User talk:Danimal57

Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Happysailor (Talk) 11:27, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.  Chzz  ► 23:33, 26 September 2010 (UTC) Christopher Magee (fighter pilot), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Tim Pierce (talk) 01:19, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Speedy deletion nomination of Hamilton McWhorter III


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hamilton McWhorter III requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hamilton McWhorter III


The article Hamilton McWhorter III has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet military notability, because not awarded Medal of Honor or promoted to flag rank, or general notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

The guy was an ace, and he flew from the start of the war until the end. There are other aces on the site that are less remarkable. What gives? Danimal57 (talk) 23:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Hamilton McWhorter III for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamilton McWhorter III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hamilton McWhorter III until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:02, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Rescue
Thanks for joining us and starting new articles. You seem to to be getting some flak but your efforts are appreciated and the Article Rescue Squadron has been alerted. In the meantime, here's a welcome for you with some tips and links which may help. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Danke! Danimal57 (talk) 00:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Danimal57, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Andrew🐉(talk) 09:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Hamilton McWhorter III
Hello! An article you have been editing –- Hamilton McWhorter III –- was recently nominated by another user at Did you know, to be featured on the main page. The nomination has now been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 17:06, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Well, it's cool that a page that I started might be interesting enough to go into DYK. Overall, there's an issue with legendary warriors, in that facts sometimes become obscured by legend. This gets compounded in WW2 because the propaganda apparat wrote the historic record. For example, the whole "one slug" myth as presented in the article is hogwash. Mac was stingy with ammunition, but it's impossible to fire a single round from a Hellcat.

Also, the "1st Hellcat ace" nonsense is only true with constraints. Mac was most likely the first guy to score five kills where all those kills were in the F6F. But how many Navy aces got their five kills in a mixture of F6F Hellcat missions mixed with missions flown in F4F Wildcats? Are those guys not "Hellcat aces"? I doubt that anybody knows whether another pilot got to ace status with a mix of Hellcat and Wildcat victories. To me, there's a lot of myth, legend, and propaganda mixed into any and all of the official histories regarding WW2 heroes.

Don't get me wrong, I like it that way and I'd like to see Mac on "did you know". He seemed like a good guy to me and he should be remembered, but there's some hokum and hogwash mixed into the facts. Danimal57 (talk) 17:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Hamilton McWhorter III
—valereee (talk) 12:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jay "Pee Wee" Gleason
Hello, Danimal57. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jay "Pee Wee" Gleason, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jay "Pee Wee" Gleason


Hello, Danimal57. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jay "Pee Wee" Gleason".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)