User talk:Dark Shikari

'Note: I will archive this page whenever I see fit. If I archive a discussion that you want to continue, feel free to move it out of the archive and back to the main talk page.' Archive: 1 2

EVE Wiki on EVE Online
Hello DS, I wondered if you could take a look over a conversation I am having with User:Alatari here we seem to disagree on the inclusion of a link to EVE Wiki in the EVE Online article, my understanding of WP:EL is that it should not be included as it is an Open Wiki without a substantial history of stability or a significant number of editors. As it stands I have not removed it from the article as to avoid a edit war over the issue. Richard Slater (Talk) 19:55, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Who do I turn to that 's an uninterested party and an editor to resolve this matter? You seem to believe the external link is agreeable as in Wookieepedia.  Alatari 07:30, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Well I'm not going to get involved as this looks like a useless revertwar. I think an external link is reasonable, but only if it satisfies certain conditions, which EVE-Wiki might not.  I suggest you try to get some sort of agreement on the talkpage, and if that doesn't work, look towards a simple dispute resolution method. — Da rk •S hik ari [T] 12:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * If this was another wiki dedicated to EVE which is just as useful or successful I would be fighting for that site. Having it externally linked means the Eve Cruft is not getting posted on Wikipedia  which is a distinct possibility as EVE gets increasingly popular. And this method is used for WoW, Runescape and Second Life which have one and only one external Wiki linked each. I appreciate you comments Alatari 15:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * See the data I collected Talk:EVE_Online about the handling of external Wiki's on all other MMORPG articles on Wikipedia. Your input is appreciated.  Alatari 18:40, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Congratulations for possibly creating the 2000000th article on English Wikipedia!! Horrah! —Pengo 09:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Nah, its the 2,000,001th :) — Da rk •S hik ari [T] 09:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't count recreated articles :) —Pengo 09:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Wow, nice work on the near miss. :) - Taxman Talk 16:44, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You still might be able to knock out your competitor, see Wikipedia Signpost suggestion. --  Jreferee  (Talk) 17:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * If you read later, it turns out those numbers are backwards anyways :) — Da rk •S hik ari [T] 19:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:Vfd1
Hi, I just noticed that a template you created, Template:Vfd1, is unused and appears to be abandoned. I've marked it as deprecated, meaning it'll be deleted in two weeks' time if nobody objects. If there's a reason to keep it please leave a note at Wikipedia talk:Deprecated and orphaned templates and feel free to remove the deprecated tag from the template. Thanks. Bryan Derksen 01:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

List of Air Cadet Squadrons in Canada
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Air Cadet Squadrons in Canada, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry 20:36, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

User:Dark Shikari Bot
I would like to clone this bot, as I would like to do some tagging of my own, for different WikiProject. If you will allow me to clone it, I would prefer you to comment on it on my talk page. Dreamy §  00:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Your User Page
A blank userpage is fine, but come on, you have to have at least one Tachikoma pic. :) --Wootonius (talk) 15:44, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, Tachikomas are copyrighted, and fair use images aren't allowed on userpages ;) — Da rk •S hik ari [T] 17:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

EVE Online
This diff isn't vandalism like your edit summary claims. He sourced it and made a good faith edit. If you disagree with it then we can reach consensus on the talk page. Reverting good faith edits as vandalism can get you banned... be careful. Alatari (talk) 22:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I read the source quite a while ago. That account is a sockpuppet of an IP who has been inserting that paragraph repeatedly for weeks.  The article says almost nothing to back up his claims. — Da rk •S hik ari [T] 22:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I checked the article again, and indeed I appear to be right. The section the sockpuppet is repeatedly trying to insert into the article claims that the allegations he mentions are true while his source merely states them to be allegations and nothing more.  There is quite a big difference between an allegation and a fact. — Da rk •S hik ari [T] 22:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree on that point. But the NYT article does mention allegations of improperly infiltrated a Goonswarm group while  the EVE Online article remains quite on this point.  If that was the phrased used then the source would be properly attributed.  Really I saw someone on The Holocaust page get banned because of misleading edit summaries so that's why I wrote you.  Do you thing the sockpuppet would compromise on the improperly infiltrated a Goonswarm group phrasing? Alatari (talk) 22:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know--the main issue is that I've never seen him once post on a talk page, so it doesn't seem he's willing to compromise on a single word. — Da rk •S hik ari [T] 05:36, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If he makes one more major change that's not agreeing with the source and without talking on the talk page or our pages I'll stop assuming WP:FAITH Alatari (talk) 05:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks like he earned a block. He break the 3RR rule? Alatari (talk) 18:46, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Combined Comunity Codec Pack / AVG
Again, AVG is reporting a false positive. Please do not include unsourced defamatory statements in articles.) (undo)

hi, i am not trying to come accross as an ass here, i would just like help... how do i go about finding a source for this? surely as AVG has reported this as a virus, that in itself is a source? Also i was not trying to flame, more warn peopel there amy be a potential problem out there so they can decide fro themselfs wehther to trust the author or not, also by putting the information out there others may contriute and say they are having problems and this is possibly the source of system being compremised. i was not trying to upset anyone, more share this information.

Regards Pete —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.41.87 (talk) 22:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * A reliable source. Like a newspaper, or anything else mentioned in this policy on Verifiability.  If you think there is a virus in the CCCP, why not go to the official forums and report it?  I highly doubt this is the case, however; its far more likely that AVG is seeing a false positive in the compressed executable, which is not uncommon. — Da rk •S hik ari [T] 00:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

THis is not in the compressed executable install file, it is in one of the files (settings.exe) after i have installed the codec pack. if i where to post on their forums it would get removed quicker than it did here, like i say my aim was to try an spread the information through i can acceot that this is maybe not the most aporpriate way to do it. Also as for your claim for reporting false positives, again i know AVG can do this, but i personally put my trust more highly in AVG than i do for other 3rd party software writers. i also feel 'its a false positive' is a poor arguement, because anyone could say that about a file they have infected and by the time this has been verified that it is not a false postive, its 2 late and many people have been infected. If the information is shared instead of repressed it can be held up to examination and then disproved. removing it means that no-one can see it so are not aware that a potential problem may exist. lie i say maybe this was not the correct medium to do it, but i felt it was more important to share the information.

Pete

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.41.87 (talk) 06:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You can easily verify it being a false positive by using VirusTotal, a free service that scans any file with dozens of antivirus scanners and reports the result. What do you mean by "it would be removed even faster on the official forums?"  No, they would answer your question honestly, like they do all others.  This is not a discussion topic for Wikipedia. — Da rk •S hik ari [T] 08:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Email
Hi,

Can you enable wiki-email? It's off at the moment.

Many thanks,

FT2 (Talk 03:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Bot activity
I was going over the list of bots and noticed that has not edited in a very long time. Is this bot still active and if not, would you object to it being de-flagged? Please post your comments to Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval since this is a rather widely-posted message.  MBisanz  talk 18:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Microban
I have nominated Microban, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Microban. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Papa November (talk) 21:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Azumanga Daioh Good Article Reassessment
As a major contributor to Azumanga Daioh, I thought you'd want to know that that article is currently under going a Good Article Reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps. The article currently fails the good article criteria, as detailed at Talk:Azumanga Daioh/GA1. Its reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time for the issues to be addressed. Thanks. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 19:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Azumanga logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Azumanga logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Reassessment of Steel
Steel has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. Ruslik_ Zero 12:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Air Cadet squadrons in Canada
I have nominated List of Air Cadet squadrons in Canada, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of Air Cadet squadrons in Canada. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sancho 23:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

cylindro-conoidal bullet
Hello Dark Shikari : is it "loCus pith" or "loTus pith" ? I'd rather think lotus, since they were southern Indians...BTW, didn't find any vegetal by the name of "locus"...Thanks & t.y. Arapaima (talk) 07:24, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of To Each His Own (album)


The article To Each His Own (album) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a notable album per WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattg82 (talk) 23:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Homeworld music cd.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Homeworld music cd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Days of Our Lives families


A tag has been placed on Category:Days of Our Lives families requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Black projects has been nominated for merging
Category:Black projects has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor(talk) 16:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Funnelback for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Funnelback is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Funnelback until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 03:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

"TechMUN" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TechMUN&redirect=no TechMUN] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. #prodraxis connect 17:19, 13 September 2023 (UTC)