User talk:Chick Bowen/Archive1

'''This is an archive. Please do not edit it.'''

Links
Hi there, Chick. Thanks for the message. Regarding what to link and what not to, take a look at Manual of Style (links), and read it in the context of the two-sides-of-the-coin debate on Make only links relevant to the context and Build the web.

But what I was thinking of when I linked to the orchestra was a line on Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) which says, "Redlinks (links to articles not yet written) may be included only if you are confident that an encyclopedia article could be written on the subject." I'm sure the Toledo Symphony Orchestra (yes, I did it again...) qualifies under that guideline. Link it often enough, and someone will eventually write an article. Cheers, –Hajor 16:49, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

List of literary movements
Hi Chick: Thanks for dropping me a line. I appreciate being invited to participate. I was the fellow who originally VfD'd this article, so it's nice to see someone take an interest. While I too am unhappy with some of the McDefinitions on the list, I do think (as was suggested in the VfD discussion long ago) that we need to treat this article as an annotated list rather than a series of short essays.Dave1898 10:40, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * And thanks for improving my paragraph about naturalism. As a suggestion for an alternative name, try finding the thing you like the most and add it to your astrological sign.--HistoricalPisces 18:32, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Other than that he was associated with people involved in the 1919 World Series scandal, I don't have anything against your user name.--HistoricalPisces 16:42, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Re: User:135.214.154.104
No, not really. The IP address is from a major U.S. corporation, and had been blocked because someone I blocked for violating 3RR was using the IP address. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | WS 20:02, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

Re: AfD: Kaiser Wassili I
Yep, I'm keeping up on it. Left a comment on the AfD page and changed my vote. –ArmadniGeneral (talk • contribs) 01:28, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

Toledo Museum of Art
Love the painting you selected for the Toledo Museum of Art article! I have been hunting for a good candidate all week, but could not find a good sized one to add. All the good candidates I found were landscape-sized (such as Cropsey's Starrucca Viaduct or my favourite painting in the collection, Doré's Scottish Highlands) rather than the portrait-sized that fits best into wiki articles. Great choice! :-)

Olympic-style shooting sports
Thanks for notifying me. Indeed there is nothing here that cannot be found in International Shooting Sport Federation and ISSF shooting events. I guess it would be quite harmless to turn the article into a redirect to the latter, but I doubt that someone would type in the title, so it would probably not do much good, either. -- Jao 15:26, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Daryle Lamont Jenkins
I've deleted that article, and removed his personal info from another.-gadfium 04:14, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Win
When you moved Win to Win (baseball), was it just for general consistency or for any particular reason? I ask because I note that there's already a disambig page at WIN, and I'm wondering whether that material should be incorporated into a new, bigger, better disambig page at Win, which would be made possible by your move. Or did you have something else you wanted to do with it? Chick Bowen 00:07, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Yep: consistency (in line with Hit and Hit (baseball)) as there are plenty of other meanings: Win (band), Ne Win, etc., that definitely could be merged with the WIN disambiguation. I didn't realise how complicated a move it would turn out to be; an older attempt to do similar has left many pages linking to Win (baseball statistics) and other variants. Another side issue is that Winning links only to the baseball definition, despite none of the pages linking to it meaning it in that sense. Tearlach 00:42, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

OwenX's RfA
Thank you for your support on my RfA. Your kind words are well appreciated. Owen&times; &#9742;  22:26, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

WIkiversity
So, after following the link to your page from House of Pomegranates, you have persuaded me to sign up on Meta to vote against Wikiversity. Good going. DS 18:16, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Registy/Registry
Thanks for pointing out my mistaking registy for registry. I changed my vote to redirect. Sometimes you see what you expect to see, instead of what it actually is. --Rogerd 23:46, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

Monkey controls robotic arm
Chick Bowen: I just felt as though I had to disagree on record. From the current viewpoint, it doesn't seem as though that specific research paper is enough to merit its own page, however I strongly feel as though 5-10 years from now as more and more brain-computer interface work comes out, people will look back on that paper as a turnig point for the field and for the PLoS journal. However one cannot build a consensus from a feeling, nor can I claim to be unbiased, as this is my research field. The original author made good points that I felt were not answered, but should be before deleting or merging the article. However a consensus was reached never the less, and I happily accept the outcome. Such is the nature of wikipedia! Thanks for thinking to leave comment on my page, however. I appreciate it. Best! semiconscious ( talk  ·  home) 17:24, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Mário de Andrade
OK. The move seems utterly non-controversial and all I'd be deleting is a redirect with trivial history, so I'm going to go ahead and be bold. (The backlog on WP:RM is appalling at the moment.) –Hajor 18:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * No problem. Well done adding the disambiguation header on the MdA (Brazil) article (which was why I opened it up, but then entirely forgot about it.) Cheers, –Hajor 21:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Syncretists
Thanks for the heads-up. I'm pondering and asked the question on the AfD subpage as to if others feel the 4 "leaders" should go, too. Filiocht | The kettle's on 07:17, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Welcome from Redwolf24


I noticed you hadn't gotten one of these yet. And thanks for your kind words at my RfC. Cheers :) R  e  dwolf24  (talk&mdash;How's my driving?) 23:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

re mergeto on Cognitive grammar
Hi Chick. I noticed you added a mergeto on the Cognitive grammar article. That stub pertains to a specific cognitive approach to grammar, namely the "Cognitive Grammar" framework created by Ronald Langacker (a type of construction grammar). The article should probably be named Cognitive Grammar, but it shouldn't be merged into Cognitive approaches to grammar. If you think "cognitive grammar" is too generic to go to a little known framework, then it should probably go to a disambiguation page. I've kept an eye on what links to Cognitive grammar and it all pertains specifically to Langacker's framework, not to anything generic. Mike Dillon 04:05, 16 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I know the current Cognitive grammar stub sucks and is definitely substandard in terms of both content and clarity. I'm not sure about any controversy, but my understanding is that "Cognitive Grammar" is its own framework. In my school days, it was referred to as a type of construction grammar, but I don't recall Langacker himself saying that in the text. For those reasons, I don't think a redirect is appropriate either. I've removed the merge tags from both articles. If I have some time later, I'll attempt to improve the Cognitive grammar article, since I do have both volumes of Langacker's Foundations of Cognitive Grammar on hand. Mike Dillon 16:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Mário
Thanks for letting me know; I'll be sure to take a look. –Hajor 01:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Mário de Andrade
I will have a look later this evening. The poster is I think public domain anyway, will retag with explanation later. Are there other useful online sources of images for him? Justinc 15:41, 18 October 2005 (UTC)


 * ok have had a first look. I have tagged the poster as it is before 1.1.1923 (basically everything before then is PD in the US even if not elsewhere, but this is fine for wikipedia). You have picked the difficult period of course - copyright still valid for a few more years, but the people not alive to get free stuff. The painting I am slightly unsure about (FA terms need to be very clear). Can you find out about why it was painted and how they knew each other? Looking at it its very much in the early modern movement style, I would guess that with some research you could bring out enough between the relation between Andrade and Segall to make an excellent fair use case (there are a few mentions in the Segall article that hint that they were part of the same group).


 * The photo I would be happy to sign off as especially if you write more about his photography, especially as it is a self portrait in a sense. Currency is very country dependent, I will check it out for Brazil, but as that is a currency that no longer exists it might be PD anyway; its fine as fair use but some countries currencies are simply illegal to reproduce which makes the international situation confused.


 * In terms of other free pictures, try to find anything before 1923. Also there are wikipedians in Brazil who could take pictures (I dont know what there is left, houses, places, memorials etc are often good). Do you know where the photographs are? or the archives? Who the heirs are?


 * As I was writing this I just linked the article to the one in pt wikipedia, and got your message - must press the save button and look at the links in your message.... Justinc 00:25, 19 October 2005 (UTC)


 * oh forgot to say, its a really great article. You should go to Brazil if you get the chance, its a fascinating place. I went years ago and would love to go back. I have linked the article to the portuguese one both ways now - would be worth talking to them (though they have no pictures at the moment). Justinc 00:31, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

More Mário
Good luck with with the FA drive! I might find the courage to stop by and cast a vote, but that's not really a place I frequent. By the way, are you unaware of the article Macunaima, or are you just giving it the (deserved) cold shoulder? –Hajor 03:00, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

And more Mário: wow. I had placed a request for this one some months ago (while playing Brazilian music and looking for more information)&mdash;just noticed the link was no longer red, and was delighted to see what you'd done with it. Nice work. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:41, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

The article on Mário was astonishing. I am brazilian, I´ve read and studied his books, I´m familiar with the subject. Congratulations and thank you! Subramanian talk 04:46, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Hippolitie Taine.gif has been listed for deletion
Re Your message "Image:Hippolitie Taine.gif has been listed for deletion". Please go ahead and delete. A far better image has now been added to the Hippolyte Taine article. Lumos3 20:27, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Juan Berenguer
Thanks for fixing that article up, I saw it come through on New Page patrol and wanted to make sure it wasn't speedied (it wasn't in very good shape and you never know), so I slapped something on it. I didn't check on that stub...I pulled it right off of stub-types, oh well. Anyway, thanks again! Rx StrangeLove 03:52, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you very much for your support and kind message on my behalf. I look forward to working with you in the future. -- a.n.o.n.y.m  t 04:48, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations
On getting Mário de Andrade to FA status. Justinc 21:32, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Bounty Board
Greetings. You've recently been involved with working on get articles up to featured status, so I wanted to let you know about a new page, Bounty board. People have put up monetary bounties for certain articles reaching featured status - if the article makes it, the bounty lister donates the stated amount of money to the Wikimedia Foundation. So you can work on making articles featured, and donate other people's money at the same time. If this sounds interesting, I hope you stop by. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 01:03, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Mário
Congrats! –Hajor 16:06, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank very much for your supporting comment. I wish you my best. Regards a.n.o.n.y.m t 17:34, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Re : consensus
Hi Bowen,

Thanks for your message, will remember to get the word 'concensus' 'consensus' right the next time round. ;)

- Cheers, Mailer Diablo 16:59, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

The George Psalmanazar International Appreciation Society is pleased to announce...
A donation of $10 USD has been made in your name to the Wikimedia Foundation. May Mário de Andrade no longer be forgotten!--Pharos 00:23, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Haukur's RFA
Þank you for supporting my nomination till ðe end. Your assessment meant a lot to me in what I found to be a difficult day. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 21:49, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Sicilian octave
Chick, buona sera. Thanks for looking at that for me...I'm no expert. Thanks for all your good work on Wikipedia. --Dpr 02:53, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

tnx and acad stubs
Hello, Chick, and thanks for your encouragement. I have been postponing some pitching in for a year or so but now finally taken the plunge and was a bit worried about the myriad caveats I read long ago on a talk page about academic stubs. When there is a red link to someone in an article is it better to do nothing than give a few categories and a major book title? There is another unstubbed living linguist whose book I've read that it bothers me to see in red, too. I feel weird about this because they are also living people (whom I don't exactly know) but it seems to me that at least the title was a better start for others than nothing at all. Ph7five 00:37, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

football categories
Yeah, I had the same thought. I haven't figured out what to do with Dowling or the actors in that section who achieved more notoreity after their playing days. I had to create a number of new categories when I cleaned up the Basketball and Baseball categories, so I'm sure something will get figured out.--Mike Selinker 23:28, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Combining the two into Ivy League football (that's a statelier name anyhow) sounds fine to me. Go ahead and do it, as I'm not sure I can change a category name.--Mike Selinker 17:33, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for covering my talk page
Much appreciated. Josh Parris # 01:28, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments
Just letting you know, I plan to ignore all your advice--Etyheryery 04:11, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Questionable earldoms
Nah, that can go away. It was used for separating out Anglo-Saxon earldoms. The principle is well established now, so there's no need for the page. Mackensen &#91;&#91;User_talk:Mackensen&#124;(talk)]] 02:05, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Re: afd
Yes, you're right, it was the result of having a script do it all (the AFD Nomination feature is still experimental; the voting feature was its original purpose). And it'll take significant changes to fix it for the case where an AFD has been made before. But I'll put it on the ToDo list and hopefully get to it soon, and in the meantime, try to avoid it! Thanks. user:jnothman talk 01:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Thank you
Just wanted to drop by and thank you for taking the time to comment on my RfA. I really appreciate the feedback. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 15:28, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Proposal up for a vote
A new proposal on representation of Norse mythology names is now up for a vote. I'm letting you know because you commented on that page :) - Haukur Þorgeirsson 00:51, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Andrade
Hello Chick Bowen. Just to let you know that I did read you comment on my page about the Andrade issues and that I shall adress them soon (probably only this weekend, though, as I am without time at present). I assure you that there are good reasons for what I did and also that I hadn't finished doing everything. Of course you might come to desagree with me... I'll get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks! The Ogre 01:10, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Hi Chick Bowen. Sorry for the delay. I've changed stuff in the Andrade article and made Andrade (disambiguation) a redirect page to the main article, since it concerns only people with the surname Andrade that are already listed in the main one. What do you think? The Ogre 19:11, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Hi again Chick Bowen. You're right, so I've reverted the changes to Andrade (disambiguation) and removed all those people from the arcile Andrade. There's really no need to discuss who is a member of the family or not. Let's just say that the disambiguation page is a list of people and the main article is on the origins of the family. Do you think it's ok now? The Ogre 19:58, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

My user page
Thanks for the fix. Cheers! – ClockworkSoul 03:18, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

RFA for TheParanoidOne
Hello Chick Bowen. Thanks for the vote of confidence in my RFA. I have now officially received the badge, so I shall try my best to be a good administrator. Thanks again. --TheParanoidOne 21:23, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Eastern Idaho Railroad
Chick by the way i am the copyright holder of the part that was copy in toEastern_Idaho_Railroad! If you look here NWOR you will see me Steve Spring listed as "Feature Contributor", NWOR was never a commercial site but a e-zine. The writers and photographers never gave up there copyright to NWOR, it was a one time use. The part that i copy i wrote. Otherwiss i would not of posted the link. If you look at this page that is mygallerys at pbase you will see that i use lazarus long as a user name and my real name is listed on the top left of the page. Now i know i need to add references but i still am learning. I still trying to figer out how you can site your self though?Lazarus-long 21:55, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

YES PLEASE! HELP!
SORRY! What I did was:


 * Moved "Unitarianism" to "Unitarianism (theology)".
 * Created a disambig page called "Unitarianism", which listed:
 * "Unitarianism (theology)"
 * "Unitarian Universalism"
 * (also a link to Politics of Spain per a link I later on an artifact page (probably no incoming links) called "Unitarianism (disambiguation)")

But I didn't check links first, and then found VERY MANY incoming links to "Unitarianism". And I didn't tbink I could check and adjust all those links without making mistakes.

So I was just going to put it back the way it was, and put a disambig notice at the top of "Unitarianism". But it wouldn't let me rename the links pages to holding titles, I guess... it kept re-creating the page as a link to the holding title.

So I had to leave it the way I did it, with "Unitarianism" being a disambig page.

That's not SO bad. In fact I'm not sure that's better. Here in the USA at least, when you say for instance "I'm a Unitarian" everyone understands that to mean "member of the Unitarian Universalist church" rather than "a non-Trinitarian, not necessarily a member of any church". And I don't think its appropriate for Unitarian and Unitarianism to default to the more obscure term.

But I dunno about all those links. So I guess It should go back. Its complicated. In the article about (say) Arianism, the link should go to the theology (as it did before I started my changes). But in the link for Joe Schmoe, where it says he's a Unitarian minister, it should go to Unitarian Universalism (which it won't do if everything is restored).

But it's very hard to tell in some articles what is meant by Unitarianism -- does it mean he was member of that church, or a precursor, or another non-Trinitarian church, or just didn't believe in the Trinity.

I'm not up to sorting all that out. So the safe thing would be to restore it as it was.

But maybe its OK to leave it as it is not, with everything going to the disambig page, and let the user work out where she wants to go. Anyway this came up because "Nontrinitarianism" is up for being merged with "Unitarianism".

I don't know. I think it would be safer to restore it the way it was. Unless you disagree, would you do that? I can't because I can't delete. THANKS!!!! All you have to do is:


 *  Delete disambig page "Unitarianism", and
 *  Move "Unitarianism (theology)" back to just "Unitarianism"

THANK YOU for your kind offer of help! Herostratus 21:21, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Unitarianism: yes, great, thanks!!!
Yes, exactly, I agree, a disambig page is extra work for the reader. Yes start it up per your kind offer, thank you! Herostratus 21:55, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * OK, great, thanks. Herostratus 22:25, 7 December 2005 (UTC) P.S. I used to work with the son of Al Naples... who played I think seven games (maybe it was 7 at bats) with the Browns...

My failed RFA :)
Dear Chick Bowen, I would like to thank you for supporting me on my RfA. Even though it failed with a with the final tally of 55/22/6, I want to thank you anyways. I don't want to be one a admin anymore until I reach 10,000 edits now that it's over with. Thanks --Jaranda wat's sup 02:47, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Awolf002 RfA
Thank you very much for your support for my RfA. I will do everything I can to justify your trust in me. Awolf002 03:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:BoycottWikipedia.jpg
Please vote to keep my image on Wikipedia. You may voice your opinion on whether or not to have the image deleted at [Dec 10th images]. I also wanted to let you know that it looks like my WBC personal subpage will remain on Wikipedia.--JuanMuslim 1m 22:59, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

administrator badge
Can I get in trouble for having an admin badge when I'm not one? otherwise well I would like to keep it hehe.. --Mistress Selina Kyle 23:40, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

How did you find the computer help desk?
Hello again,

I was curious how you found the Computer help desk; I've been trying to get the word out on it and I'd like to know what was effective enough that you were able to find it. Can you let me know? Thanks! Triddle 03:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Picture
ChickBowen, this is ajm786. You left me a message that was pertaining to the article on Alyssa Milano, stating where I got the picture I posted.

The picture is available to the public on lots of websites, so would it suffice if I just provided one of these?

WikiProject Neuroscience
ChickBowen: I'm trying to revive the temporarily defunct WikiProject Neuroscience. Because of your past edits on neuroscience related articles in the past, I thought I'd let you know. Cheers. :) Semiconscious ( talk  ·  home) 06:38, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Izehar's RfA
Hi Chick Bowen, I would like to thank you for your kind support on my RfA. I'll do my best to be a good administrator. If you need anything or if I ever do something I shouldn't have, please, don't hesitate to drop me a line. Izehar 16:26, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

ChickBowen,

I can edit the article to add the event to it, if necessary. The events attended by she are not private (no media allowed) type of events, so I'm sure it would be ok for you to keep the image.

Thanks. ajm786

Re: My user page
Thanks for fixing my user page for me, I would have otherwised not noticed! That's what you get for being a recent changes patroller! --Winter 02:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Please delete "Herzog-Schonheim conjecture" for me
The old one "Herzog-Schonheim conjecture" I have created should be deleted completely since I have built the correct one "Herzog-Sch\"onheim conjecture"

Italian capitalization
Thanks for your note. I am working on opera so I will leave the capitalization of the literature article to you.

I don't agree with applying English capitalization rules to other languages. No publishers do it that way and Wikipedia should not either. Just common sense really. Imagine if German capitalization was applied to English! Would that be acceptable? I don't think so.

Kleinzach 00:28, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


 * You write "I don't think it makes sense to change the occurrences of the title in the article without moving the article itself." Agreed. There was a problem with the redirect so I didn't do it after the editing as I had intended.


 * You write "I noticed that the opera of OF was not capitalized the same way. I've left a message about this at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style."


 * We have about 500 articles on opera so changing the rules would be a major problem. We follow the New Grove Dictionary of Opera on style. This is the standard reference.


 * Opera is an international world. It's worth remembering that almost all operas are now performed in their original languages (Italian, French, German, Russian, Czech or whatever) in the Anglo countries. We do not try to Anglicize them. (Only a handful of operas are known by customary English names.)


 * You write "I think the encyclopedia as a whole should be consistent." I agree there have to be rules but they have to be intelligent ones. Applying crude (dumbing down) rules across the board and across different languages would be ugly, and I don't believe it's possible anyway. Wikipedia is too diverse.


 * Kleinzach 01:10, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I have found a page on this issue: Naming conventions (operas) which says "If the opera's title is rendered in its original language, capitalization in the title should follow the usage in the most recent editions of New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians". That's clear enough, isn't it?


 * Kleinzach 01:28, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


 * My concern is the opera articles. I will leave the Italian literature capitalization to you and not make any further changes.


 * Kleinzach 01:35, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Page move
Hi Chick. I deleted the redirect and also moved the page to Niccolò Tribolo. Cheers -- a.n.o.n.y.m  t 02:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)