User talk:Curious man123

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Somnath temple, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Somnath temple, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Packer&#38;Tracker (talk) 06:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
TrangaBellam (talk) 11:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

That edits is based on what historian views are about it and not any other historian has mentioned similar views. It might be right about the views on Somnath but still it is not well accepted facts and based on Wikipedia rules of NPOV that is neural point of view, the edits was done to attributes the views. And still it is based on the findings of the Historian books and citation about that statement is also attached to the end of statement. So that edits was just a to give neutrality on the page. Curious man123 (talk) 12:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia policies
A friendly suggestion to not edit war. Please read through Wikipedia policies before engaging further on the Somnath page. Webberbrad007 (talk) 19:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Indian religions, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  14:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Pipe058. I noticed that you recently removed content from Muhammad Iqbal without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. pipe058 06:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

I did it accordingly with the WP:INDICSCRIPTS Curious man123 (talk) 06:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Veraval Port taken in 1895.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Veraval Port taken in 1895.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:31, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Names for India, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Patna, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources. Thank you. Boyinaroom (talk) 06:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I removed it because Patna was a page for city and not for district. We can add District Magistrate on Patna District page and not on city page as it's jurisdiction is not only for city but for district as a whole. And that's why i removed it. if i didnt anything against the rule, thats was not intentional. Curious man123 (talk) 15:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The government section says that "The civic administration of Patna is run by several government agencies and has overlapping structural divisions. At least five administrative definitions of the city are available; listed in ascending order of area, those are: Patna division, Patna district (also the Patna Police area), the Patna Metropolitan Region (also known as Patna Planning area), "Greater Patna" or PRDA area, which adds to the PMC area a few areas just adjacent to it and Patna Municipal Corporation area." so District Magistrate should be added
 * Boyinaroom (talk) 17:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Talaja Caves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Talaja. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Daulatabad Fort—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
The script that produces infobox templates in articles often contain notes that can only be seem if you are editing. The one in the nickname field of the infobox in the article on Veraval looks like this:  It was unhelpful of you to delete it. Please do not do it again.

If you think that the note is wrong, you should use the article talk page to discuss it. -- Toddy1 (talk) 16:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Bandra Terminus–Veraval Weekly Superfast Express moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bandra Terminus–Veraval Weekly Superfast Express, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roshen Dalal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BA and MA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Kashmir princely state
This page is on WP:1RR. You cannot make more than 1 revert on this page thus you should revert your recent own edit.

Another reason why you should revert is, that you are wrong about Aksai Chin. It was not controlled neither by this princely state or the British.

See the last paragraph of the section Aksai_Chin where it talks about how the British never demarcated this Aksai Chin. Thanks. Capitals00 (talk) 02:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Well the section you mention tells that until 1933 the map published by the government of China shown aksai chin in India and also the Peking university did the same - "From 1917 to 1933, the Postal Atlas of China, published by the Government of China in Peking had shown the boundary in Aksai Chin as per the Johnson line, which runs along the Kunlun mountains. The Peking University Atlas, published in 1925, also put the Aksai Chin in India." And also India did salt mining in 1950 to understand the economic feasibility for the aksai chin which is also mention in the article with ref. And yet you think we are missing something then i suggest to create a talk on talk page and establish a consensus about it. Curious man123 (talk) 03:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * China shows Taiwan on its map. Do you think that is accurate? The source cited for collecting salt itself states that it was purely a scientifc research work. You can make better argument for Myanmar forces when they just got inside Indian territory months ago but I am sure you won't say that Myanmar forces are in control of Indian territory.
 * You should self-revert now. Capitals00 (talk) 05:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Well this is a matter of consensus now so i am adding a topic on a talk page on the article and we should actually have this debate about this over there. Curious man123 (talk) 05:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Notice about discussion at WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. This is the link.-Haani40 (talk) 21:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PadFoot2008 (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)


 * how this was a edit war @PadFoot2008? Simply because i am adding something which we already have a factual info how that implies for edit war. Adding info provided by a reason and basis for which we already have a ref and backing for what i am saying i dont understand how that amounts for a edit war? Yes having rebuttals is altogether an differnt issue and having rebuttal are one which provides good atmosphere for editors to make a good articles. But saying, this was a editing war, than i am sorry to say but you are mistaken Curious man123 (talk) 10:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:edit warring. PadFoot2008 (talk) 10:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That goes for unexplained reverts, i had already said about the reasons for what i have added for which i had a basis and i insist you to refer WP:Consensus which says that if something is establish once do not require consensus for every article. As far as your reverts, i might be wrong, but it seems like a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. But fair enough, i don't want any edit war between anyone. If you insists for consensus, i am happy to go with your way. Curious man123 (talk) 10:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't know why you should be making random assumptions but WP: Editwarring extends to "explained reverts" as well. There has been no consensus on any article talk page to include those specific entities to succession list of the Mughal Empire infobox. And also please refrain from making random accusations against people. And lastly, yes, I would indeed recommend you to discuss on the talk page of the concerned article. PadFoot2008 (talk) 10:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)