User talk:Dav4is

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here's some tips:
 * You can introduce yourself on the new users page
 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like . If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * Remember to use the show preview button before you save a page.
 * If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page.

Other useful pages are: how to edit, how to write a great article, naming conventions, manual of style and the Wikipedia policies.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Angela. 22:53, Mar 6, 2004 (UTC)

Harrison family
I think that within the, everyone should be sorted by their first name, and not by the default order. That's why I had left in that article. It overrides in that case. What do you think? Neier 23:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I disagree. The convention is to sort by surname, even when the list elements are presented as "given-name surname". See Categorization, particularly the example of Category:Presidents of the United States.

I know that, in the case of a family category, this may seem to overload one particular index (H, in this case), but to sort by given name just confuses things, with some name categories sorted by surname, others by given name. -dav4is 10:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I put them all back under the H, including a few which were under W before I started. Neier 14:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Tx. -dav4is

John Wayne / Tommy Morrison
I liked that one approach of citing answers.com (a wikipedia mirror site). In Geometry class, we used to call that "using the theorem to prove the theorem." If it's really true, it ought to be out there somewhere. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 13:57, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Misc
Good luck with your article - thanks for starting it before referencing it. Martinvl (talk) 15:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Parting stone
Just a query, as you make progress with Parting stone, as to whether this might not be a type of Boundary marker (which includes Boundary stones) and might be worth including there rather than  as a separate article ?  Velela  Velela Talk 15:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Velela]. I considered that, but decided against it because there is no boundary involved with a Parting stone. In each of its senses, a Parting stone marks only a point in space -- and in time in the case of a memorial parting stone. -dav4is (talk) 17:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TheOneSean &#124; Talk to me 15:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lists of people with specific surnames
Hello Dav4is,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lists of people with specific surnames for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks,

Chihin.chong (talk) 20:10, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Lists of people with specific surnames for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lists of people with specific surnames is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lists of people with specific surnames until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peridon (talk) 21:00, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Lists of people with specific surnames (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Quincy, Beers, Hawley, Sands, Guthrie, Morehouse, Ruggles, Zimmerman, Wildman and Mott

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Banjo (signal) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Banjo (signal), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Noel Loomis


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Anupmehra - Let's talk!  18:37, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Noel Loomis


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Noel Loomis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ruby  Murray  23:20, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikilinking
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
 * dates
 * years
 * commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
 * common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

(This even applies to infoboxes.)

Thanks, and my best wishes.

Tony  (talk)  03:40, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:People descended from Joseph Loomis
Category:People descended from Joseph Loomis, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Banjo (signal) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Banjo (signal), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dudipatsar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black bear. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis Shotridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chilkoot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The old refrain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cover and Viennese ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_old_refrain check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_old_refrain?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of IBM Product Test for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IBM Product Test is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/IBM Product Test until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coin945 (talk) 05:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Write-only language for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Write-only language is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Write-only language until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 17:11, 27 November 2023 (UTC)