User talk:Cyberherbalist

Mike Gregoire
I've put a merge tag on the Mike Gregoire article which I believe you created... I can't see anything notable about him, being the first "first gentleman" is certainly a first but through no real fault of his own. Does this really make him notable per WP:BIO? A mention on the Christine Gregoire page will suffice. You have first call on merging the info, I'll probably do it in a couple of days if you don't get round to it.  D e iz  02:52, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that's mine. I put the article up because of an empty link in the spouse box on Gov Gregoire's article. It appears to be the plan around here to provide an article for each US state governor's spouse (new layout, you've seen it I'm sure). You can find this on virtually every incumbent governor's article. A few of these have articles.--Mike 08:40, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

"It seems to be the plan" doesn't automatically override the WP:BIO criteria.. He | scores 1800 total / 306 unique googles which is low. But I'll see what the other pages are like and if it really is the way forward then fair enough.  D e iz  09:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Well, I can't argue that Mr. Gregoire is independently remarkable. For consistency's sake, if he doesn't rate, and other governor spouses don't rate, then the whole raftload of governor spouse redlinks (just saw that term for the first time) should be delinked and let them be relinked on a case-by-case basis by whoever thinks they deserve an article. --Mike 09:21, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

I think you've struck gold with that last idea... the tagging of redlinks on names of people that aren't known to be notable by the tagger is a huge source of cruft (crap) in WP these days, you did really well to research up a page but probably ignore those redlinks if you don't immediately know yourself that a person is actually notable... As a general point this isn't a realm of knowledge I have much / any interest or knowledge in so I probably won't get involved in any consistency mission but it would help. The ideal here is that Mike Gregoire should redirect to Christine Gregoire but is unlinked in the infobox and elsewhere on her page.  D e iz  21:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Mike G
I've gone all out and redirected Mike to Christine, and delinked his name in her infobox. By all means you could add a little more about him in her article but... nice one  Dei zio  03:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:GregoirePicture.jpg
There were many problems with this image. It had no real source information, meaning we don't know who the photographer or copyright holder is. It was described as coming from a press kit but licensed under the GFDL, which is extremely unlikely. An editor then changed the licensing information to make a Fair use claim on it, which, while at least more accurate in terms of not misleading anybody, cannot be done with an unsourced image of a living person per Fair use criteria.

Someone just needs to find a federal government-employee-taken photograph of this person (or any other freely licensed photo), or request one from her office and email the release to permissions AT wikimedia DOT org. Jkelly 21:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, I've just talked with the governor's communications office and they say that the image linked at the bottom of the page is her official photograph and may be used freely.  Is the notation of "official portrait" on the governor's official web page sufficient?  I think maybe not, because the previous governor's image on his article is definitely a state-created image, not the federal gov't, yet that's what it says.  Do we have a slight permissions problem, or maybe the permissions policy needs to take US states into account?  I checked WA governors back to Dixy Lee Ray and the images are all incorrectly attributed for permissions purposes.  A couple are claimed to be created by the feds when they are clearly official WA portraits, and one is sourced to the WA state guard (for Gardner), of all things --- even though it looks like a photo taken at a barbecue by a private party.  Ray's photo is likely the gov's official photo, but was obviously scanned from a newspaper.  Geeze, what a hodgepodge.  Mike 21:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


 * There's this idea that because the US federal gov't releases material into the public domain, that the states must as well. That is mostly not true, and US state gov't copyright is just like any other copyright, but there's a lot of confusion around it, and people are more likely to go looking for a tag that will avoid the deletion of the "it must be free because it is a state gov't photo" than stopping to consider that it is possible that we can't use it.  In any case, with Gregoire's official photo, just have someone at her office email permissions AT wikimedia DOT org stating that the photograph can be used for any purpose and then we can go ahead and use that.  Note that this has to include commercial and derivative use; they may not have thought of that when they said "used freely" -- they may just have meant "free of charge".  Jkelly 21:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:OzarksAIDSLogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:OzarksAIDSLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:LFrank_by_PBoss.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LFrank_by_PBoss.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Black Bear Diner
A template has been added to the article Black Bear Diner, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. B. Wolterding 16:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

7th Infantry Regiment (United States)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 7th Infantry Regiment (United States), and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 00:35, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, yeah. I fixed it.  Sheesh.  :-)

ACN Inc.
Please read my comments on your ACN Inc. edit. If changes are not made, I will have no option but to revert the changes, since it's current form is unacceptable. I understand you probably spent some time writing your edit, so I do want to give you the opportunity to change the page so that it conforms to wikipedia standards.

Tristan.buckmaster 08:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Acn logo small.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Acn logo small.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

MLM articles of interest
I just thought you might be interested in reading some of the articles on the website http://www.pyramidschemealert.org/PSAMain/resources/resources.html. http://www.pyramidschemealert.org/PSAMain/news/MythofMLMIncome.doc.pdf is a interesting read, with an explanation why 99% recruits must fail (if you didn't like the explanations I have already given). Also http://www.pyramidschemealert.org/PSAMain/resources/12tests1.pdf is a good test that you should apply on ACN Inc. Tristan.buckmaster 07:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not interested in reading them. If they contain the same kind of fractured logic your pronouncements contain I think I got the word already thanks.

Tristan that test is really good. CLEARLY shows that ACN is an absolutely terrible company with no opportunity for representitives to make money. It's a shame this isnt broadcast on the news daily. I think ACN truly would be finished then. I bet most of the company revenue derives from the $499 representitive fees.--TheEditor22 (talk) 09:56, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

You really cornered Mike there. I bet he did read them but had no answers.--TheEditor22 (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Just on the offchance that you have my talk page on your watch list, TheEditor22 (can I call you just 22?), let me disabuse you of the notion that I read Tristan's suggested reading list. I don't feel in the slightest way cornered, either. Do you really expect that an outfit with a domain name like "pyramidschemealert" and pages entitled "MythofMLMIncome" has anything worthwhile to say about MLM? Well, you might expect it to, but I have better use for my time. If I were to suggest a pro-MLM reading list, you would have exactly the same thing to say.  Mike (talk) 09:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cover ThereIWas.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cover ThereIWas.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Done.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PorterBruceD.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PorterBruceD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AcornSoupbyLFrank.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AcornSoupbyLFrank.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. βcommand 22:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cover Janissaries Novel by JerryPournelle.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cover Janissaries Novel by JerryPournelle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cover Onslaught Novel by DavidSherman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cover Onslaught Novel by DavidSherman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Olympia Amateur Radio Society
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Olympia Amateur Radio Society, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Olympia Amateur Radio Society. BJ Talk 23:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Oars logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Oars logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:WingsOfHell Sherman&Cragg Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WingsOfHell Sherman&Cragg Cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Janissaries IV: Mamelukes
An article that you have been involved in editing, Janissaries IV: Mamelukes, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janissaries IV: Mamelukes. Thank you. Captain-tucker (talk) 21:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

==Proposed deletion of Out of the Fire== A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Out of the Fire, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * no assertion of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tznkai (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Spam in User:Cyberherbalist/ACN2
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User:Cyberherbalist/ACN2, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User:Cyberherbalist/ACN2 is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User:Cyberherbalist/ACN2, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of non-NPOV fork
I have nominated the page User:Cyberherbalist/ACN2 in your user space for deletion. Wikipedia tries to build consensus on articles as opposed to making multiple disagreeing ones. Please see Talk:ACN_Inc. and Content_forking for more information.

--Meawoppl (talk) 19:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

ACN
Hi Mike, have you ever walked into a Mc Donalds and have them say to you;

"would you like a bigmac? Oh also, we're selling a $500 franchise today.  We dont care who you are, what skills or business aptitude you have, as long as you pay us $500.  Basicaly our requirements for acceptance into this franchise are that you are human and over 18.  Oh and, you cant use the McDonalds name/logo in any advertising."

You want to have a discussion? A free exchange of ideas and opinions? Then come out of hiding, Mr. Anonymous Coward, and let's do it. I don't feel like debating with a ghost. Mike (talk) 03:47, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh I do apologise Mike. My name is Jacniss. You never really answered my question though. Jacniss Hit

Thankyou, Jacniss. No, I didn't answer your question. I wanted to see who I was talking to, as a precondition. I thought I made that clear.

Now that you've made your introduction, the answer to your question is: No, I have never had this experience in a McDonalds. Next question? Mike (talk) 03:20, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps thats the difference between a legitimate franchise and a multilevel marketing scheme. And when somebody calls a MLM scheme a pyramid scheme thats because it is closer to being a pyramid scheme than any other kind of business. Do refrain from mentioning legitimate franchises such as McDonalds in order to defend the MLM business model because they are completely different. --TheEditor22 (talk) 07:25, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

You brought up McDonalds. Not me. Do you actually have something substantive to say? Mike (talk) 08:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

I do. ACN is more of a pyramid than non-MLM companies. Why? Because they have been taken to court with said accusations. I havent seen any non-MLM legitimate companies being taken to court for such reasons. So if it's not a pyramid, it's damn close. (i am now half expecting you to give the story that all business is pyramid shaped)--TheEditor22 (talk) 09:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

I might also add that they werent open and shut cases. Clearly the courts had to spend time deliberating for ages over it. And if the idea that ACN being a pyramid scheme was that ridiculous then it would have never reached the courts!--TheEditor22 (talk) 09:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

TheEditor22: I have nothing further to say to you in this page. If you add anything further to my talk page it will be reverted. Mike (talk) 21:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Generals in Muddy Boots


The article Generals in Muddy Boots has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears to fail WP:BK, Please add reliable 3rd Party sources to prove otherwise

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tim1357 (talk) 02:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover GeneralsInMuddyBoots by DanCragg.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Cover GeneralsInMuddyBoots by DanCragg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Ja Ga  talk 20:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

SVG Maiduan map
Howdy Cyberherbalist,

I thought you might like to know that I made an SVG version of your nifty Maiduan languages map. I tried to make it as close as possible to your original. You can see it at Maiduan languages. I've been trying to jumpstart a California languages Wikiproject, by the way, if you're still intersted. Cheers, babbage (talk) 10:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Good work on the SVG version of the map. Looks much more crisp and clean than my original!  I'd like to participate in your Wikiproject, but currently I am finding myself rather more busy than I can be and still contribute meaningfully.  Mike (talk) 07:50, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

ACN 3RR
I don't have time to check, but please make sure you haven't broken 3rr either. ;)   Will Beback    talk    05:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I haven't. I was keeping careful count, and instead of reverting his last reversion, I put some inline citation requests in appropriate locations and AGAIN invited him to a discussion.  Mike (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Your DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Ferdinand Maria von Senger und Etterlin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! M AN d ARAX •  XAЯA b ИA M  09:01, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Just testing something
Hello. Cyberherbalist (talk) 04:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:DalessondroPeterJ USMOH.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:DalessondroPeterJ USMOH.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:28, 30 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:28, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Renaming WikiProject Native languages of California
Hello Cyberherbalist! On the talk page I've suggested renaming WikiProject Native languages of California, as WikiProject Indigenous languages of California. This would be consistent with the name of the Category:Indigenous languages of California, and the discussion in its deletion debate. Do you concur? Djembayz (talk) 01:14, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, absolutely. I noted the concurrence on that category's talk page as well.  Cyberherbalist (talk) 02:46, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Indigenous Languages
Good day, I saw your contributions on the subject of Native American languages and would like to invite you to the recently created Wikimedia Indigenous Languages, an international body to promote and support the use of small and endangered languages on Wikimedia projects. Thanks, Amqui (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Calif MaiduanLanguages map.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Calif MaiduanLanguages map.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Howard Vollum Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stanley Fields (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:BlueCheckBoxUnChecked.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:BlueCheckBoxCheckedRed.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited USS Ogden (LPD-5), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 9th Infantry Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DanCragg.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DanCragg.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:04, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PaddyFlint with GenPatton.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PaddyFlint with GenPatton.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:PaddyFlint with GenPatton.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PaddyFlint with GenPatton.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:51, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zielonka Pasłęcka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Osterode. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Historical map comparison showing that Grünhagen and Zielonka Pasłęcka are the same.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Historical map comparison showing that Grünhagen and Zielonka Pasłęcka are the same.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Historical map comparison showing that Grünhagen and Zielonka Pasłęcka are the same.png
Thanks for uploading File:Historical map comparison showing that Grünhagen and Zielonka Pasłęcka are the same.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:14, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mimi Daraphet


The article Mimi Daraphet has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No mention on IMDB as being in anything, so must have been a very minor uncredited role, only verification is from wookiepedia . No significant coverage of anything else she's done.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 00:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Augustine Peter Curtin


A tag has been placed on Augustine Peter Curtin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.benhavenarchives.org/wiki/Augustine_Peter_Curtin. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The source webpage is released under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0), which is not a compatible license. — Diannaa (talk) 02:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Status and Advice

 * As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article.  A restriction to non-commercial use has never been compatible with Wikipedia's licensing.  DGG ( talk ) 07:48, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

File:DavidSherman.jpg
You uploaded, File:DavidSherman.jpg, where you either stated that you had permission to upload it or that evidence of such permission would be provided on request. Wikipedia needs the permission to be explicit and proven at the time of upload.

Please read Requesting copyright permission, which advises on how to confirm the permission you obtained from a third party.

It is also advisable to ask the third-party what source attribution they desire, as opposed to marking the image as having been "sent personally".Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

File:DavidShermanDanCraggTamCraggHoaCragg detail.jpg
You uploaded, File:DavidShermanDanCraggTamCraggHoaCragg detail.jpg, where you either stated that you had permission to upload it or that evidence of such permission would be provided on request. Wikipedia needs the permission to be explicit and proven at the time of upload.

Please read Requesting copyright permission, which advises on how to confirm the permission you obtained from a third party.

It is also advisable to ask the third-party what source attribution they desire, as opposed to marking the image as having been "sent personally".Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DavidSherman.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DavidSherman.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 06:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DavidShermanDanCraggTamCraggHoaCragg detail.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DavidShermanDanCraggTamCraggHoaCragg detail.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 06:10, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wladimir Jan Kochanski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hour Magazine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)


 * OK, I'm trying to talk with a bot. The original link that I replaced pointed to an article which doesn't exist yet. I thought that pointing it at a disam page would help by way of enticing someone to create the page.  THis is probably a useless notion.  Apologies.

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover art for the novel For We Are Many by Dennis E. Taylor.png
Thanks for uploading File:Cover art for the novel For We Are Many by Dennis E. Taylor.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover art for the novel We Are Legion (We Are Bob) by Dennis E. Taylor.png
Thanks for uploading File:Cover art for the novel We Are Legion (We Are Bob) by Dennis E. Taylor.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Categories in sandboxes
Hi, Cyberherbalist! Can I ask you not to add categories to your sandbox articles? These show up in the live categories before the articles are ready for prime Fox|talk]]) 15:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I will avoid this in the future! Cyberherbalist (talk) 08:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WashingtonStateGuardEmblem.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WashingtonStateGuardEmblem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Yoshihiko Kikuchi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yoshihiko Kikuchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yoshihiko Kikuchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 14:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rudolf K. Poecker for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rudolf K. Poecker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rudolf K. Poecker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 02:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Knives in the Night for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knives in the Night is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Knives in the Night until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:43, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Main Force Assault for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Main Force Assault is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Main Force Assault until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Night Fighter (novel series) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Night Fighter (novel series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Night Fighter (novel series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Out of the Fire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Out of the Fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Out of the Fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of A Rock and a Hard Place for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Rock and a Hard Place is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/A Rock and a Hard Place until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of A Nghu Night Falls for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Nghu Night Falls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/A Nghu Night Falls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Charlie Don't Live Here Anymore for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlie Don't Live Here Anymore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Charlie Don't Live Here Anymore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Jedi Trial for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jedi Trial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jedi Trial until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Gulf Run for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gulf Run is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gulf Run until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rally Point (novel) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rally Point (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rally Point (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Onslaught (novel) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Onslaught (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Onslaught (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Wings of Hell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wings of Hell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wings of Hell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of The Squad (novel) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Squad (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Squad (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of There I Was: The War of Corporal Henry J Morris, USMC for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article There I Was: The War of Corporal Henry J Morris, USMC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/There I Was: The War of Corporal Henry J Morris, USMC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Firestorm (novel) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Firestorm (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Firestorm (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 08:59, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Flashfire (novel) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flashfire (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Flashfire (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 09:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of A World of Hurt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A World of Hurt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/A World of Hurt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 09:03, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover GulfRun Novel by DavidSherman.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cover GulfRun Novel by DavidSherman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover Out of the Fire by David Sherman.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cover Out of the Fire by David Sherman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover KnivesInTheNight by DavidSherman.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cover KnivesInTheNight by DavidSherman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover Onslaught Novel by DavidSherman.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cover Onslaught Novel by DavidSherman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover RallyPoint Novel by DavidSherman.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cover RallyPoint Novel by DavidSherman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover ThereIWas.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cover ThereIWas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Yoshihiko Kikuchi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yoshihiko Kikuchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yoshihiko Kikuchi& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 10:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Matt Jaissle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Jaissle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Matt Jaissle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ★Trekker (talk) 20:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anti-hero (film)


The article Anti-hero (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Uncited and appears to fail WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Missvain (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Johannes Erxleben moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Johannes Erxleben, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover Starfist 10 AWorldOfHurt m.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cover Starfist 10 AWorldOfHurt m.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Johannes Erxleben
Hello, Cyberherbalist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Johannes Erxleben, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Johannes Erxleben


Hello, Cyberherbalist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Johannes Erxleben".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:18, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of School of Fire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article School of Fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/First to Fight (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. asilvering (talk) 01:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)