User talk:Davidkazuhiro

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! If you need help feel free to drop a line at my talk page. :) --Actown e 03:55, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Seanho.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Seanho.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Image legality questions. 12:26, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Paulcolman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Paulcolman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Request for assistance
Hello there, I see from your user page that you're fluent in Japanese, so maybe you can help me out. A friend back from Tokyo brought me a bag of tea, which has of course japanese writings on top. Neither of us knows Japanese, so I was wondering whether you take a look at a scanned photo and translate it from me. It's not very long, of course, I expect it to be something about the tea shop. In any case... thanks for your attention! =)    --Nehwyn 18:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your availability! I've uploaded a zip file at http://mio.discoremoto.alice.it/nehwyn/ ; click on the file name with the left button and that should open the download window of your browser. Alternatively, check the "Seleziona tutti" (select all) and press the "Scarica" (download) button. Thank you very much!  =)    --Nehwyn 11:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot for the translation... I didn't know what Hoji tea was, but I know now.  :)   --Nehwyn 19:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Bill Myers
I have added the categories, stubbed, added a link or two and general tidy up. But, obviously you will notice the removal. See the talk page and I will be back in a moment to chat to you. Glen  06:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, now if you take a look here you'll see I listed all the individual list items you had in the article - 107!
 * I know you've been an editor awhile so Im sure you've read the Manual of Style - when the list is taking up 80% of tyhe article something has to be done. So, maybe a fork off the main article is called for. Take Michael Jackson, if he listed every single/album/DVD etc he's released in his main article it would type out to look like a toilet roll... so, it has Michael Jackson album discography and Michael Jackson singles discography. Maybe a Bibliography subarticle would be best?
 * Have a read of Summary style and let me know your thoughts, or ignore me altogether of course :0 Great work by the way!  Glen   07:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * You make some good points. Being slightly familiar with the extent of Bill Myers' career, I was foreseeing the content to take up more space than the list of his works. I've just had a hard time finding sources I can cite about his life and career. But the organization you proposed does match the manual of style a bit better and does look a lot more organized. Davidkazuhiro 08:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Directional microphone
Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply, if you can.

Thanks! --Vox Causa 22:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * And again at Phase distortion.--Vox Causa 22:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Yet again at Lavalier microphone.--Vox Causa 22:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Yep sorry about that. I couldn't find the category I was looking for so I put the generic stub tag so that attention would be brought to it. I'll be more meticulous and creative about finding specific stub tags next time.--Davidkazuhiro 00:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Caj.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Caj.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Butseriouslyfolks 20:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Professional sound production
Hello! I recently joined WP:PSP and decided to have a hand at creating an advanced project banner, but I didn't see the work you had already done on this until I went live with mine (which I adapted from WP:FMK's template.)

Anyway, I invite you to have a look at my changes and see if there are things you think should be done differently. The major difference I noticed was the category names; you used "PSP" whereas I use the full name of the wikiproject, which I think might be more standard.

I have no strong opinions on the technical side and would welcome a discussion of features, etc. that can be merged from both our drafts to create the best possible template.

Cheers!

-Fadookie Talk 01:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: I went ahead and fleshed out the entire assessment scheme so we can get the ball rolling. We're now recognized by the WP:1.0 bot, which will automatically refresh our assessment worklist and stats on a daily basis. I hope you don't mind that I took the initiative here, since I did use my version of the category names. Hopefully this list will be enough to convince you that the project's full name is standard for categories. :)
 * -Fadookie Talk 04:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Greetings
Greetings from a former YWMAer. :-) CyberAnth 02:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:YWAMer_Wikipedians - perhaps it will grow over time. CyberAnth 07:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Where is the British Colloquialism talk page then?
Where is the British Colloquialism talk page then? Are you in agreement that the only reason for the addition of the "fag" line is to be provacative? (82.40.177.159 09:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC))
 * It's not a talk page it's a subheading on the cigarette talk page. I was the one who added it and it was not added to be provocative. --Davidkazuhiro 10:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * So why add it given that there are countless other nickanems for cigarette? Why fag?(82.40.177.159 10:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC))


 * It was added because its an unusually well established term for it, and is a notable facet of culture within the English speaking world. Because of the general reaction of North Americans (due to their different use of the word as well as their ignorance of its use in Britain), it will most likely be moved into a subsection. Were you able to find the British Colloquialism heading in the cigarette talk page? Please include your opinions and suggestions there. It will help us further the discussion and come to an agreement. --Davidkazuhiro 11:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * ok(82.40.177.159 11:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC))

Cig
Okay, I will stop adding that nickname to the article for now, but I still think it should be written somewhere in the article. However the introduction paragraph may not be the best place to add it. Maybe it could be added in the paragraph that also discusses the term "fag". 216.246.243.148 12:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

C. S. Lewis & Tolkien
Hi mate, I don't think the word "regret" is a direct quote, so go ahead and change it if you think "disappointment" is a better description. :)

On a totally unrelated matter, I see that you speak Japanese. I'm just learning myself (learning the Kana at the minute). Any tips or good resources? Martin 00:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the Japanese advice. I'll be sure to drop you a line if (I mean, when) I get into trouble! :) Martin 01:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Loudspeaker
Thanks for the invitation. As it happens, I've just finished a good bit of copy editing at loudspeaker, enclosure, woofer, tweeter, and a couple of others I can't quite remember. So until some one decides to reorganize one or more of them, I'll probably stay on the sideslines a bit.

If you've been interested in hifi DIY projects, I can suggest something I've just run across. It's a Swedish site (41Hz) which has been developing very high quality amps (very small(!) and cheap), suited to biamping and triamping on the low cost end of things. I've been thinking about multi-amping one of Tony Gee's designs (at the Humble Homemade site). John Pomann has a very nice active crossover design with lots of flexibility (relatively los cost) and that's the one I'm considering. There's a link to Pomann's site at Art Ludwig's Web page on sound -- at the crossover section.

I've noticed your interest in textual criticism, and can suggest a book for you to look into. Not fully academic, but quite readable. It's Leo Deuel, Testament of Time. Amazing how some of the manuscripts managed to just barely survive.

And, on the computer science end of things, you might want to consider the best programming textbook I've ever come across. Start at the beginning, go through it doing (or very seriously trying) all the exercises and you'll be a serious programming master when you get out the other end. K N King -- Modula 2. Modula 2 is small enouhg to learn all of it (no one anywhere knows and uses all of C++, Java, PL/1, ...), but more than fully featured. No cost compilers available for Linux (see links at the en.Wikipedia.org article). And consider Dijkstra's EWD 498, the one that discusses Telling Unpleasant Truths. Hilariously so. Perhaps not programming design or management (see Joel on Software, Mythical Man-month (Brooks), and the original version of Software Tools (Kernighan and Plauger -- do all the exercises, but with the warning that they will be perhaps easier in C than in other languages).

Sorry to load you up with work, but what are students for after all? ww 02:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Davidkazuhiro! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

commons:User:Davidkazuhiro
I assert to be the same user as commons:User:Davidkazuhiro

Down Syndrome
Regarding this page, you edited the page to be redirected to George W. Bush. Is there any particular good reason for this? Or were you just causing vandalism despite your history of doing the opposite?

07:56, 25 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Down Syndrome (←Redirected page to George W. Bush) ViriiK 18:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * That was a mistake. There was apparently vandalism going on with the President Bush redirect page, and I was trying to revert that but edited the wrong page. I'm sorry about that. --Davidkazuhiro 08:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Message from anon
FYI, 80.188.11.131 posted this message on your user page. --KFP (talk | contribs) 22:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh wow a message on my user page. Wouldn't have noticed that! Thanks KFP! --Davidkazuhiro 08:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I just thought you might've missed it as it was reverted along with the vandalism. --KFP (talk | contribs) 15:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops just in case I sounded sarcastic, I was actually being serious! Sorry if I did. That's one of the disadvantages of communicating with text... --Davidkazuhiro 09:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Wrong correction
Hi david!

You said that i should talk to you like this but im not shure if im doing it right :P, if it shouldent be right sorry for takeing up space on your talk page Any ways, i just wanted to point out that i made a correction to the articl 'Nemi (comic strip)', but you deleted it sayin it was not helpfull information, as if it was vandalism... im sorry to say that the information i put there was the truth

pleas go to this website:[] and use the scrool bar to scrool down to: "Nemi 022307".

Thnks, axel —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.188.11.131 (talk) 16:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC).
 * Hey Axel. Nope, your doing it the right way. If you want to talk to me, my talk page is the place to do it, no matter what you have to say! I'm sorry if I reverted a meaningful contribution. Your contribution though, which read "named 'I want to grow up to be an anorectic slut, and fuck me in 500 ways - yeah'" is very easy to mistake as vandalism, especially if not accompanied by a citation. I would suggest you include a citation and read Citing sources if you don't know how. I will post this response onto your talk page as well. Don't forget to sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes " ~ ". Happy editing! --Davidkazuhiro 04:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
David, Thanks for inviting me to the Pro Sound WikiProject man! I'm glad to see that there are other people on this site that are interested in expanding this topic. --Phil McGowan (user:PhilyG) 17:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * No problemo! Need all the help we can get! Look forward to working with you toward bettering the Pro Sound articles! --Davidkazuhiro 09:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

List of YWAM bases
An article you created: List of YWAM bases has been tagged for deletion. The reason is it's a list of external links. See WP:NOT. -Sucrine ( &gt;&lt;&gt; talk) 13:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Glad to help out. =) --Dennisthe2 18:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

wikiproject:Profession sound production articles
I am happy to see someone on wikipedia finally adding some sound articles. I think its great and a hole wikipedia needs to get closed. My friend and I noticed the lack of articles and are working on getting www.wikirecording.org going, it's less formalized encyclopedia and more a loose community wiki thats full of audio information and tips. It is more freeform based and less constricted by wikipedias strict content and writing style guidelines. However, I think there might be room to collaborate on article creation and editing. well just thought i'd show my support and we are always looking for more active contributors. - Nate march 15 2007 nstanton # at # gmail.com

Image:Paulcolman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Paulcolman.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 05:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Paulcolmanlive.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Paulcolmanlive.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 05:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Little context in Jody McBrayer
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jody McBrayer, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jody McBrayer is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jody McBrayer, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Jody McBrayer itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I've restored it. Seems that a vandalised revision was tagged for speedy deletion. --KFP (talk | contribs) 11:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Duncanphillipsmorroco.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Duncanphillipsmorroco.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Duncanphillipslive2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Duncanphillipslive2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Adriane Knoppix nominated for deletion
Hi. This looks like a good topic, but it lacks significant sources to demonstrate notability per WP:N. I looked through search engine results and could not find enough info. to make a case for a keep. Maybe you can. Good luck. --Kevin Murray 13:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Omlogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Omlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ywamold.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ywamold.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cajlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cajlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Fellow YWAM kid
I'm attempting to link all the YWAMers on Wikipedia together. Just saying hi and asking for help on reedeming our reputation of the YWAM page. Saksjn (talk) 14:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Featured sounds
I noticed that you have participated in Featured sound candidates in the past. There are now two candidates and the project appears to be abandoned. If you could look at the candidates and vote it would be appreciated. Zginder(talk) (Contrib) 00:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Hey David, I noticed that you are also editing here. Just dropped by to say 'hi' :-) Sudharsansn (talk · contribs) 04:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

****
Hi, can i see your year book with ****? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.66.187 (talk) 05:31, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Because it was rude of me to use her real name. Just as it would be rude of me to use yours DSH. An admin has deleted any history of your edits to Maria Ozawa's discussion page, later today I will get him to do the same to your talk page.

I'm sure she would be grateful if you did not publish her real name in future, it is a gross invasion of not only her privacy, but her family's aswell. Drplatipus (talk) 07:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm very sorry that she has chosen a career that you do not approve of, but that does not give you the right to broadcast her real name or other details she may or may not want to be public knowledge. She has not revealed her real name nor where she was educated. It therefore stands to reason, does it not, that she does not want such information to be public knowledge?

PS It was another editor, not me, who requested the informatiuon be deleted by an admin.

Drplatipus (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Maria Ozawa edit
As per your request, the reason for the edit comes down to WP:BLP. It states:
 * "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space." (particular emphasis there mine)

Something like a porn star's real name must be properly sourced, otherwise it's just a blind statement. The only source we have for the English name you mention of Maria is a yearbook which you have in your possession. That to me sounds like original research and must be discounted. Once we arrive at that point, we're left with an unsourced name and a policy which leaves little room for manoeuver. Removal of the name was the least that should have been done; acting to further clean things up by removing it from the history is admittedly an unusual step but one I think is only proper for privacy reasons. I speak about that privacy requirement from experience... look at this edit to the article on Katja Kassin on the German version of Wikipedia. The OTRS bit that's mentioned is a complaint which Katja sent to me about how people were hassling her parents because her real name was there (and we had already removed it from the English language one as being unsourced.)

As I said, everything's a little unorthodox, but there is policy justifying the actions. Any questions? Tabercil (talk) 02:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Just let it go. Drplatipus (talk) 06:28, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou, and merry christmas to you. I'm sorry we got off on the wrong foot. Drplatipus (talk) 08:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:SimpleSRsystem.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:SimpleSRsystem.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ja Ga  talk 17:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Not a bot of mine - that's just the standard message that's auto-placed when you nominate an image for speedy deletion. All the same, I did a little digging, and found the replacement: File:SimpleSRsystem.png. I am surprised they don't place the name of the replacement image in the message. -- Ja Ga  talk  06:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Revisions to Sound reinforcement system
Hey, thanks for appreciating the work and for all the work that you have done yourself! The removal of the simple SR system pic was that I felt that it was far to basic to warrant being displayed in the page about Sound Reinforcement. If there was at least a mixer and a floor monitor displayed I think that would perhaps warrant it's placement within the article. I felt that most people already understand that basic concept of plugging a mic into a speaker so that others can hear them. The other diagram showed a more typical Sound Reinforcement system and perhaps this is because I am a professional, but I did not feel that it was too complex for a newbie to be able to understand. If you compare it to some of the diagrams in some of the science articles in Wikipedia, it pales in comparison.

As far as removing the channel strip photo, the description listed seemed to label the photo of an example of a mixing console that the input signals are routed to, in which case the photo does not show what that component of a SR system looks like. From the channel strip perspective, I think that if we wish to have a shot of that then we should have an overhead view of a channel strip so people can actually see the different sections of a channel strip, not just a fader and some (to them) random knobs shooting off into nowhere above it. I also have been trying to move the article more in the direction of describing the intricacies of the large SR business, as I have a hunch that this is what the general public both is the most interested in (in the realm of live audio anyway) and has the least knowledge about. I felt that having the image be of a small/mid sized Soundcraft console was less appropriate than showing a full image of two of the most popular large format live analog consoles. I am open to the image returning but feel that it should be resized or placed somewhere else because the look of the article with it protruding into the next section looks bad to me.

As for the last edit you listed, this was not an edit by me but by Binksternet. Are you referring to the edits to the section on the difference between PA and SR? In that case, I made those edits to simply improve the flow of the section.

Feel free to change any of the edits that I made, I won't be offended in any way. Thanks for discussing it with me first though, that is always appreciated! --PM - PhilyG talk 19:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Thewaiting.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Thewaiting.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  Chris  00:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tokyo Baptist Church


The article Tokyo Baptist Church has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * not clear how this orphaned article meets notability guidelines, lacks any references to 3rd party sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:25, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tbclogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tbclogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 08:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Davidkazuhiro! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Jeff Frankenstein -

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cajlogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Cajlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeff Frankenstein


A tag has been placed on Jeff Frankenstein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:04, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Rock Across Australia


The article The Rock Across Australia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * not notable, no claim to notablilty

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 18:46, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bill Myers


The article Bill Myers has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable author"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dronebogus (talk) 00:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikimedia Sound Logo project
VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Tataouine.JPG


The file File:Tataouine.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, low-res, superseded by pushpin map at Tataouine."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 11:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Meyersoundlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Meyersoundlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)