User talk:Cloudjpk

Re: Revert
When you revert with a sentence such as "Please; read the Talk" - then there is a requirement for you to actually be able to demonstrate a consensus for that edit (if it is a new edit - such as this was), or generate a consensus for this change. Since no such consensus is present in the actual talk thread, then i do not know what you are referring to.... --Kim D. Petersen 17:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

What_is_consensus%3F Cloudjpk (talk) 17:43, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You still have to demonstrate consensus, and no such is present. All you've done on that thread is claim (paraphrased)"My source trumps all of your sources ... because!". And you may also want to read WP:BRD, since you appear to be neglecting the D part. --Kim D. Petersen 18:01, 15 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Please don't attribute claims to me I never made. Thanks for the references. Cloudjpk (talk) 18:40, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Please learn how to indent. Your comments on talk pages are almost unreadable because you don't indent when answering a comment. Please see WP:TPG ("Keep the layout clear"), which will lead you to WP:INDENT. --Kim D. Petersen 22:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, how's that? Cloudjpk (talk) 23:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Much better - thank you :) --Kim D. Petersen 23:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You bet :) (Hey this is fun :) Cloudjpk (talk) 23:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Please indent your comments
Your comments on the e-cigarette are hard to follow. The indentation, or rather lack of indentation makes the flow of the discussion hard to follow when you reply. Please indent your comments WP:THREAD. Thanks. AlbinoFerret (talk) 22:53, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * OK! Cloudjpk (talk) 23:13, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

edit warring at Electronic cigarette
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Electronic cigarette. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Please discuss on Talk page instead. Mihaister (talk) 21:33, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Done! Thanks Cloudjpk (talk) 21:36, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Please revert your last edit and join the discussion on the Talk page. Thanks. Mihaister (talk) 21:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I invite you do to the same. Cloudjpk (talk) 22:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ultrafine particle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circulation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

edits to E-cigarette citing consensus
I invite you to explain how "mist" has consensus, there is a talk page section on this topic, created before your edit. AlbinoFerret 01:32, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Your recent editing history at Electronic cigarette shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mihaister (talk) 00:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

General Sanctions: Electronic Cigarettes.
SPACKlick (talk) 12:14, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

e-cig
Of course, your edit was also "removing well sourced, relevant material"! Johnbod (talk) 17:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Oh please; hardly comparable. And of course new material may be added without massively removing well sourced, relevant material. Cloudjpk (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Public Health England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lancet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Amendment request
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, AlbinoFerret  23:59, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Notifying of the archival of an amendment request
Hi _Cloudjpk, this is a notification that an amendment request pertaining to Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles has been archived with no action. You can now find it here. For the arbitration committee, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 03:15, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ed Simons (born 1917) has been accepted
 Ed Simons (born 1917), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  00:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

A page you started (Ed Simons (conductor)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Ed Simons (conductor), Cloudjpk!

Wikipedia editor Menaechmi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Lovely article, hope to see more from you soon."

To reply, leave a comment on Menaechmi's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

menaechmi (talk) 18:17, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Edit War Electronic Cigarette
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Electronic Cigarette; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You continue to revert changes despite ongoing discussion on the talk page. This constitutes disruptive editing. Please stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpoonLuv (talk • contribs) 17:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beland (talk) 22:22, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

November 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Electronic cigarette, you may be blocked from editing. ''You leave notes about following WP:MEDRS in your edit summaries, but I don't think you've read MEDRS. Spend time absorbing how to choose high-quality sources, and stop edit warring, WP:WAR. Final warning.'' Zefr (talk) 00:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * I'm not engaged in disruptive editing. I was the one who requested the other editor to Talk. These are the facts. Thanks. Cloudjpk (talk) 00:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I was mistaken about which edit I reverted. I apologize. I have now fixed it. Thanks for your help! Cloudjpk (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Request for don’t removeing vice president's image
Please don’t remove vice president Gopal Swarup Pathak image. Why are you removing it again and again? J. Modak (talk) 16:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

I haven't done that. Perhaps you're thinking of someone else? Cloudjpk (talk) 20:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)