User talk:Daniel Case/Archive 12 3/1/2009-7/23/2009

Support
Yes, long time no see! Well, that's not true, I have seen you around. Congrats on adminship, as well.  Ty  00:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Cornwall Friends Meeting House
Shubinator (talk) 04:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Soulfly article
Hey Daniel! I've been recently editing the article of Brazilian heavy metal band Soulfly, which was somewhat inept due to a gerenal lack of sources. Another Wikipedia editor, Prophaniti (talk), has changed music genres in the Infobox based on an ultimately unreliable source, The Metal Observer. Now, I've had a nasty run-in with this editor and his friend Landon1980 (talk) in the past due to some editing on the now deleted Metal Observer article. I'm not asking for you to get directly involved but to check, now and then, the talk page of Soulfly article, as an admin uninvolved with the editing process. I am under the impression that we'll see sparks flying in a near future, and I'd like some with more experience in Wikipedia matters to intervene in case this gets out of hand. Musicaindustrial (talk) 10:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Wallkill River
Hello, I've translated this article into the German WP but I ad problems in understanding in the following passage:
 * It also has the unusual distinction of being a river that drains into a creek, due to being impounded shortly before the Rondout confluence into a small body of water called Sturgeon Pool near Rifton, and what reaches the Rondout from there is the lesser flow. 

Could you please clarify that? --Matthiasb (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Village of Monroe Historic District
Shubinator (talk) 04:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Copypaste
Re:, which bit appears to be copypasted from where? DuncanHill (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks - wpuld be helpful to put that on the article talk page. DuncanHill (talk) 17:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This has been heavily re-edited, could you now reasses please Kernel Saunters (talk) 17:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Troy
You're welcome. It's a good article. Are you involved with the Troy historic district?Historicist (talk) 17:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, it is a nice article. And you are entirely correct about the synagogue. Tt is architecturally notable and should be listed on the Natinoal Register. I suspect that it lacks a constituency, since some less notable synagogues are listed. However, it has been neglected by architectural historians. sometimes buildings in second-tier cities get forgotten.Historicist (talk) 17:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

2,352 Gemstone Images not worth being added as a link?
Hi Daniel, you could be the one who might ask the Wiki.en gentlemen to whitelist my URL www.realgems.org. Since December 2008 Vsmith & Co. (USA) have deleted all my external links so that all gemstone-interested Wiki users worldwide (! - except Germany) cannot find my collection of faceted gemstones (and their rough versions) any more... From July 2008 until December 2008 all my link additions (to my own, educational and non-profit website) were not regarded as spam!!!

Since a few days I have followed the instruction of an English Wiki admin to create something worthy for Wikipedia so that my URL can be whitelisted again. So I created these articles on German Wiki BECAUSE GERMAN WIKI HAS WHITELISTED MY URL BECAUSE THEY HAVE SEEN THAT MY COLLECTION OF MORE THAN 2000 IMAGES IS WORTH BEING LINKED AT WIKIPEDIA: Tugtupite, Jeremejevite, Benitoite and added some data to Red Beryl. What else can I do to reach a worldwide whitelisting?

Kind regards, Mike / Realgems.org F.N. Berg (talk) 20:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Daniel, more infos here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spam_blacklist#Realgems.org_-_a_useful_website_for_Wiki_users.3F

Mike F.N. Berg (talk) 20:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

re: Bank of Ireland
May seem a lame excuse but I didnt know when I gave the message that you were an admin (just a very active user) but when I found out I was unable to remove the said message.

Sorry for the inconveniance.  rdunn PLIB 10:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I mean there was no problem here on wiki but the filter on the collage network I edit from blocked access to parts of here so I couldnt (its now been resolved)  rdunn PLIB 15:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Will v. Michigan Dept. of State Police DYK
Thanks for your help getting this throught the DYK nominations. It was my first try and I don't think it would have succeeded without you. Thanks again.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 19:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

User Tigeroo
Hi Daniel Case Need your intervention with restraining User Tigeroo who has again begun wholesale deletions of referenced content with citations. Here are three specific instances in one single day from the same article


 * 4 March 2009 Tigeroo
 * 4 March 2009 Tigeroo
 * 4 March 2009 Tigeroo

Tigeroo cites Wikipedia rules to corrupt the spirit of these rules ,I have tried really..really hard earlier as well to reason with him ...see Talk:Muhammad bin Qasim but to no avail. Intothefire (talk) 17:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Dear Daniel,


 * The reason there are three listed edits is because each edit was explained in the edit summary for each so that other editors may see what I was doing. They are effectively just one edit punctuated to enable greater transparency, and I suppose I could have also done the same on the talk page. In essence they are a very simple removal of direct primary source material haphazardly copy and pasted under a title or randomly inserted into a section. I did not really see it as an extensive change, just as a rather obvious fix. If you have a quick glance at it, I am sure you will see what I mean.


 * On other articles, I have explained myself at greater length when an editor did not think the edit summary was specially clear or obvious and the issue was raised. i.e. in India at Decline of Buddhism I have contributed extensively across Wikipedia and will have had some prior content disputes with editors, such as User:Intothefire. Some, that could possibly flare up again. It would be ridiculous to have all those that disagree with my edits or previous disagreements to call upon you to complain and bring their disputes here. I do believe I have been conducting myself within wikipedia acceptable reason when reapproaching such issues but would could use some advice on how to tackle such issues that may crop up.--Tigeroo (talk) 13:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Checkerboard Inn
--Dravecky (talk) 22:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK update
Can you do another update? Should be from queue 3. Shubinator (talk) 17:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I can do credits and archiving. Shubinator (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've got to run. Shubinator (talk) 18:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Update done by Ruhrfisch. Shubinator (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Update time, from queue 3. The picture has already been protected at Commons. I can do credits and archiving. Shubinator (talk) 04:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Don't forget to bump the next queue count to 4. Shubinator (talk) 04:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Another update needed from queue 2. I can do credits and archiving. Shubinator (talk) 20:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * PeterSymonds did the update. Shubinator (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Walnut Park
I, too, have a degree from SU...well, actually, they didn't mail me the diploma yet, but I finished a Masters in Accounting in December. Thanks for the picture suggestion...I'll try Bird sometime. As for the linear park phrase, it is how it was referred to in the nomination form. I have no problem with taking the word out. I like the way the picture looks in the infobox, too, but the reason we changed it is that apparently when Firefox users look at the article there's a big white space from the end of the text to the bottom of the infobox before the table begins. Moving the picture out of the infobox made the infobox shorter, and thus minimized the white space. I won't change it back, but doncram might if he visits it again, since he's a Firefox user. I was thinking I'd like to be able to look at articles in both browsers, to be sure they look okay, especially the district articles that I've put tables into. Maybe I'll download Firefox and try having both browsers available. Thanks again for the interest and suggestions. Lvklock (talk) 00:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I added a bit to this article. Take a look, when you get a chance.  I don't do much real article development...I like pictures best. Lvklock (talk) 21:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Bias, contridictions and abuse of power
Wow i found it amazing you would block me for removing something that was sourced by youtube, giving them the benefit of doubt (pending the original DVD as a source, which is still NOT here) yet did nothing when they vandalized my argument that had a youtube vid, even though the start of the film had a NASA SIGNED document. did you block the guy who STARTED the edit war? of course not.

i know, IGNORE it and or distort what im saying and no doubt abuse your power. you can find a reason to ban me again. if all else fails, make me take it to the talk page and use the apeal to popular opinion fallacy. i dont know moon landing has evidence for/against it, though more against it, but its not a major issue. forget this, no wonder wikipedia is a joke. bye Sfvace (talk) 07:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - March 2009
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Request for Adminship
Good evening! I was wondering if I could ask you a favor. I am considering standing at RfA in the near future and wanted to ask if you would be kind enough to write a co-nomination? MSGJ has generously offered to nominate me, as we work together at WP:AFC. However, I would also like someone's opinion from a different area (namely, UAA). Thanks in advance. TN X Man 00:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey Daniel, you should maybe try to usurp User:Daniel case because I nearly posted on the wrong talk page! Have you thought about the above yet? It's okay if you don't feel able to, just if you let us know because I am about to write the nom. Cheers, &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:21, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, just in case you missed the reply on my talkpage, if and when you are ready, the link to the nomination is here. Someone else who helps on the helpdesk, ukexpat, has also offered to conominate, so you don't have to write too much! Cheers, &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: This guy
Hi Daniel, is it okay if I reblock this IP? He's a "notable" troll that is known as "the falisifier" (you saw what he does). Not a big deal if you say no but it'd be advantageous for the Wiki. Thanks in advance! Scarian Call me Pat!  07:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks much! :-) Scarian Call me Pat!  17:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Unblock requests
Hello. I see that you handled the unblock request for. If you are interested, the other-half of that content dispute edit war has also requested an unblock. Both were blocked as a result of a report at WP:AN/EW. --Kralizec! (talk) 16:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination
Would you mind giving, as it were, a second opinion about this nomination for a DYK. Awadewit has rejected the article claiming it has plagiarism. I think you could claim the offending paragraph was not sufficiently copyedited, and I have learnt something from that. But plagiarism seems over the top. I have corrected the offending paragraph, and can find no other problems in the article. --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

DreamGuy, again
Within hours of getting unblocked, User:DreamGuy is up to his old tricks. He just removed a bunch of consensus edits (and some other ones) on the Ambigram page and removed a lot of comments on the Talk:Ambigram page that he disagreed with (mostly, perhaps all, mine). I'm leaving this message on your talk page (and User_talk:Protonk's and User_talk:Hersfold's) because of your involvement in his recent block. Thanks. RoyLeban (talk) 19:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I just took a look at it, and it's not looking too good, more of the same WP:POINTy crap. I want to get you and Protonk's opinions on this before I do anything or take this to ANI, though. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 19:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Jabuka
I saw that you protected Jabuka article with description that "anonymous IP-hopper making extraordinary unsourced claims". Ok, I am "anonymous IP", but it is because I prefer so, and, as I understand, it is not against Wiki rules to edit articles as an "anonymous IP" as long as these edits are not disruptive. Now, the question whether I posting there "unsorced claims" or not is another story. I actually posted my sources in both: the talk page (see: Talk:Jabuka), and the article itself, but the problem is that user:Speidelj claim that he cannot open Internet source that I presented to him on the talk page and he removing from article references that I posted. This is his edit in which he blanked reference list: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jabuka&diff=275800413&oldid=275704615 Ok, if you already involved yourself in this problem, can you perform some sort of mediation here? I will try to prove to you that it is not me who behave disruptive here, but user:Speidelj (no matter if I edit articles as "anonymous IP" or as "registered user"). First, I will ask you to tell me can you open this link or not (since user:Speidelj claim that it cannot be opened): http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:m5yUnACBSbAJ:www.sopancevo.org.yu/30-1-l+jabuka+stratiste&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2 If you can open this link, can you tell to user:Speidelj that link can be opened and can you confirm to him that it contain these 3 sentences: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jabuka#And_now Also, is there an easy way to check is user:Balcescu an sockpuppet created by user:Speidelj? Thank you. 81.18.62.135 (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Today user 81.18.62.135 informed me, that his sources are to be opened:
 * "Actually, Speidelj, I admit that you are right in one thing: the link that I provided to you indeed have an form that ask for your name and telephone, but you do not have to fill this form - all you have to do is to go to lower part of that page and to read history of Jabuka. Would you be so kind to do this, thank you: http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:m5yUnACBSbAJ:www.sopancevo.org.yu/30-1-l+jabuka+stratiste&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2 81.18.62.135 (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Speidelj" and further:"The stupid web site is online again - as I assumed, it indeed changed Internet domain from "yu" to "rs", so the new adress is: http://www.pancevo.rs/Jabuka-30-1 So, Speidelj, would you be so kind to read history of Jabuka on this page? thank you very much. 81.18.62.135 (talk) 20:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)--Speidelj (talk) 23:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC) But anyway, the source is always rhe same one, without citation, so it is not a valuable source for wikipedia. But all the other days he called me a liar and a denier of holocaust.--Speidelj (talk) 23:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

My conclusions
Well ... interesting argument you have going there. I can't read that linked page; it's in Serbo-Croatian (well, I could try based on familiarity with two other Slavic languages but it's really too late for that now.

Why don't you try seeking a third opinion on this, or perhaps seeing what the people at reliable sources noticeboard think? As for the sockpuppetry allegation, that should be handled at WP:SPI. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Unlock Jabuka or what?
OK, the basic problem with Jabuka article was that I used an source that changed its internet domain from "yu" to "rs", and older version of this page that I used could not be oppened any more. However, I found new version of this page about Jabuka (now with "rs" internet domain): http://www.pancevo.rs/Jabuka-30-1 Also, if you see this, you will see that user Speidelj also addmitted that he can open and read this source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jabuka#Finally So, you basically locked article until 15 March 2009 with description that "anonymous IP-hopper making extraordinary unsourced claims", and now, when I have link that actually work, would you be so kind to unlock article, so that I can update links that point to this source, thank you. 212.69.6.213 (talk) 17:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * There is no need to open the article for IP-hoppers, who are offending users as sockpuppets, sockpuppetmaster or even as liars and, worse, denier of holocaust.--Speidelj (talk) 21:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Smith Clove Meetinghouse
--Dravecky (talk) 03:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Your editing Lou Pearlman
I see you removed the part about Ayman Difrawi on Lou_Pearlman. I do not consider this editing appropriate, and reverted the changes. Difrawi was Pearlman's main man in his controversial talent scouting businesses. They were Difrawi's brain childs and he was in fact running the show. Pretty well-sourced graf's too, imho. If you intend to repeat your actions, please be damn specific about them. Thank you. Regards --WeatherFug (talk) 07:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Few Questions. Apparently the names Ayman Ahmed el Difrawi aka Alec Defrawy and other aliases are demanded to be completely removed from Wikipedia, and legal pressure is employed by Difrawi's lawyer? Could you please provide detailed specifications about all concerns, so I can address them one by one? Have mr Defrawri's legal threats been addressed directly to you, or to the appropriate Wikipedia department? Thank you, kind regards --WeatherFug (talk) 21:58, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Hancock Manor
Hi. I wonder if you could help me out with something. At the Hancock Manor article, various IPs have, for the past two months, been removing mention of the fact that slaves were kept on the property. They have also not engaged in discussion at all. I believe this may be the doing of a descendant of the family, and while I understand one's reluctance to have that aspect of the family history publicized, it is nonetheless still history. Do you have any advice? Perhaps semi-protection for a while might work? - Biruitorul Talk 17:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Great, thank you for helping out. - Biruitorul Talk 01:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Parappa664
Requested a new account per your comment of WP:GOTHACKED, I've decided to WP:AGF this one and created the requested account of User:Parappa665 and notify you as the blocking admin. Q T C 01:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

RfA
I appreciate your support. It has gone pretty much as I was warned it would, but I'm seeing lots of support, which is good - and a fair amount of constructive criticism among the opposing, with a few vindictive votes thrown in there. If someone else nominates me again in 3 or 6 months or whatever, a fair number of the vindictive ones are liable to be long gone, and hopefully the sincere ones will see sufficient improvement. Thanks again. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 05:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm not working on ANI or Obama anymore, so I've got lots of free time now. :) But it's getting close to shutdown time. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 05:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Archive
Would you like me to archive your talk page? :)  Enigma msg  05:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. It seems you're talking about a full archive. I would simply archive all the discussions that haven't been commented on since 2008. Leave ones that have semi-recent comments on your talk.  Enigma msg  05:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

If
I saw that you mentioned a Kipling classic recently - good stuff. You may also be familiar with Desiderata. I first heard of it 40 years ago when Leonard Nimoy released an album (still may have the vinyl somewhere). And I was going to try to adopt the lingo of the current generation with a "Dude, you really need to archive" - but I see that's covered in a thread above. Nothing else really, just that I like the "If -" poem, If the post is too forumish .. just delete. — Ched ~ (yes?) 06:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Happy belated birthday Daniel!
 Master&amp;  Expert ( Talk ) 01:12, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Kinesio tape
Obviously I support the deletion (I originally tagged it for speedy deletion and then started the AFD), but I would like to point out that User:KinesioTape didn't create the article. He did most of the work, but he didn't create it. That was User:Malibuken11, whose only edit was creating the article.  TJ   Spyke   03:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Username Issues - TentaclePorn
Hi there Daniel, I appreciate your concern and as a clearly productive user of wikipedia I will regard your advice as well justified. Although I don't believe - personally - that there are any issues with my current username, I do understand how some people may target me. Despite my strong disagreement with anything offensive or questionable about my name, I do want to avoid any issues that may arise. As a relatively new Wikipedia account owner, I am unsure how I would go about changing my name. Any help would be appreciate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TentaclePorn (talk • contribs) 03:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's simple: Request a name change at WP:Changing username. Follow the instructions, and be sure to choose a reasonable name that doesn't fall afoul of Wikipedia's username policy. A bureaucrat will do it, but it may take some time (though most of them are done within 24 hours). -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 03:07, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Migrating birdies
It's a sparrow not a swallow, you twit! And they do migrate. Millions of the little buggers have emigrated from England to Australia, where they are regarded with intense prejudice, particularly in the West where they get shot just for crossing the border. A sparrow's head don't really make much of a trophy, but you really do have to admire the marksmanship of a West Australian with a ring of little sparrows' heads bobbing round his akubra in place of the more usual corks.Amandajm (talk) 06:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I found a pitcher! Amandajm (talk) 10:58, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Long time no see
How's it going? :) - Things are really going well here. If you haven't noticed, I am running articles up by the books :). You know the new books feature? Well, I am looking to completing and ordering my first book - Highways in Warren County, New York. Maybe you can help me with Dutchess County? That would be fun. :) - It is close, but Julian and I have been unable to finish it :|. Mitch 32 ( Go Syracuse ) 15:13, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * You can, but I have some images of my own as well :) - Just that I gotta find them :| - And yes I saw your edits as I am the one who got Sloatsburg to GA. Mitch 32 ( Go Syracuse ) 15:30, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

George F. Baker High School
I noticed your recent edit to George F. Baker High School added a link to a page that doesn't yet exist, and you even mentioned this in your edit summary. Are you planning on creating the page soon, or do you hope that someone else will make the page now that there's a link to it? --Ericdn (talk) 19:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

invitation
You're invited to sign up as a founding member, at WikiProject Council/Proposals ! :) doncram (talk) 05:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Nice work
On the Sloatsburg NRHP series. Just saw your post on StarM's talk page. I found the Sloat's Dam and Mill Pond article to be particularly interesting. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  05:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Help with a blocked editor
You recently blocked Pkrdoctor because his username is inconsistent with policy. Do you know of a way that I can get in touch with him under his new name, whatever it may be? He requested mediation from the Cabal. Tealwisp (talk) 06:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Sloatsburg NRHP listings
good job! Sorry I wasn't able to be more of a help. I moved shortly after the June meet-up and while I'm not that far, I haven't had too much free time in Rockland of late :( StarM  18:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Masten-Quinn House
--Dravecky (talk) 02:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

File:JD Salinger.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:JD Salinger.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 03:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Have a pint of lager...


...as a reward for clearing out WP:AIV, as per my thread at WP:AN. Enjoy!!! =D C.U.T.K.D  <b style="color:blue;">T</b> 14:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

WP:HSITES
WikiProject Historic Sites is opened up. I took the liberty of assuming your support for the wikiproject meant you wanted to join as a member, and I copied your signature to the Members list on the main page. Please visit and add to, or remove, your listing there. It would be great to hear about what you're interested in the Wikiproject being, in your member comment and/or at the Talk page, shortcut wt:HSITES. Thanks for your support! doncram (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK update needed
DYK is due for an update, from queue 3. I can do credits. Shubinator (talk) 14:43, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Richard Gere/Jennifer Fitzgerald
I would like to know why the Richard Gere edits regarding the Gerbil story although well sourced is not acceptable because its a rumor, and the vast majority of Jennifer Fitzgerald's article is clearly a rumor? And that is allowed to stay?Fodient (talk) 22:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

LeAnn Rimes
See my response at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. -- Wh ip it !  Now whip it good! 21:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

You've got an e-mail
–Juliancolton <sup style="color:#666660;">Tropical <sup style="color:#666660;">Cyclone  06:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No rush, just something to consider. Hope you had fun in the Catskills! It was a nice day to be out and about, though just a bit cold. –Juliancolton <sup style="color:#666660;">Tropical <sup style="color:#666660;">Cyclone  06:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

You're invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:08, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Oversight
Thanks for oversighting the posting made in response to something I'd said on Charles Manson talk. As I outlined in my oversight email, this is just one more step in a long series from the proven sock master account that has continued to return and harass. I noticed that the account itself is still present and not blocked, which means she will come back and do something again. Since it was created immediately after I'd posted a warning to another account of the sock master and now used to harass me and try to out me, I was wondering why this account isn't blocked and deleted? Is there something more I need to submit to clarify the situation besides what I sent in the oversight request. I'm not keen on this sock master having an account with my real name that she can use when she wants. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Sloat House
Shubinator (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Old Sloatsburg Cemetery
Shubinator (talk) 06:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Traduction
Salut, J'ai contribué à l'écriture de l'article fr:Bataille de Latroun (1948) et j'ai commencé sa traduction vers Battle of Latrun mais je n'y arrive vraiment pas. De l'anglais vers le français, je m'en tire très bien mais je ne parviens pas à traduire les nuances du français vers l'anglais... Pourrais-tu m'aider ? Merci, Ceedjee (talk) 17:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Siena College
I hate to bother you with this, but I am at my wits-end and I know I get overly emotional about disputes on wikipedia, so I'm hoping you as an admin can take an objective look at this argument that I admit did escalate at a point to an edit war. Siena College, if you could read its talk page on whether the college is located in the hamlet of Loudonville or the hamlet of Newtonville (we all agree it has a Loudonville ZIP code). Further information can be taken from my talk page, user:JBC3, and user:Hippo43. I dont know if even an admin has the right to step into this type of argument and make any kind of judgement as to the legitimacy of information presented or anything like what I'm asking, but if you could put in your two cents after examining all the evidence (I guess kind of like a judge) whatever position sways your opinion I can live with, I'll admit I may not agree with it and still think its wrong, but at least there will be what I consider an outside unbiased opinion and if my arguments fail to win the case, then I'll just have to search harder and maybe next time can find more definitive sources or just give up. Thanks and I hope this doesnt end up causing stress on you!Camelbinky (talk) 05:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I dont know what to do now that you have said that the USGS suggests Newtonville. The user Hippo43 is accusing me of vandalism if I change it back again. In my opinion there is nothing wrong with the sources I had and I would like to add the USGS map you have as well. The user says the sources arent legitimate, claims that since nothing comes out and SAYS "Siena is in the hamlet of Newtonville" I cant put that it is in the hamlet of Newtonville unless a source says so. Is there some warning or anything you are willing to do so I can put my sources and information back in the article or at least use those same sources and information to keep him from stripping from the Newtonville, New York article that Siena College is in the hamlet. I dont want to be the one labeled a vandal. I just want what to be able to present my facts in the articles.Camelbinky (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm taking the discussion at Siena College to dispute resolution. It said that it could only consider conflicts that already had asked for a third party opinion. I figure I could use that I asked you for an opinion as having tried that step already. I could use your professional opinion on what to do now. I was ready to drop this until Hippo43 made the comment that "you are in the minority view" towards me, when in fact wadester and JBC3 both are in the same basic view with me versus just him. I am a little over my head with bringing something to conflict resolution as I have not filled out one before and am not familiar with alot of the technical aspects of wikipedia. I have asked wadester if he's willing to do it, as he's better than I am at this stuff and much calmer about it, but if you dont mind filling it out that would be ok too. I guess all parties have to sign, so I hope you are willing to sign it too. Thanks and sorry I dragged you into this in the first place.Camelbinky (talk) 02:19, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
This is the exact message that I receive when attempting to edit anything from my apartment:

You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia. You can still read pages, but you cannot edit, change, or create them. Editing from 98.231.16.0/20 (your account, IP address, or IP address range) has been disabled by Nishkid64 for the following reason(s).

This is AFTER I log in to the account, which I had assumed would allow me to 'get around a block.' This is really getting frustrating for several reasons: 1) no reasons have been provided for the block 2) this is Wikipedia, not the Oxford Dictionary (that is not a slam on Wiki, but the truth of the matter is Wikipedia was intended to be a user based site and users are being banned for years for no reason) 3) I keep going in circle after circle with various mods attempting to get unblocked. Every time I provide what is requested, something else is asked. Once that is provided, someone asks for the originial request again.

Here is the IP from my apartment that is apparently the one being blocked: 98.231.16.46 Huntmog (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK overdue
Hey Daniel, it looks like you might be online right now so I thought I would let you know, the update to T:DYK appears to be about three hours late. If you get this message in time, would you be able to flip the hooks? <b class="Unicode">r ʨ anaɢ</b> talk/contribs 18:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Never mind, looks like Dravecky just got it! Thanks anyway, <b class="Unicode">r ʨ anaɢ</b> talk/contribs 18:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

About my block still
The reason that I seem so intent on the block being lifted is simple: it irritated me that the process was so convoluted for such a minor issue. All I wanted to do was edit a couple of athletes pages that have erroneous information, and add references to Sitting Bull's page. I play a lot of online poker and like to have a lot of background noise going, so forums and wikipedia allow that activity during a lull in the game.

A temporary/trial un-blocking would be great since Im sure the first time I did anything out of line, it would be jumped all over anyways. Thanks again and hopefully this can be resolved soon. Huntmog (talk) 18:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Bog Brook Reservoir pic
Looks great. I added it to Southeast, New York, and per your suggestion, I'll include it within the portal's selected picture rotation. –Juliancolton <sup style="color:#666660;">Tropical <sup style="color:#666660;">Cyclone  21:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for being a part of my block removal. As I told the other person, I may be rough around the edges when it comes to the correct format, but I have lots of good information/citations/references to add to pages. If I do anything out of line, please let me know. Huntmog (talk) 23:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

User talk:216.120.198.130
I see you declined the unblock request, but I think we could give them a little faith. Would you have a problem if I unblocked them to see how it goes? Even if they do return to vandalism, the block can be re-applied, with an expiry. Netsnipe hasn't edited in nearly a month, so I'm not holding my breath for a reply there. – xeno  ( talk ) 14:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I was under the impression that the wheel-war didn't start until the third action... – xeno  ( talk ) 15:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * True enough. Anyhow, I've unblocked the IP. I also found a bunch of other indef schoolblocks, you may wish to comment at the AN thread here: AN. – xeno  ( talk ) 15:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Wanna take a peek over the following? (Especially the first two, which I gather you did not mean to make indef.) – xeno  ( talk ) 20:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * 24.210.109.25 	Daniel Case 	20070708171834.00	Vandalism-only account
 * 68.103.249.21 	Daniel Case 	20070713032516.00	Vandalism-only account
 * 77.99.161.6 	Daniel Case 	20070707065133.00	Suspected sockpuppet of banned User:Gonz4
 * 77.183.244.184 	Daniel Case 	20070718211642.00	Abusing multiple accounts: seems to be anon User:77.183.228.21477.183.228.214 evading a block
 * 68.92.33.205 	Daniel Case 	20070719050326.00	Abusing multiple accounts: Suspected sockpuppet of Mmbabies
 * 195.212.52.6 	Daniel Case 	20070724002958.00	Abusing multiple accounts: suspected sockpuppet of User:Rob right
 * 68.75.167.37 	Daniel Case 	20070727032813.00	Abusing multiple accounts: suspected sock of User:JoeHazelton


 * Not sure if you missed the above^ Can we lift the blocks on at least the first two, as for the others, do you think those socks are still on those IPs? – xeno  ( talk ) 01:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Sloat's Dam and Mill Pond
<b class="Unicode">r ʨ anaɢ</b> talk/contribs 00:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

King AJ (rapper)
Thanks for checking the username and article. Sorry for not acting on my own on the matter, but its been a few months since I last exercised adminship rights on such matters, and wanted a second opinion on taking action on the matter. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Hip to Be Square
Hey, just because you can't understand such hard hitting, thought provoking lyrics such as "IT'S HIP TO BE SQUAREEE!", don't come cryin' to me at the DYK page. :P In all seriousness, thanks for making me laugh! :) Have a great day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 20:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

comment requested at wp:an
I have opened an Unban request on behalf of Jvolkblum and others, which also includes a ban request on Orlady, at Administrators' noticeboard. Mbisanz(sp?) asked there that you be invited to comment. I hope you please will. doncram (talk) 00:19, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for taking control of this. ~  ωαdεstεr 16  «talkstalk» 16:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Siena College
Hi Daniel, thanks for your input in the Siena College dispute. Hopefully we can reach a good solution.

Your threat that I would be blocked struck me as excessive. I apologise if my sarcasm caused any offence - it was intended as a rhetorical statement, not disrespect to any person. I'm not especially knowledgeable on blocking policy, but I can't see at all how this might be grounds for a block.

Moreover, I'm concerned that the statement you posted in the RfC was not at all neutral, as required, or representative of the preceding discussion. It struck me as a real distortion of the case for 'Loudonville', and omitted the clear consensus that exists among reliable sources.

It's great to have the involvement of an admin in this, but I'm concerned that you are supporting a particular position in the dispute as well as acting as a kind of authority figure. Your position as an admin gives you a certain status in this - threatening to block someone who holds an opposing view to yourself, and posting a misleading (at best) statement for the RfC strike me as quite partisan. Is there a way to resolve this? Again, I'm grateful for your help in finding a resolution. --hippo43 (talk) 18:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Another picture
Wow, that's great! Nice job on that one. Added to the selected picture rotation.

On a side note, I'm surprised we don't have a Harlem Valley article. I found some useful sources which I might use to throw together an article later. – Juliancolton  | Talk 14:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅. I like the contrast between the dark blue sky and the red door in that photo. – Juliancolton  | Talk 15:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd say it has a shot at passing FPC, but what do I know; I've had about a dozen failed FPCs over the years (seems it's easier to pass RfA nowadays). If not FP, it's certainly WP:VPC material. – Juliancolton  | Talk 15:08, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Input requested
Hi, your are listed in WikiProject Bridges and I wondered if you might want to weigh in on a requested move? There is a discussion here Talk:Suspension_bridge_types which results from a previous move. The discussion has major consequences on the content of the main article on suspension bridges. The root question: Is suspended deck bridge the proper name for a typical suspension bridge? - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 02:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Eastern Bloc politics
I changed your hook, so please review and correct if necessary. Art LaPella (talk) 04:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Harlem Line
Hey Daniel, Some great pictures you added to the Tenmile River and Wassaic articles! Today I was out photographing north of Wassaic, up by Amenia & Millerton. Check some of the articles out, you'll like the pictures!--English836 (talk) 03:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Littlemarca
I am ok with giving the user another chance. Up to you. Thanks for asking. -- K u k i ni  háblame aquí 13:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

New Rochelle discussion notice
New Rochelle problem discussion notification: I've opened a new discussion at Administrators' noticeboard.

This relates to the 4 part proposal i opened on March 26, which was closed on March 27 and archived at Administrators' noticeboard/Archive187.

This is a courtesy notice to all parties who had more than a one word comment in the previous discussion. I think it is a problem that won't go away, and I hope that you will be part of the solution, whether or not you and I have agreed previously. I hope that we can at least clarify the problem, if not immediately agree upon a solution. If anyone thinks this is inappropriate canvassing, I am sure they will express that. I don't anticipate too many separated discussions on this topic, but if this one is closed and a new one opens, I'll probably notify you again, unless you ask me not to. doncram (talk) 03:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

AIV
FYI, Some questions about your decision not to take action against Georgeperez have been posted to WP:AIV.--RadioFan (talk) 03:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Request for arbitration - Unjustified ban of users
I have filed a request for arbitration regarding recent bans of user accounts from which no activities could be found that dispupt Wikipedia. The arbitration request can be found here: Requests for arbitration You are not mentioned as an involved party, I send you this message as a courtesy for your information, and I hope that your opinion there can contribute to solve the issue. Thank you! doxTxob \ talk 23:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Old Southeast Church (Brewster, New York)
Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

My UAA report
Since you thought my UAA report was a joke, and did not assume good faith, I figured I should give you a record of what exactly happened there. Anti venin  17:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Now Siena conflict has migrated!
HELP! This has gotten out of hand. Now hippo insists on editing the Loudonville, New York article to say it is a town, and says that it is because according to the common definition of a town it is and it doesnt matter what the political reality of it is. He says we must have a source to cite that Loudonville is NOT a town. He has also brought the Siena conflict to two other outside discussion forums, Doncram can give you the link to them, I dont have them. This is getting out of hand for such a little thing that we all were willing to compromise greatly on. I really truly believe this is a matter of trolling, I hope I dont get in trouble for saying so but that is my interpretation of how this migrating, the edit to Loudonville without discussing first really seems to just be a way to create more conflict and arguing and not constructive to the article at all. Is there anything to be done about this? I'm very disillusioned with wikipedia and probably will "retire" from it even if something is done about him. What is the point in me doing good work and editing if someone like hippo is allowed to hide behind technicallities to put in blatantly false or misleading info and make judgement calls on my sources and say they arent reliable without ever bringing a discussion or abiding by concensus.Camelbinky (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Camelbinky, you have spread this nonsense around fairly widely. I don't think I ever edited the Loudonville article to say it is a town. Can you supply a diff? If not, you owe me an apology.
 * DC, I took the discussion to WP:RSN and WP:NORN when the Siena page was edit protected, which seemed constructive. It produced more debate and some interesting views. --hippo43 (talk) 20:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Jeez, how many places do I have to go to combat this slur? Anyways- as I told wadester, Daniel you can check the history of the Loudonville article and see hippo's edit yourself where the statement that Loudonville is a town does appear and where doncram mentions it in his edit summary on the revert. I'm not asking anyone to take my word for it, the evidence is there.Camelbinky (talk) 20:59, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Camelbinky, at your talk page I have posted links to all four edits I made on Loudonville, NY. Please point out which one you are talking about. I think you may have taken Doncram's edit summary as gospel. Before you say anything dumber, or make things worse, please read the diffs. Which one contains the evidence you are talking about? --hippo43 (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Edit Help.. please??
Hey, i'm new to wikipedia and I've just recently uploaded my article on Muscina flies. I'm currently looking for editors who can do a quick edit to help me make the page a better Wikipedia article. If you could help me edit, I would be extremely greatful. If not, than that's okay too. If it's not asking too much, could you could maybe forward this message on to other veteran Wiki users who could help me edit I would be much obliged. --Hieu87 (talk) 19:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Hieu87

Repsonse to your comment:
Thank you for getting back to me. I hope you are having a fun time in Amman and not just doing work, lots of archaeological sites to see, I have always been fascinated with Petra, if you get a chance to see that site I would love to hear a first-hand account of it. When you get back I am willing to give it a chance to see your opinion on how the situation unfolded. I will not present my side at this moment, when you are back and you have time to look over the situation then I will answer whatever questions you may have. I have however retired from wikipedia, most likely for good, though I do watch articles I like to keep up on for new information, I just dont care to edit at this moment or get into arguments with people who disagree with my edits and resort to saying that my statements are "dumb". I do however wish for some sort of validation that I did not blow out of proportion hippo43's treatment of me on my own talk page, and that his continued posting of inflamatory remarks not just on my talk page but on multiple other pages was over the line. At this point I'm not looking for "revenge" against him, I dont care if anything happens over it, I just would like to know if a third party truly thinks "yea, camelbinky, you're right, hippo did step over the line and was rude, you're not exagerating". But if I am I'd like to hear that too. Anyways, have fun, relax, and take your time no emergencies.Camelbinky (talk) 05:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I had thought it would be best, since I had already retired my Camelbinky account, to edit only through IP addresses to avoid Hippo43 and to keep him from editing on my talk page. But now that my "identity" has been "discovered" I have resumed User:Camelbinky as my account. Hippo43 has resumed his posting of comments on my talk page after several warnings to not send me messages on my talk page and confine his comments to me on relevant article related issues on the relevant talk page of an article. I dont know what to do, I am at my last straw, he is now claiming a user does not "own" their own talk pages. I have posted the relevant policy from Harrassment that at least I interpret as stating otherwise, to a degree that keeps the talk page in the general public's sphere but gives latitude to the user for more control than an article talk page.Camelbinky (talk) 21:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale warning
Hi Daniel. I recently noticed the fair-use rationale you added to File:Cormac mccarthy promo.jpg. I just wanted to warn you that making an explicit claim that a high-resolution image (3500 x 3500) is low-resolution ("Low_resolution = Yes") is deceptive and may lead to legal action against Wikipedia. If you wish to add a fair use rationale to a high-resolution image in the future, please first create and upload a lower-resolution of the image, or ask another user to do so on your behalf. Thank you! Dcoetzee 04:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

NY 218 question
Hey. Your three-year old question about NY 218 on Talk:New York State Route 218 finally has an answer. =) Your hunch was correct - the 1930s maps that I've acquired over the last year confirm that US 9W originally followed NY 218. –  T <font color="#0000C0">M F 05:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Jennifer Fitzgerald.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jennifer Fitzgerald.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <span style="color:#0D670D; font-family:Georgia, Helvetica;">rootology ( C )( T ) 16:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Request for Mediation
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Requests for mediation/Li Yong (Tang Dynasty), and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, Nlu (talk) 16:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC) --Nlu (talk) 16:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Spy magazine August 1992 cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Spy magazine August 1992 cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Loudonville, New York
I dont want to confront or start another argument with Hippo43 but can you take a look at the info I put into Loudonville that Hippo keeps removing. It is my personal opinion that he is removing the info because it may make him "look bad" in that it is a legitimate newspaper source that mentions that some people use Loudonville PO boxes as their addresses even if they live outside the mailing area just because it makes their business seem "higher class" and legitimizes what some of us said at Siena College that PERHAPS the college wanted to promote the name L. for its own benefit. But anyways, I just wanted a second opinion, if you think the info I put in really doesnt belong then I'll go along, but if you dont think so I still dont know what to do because I'm not going to get into another convo with that guy!Camelbinky (talk) 00:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Rhode Island
I'm currently working on Portal:Rhode Island, specifically the selected picture segment. I remember that you went over there last year, so feel free to add any nice images you have to the rotation. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jennifer Fitzgerald.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jennifer Fitzgerald.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Request for mediation not accepted
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

WP:NYCD
Just so you know. ~  ωαdεstεr 16  «talkstalk» 11:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

US 62 in NY
Hey. Since you've been to WNY many times (if I'm remembering correctly), you may be interested in taking a look at the recently-created U.S. Route 62 in New York. The creator of the article means well, but sadly, the route description is not that good. Your descriptions - whether it be NY 32 or US 20 in NY - always turn out well, so I was wondering if you'd be interested in taking the task of sprucing it up or rewriting it completely. At least it wouldn't be as lengthy as US 20 was. =) Regards,  T <font color="#0000C0">M F 06:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Wormfood
Discussion of the content of a BLP is fine. Comments that the person will soon be dead, and "wormfood" are wholly inappropriate. I've removed your remarks, please reword if you must replace their substance.--Scott Mac (Doc) 07:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Southern Gothic Productions
Please have another look at the source cited for SGP on the Hilarie Burton Wiki Start article as well as the blog itself. You may not recognize Hilarie Burton, Austin Nichols or Kelly Tenney but we do - and are trying to contribute to Wikipedia in the spirit in which it is intended - with collaborative, positive, accurate information. Aliexpedites (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Bludvera
You deleted my Bludvera page. I referenced all the information and you still deleted it due to "unimportance". If you think this was lawful, would it be possible if you could help me produce the article again but to meet standards?

Thank You —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.13.87.86 (talk) 13:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Southern Gothic Productions
Thank you for your time in re-considering SGP. Although clearly new to blogging, H. Burton, K. Tenney et al are not new to film-making. As of now, all efforts on behalf of SoGoPro are fan/volunteer-based - hence the confusion. Naturally there ARE lawyers - and a marketing firm (overdue on delivering an official website.)

For a national publication quoting Hilarie re: SGP see TV Guide - May '07

For an indication of international appeal, i invite you to look at the flags and live-feed on their messy but happy blog.

And because pictures (and pictures on maps!) are worth... okay - not a reliable source - if you say so

I have asked our street team to become familiar with the Wiki guidelines and community in order to contribute in a meaningful way - and i am trying to follow suit.

personally looking forward to this all going better and a trip to the Hudson Valley

again - thank you for your time Ali

okay - my links are broken - HTML scares me and not sure if this will thread properly - sigh

Aliexpedites (talk) 23:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Troy, New York talk page
Hello Daniel Case. Since it appears you did the work converting to a Geobox for Troy, New York, I thought you might find this section of the talk page relevant: Talk:Troy, New York/Archives/2012. --JBC3 (talk) 04:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Jeez, JBC3, I know you have issues with me but come on, if you had a problem with me suggesting an infobox to replace the geobox then say so at the article page. I simply wanted to make all city, town, and village articles in the Capital District look the same, since Albany and some others use an infobox I thought Troy should probably change. If there is a reason why some people prefer geoboxes versus infoboxes, then they should speak up and we can have a discussion at the capital District Wikiproject talk page. From the reading I've done infobox settlement seems better prepared for city articles. That's my personal preference, but if the majority of CD wikiproject members prefer geoboxes so be it. Oh and when did Wp:BOLD stop applying to me personally? Ever since you labeled me a "sockpuppet" you've gone around and decided that anything I do needs to be scrutinized and make a big deal about it. If I want to change a geobox to an infobox what is the big deal exactly, why dont I have the right? infobox is valid and there is a whole wikiproject of people involved with it. I dont even understand why we have geoboxes AND infoboxes.Camelbinky (talk) 04:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Camelbinky, I have addressed your statement on my talk page, as you have left a similar message there as well. --JBC3 (talk) 05:13, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

AFD Re-opened
As you are an editor who had been involved in the Afd discussion of Jennifer Fitzgerald, I'm here to let you know that I re-opened the discussion on the article to gain a stronger consensus. After some discussion with a few other editors I agree that I may have closed the article too hastily and that further discussion is necessary before a final decision is made. Best wishes, Icestorm815  •  Talk  19:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Geobox help
Can you look at the geobox region that I put in for Capital District, I know I still have to fill out some fields like area. I'm just curious if I used the right (or best) one for this article. I found the template used on most California regions and those are the best ones for sub-state regions I've found so along with your comment that geoboxes are better than infoboxes I thought it would be a smart thing to emulate them. If you have any other suggestions or comments for improvement on the article if you get time to read the whole thing I'd love to hear those too. And I'll change the Albany, New York article to a geobox too.Camelbinky (talk) 00:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow I'm embarressed! I didnt even notice it and I looked it over and over trying to think "is anything wrong?" and never noticed I put the wrong county! I'm so glad you were able to look it over and catch that. I'm now going back and putting citations everywhere for the article, but I was wondering what your opinion on info in an infobox, does it need a citation if the info is also in the article and cited in the article itself?Camelbinky (talk) 02:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Another question, sir!
Sorry to be a bother but you were alot of help with geoboxes, so I was wondering if you could help me with another question- can tell me how to move a photo from wikimapia? There are two great photos of the Schenectady City Hall on wikimapia but I cant seem to find them on the commons or see how to move them to wikipedia. Is it ok to just save the photos to my computer and then just upload them to the commons?Camelbinky (talk) 23:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Suggested article topic
Hi Daniel. As my article on the Merchant Shipbuilding Corporation is in the DYK pipeline, and since you like to write article about historic places, I thought you might be interested in penning an article on the Harriman Historic District, which is mentioned in the above article but which doesn't appear to have an article of its own yet. Harriman township was the largest single housing project undertaken by the EFC during the First World War. It would make a nice complement to the MSC article IMO if you could get it done fairly quickly. Regards, Gatoclass (talk) 01:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Cool! Looking forward to seeing what you can do with it. There's certainly no shortage of info in the reference you located :) Gatoclass (talk) 04:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Just to let you know I have expanded your article to make it eligible for DYK and made a double nom of it along with my article Merchant Shipbuilding Corporation. Cheers, Gatoclass (talk) 06:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem. I would have preferred to leave it to you, but as I was unsure if you intended to expand it further, and time was running out to submit the tandem hook, I felt I had little choice but to take a crack at it myself. I think it turned out okay in the end, although I guess a little more could be added to the "Description" section. Thanks once again for helping me out with it :) Gatoclass (talk) 13:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see you've done a little more work on it already. Yes, I like the new layout and organization, I think it's an improvement. Gatoclass (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

In the comment section you state that it is "facing south". I think that's incorrect; it's facing north. Indeed, the caption of the pic at South Fallsburg states that it's facing north. --Notyetbornagain (talk) 15:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Question
I'm trying to access the NRHP source, which you use to source the synagogue articles. I've downloaded Java but all I get is a two page document that says that the building is NHRP, nothing more. Can you please help? Thansk, --Notyetbornagain (talk) 17:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm using Firefox. Maybe I'll download Safari. I need to get a look at the source for South Fallsburg Hebrew Association Synagogue; there's some factual mistakes there. For one, "the bimah is unusually placed in the rear, near the ark, rather than the center as is customary in Orthodox synagogues"

can't be right. Firstly, I was in the synagogue a few years ago and the bima was not in the rear. A bima is never placed in the rear. It is either in the front or in the center. Also, an ark is always in the front.

Secondly, the sukka in the basement thing doesn't really make sense. The most fundamental aspect of a sukka is that it have nothing but the sky above it. The last place a sukka can be placed is in a basement.

But otherwise, the articles are really awesome. If anyone here should be paid for there contributions, it's you. Best, --Notyetbornagain (talk) 18:26, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

==Silver Lake (Woodridge, New York), Silver Lake Dam I fooled with the DYK hook. The grammar of the latter part was unclear as to what it was referring to. I hope I didn't mess anything up. Also, I thought the fulla rticle title is supposed to be included in the hook for the articles? I think the dam one just says "dam"? Anyway, just wanted to give you a heads up in case you want to revert. Cheers. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

WWOOF
Hi, I see that you have stepped in to participate as a managing editor on the WWOOF page open issues. If you get a change, would you mind taking a look at the proposal I made on the talk page there to create two separate pages for the philosophy / and the organizations:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:WWOOF Wwoof (talk) 04:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Samuel D. McDearmon
Thanks Daniel for verifying the article. Glad you caught "the end of the American Civil War" as being incorrect. I should have known better as I wrote Conclusion of the American Civil War, which became a Good Article.--Doug Coldwell talk 17:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

You're invited...
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, establish a membership process for the chapter, review the upcoming Wiki-Conference New York 2009 (planned for ~100 people at NYU this summer) and future projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:47, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

200 DYKs

 * As someone who only has 33 DYKs (with 34 and 35 in the queue now), I am in awe of your consistent productivity. I am glad to honor your accomplishement and look forward to 300 more (and beyond). All the best, Ruhrfisch <sub style="color:green;">&gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 14:20, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Username "StinkyLola question
Hi Daniel, "Stinky" is actually the name of my cat, "Lola" the name of my dog. I'm not sure it's offensive even if people don't know they refer to pet names but am willing to change if need be. Thanks. StinkyLola (talk) 20:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

DYK review
Hi Daniel. I'm enjoying reading and reviewing your historic places DYK series, thanks for the articles. However, it's a right pain checking your sources when I get a tiny slit at the top of the screen to read these scanned application documents (one damn page at a time) - like this. Do you know any way to make them display full screen? Or get a download of the entire .pdf? Or at least give us some page numbers to make life easier :) I'm checking Union Street Historic District (Poughkeepsie, New York) at the moment - and there are 63 pages in the damn application, sigh. Paxse (talk) 15:02, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Request for help
Hey, I have a favor to ask. Since you live in the Hudson Valley region, I was wondering if it'd be possible for you to access the contents of this 1916 article in the Middletown Times Press through a local library. The relevant portion of the piece discusses the improvement of a 1.3-mile highway leading from the NYS Women's Relief Corps Home to Oxford; this highway became legislative Route 8-a in the late 1910s and part of NY 220 in 1930. If it isn't possible to access it, it's OK, but I figured it was worth a shot. =) Thanks in advance! –  T <font color="#0000C0">M F 15:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

05hepburn2
I have unblocked. He's been blocked for two years. It wouldn't hurt to give him a chance. I'll monitor his edits. Fred Talk 21:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Catskill synagogues
Nice articles. I'm afraid I have nothing to add.Historicist (talk) 19:09, 12 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Can you explain how the Fallsburg synagogue has a sukkah with a retractable roof in the basement? I followed the link and it is described that way in the document you cite.  But... surely this is an error?  After all, it's not a basement unless there is a built space bove it, in which case it cannot be a sukkah.  I'm just puzzled.Historicist (talk) 21:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)


 * This year it's October 2-11. Lots of synagogues have built in sukkahs, rooms with roofs that lift or slide back to open to the sky, or courtyards built so that all you have to do when the holiday begins is to lay fresh branches on top.  The requirements for a sukkah are walls and an open roof covered with branches through which you can see the stars.   A basement does not work.  This is hardly an important point.  But it did pique my curiosity.Historicist (talk) 22:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Congregation Berith Shalom in Troy, New York
I've noticed that you seem to do alot of work with synagogues. I was hoping if you get some time maybe you could look at Congregation Berith Sholom and help out if you can/want, or at least give pointers and ideas where to find more info. Also, being a member of the congregation doesnt make it a COI for me as long as I dont violate NPOV right?Camelbinky (talk) 00:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Monument Square
What do you think? Remove the first two images and replace with the third in Central Troy Historic District? I really like #1, and would like to replace it with a higher quality panorama; do you know the photographer? I'd like to duplicate it. wadester16 | Talk→ 06:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Did You Know problem
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Art LaPella (talk) 06:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Decline on User talk:Bop It Guy20
Thank you. This user was really starting to give me a headache. =P Oh, nice reason too. I love it when Wikipedians use humor in their responses. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 16:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Br4011
Hi Daniel. Could you have another look at user Br4011, in the unblock review seem a bit weird: You've replaced one of the unblock request texts by another, and left one of the templates unreviewed. I'm not quite sure which decline reason fits with which request, so I'll rather let you sort it out. :) Thanks & Cheers, Amalthea  13:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I think you misunderstood what I was asking above, so I myself after all. I think that's how you intended it to be. Thanks,  Amalthea  13:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Qqtacpn
I have no concerns, I am happy to trust your judgement entirely. J Milburn (talk) 16:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * That said, you have seen the issue about the hoaxes at the bottom of the talk page? I haven't read it, but it may be worth checking that... J Milburn (talk) 16:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

He was creating new socks even while blocked. See User:Irmandino. He should be blocked as a vandal, see the talk page for Immemorial nobility and look at his contributions there that were removed. Drawn Some (talk) 16:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

re LaurenRueda unblock
Sure that sounds reasonable. Go ahead and do that if you feel it is best. Cirt (talk) 20:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking care of that, good call. And I also fully agree with this comment you left for the user upon unblocking . Cirt (talk) 20:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Bergh-Stoutenburgh House
This article says it is one of only two remaining Colonial Dutch houses in Hyde Park, but the Dutchess county list entry says it is the only one. Is that normal or am I misreading something? Circeus (talk) 02:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Niagara Engine Hourse
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. --Leifern (talk) 18:18, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

domain names
Daniel, we have talked in the past about borderline violations of WP:UAA, and I feel that we have always been perfectly friendly and civilised in our conversation. Can you please clarify for me your view on usernames which are, or appear to be ,domain names, of which there are several under consideration at present. Surely these names are absolutely prohibited? And therefore, discussion with the user is only of value if they promptly file a username change request? Accepting that the editors currently nominated are not vandalising, could you please share with me your intentions in the event of their not applying for name change? And, how long do we wait? (I would concede that this answer may well depend on their edits). --<b style="color:red;">Anthony.bradbury</b><sup style="color:black;">"talk" 16:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hyde Park Elementary School
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

WP:U policy discussion
Hi, there's a discussion over at Wikipedia_talk:Username_policy that I'd appreciate your input on, since it seems you have an interest in this area of policy. Gigs (talk) 03:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Great job!
Good work getting all those photos for the NYC NRHP lists. They look great! --sanfranman59 (talk) 03:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I just happened to notice that you completed the 59th to 110th St. list this evening. I know that I've seen your name pop up frequently on the NRHP pages on my watchlist, so I just wanted to acknowledge your work. Thanks for your efforts. --sanfranman59 (talk) 04:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of MacKenzieHeartsu
I have nominated MacKenzieHeartsu, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/MacKenzieHeartsu. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

+1
Nice one. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Good idea; ✅. On a side note, I've been considering adding a "selected property" section to the portal, since we have several hundred decent NRHP articles. Do you think that would work? – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination template
Please use the DYK nomination template when you're nominated DYKs. It takes us a healthy chunk of time to fix everything otherwise. There are instructions for using the template at the top of T:TDYK. Shubinator (talk) 15:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is optional. But you'd help us out if you used the template. Shubinator (talk) 16:38, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Shubinator (talk) 16:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Page moves by new user
A new user, User:DmcReif, has been moving pages to names he personally thinks are better or easier to understand. Since there are numerous guidelines in place for moving pages, I'd like your opinion on if anything should be done in response to these page moves. I've given him a Level One warning and noted WP:MOVE. See here for contribs. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 16:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I've left him a message and pointed him to the WP:ROCO naming conventions. Daniel Case (talk) 17:05, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * His last page move was after your warning, here. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 17:28, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * That's actually a valid move, since it is the park's official full name. Daniel Case (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Capital District compilation image
You input would be appreciated.  wadester 16  04:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Peer review/National Register of Historic Places listings in Syracuse, New York/archive1
Since I enjoy and respect your NRHP work, I'm wondering if your could take a minute to look at this list I put up for peer review. I'd very much appreciate and value your input. Thanks. Lvklock (talk) 16:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

If you have a second to take a look
The user I reported (and you blocked) User:Aafinc, has apparently been reincarnated as User:Promixluvr. Promix, is apparently the name of this company's primary product line. I feel like there is some appropriate tagging to do here, both in the article and for the user (still a COI for example), but I don't want to be a wikistalker. Your thoughts? <span style="padding:2px;background: #cccccc; color: #0000cc; BORDER-RIGHT: #6699cc 3px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #6699cc 3px solid;"> 7   talk   00:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Central Troy Historic District
Thanks! And, I absolutely will look at this tonight. Lvklock (talk) 14:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I love this article. I think I have nothing to offer for improvements, as it looks awesome as it is.  My grandfather went to RPI in the late 20's, and it's very cool to think I can go visit and get a sense of what the city was like when he lived there.  Your pictures rock, as always.  And, my Central New York response to Bruno's contributions is "oh, that's where some of our tax money went", as it doesn't appear to have been much spent in CNY. ;)  The district map is really nice.  Are those overlays hard?  I saw someone else do a map like that somewhere and was impressed then, too.  On my browser (IE), there's a big blank space under the National Register of Historic Places section header, from halfway down the Gurley Building to the top of St. Paul's Epsicopal Church.  Interrupts the flow a little.  I'm definitely gonna keep a link to this article on my talk page for inspiration.  Thanks for pointing me to it for a read. Lvklock (talk) 23:55, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Jauerback
For the record, I completely agree with your comment at UAA. I did a little searching and it appears that Iquin is upset that Jauerback nominated an article at AfD. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I asked Tnxman some questions about this particular UAA, and your block threat. Geo Swan (talk) 18:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Per diff linked below
"Per diff linked below" <-- What "diff" are you referring to? --JWSchmidt (talk) 21:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Eligible but not yet listed NRHP sites
Hi Daniel ... I see that you added Rivercrest Historic District to National Register of Historic Places listings in Broome County, New York. It's been my understanding that the NRHP tables should only include properties once they're officially listed on the Register and not those that have only been determined to be eligible. Do you know otherwise? --sanfranman59 (talk) 05:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm pretty sure that the NPS assigns a reference number when a property is nominated and ruled eligible. But that doesn't mean it's "listed". There are lots of properties that are in "eligible but not listed" status and I think some stay that way for long periods (years or even indefinitely perhaps?). I think WP:NRHP made the decision not to include these properties back when we were deciding on the content and format of the tables. But feel free to raise the question on the project talk page. --sanfranman59 (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Pacmansrevenge has responded to username concern
Hi! I noticed that User:Pacmansrevenge has responded to the username concern you posted on their talk page. Could you check if you find the explanation satisfactory, and if that is the case, remove them from Category:Wikipedian usernames editors have expressed concern over? Thanks, Questwolf (talk) 18:45, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Block/Unblock
You're recent denial of my unblock request was, to be blunt, childish. I said I was sorry, and woud not contiue vandalising. Therefore the continued block was merely punitive, not preventative, which if I am correct, is against the rules.75.93.119.255 (talk) 23:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That doesn't make it any less punitive. And who are you to speak for the rest of the admins? Do you have ESP or something? If not, keep your opinions that way: yours.75.93.119.255 (talk) 01:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Neher-Elseffer House
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mackenzie with the winner of the car.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Mackenzie with the winner of the car.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:MacKenzieHeartsu.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:MacKenzieHeartsu.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mackenzie mad about her gift.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Mackenzie mad about her gift.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Your opinion...
Since I have found you to be quite wise and thoughtful in our discussions and Wadester puts alot of confidence in your opinions I thought I would ask for your opinion on this, since the question/idea has been nagging me for some time and was somewhat touched on your comment about the info on Washington Park being more for an article on the park itself than the district. So here is my question/comment- I have noticed that alot of places/buildings have articles in which the title is that of the NRHP/district and not any actual name that is notable today (or in some cases a name that it was never known as). Washington Park in Albany does not have a page, but rather redirects to the historic district. At National Register of Historic Places listings in Albany County, New York there are listed many places that were never referred to by those names when they were actually around, such as the Albany Glassworks Site (I posted the correct names with at least two references on the talk page). It is my opinion that these buildings and/or places should have their official present-day name for the article and that any NRHP designation should be a redirect and be a section within but separate in the article, it bothers me because when writting articles like History of Albany, New York I have to create links to articles that in title dont resemble the name I need for the article and am afraid they could at face value be confusing and with so much emphasis on the NRHP designation linking the term Washington Park (the one in Albany) for an Albany history article to the historic district imparts no new information for the actual park. Feel free to tell me I'm being anal and you see no conflict or problem, I probably am, but if this is a common problem please let me know what the best course of action is to do, I would hate to have to create duplicate articles for each NRHP/district just to cover the actual place/building that is notable instead of the designation, there is already a Washington Park Historic District (Troy, New York) and then for me to create a Washington Park (Troy, New York) as a separate article to cover just the park seems redundant to me. Would it be ok to change the name of the article and make the info on the district a small side-note in a section (since the article itself is just a sentence or two already)?Camelbinky (talk) 21:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, that was alot of good info to know. Hopefully I can find the time to do some more research on both Washington Park's and get two good articles going. I have found quite a bit of interesting info on the Washington Park in Troy, I dont know if its DYK material but to me it was interesting going through the TU archives and read just how bad the park and neighborhood had gotten in the 1980s and then its turn around and a minor controversy over who owned the street Washington Place (the city or the association) and was therefore responsible for maintenance of it.Camelbinky (talk) 22:28, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

IP return
IP user 124.104.18.247 is back again using 124.104.26.207. The IP is restoring information on the David Archuleta that isn't cover by the sources provide. Can you block the IP and maybe do a range block or whatever it's called because the IP always comes back under a new IP mostly every day and makes unconstructive edits on the Regine Velasquez article such as this (the most recent one), this, this and this, saying they are "reverting vandalism". Thanks for your time. MS  (Talk | Contributions)  01:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Looking back through the article history I found these: 124.104.19.142, 124.104.20.5, 124.104.26.186, 124.104.25.171, 124.104.16.244, 124.104.27.51, 124.104.20.234 124.104.17.182, 124.104.25.155, 124.104.92.152, 124.104.80.171, 124.104.81.175, 124.104.87.102, 124.104.94.45, 124.104.80.217, 124.104.93.129, 124.104.84.156, 124.104.157.36, 124.104.91.49, 124.104.83.214, 124.104.221.254, 124.104.82.88, 124.104.94.70, 124.104.31.148, 124.104.16.147, 124.104.19.218, 124.104.24.170, 124.104.20.74, 124.104.27.116. Sorry if there are any duplicates, it's a lot as you can see. Hopes that helps. MS   (Talk | Contributions)  03:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

The Ip is back again using 124.104.22.195. They edit the talk page of Regine Velasquez and added in various new sections using other users signatures, as you can see here. They even left vandalism tags on the user and talk page of User:Maoster, using my old user name signature and using Stifle's signature. This is the one they left on the talk using Stifle's signature and this on is the one left on the user page using my old user name signature. Can you please do something about this? I'm getting tried of reverting the IP's vandalism. Maybe protecting the talk and article? MS  (Talk | Contributions)  19:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Advise needed
Dear Sir, I need your advise on an issue. A user Vapblack has been deleting a picture I posted in an article. I have given enough proof about the authenticity of the picture by giving the necessary references, but this user has been consistently deleting the picture even after the given explanation. Kindly let me know what action is to be taken and what is the solution. He thinks that the picture is not correct, but that is his personal opinion. If he knows how Malik Ambar looks like or if he has the picture, why doesn't he post the pic and prove the authenticity of the picture. I'd be grateful if you intervene and look into the matter. Looking forward for your reply. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nefirious (talk • contribs) 05:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Sir, this picture appeared in the Times of India supplement in the late 90's and the same picture, a black and white version appeared in Sheikh Chand's book ' Malik Ambar' written in urdu language. So, do I need to scan the article with the picture or mention in the caption where the potrait was created. Please let me know, i'll do the needful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nefirious (talk • contribs) 05:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok sir, i'll do so at the earliest. Thanks a bunch for answering my queries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nefirious (talk • contribs) 05:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

That's not how it really went down =)
I went to the page one day and saw the picture up. I then went to the discussion page and said that I don't think that's how he looked. Some days went by with no reply, then I went and put some links in the discussion page of how malik ambar really looked. Still no response. Then I took the image down and explained why. Still no response, only Nefirious returning the picture. I have a book, African Presence in Ancient Asia with the same picture you will get from a google search. Also the same way one would expect an Ethiopian to look.

On top of that, Nefirious keeps editing my page saying I've been banned from editing anything, with no explanation. I have not done too much wiki editing or been involved too much in the community, but I don't think that's how it works. Check my page history for proof, and check the malik ambar page. Just so I know, if there is a dispute in wikipedia, who am I supposed to speak to? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vapblack (talk • contribs) 05:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

I have got the facts
I have scanned the copy of the newspaper where the picture was published and also stated the source. I hope the person deleting my post is informed about the same. Sir, please visit the page, I have also scanned a copy of Times of India, Aurnagabad Plus, where his picture was published. The book, Malik Ambar' by Sheikh Chand has the same picture but in black and white, a museum in my city again has the same picture. I have not only contributed the picture for the article Malik Ambar but a lot of other material from books that I have. Sir Malik Ambar is someone whom we look upto, he has erected the very same city where I live today. So I am equipped with more reliable sources. Please consider.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nefirious (talk • contribs) 07:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Requesting comment on Articles_for_deletion/Croatia%E2%80%93Lebanon_relations
Hi,I'd appreciate it if I could have you could comment on. Thanks --Roaring Siren (talk) 15:32, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Stargirl84
Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 18:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

whitespace issues in Central Troy HD article etc
hey, just trying some changes with L. i actually use Firefox, and did not see whitespaces, think the article looks great. Let me say, by the way, that i felt bad or a bit worried about being perhaps too harsh in my comments at PR about that. It is an awesome article! It really is organized and narrated nicely and works out very well, you did great work with that. Ruhrfisch uses MSIE exclusively or most regularly, and sorted out some tricky issues of appearance in MSIE vs. Firefox for an infobox placement in the Joseph Priestley House article a while back, before its FA, so perhaps he could know some tricks for fixing appearance in this article too.

About making a fully illustrated list out of the 3-item Babylon NRHP list which DTD insists on being a separate article, that would be fine and a bit funny. Glad you have a new camera. I think it is a big advantage to have taken good pics before and figured out, perhaps, some angles and some time of day matters, so perhaps you could take a really great pic that meets the glossy calendar requirements this time around in the NHL pic competition. Good luck! I'm sort of planning/wanting to run our own photo competition for a calendar, too. More about that later. Regards, doncram (talk) 04:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, D and I were just messing around while we were both online, he on Firefox and I on IE. He did make the space a little smaller by moving just one pic.  Not so disruptive to the flow, IMO.  Also, I haven't gotten to the Syracuse stuff in earnest yet, but I do greatly appreciate your input and will be acting on it, soon.  Work's nuts and when I get home I'm not thinking too well.  Feel free to do the H of L list (you know, I don't think I ever had a class there....even in my one semester of undergrad at SU....My grad classes (just finished in Dec) were mostly in the School of Management, first the "Old" one (which was new when I was an undergrad), and then in the new Whitman School at the corner of Marshall and University.  Did have some classes at the Maxwell School, in the newer building...Eggers, I think.  Anyway, I wouldn't get the H of L for quite some time, I'm sure.  Will get up there and get that interior pic, though.  It's an easy walk from my office. Lvklock (talk) 15:26, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

NRHP Question
I just started writing this and would like to see if you know where I can find an online source for the filing. The best I could find, when I included it here, is this (ctrl+F "District No. 6"). Is there a more complete source somewhere? The dedication ceremony was yesterday (almost a year late) and the Record was there, but they didn't write an article for today's paper; they only printed pictures from the event (leave it to the Record...), so I have no other RS to go from.  wadester 16  20:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Benner House
Hi. Maybe you saw that I finished the German translation of the article some days ago. I have risen a question you could answer, perhaps. --Matthiasb (talk) 11:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps...
... is a bit over the top? (Besides, you oughta be defending me as well as Thatcher there!) --jpgordon:==( o ) 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Review my new NRHP articles?
Would you mind reading over two new articles I just wrote? Hoping you can have some valuable input about the articles; I've never written one about a NRHP location. Garfield School (Brunswick, New York) and Little Red Schoolhouse (Brunswick, New York).  wadester 16  02:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Golan Heights
Greetings. Thank you for your contribution at Golan Heights RfC. Just a friendly reminder that you forgot to sign your comment... Cheers! :-) --Nsaum75 (talk) 05:08, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Cobblestone bonanza
Since you're the resident upstate New York NRHP editor round these parts I thought I would bring Cobblestone architecture and Category:Cobblestone architecture to your attention. There is a corresponding category on Commons that needs to be populated as well. Hope all is well, and happy editing. --IvoShandor (talk) 06:16, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

HV portal
Definitely, added. Great shot! – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. I really like that one; lots of historical/educational value. You might want to try for FP or VP. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool, good luck with that. On a semi-related note, have you ever considered running for adminship at Commons? You seem to be pretty active (and I enjoy "stalking" your contribs occasionally for new images). – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 07:00, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Seconded.  wadester 16  07:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

WP:NYSR inactivity check
Hello, Daniel Case. You are receiving this message because you are listed on the participant list of WP:NYSR. I am conducting an inactivity check on behalf of the project to see if the project still has an active editor base. The status column on the participant list will be cleared today, and to remain a listed member of the project, you must update your status on the participant list (preferably using the terms "Active", "Semi-active", or "Inactive") which is located here. Those who do not update their status after one week (by the night of June 25) and those who put inactive as their status will be removed from the list. If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page or at the "A smorgasbord of topics" section on WT:NYSR. Thank you for your understanding and your time. –  T <font color="#0000C0">M F 12:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

NRHP refernce numbers
Altought they are a useful tool for WP:NRHP, they are used for tracking nominations within the NPS. Everything that comes into their office gets a refnum, whether or not its eventually listed. Einbierbitte (talk) 18:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Image request
Just in case you didn't notice.  wadester 16  19:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Troy Map
I requested that a new map be made for Central Troy Historic District, mainly so it's in SVG. Feel free to leave comments about the new version.  wadester 16  17:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Take a look back there. You know better than I about what he's talking about.  wadester 16  16:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK and comments
Daniel - please do disagree with me forcefully when you feel I am in the wrong, but please leave the personal attacks out of it. Thanks. Awadewit (talk) 15:09, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

NY 28A
Got a question for you. Do you know if the reference markers along New York State Route 28A, which TwinsMetsFan and I are working history for, are similar to the ones on New York State Route 55A. We have found that NY 28A may have never been maintained by the New York State Department of Transportation but the New York City Board of Water Supply for the Ashokan Reservoir. Do you have anything that could confirm this?<i style="color:red;">Mitch</i>/<i style="color:black;">HC32</i> 19:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, this road is becoming more interesting by the second. We may have a 3rd 28 article FA on our hands.<i style="color:red;">Mitch</i>/<i style="color:black;">HC32</i> 19:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - Coordinator Election
Hello. To begin, every member of WikiProject Novels will be getting this message (the joy of macros) so if you wish to get in touch with me, please post a message on my talk page. I would encourage anyone who so wishes, to stand in the Coordinator Elections. If you wish to stand, please do so by 23:59pm, June 27. Voting will the continue to 23:59pm, July 21. Can everyone please check-out the Coordinator Elections page. Also, the collaboration of the month is The Tin Drum, so if you have any spare time, please check it out. And I apologise to the seven of you for whom this will be a repeat message. Regards, Alan16 (talk).

Redirect targets for "Downtown Hudson" and "Downtown Troy"
Your comments at the RFD for these would be appreciated. I initially redirected these to Hudson Historic District and Central Troy Historic District. Seeing as these are principal cities with thriving downtowns and that "Downtown X" might be a plausible search term, I redirected the then red links to the historic district articles since there was no separate downtown area articles and it seemed to me the the historic districts encompassed most of the downtown areas of these cities. I'm not sure if separate downtown area articles are appropriate but it seems to me deletion of the redirects is unnecessary. Thanks. --Polaron | Talk 19:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks, i meant to come ask Daniel Case to comment in the RFD discussion too. doncram (talk) 16:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Mistaken block notice?
Regarding this edit, I don't see in the logs that User:Larbkai has ever been blocked. Is this a mistake? Paul_012 (talk) 07:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * My mistake, then. In that case, however, I don't feel such a block was really warranted. Yes, the user has been creating a large amount of unsourced BLP stubs and uploading images without providing fair use rationales, but those stubs usually consist only of facts and statistics and so don't contain any potentially libellous information, and on the whole I don't feel that his contributions "have the effect of disrupting progress towards improving the articles" as described at Disruptive editing. Also, the user was never specifically warned against continuing such edits, since the numerous messages on his talk page were mostly regarding file sourcing/copyright problems and not his pattern of editing.


 * In any case, the user seems to be using a sock-puppet to circumvent the block and is now editing under the name User:Megazawa07. Perhaps another block is forthcoming, but I'd like to imagine we could first try and educate the user on the basic Wikipedia policies he still seems unfamiliar with. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Coordinator Election
Hello. The Coordiantor Election has begun. All members are encouraged to vote by the deadline, July 28. To vote simply add support to the comments and questions for.. section of the member of your choice.

3 users are standing:

Regards, Alan16 (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC).

Automatic UAA Wait Template?
I reported a user to UAA using Twinkle and wanted to add the template to it... seems you beat me to it. I'm wondering if there is a way to add the report with the wait template already attached other than a manual edit of the reporting page. --Tckma (talk) 16:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Truegreta block - why role account?
From the name signed to the first note on 's talk page, it would appear that the editor is Greta Berlin. I'm unclear on why it appears to be a role account.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:41, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I also wondered this account was blocked. They wrote in the third person on WP:COIN but other than that I see no evidence that it is a shared account. Smartse (talk) 10:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Wiki-Conference New York Update: 3 weeks to go
For those of you who signed up early, Wiki-Conference New York has been confirmed for the weekend of July 25-26 at New York University, and we have Jimmy Wales signed on as a keynote speaker.

There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session. Register for the Wiki-Conference here. And sign up here for on-wiki notification. All are invited! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

User Qelknap
I've been at Wikipedia for a couple years now, probably done around 9000 edits, and had a number of disagreements with people, but this is the first time that i've ever been moved to waste my time typing this out to an admin: you've honestly made a 100% mistake in your poorly formed decision on AIV concerning this user. On one hand, it's fine that you make wrong decisions because you have a bunch of pion editors (myself included) at your disposal, who will go on cleaning up after you: wasting time, breaking 3RR; on the other hand, it would be nice if you made better decisions. Thanks, honestly, for your admin work regardless, Quaeler (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Insuffiecent warnings?
67.82.174.147 has been warned several times today - if you check his talk page history, you'll find a fresh level four warning timestamped today. Kotiwalo (talk) 16:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * No worries, admins are only human =). Kotiwalo (talk) 07:04, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

HV portal
Ooh, nice. Added. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Palace
Sorry, I'm not trying to one-up you. The timing was completely coincidental; took this on Wednesday. Happy 4th!  wade ster 16   16:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
I dream of horses (talk) 13:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Prada
Hey, you are welcome! I am glad to remove unsourced analysis to bring articles in compliance with WP:Novel. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Adirondack Park
I concur with your revert. Adirondack Park and Forest Preserve are legal designations created by the State of New York. The term Adirondack Park Preserve appears nowhere in any New York State legal document. Its presence elsewhere would be erroneous. Discussion on this topic appears in citations in Adirondack Mountains and those same citations should probably also appear in Adirondack Park. Adirondacker (talk) 16:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

You have mail
Check your e-mail - I sent.<i style="color:red;">Mitch</i>/<i style="color:black;">HC32</i> 22:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Sent two more - sorry about that.<i style="color:red;">Mitch</i>/<i style="color:black;">HC32</i> 23:05, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Yup, through DYK. I was checking on my own and stumbled on yours by chance. — <font color="#C0C0C0">Hunter <font color="#595454">Kahn  ( c )  13:53, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Just noticed your message. Thanks for your help with the Blair Waldorf matter. -- James26 (talk) 06:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

File:NY 218 on Storm King.jpg
Good enough for the portal? – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 06:32, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Added both. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 20:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Hudson, New York
Hi, maybe you could check the Hudson, New York article, especially the history section and provide some inline citations since that article is lacking some where they're needed.

Also only one of the historic districts in the city is linked in the article. Most of the individual NRHP entries in Hudson don't appear in the city article. Maybe you could improve that. --Matthiasb (talk) 12:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * PS:Expect the translation of the Hudson Historic District article into DE:WP within ten days... ;-)

Image
I saw File:Albany.jpg and thought you might be able to use it for something. The spire is cut off, but it is an unused Albany pic that is otherwise good.  MBisanz  talk 00:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Moved to Commons and renamed File:NYSDEC in Albany.jpg since Albany.jpg was already taken at Commons. Placed in the NYSDEC article.  wadester 16  15:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Interesting issue on copyright
Don't know if you followed at all, but did you notice that when the Democrats took over in the NYS Senate in January that they revamped the entire website? It looks great; I'm not putting Dems on a higher pole than Reps, but it seems when they come to power, they're more interested in the tech generation (Obama, as another example; and Congress when that switched too). The State Senate now offers its content under CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0 (scroll to bottom of home page). I'm intrigued that they even know what Creative Commons is; but why does New York State care whether its publications are copyrighted? Why don't the states offer their works in PD like the feds? What do they gain from it? I guess I'm just babbling a bit. I saw the CC logo and was intrigued and impressed to see they were using it, but disappointed at the same time to see that it wasn't really free. And on a somewhat related note, why is a "public document" not considered to be in the "public domain"? What's the legal difference?  wadester 16  14:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

I think this may be OR, but..
This (pages 64 and 65) is where I have gotten some information regarding Clinton Square. The proposal for improvements to the square that this publication speaks about seems to have been carried out, as there are photos in several books showing the square looking as the diagram shows; however, there I can not find any source that specifically says that the proposal was done, or even when it was built; one proposal, the "proposed plaza in front of the railroad station" wasnt built until over 70 years later (the railroad station today being Kiernan Plaza and the "proposed plaza" being Tricentenial Park) and other proposals were never carried out. Therefore it seems, to me at least, that it would be OR to compare a 1913 photo of crappy Clinton Square and a photo of 1920's photo of a beautified Clinton Square and say "obviously the plan was carried out as you can see". So is this a case of where "ignore all rules" comes in, or does the lack of a source simply keep the renovation of the square out of the article for now?Camelbinky (talk) 22:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. Am I correct in interpreting the policy you sent me to as saying that as long as I put an image of Clinton Square after the renovations (which must have happened sometime between 1913 and 1925) it is ok to state that the renovations done? A sentence along the lines of "Sometime between 1913 and the mid-1920s Clinton Square was remade and beautified".Camelbinky (talk) 03:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

St. Paul's
What do you think?  wadester 16  02:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yea, I thought the engraving of the original church was a real find! Was talking to my mom; we agreed it must have been where the parking lot for the Rensselaer County Courthouse is now.  wadester 16  04:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:NODRAMA reminder
Thanks for signing up for the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Wikipedia stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. This is a double reminder. First, the campaign begins on July 18, 2009 at 00:00 (UTC). Second, please remember to log any articles you have worked on during the campaign at The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/Log. Thanks again for your participation! --Jayron32. talk . say no to drama 21:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Might you have use for these?
I scanned and restored these files, not knowing if there was yet a use for them. Just letting you know they exist in case you do have a use.  wadester 16  21:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad you found use for at least one. Btw, might be time to archive. :-)  wadester 16  20:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Albany Downtown Historic District
I thought this map may be of use for that article if you have a place in the article to put it- File:Downtown1878.jpg Camelbinky (talk) 01:32, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

17M
That's got to be one of my favorites. Added without hesitation. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:10, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Speaking of 17M, I have to ask why you moved all images to one side of the page as it creates stacking issues regarding section edit links and makes the article itself look lopsided. Also, if the change was made due to changes in the MOS, then this needs to be addressed on a project-wide level. –  T <font color="#0000C0">M F 20:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Albanian response
I can understand wanting to use something different than Albanian to keep people from being confused, and I had pretty much guessed that is why someone (did not know it was you) had not used Albanian; but Albanyite isnt a word, and more importantly it isnt the name of someone from Albany. As the Albany, New York article states in the infobox the demonym for Albany is Albanian. (I am not the editor who added it, but it is the name I have always heard, you may want to check the history and find and ask that particular editor if he/she has a source). I am more concerned with being correct than with people being thinking there are Albanians from Albania in Albany (which I am sure there are some, since the nearby Utica-Rome Metro Area has one of the largest Albanian/Kosovar populations in New York). Even linking the word to Albanian would go to a disambiguation page which since March 2008 has had listed as one of the possible meanings- A resident of the city of Albany, New York; therefore linking that in the article could help those confused find that Albanian can mean a person of Albany along with Albania (and a couple other places, such as an ancient kingdom in Azerbaijan) Having Albanyite in a Wikipedia article encourages the spread of that word into the mainstream, Wikipedia should not be about creating new words/concepts for the ease of the masses because some may get confused, that's why there is the bluelinks to educate further on terms.Camelbinky (talk) 21:42, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Website using your photo
This website is using your photo for their background without any attribution. Just wanted to let you know. -- Austin512  ( talk  &bull;  contribs ) 04:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

That's what I said, without. -- Austin512  ( talk  &bull;  contribs ) 04:05, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

You might not see it with a small monitor. They have a 800x600 div with a green background with all of the content (what you're seeing), and then the photo is behind it. I have a 1920x1080 monitor, so the photo is 75% of the screen, but I guess most people barely see it. -- Austin512  ( talk  &bull;  contribs )

Huh, that's odd. I see it every browser except IE6. If you use NetRenderer you should be able to see it. -- Austin512  ( talk  &bull;  contribs ) 04:44, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I confirm that it's there. It's being used as a background.  wadester 16  06:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for making WP:NODRAMA a success!
Thank you again for your support of the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at WP:NODRAMA/L with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:


 * T:TDYK for Did You Know nominations
 * WP:GAC for Good Article nominations
 * WP:FAC for Featured Article nominations
 * WP:FLC for Featured List nominations
 * WP:FPC for Featured Picture nominations

Again, thank you for making this event a success! --Jayron32. talk . say no to drama 02:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)