User talk:Cientific124

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) ''' Hello, Cientific124, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Be Bold!
 * Learn from others
 * Be kind to others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us a bit about yourself
 * Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type  on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes ( ~ ); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 02:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of attacks related to secondary schools, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salvador ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_attacks_related_to_secondary_schools check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_attacks_related_to_secondary_schools?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rzepin train disaster for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rzepin train disaster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rzepin train disaster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed,Rosguill talk 22:15, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of serial rapists by number of victims for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of serial rapists by number of victims is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of serial rapists by number of victims until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lmatt (talk) 23:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Vic Morrow into List of unusual deaths. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the warning! I will sure attribute to the editor who made the text now.--Cientific124 (talk) 15:47, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem on List of unusual deaths
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-01-17-mn-118-story.html, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello! Sorry for the mistake. I will re-add the death but written in my own words.--Cientific124 (talk) 14:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Alfeu Viero Filho for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alfeu Viero Filho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alfeu Viero Filho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 05:55, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Page deletion
I'm not an admin so I can't delete pages, but if you add to the top of those pages, an admin will delete them for you. Trivialist (talk) 19:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --Cientific124 (talk) 19:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I just requested it. Thank you for the warnings! The next time I create articles, I will sure check the sources to check notability.--Cientific124 (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey man, could we be friends? I never had a friend on Wikipedia. I would like if you would be my first friend here.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2016 in Brazilian case law


A tag has been placed on Category:2016 in Brazilian case law requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:38, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I have put a warning requesting the deletion of the page.--Cientific124 (talk) 17:58, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alfeu Viero Filho.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:Alfeu Viero Filho.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:The online encyclopedia where the guidelines overpowers the common sense
Wikipedia:The online encyclopedia where the guidelines overpowers the common sense, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:The online encyclopedia where the guidelines overpowers the common sense and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:The online encyclopedia where the guidelines overpowers the common sense during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 09:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:The online encyclopedia where the guidelines overpowers the common sense


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Wikipedia:The online encyclopedia where the guidelines overpowers the common sense, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
 * It is an "attack page". (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ivomoku Bakusuba for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivomoku Bakusuba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ivomoku Bakusuba until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Burundian serial killers


A tag has been placed on Category:Burundian serial killers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tiago João da Silva.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tiago João da Silva.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)