; so you better really hammer it out first… Good luck, and Happy Trails! -- dsprc   [talk]  12:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your signature
Hello, CharlieMehta,

This is a request to please change your signature that you used to sign your messages or AFD reports. Right now, both your User page and talk page show up as green links. This means that you have directed editors to a Redirect page rather than your actual User pages. I'm not sure why you are doing this unless you have changed your username recently but it would be better to just have a regular signature that includes your username and direct links, especially to your User talk page. You can access your Signature options through your Preferences. Thank you for seeing to this. Liz Read! Talk! 04:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Also, do you have any connection to editor DJ InstaMalik? They are a new editor who has commented on all of your AFDs which is highly unusual. If they are an alternative account of yours, please declare this on your User page and do not have them editing to support your position in deletion discussions. Without a disclosure, this could look an awful lot like sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry if they are an associate of yours. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 04:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Liz Thank you for informing me about the signature issue. I have corrected it following your instructions. Also, I want to clarify that I have no affiliation with DJ InstaMalik. However, it appears that this account is attempting to comment on all the AfDs I've recently nominated. Interestingly, on one specific page, the same account copied text from Bajaj Finance's page, which I had contributed, and pasted it onto Sanjiv Bajaj, the founder's page. I have already reversed the changes in good faith. Charlie (talk) 07:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 59
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 59, September – October 2023 
 * Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
 * Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Mrs. Bectors Food
Hello, CharlieMehta,

Your draftification was reverted. Please ensure you have read WP:DRAFTIFY thoroughly, and follow the guidelines on when draftification is an appropriate action to take and when other alternatives should be pursued. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @Liz, Sorry. I made a mistake because I got mixed up by how the quality of the article at the top of the page was shown ("An unassessed article from Wikipedia"). I will not repeat this again. Charlie (talk) 14:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Arak Oil Refinery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arak. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 60
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 60, November – December 2023 
 * Three new partners
 * Google Scholar integration
 * How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Sanjeev Singla
Hi. may I ask what is wrong with the page thet made you move it to a draft? explananing your acts can halp me to fixs what ever you feel needs to be corected, but whithout one I dont see who one can know what is needed to be done. Pen Man (talk) 10:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @איש עיטי Thank you for getting in touch. I have just responded on Sanjeev Singla's draft talk page. Charlie (talk) 15:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 61
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 61, January – February 2024 
 * Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
 * 1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Singla has been accepted
 Sanjeev Singla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Sanjeev_Singla help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 23:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

 * @Klbrain Thanks for being patient and understanding. I am just trying to learn the basics. Charlie (talk) 12:37, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

About Govind Dholakia Article deletion
Dear Charlie Mehta On what grounds you want to delete this page or wanted to nominate to delete it?? Everything was well sourced and with upto the mark citation please help us to understand or justify your point. If you don't consider leading news paper then help us with the example of right sources

Please help or restore the page as per 20th March 24 FrankoSayHi5 (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, CharlieMehta. Thank you for your work on Lonuziyaaraiy Park. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   16:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @SunDawn Thank you. It's great to hear that you have reviewed my article. Wishing you and your family a wonderful and blessed day too. Charlie (talk) 12:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, CharlieMehta. Thank you for your work on Institute of Petroleum Safety, Health and Environment Management. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @North8000 Thank you. Charlie (talk) 17:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi CharlieMehta, thank you for your work on E-ShodhSindhu. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of our new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 08:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @Klbrain Agreed and Noted. Thanks. Charlie (talk) 17:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 62
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 62, March – April 2024 
 * IEEE and Haaretz now available
 * Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
 * Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Turning Point: The Bomb And The Cold War moved to draftspace - Self Notification
An article which I have recently created, Turning Point: The Bomb And The Cold War, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved my own draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where I can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When I feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, I will move it back or submit it for a review. Charlie (talk) 05:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Turning Point The Bomb And The Cold War.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Turning Point The Bomb And The Cold War.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi CharlieMehta, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)


 * @Just Step Sideways Thank you for approving autopatroller rights. I have just set up the Rater and StubSorter scripts. Let me take some time to familiarize myself with them, and then I will definitely consider applying for the NPP. Charlie (talk) 05:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi CharlieMehta, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:


 * Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
 * If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
 * If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! –&#8239;Joe (talk) 06:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Charlie (talk) 03:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You should probably consider slowing down in your speedy tagging. For example, WP:G5 does not apply just because a page was created by a blocked user. I've removed two G5 tags of yours.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Slowing down. Let me go back and check the recent G5 tagged articles I marked, review them, and remove the tag. Thank you for the advice. Sorry, I got a bit carried away. Charlie (talk) 16:50, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Arab Bank Maroc Article
Hi CharlieMehta,

I noticed that you moved my article, "Arab Bank Maroc," to Draft:Arab Bank Maroc. Could you please explain the reasons for this action? I would like to understand any issues with the article so that I can address them effectively. Thank you for your guidance and assistance. Best regards, Adil Faouzi (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Adil, please ensure that the page meets the WP:NCORP, WP:ORGCRIT guidelines and includes at least three references according to WP:RSP. You can refer to few bank pages and use them as standard templates - Arab Bank, Bank Al-Maghrib etc. Charlie (talk) 16:58, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello Charlie, I hope you are doing well. I suggest using the MoveToDraft tool whenever you need to draftify articles. It will automate the process for you, including notifying the creator with the specific reason behind the draftification, which was not done when you moved this article. Grab Up  -  Talk  03:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Grabup I am doing well, thank you. I hope you are doing great too! I just installed the MoveToDraft tool like you suggested. Thanks for the tip and for helping me out. Lately, I goofed up with the NPP review. I am taking a step back and seeking some assistance to learn. If I find it to be too overwhelming, I am going to surrender my NPP rights and get back to basic editing. Charlie (talk) 04:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply and I am also doing well. Your NPP reviews seem good, but your CSDs, especially G5, are problematic. I suggest you continue reviewing but learn more about CSDs before tagging. Grab Up  -  Talk  05:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 63
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 63, May – June 2024 <div style="margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: 1.2em;"> Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * One new partner
 * 1Lib1Ref
 * Spotlight: References check

Comments on declined draft article
I want to thank you for reviewing my draft, it had been pending for a while.

You declined my submission for this draft stating a copyright issue. However, the contents of the page you mentioned are licensed under GODL which is accepted as a copyright free license on Wikipedia.

Some additional questions: 1. How did you arrive at the % overlap figure? 2. How do I become a reviewer of drafts that other people have created? Skratata69 (talk) 18:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)


 * @Skratata69 Thanks to you for creating this draft. From what I understand, it's okay to use GODL for images and diagrams on Wikimedia Commons. For text, it needs to be free of copyright from wherever it comes from. I might be wrong, so I suggest you ask about this at WT:AFC. Answers to additional questions; If you want to check your draft for copyright overlap, please use this tool: https://copyvios.toolforge.org/ and to become an reviewer of drafts, visit: WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Participants. Charlie (talk) 01:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Skratata69, you do not qualify to become a reviewer. You do not have a sufficient number of edits. I suspect you're not qualified for other reasons as well, but no need to go into that.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, was just asking since there seems to be a huge backlog Skratata69 (talk) 04:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I will ask a question there Skratata69 (talk) 04:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

When you find a copyvio
Please delete that material, and ask for a CV-revdel.

When reviewing and declining as a copyvio but not flagging the entire draft for deletion, the decline box has a big red banner. This means we, the declining reviewers, have work to do before we move on. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I will make this work my top priority this weekend. Charlie (talk) 17:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * In case this is about my draft, please don't delete my draft yet. I worked hard on it and there isn't a clear copyright vio (yet) Skratata69 (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Please don't worry, I will not get your draft deleted. However, it does need some trimming to conclude my review. Charlie (talk) 18:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Skratata69 It was a general comment to guide Charlie for the future in case they were unaware. I'm sure they were. loads to know al at once when entering a new area.
 * Charlie - the AFC decline parameter "cv" shoudl go to 'cv-cleaned" once you have done whatever you need and requested cv-revdel.
 * Good to meet you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * If it helps, I've just looked at the CV report]. It appears to me that the words copied are technical terms which cannot be rewritten without altering the meaning. While not exactly a false positive I think this may well not be a copyvio. You may disagree. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Timtrent Nice to meet you. I revised the page and lowered the plagiarism percentage from 33% to 18%. I also added a "further reading" section at Draft:Sovereign_Gold_Bond. Since the draft was rejected again, should I request a CV-revdel? Charlie (talk) 02:43, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I almost never take the percentage as a guide. I use the CV detector tool and examine what the duplicated words are. Looking at this draft I can see that most are strings of words that cannot reasonably be changed. Actual names for things trigger the detector, and these are, in the main, actual names for things.
 * What I would do is to look at your previous decline, and change the cv parameter to cv-cleaned, and treat it then as "job done", because I cannot see anything to delete/hide. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I should rephrase that. I use the percentage to tell me it is worth my effort to redact. >50% is likely to be worthwhile, <50% less likely. <40% unlikely 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC)