User talk:Crossark

Starting my User Talk page.

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Laila Tyabji
Thanks for your edits on Laila Tyabji. I have since made a few corrections. By the way, editors in Wikipedia, by practice, do not seem to follow the pattern, fourth-highest, but prefer a simple fourth highest. However, I have left it like that, may be, some one else will have a look at it. I have also corrected the sentence, The organization has a producer group base of over 250, and employs more than 36000 artisans; Dastkar does not employ 36000 artisans, it is the group base which has that many artisans.--jojo@nthony (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for correcting my mistakes! I wasn't sure what the sentence about the producer base was intended to say; I thought it meant that Dastkar had a producer-artisan-relationship system or something similar, with 250 producers for the 36000 artisans. Crossark (talk) 19:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Your Userbox Requests
Hello Crossark! Your requests are completed. The first two are the ones made by me while the last two are from already existing Wikipedia user templates:

I did not do the harp one since the one with similar content already exists. If you'd like custom colors or changes/additions made to userboxes, don't hesitate to ask so! I'd be glad to help you with it. Best wishes, " Simon OrJ "(U/T/C) 02:44, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bat Ye'or, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eccentric. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar thanks
Two barnstars in one evening for the same good deed ... it really must be Christmas Eve! Thank you so much, and have a happy holiday. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Re: Help with Megalith
Thank you for the comment. Could you be more specific about what confuse you, or put a tag at it or a note at the Discussion page ? I just try to put some sources actually, and rearranging the text accordingly. May be I miss something. Kembangraps (talk) 23:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Female genital mutilation for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015 Wikification drive
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! :) Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 20:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Anne Louise Avery for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anne Louise Avery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Anne Louise Avery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 02:58, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015 Wikification drive.
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the April drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 03:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

June 2015 Wikification drive.
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the June drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) &#34;A wiki of beauty is a joy forever.&#34; Seriously. That&#39;s how long it&#39;d take to read! (talk) 04:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 28 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Okoumé (band) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=722497887 your edit] caused an unsupported parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F722497887%7COkoumé (band)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Your submission at Articles for creation: Céline Bosquet (June 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Céline Bosquet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:C%C3%A9line_Bosquet Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LaMona&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:C%C3%A9line_Bosquet reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Céline Bosquet


Hello, Crossark. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Céline Bosquet".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: Current Backlog Reduction Plan
Hey, I noticed you marked yourself as a member of WikiProject Wikify and you are currently listed as active. I was wondering if you would be able to assist with our current backlog reduction plan. While traditional drives are more structured month-long sprints by WikiProject Wikify members, there is currently lacking activity within the project and in order to significantly reduce the incredible backlog, members are encouraged to review all articles marked with the Underlinked Template Message - underlinked - a list of which can be found here - to analyze the worthiness of the template message on the given article. Articles that have nothing to link or are have had wikilinks sufficiently added should have the template removed to clear the backlog and make it easier for editors to find articles in genuine need of wikification. This can be done by any editor; however, all editors should consider joining if they haven't done so already. Thank you!

The Novac (talk) 03:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Chinese alligator
I see you're not a fan of MOS and good English. Maybe you could take a technical writing course and learn how to use a dictionary.47.184.175.161 (talk) 00:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Please, elucidate me as to specifically where in the MOS your edits are addressed. Also, elucidate me as to how the phrase "by peopleby people" is, as you so elegantly put it, "good English". Sincerely, a former editor of a student publication.Crossark (talk) 00:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Hulmem. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Warning from Space, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. hulmem (talk) 15:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I apologize for leaving out a citation for this information. It would've been prudent to do so, I acknowledge, but it was late for me when I made the edit and I figured I'd come back to it the following day to add citations (assuming no one else already had). However, I notice that other information in the same section lacks a citation and hasn't been removed — notably the blurb that says the film received a RiffTrax commentary. I don't understand why this "cite first, publish later" standard for citations isn't applied universally. I hope you can forgive me for believing that easily fact-checked information that also contained no esoteric language that would need to be sourced from interviews/thinkpieces (like the properly cited, "x influenced y," sentences in the same section do) would be in less urgent need of citation, and that they could be added at a later date by one of the many users who go around the site adding citations to correct information all the time. Indeed, I admit that I wonder why you were so quick to remove the information when it was easily verifiable, and a citation could have been added by you at the time. It would seem you're simply removing any new uncited information, without doing anything in the way of due diligence to determine whether the information itself merits being in the article — something of a scorched earth policy that I don't know if I fully agree with. Nevertheless, I shall provide citations in a little while for the information I provided. Thank you for informing me that they were needed.Crossark (talk) 23:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)