User talk:Colin dm

Wuhan outbreak
Please see my comments at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Timeline_of_the_2019%E2%80%9320_Wuhan_coronavirus_outbreak#We_should_remove_the_table Also I think by "charts" you meant "table" I edited your comment in the Talk page accordingly. Mbevand (talk) 18:21, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Please edit more carefully; this is a critical article & timeline, and you removed a (non-)duplicate edit incorrectly. --2600:1700:80:5AD0:9029:CD06:1497:72BA (talk) 19:14, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Self-reverted; I see the dupe now. Spelled out "US" as a minor 'fix.' Mea culpa. --2600:1700:80:5AD0:9029:CD06:1497:72BA (talk) 19:18, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

The main page for updates on Mainland China is linked to this page, so my edit belongs there. Thanks Nebakin (talk) 15:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

FYI, my spreadsheet model projects:

Day Date    Infections reported in China 44	1/29/20	    8,356 45	1/30/20	    11,364

73	2/27/20	 1,097,520

90	3/15/20	 4,407,024

The model curve fitted to the reported 13 days of data resulted. I assumed that Jan. 16, 2020 was the 31st day of the infection.

x = Day y = 0.392x4 - 50.301x3 + 2418x2 - 51547x + 410763 R² = 0.9973. [fit of equation to dot plot data for x = Days 31 to 43.


 * wrong place to write this**: but why TF did you remove the table from the Wuhan outbreak timeline page? That's valuable information  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.226.62.169 (talk) 16:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)


 * See the talk page on the article but I removed it because they were massive, not very easy to read, and were an eyesore. If you want we can hold a vote to determine community consensus about this. --Colin dm (talk) 16:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

You may have accidentally undo'ed my revision due to a misunderstanding. NHK has posted that Japan had just got their 8th case on 29th January and was related to one of the cases on the day before. Please check. Thank you CounterBot1 (talk) 17:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh I see. Sorry for the misunderstanding and thanks for letting me know.--Colin dm (talk) 17:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * That is okay. You could add it in and improve the sentence when you edit the article next. --CounterBot1 (talk) 17:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I've added it back.--Colin dm (talk) 17:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Just wanted to take a moment to say "thanks" for all your efforts here. Much appreciated. --67.48.200.162 (talk) 17:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * 😄Thank you

Wuhan news source
Isn't CNA the default name? Cause honestly, the people at Mediacorp don't call themselves Channel NewsAsia since March 2019. TheGreatSG&#39;rean (talk) 02:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry I didn't know that. I just checked the wiki and it's refered to as CNA. Sorry for any confusion I caused.--Colin dm (talk) 02:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Alright TheGreatSG&#39;rean (talk) 02:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

General Sanctions Notice
--OhKayeSierra (talk) 07:10, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

👍--Colin dm (talk) 07:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cheyanna’s Champions for Children


A tag has been placed on Cheyanna’s Champions for Children, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 14:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello. Your recent edit to Lake Travis High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 21:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Cheyanna's Champions for Children for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheyanna's Champions for Children is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cheyanna's Champions for Children until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 22:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Os Barões da Pisadinha for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Os Barões da Pisadinha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Os Barões da Pisadinha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DOOMSDAYER 520 &#124; TALK &#124; CONTRIBS 17:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo for CC4C.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo for CC4C.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)