User talk:ChocolateRabbit


 * I monitor my talk page regularly and will reply to your messages when I have time
 * If you leave messages for me here I will reply here
 * Please sign your message(s) so I know who you are
 * If you have left me a message on your talk page feel free to add the ' template below'''
 * Please only leave polite messages
 * Any vandalism will be reverted
 * If you would like to leave me a message please click here
 * Once a discussion has been closed it may be archived by either me or Lowercase sigmabot III

January 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 23:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Instead of responding to my two requests for an explanation, you make the same report? --Neil N  talk to me 23:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * And you've been warned about making frivolous reports before. --Neil N  talk to me 23:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , would you be open to unblocking this user if they agree to 0RR on football related topics? Their constant reversion of others and ownership of football topics seems to be the root cause. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, but I need an answer about the warnings and reports for Ethan111. --Neil N  talk to me 23:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

I reported Ethan111 because of vandalism and disruptive editing. I said that at the AIV page. -- 🐇 <b style="font-family:arial"><b style="color:brown">Chocolate</b></b><b style="font-family:arial"><b style="color:green">Rabbit</b></b> 23:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Please explain how this is vandalism. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 23:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

He added unsourced content. -- 🐇 <b style="font-family:arial"><b style="color:brown">Chocolate</b></b><b style="font-family:arial"><b style="color:green">Rabbit</b></b> 23:37, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm tempted to make this block an indefinite one for competency issues. The material is clearly mentioned in the body. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 23:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I thought your initial block was lenient, to be honest, give the level of disruption this user has been causing in football articles, and their frequent edit warring behavior and use of admin boards to try to further content disputes. I almost blocked for 72 hours earlier today, but the edit war had died down then, so I gave a BLP DS in case they continued their disputes on footballers. I'd personally prefer a restriction short of an indefinite block, but I also think you could make a case for it given the disruption and competency issues. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:48, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

How can you block me anyway, when I haven't recieved any prior warnings? You surely cannot do that without giving sufficient warnings -- 🐇 <b style="font-family:arial"><b style="color:brown">Chocolate</b></b><b style="font-family:arial"><b style="color:green">Rabbit</b></b> 23:41, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * False. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * You've had rollback removed, you've been warned at WP:ANEW, and then there's this. You've had plenty of warnings. Now you should focus on convincing us why this block should not be an indefinite one. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 23:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

How about this. I only make 1 revert on individual articles to avoid potential edit wars. -- 🐇 <b style="font-family:arial"><b style="color:brown">Chocolate</b></b><b style="font-family:arial"><b style="color:green">Rabbit</b></b> 23:48, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm concerned about you falsely accusing other editors of vandalism and then reporting them. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 23:50, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

I reported what I believed to be vandalism, everyone makes mistakes -- 🐇 <b style="font-family:arial"><b style="color:brown">Chocolate</b></b><b style="font-family:arial"><b style="color:green">Rabbit</b></b> 23:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, and you were given a chance to explain the mistake (twice). You ignored both opportunities and re-reported again. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 23:54, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I share NeilN's concerns, and I think this would continue even with one revert. This isn't just one mistake, this is a pattern. This is why I suggested 0RR above, and I was prepared to impose it under the BLP arbitration case if you continued your edit warring behavior on footballers. I cannot speak for Neil, but at this point, I would be looking for 0RR and an acknowledgement that any further use of admin boards to further content disputes will result in an indefinite block. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

You cannot impose a threat like that it would be using the block as a punishment. -- 🐇 <b style="font-family:arial"><b style="color:brown">Chocolate</b></b><b style="font-family:arial"><b style="color:green">Rabbit</b></b> 23:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , I agree an indefinite block is likely needed here. I don't see any sign they understand what the issues are, and I think it would continue once the 31 hours are up. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * No, I agree with . It would protect other editors from your disruptive accusations. And I've made your block an indefinite one. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 00:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)


 * If I may add something, please take out some time to re-read my earlier advice, which you seem to have unfortunately disregarded.--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:37, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Block evasion --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 15:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)