User talk:CouchSurfer222

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, CouchSurfer222, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Jncraton (talk) 03:16, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Dassant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Pillsbury


 * Madcow Productions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to 4 track

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:43, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Fairbanks Rollergirls
Noticed the recent edits. In spite of the improvements, it's still chock full of peacock terminology. I'll check back and see if it needs to be tagged as such.RadioKAOS (talk) 03:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Dear Couchsurfer222,

I am an historian working at the National Museum, my topic the history of the search for Leichhardt. I see you have done wome work on Duncan McIntyre. I have a coupala questions I'd like to ask you. If you want you can contact me via dazdebcj@optusnet.com.au

Cheers,

Darrell Lewis 203.5.124.228 (talk) 04:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: Richard Neustadt
Re your message: I'm glad that you like my edit notice. I only made a single vandalism reversion edit to Richard Neustadt's article many, many years ago. I don't know anything about him and my interest in politics is fairly low, so I wouldn't be of much help to you writing the section that you would like to add. What I suggest is to just be bold and make the changes. If you want some feedback on your additions to the article, you might try asking for some at WikiProject Politics. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Velvet Knights
Can you give me a justification for your placement of edit templates on Velvet Knights Drum and Bugle Corps (2005)? This is a minor article about a group that has been in existence only a short time. There has not yet been much to write about, yet the article tells who they are, what they do, where they are from, et cetera. It is referenced with several citations from sources completely independent from the group. I'm sorry, but I fail to see the relevance of either of your edits. GWFrog (talk) 02:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I placed those tags on there because I felt they were needed. Reference 1 links to the organization mentioned, it is suitable as an external link but it is not a reference. Reference 2 and 4 do not appear to be independent of the velvet knights, considering they raise money for the group. Reference 3 and 5 is a site displaying score history, which is independent but susceptible to link rot. And Reference 6 appears to be a poster. I do not think any of these qualify as reliable sources. I figured the group was new, that is why I only placed tags on it. The fact that the article needs help, does not mean the article is not notable or should not be included in the encyclopedia.CouchSurfer222 (talk) 00:50, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Reference 1 links to Drum Corps International, a sanctioning organization, and verifies the statement made. Granted, Refs. 2 & 4 link to the organization itself; #2 verifying the group's short history, which is not yet recounted elsewhere; and #4 merely verifying the organization's sponsorship. References #3 & #5 are both Corpsreps.com, an archive of drum corps histories, repertories, and contest scores that has been on-line since 1996.  Reference #6 is most definitely NOT a poster, in any sense of the word; Drum Corps World has been the principal newspaper of the drum and bugle corps activity since 1972; it has been published on-line for the past year.  GWFrog (talk) 17:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Rusty Magee
Thanks for your message. Couple of things; under WP:V, no matter what truth, verify the truth with a publicly reliable source (that means published sources, not unpublished sources; see WP:COI). For Personal Life, possible that it is the truth, but needs sources to verify it. If no sources for one statement are found, it would be best to remove the statement. The short lede is a minor issue, so let's not worry it, but don't remove the tag yet. --George Ho (talk) 01:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

As for the film and television roles he did, primary sources are already implied, so no worries, and there may be no need to insert inline citations for that. Nevertheless, do not use IMDB as a "reliable source"; it's the oppose of reliable. --George Ho (talk) 01:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok, i put up a references tag. I don't know much about composers and classic music, I just usually surf backlog areas and try and improve where I can. Thanks for the advice though, I did not know in situations like what roles he played in the citations could be implied. Thanks, CouchSurfer222 (talk) 01:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Jussian
Category:Villages is not a very useful addition (look at it and you'll see it's all types of villages, not specific places). If you can't find a more precise category, please leave the article as uncategorised until someone else comes along and is willing to put a bit more work into it. Thanks. Pam D  17:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

La Cleopatra
I tried and improve the voice you have marked on June. I hope it's enough, because it's a minor poem, there aren't more sources. Thanks in advance and regards.(note: I'm not English speaker, please forgive and correct my mistakes. Thanks) Moustaky (talk) 18:42, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Madcow Productions for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madcow Productions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Madcow Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Nathan's Garden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan's Garden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nathan's Garden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:HopsonRoad 01:43, 15 January 2018 (UTC)