User talk:Deus et lex

Australian governors-general & prime ministers, etc
You may do as you please on the MOS:JOBTITLES related topic. It's not a hill, that I'm willing to die on. GoodDay (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

New Subject Re Enoneo. How long is all this Deletion stuff on my site going on for? Will you ever be removing the two templates?--Enoneo (talk) 01:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)--Enoneo (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Hayward, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Jensen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

James Cook University
Hi,

You were good enough to review the proposed changes for the article about James Cook University I made here: Talk:James Cook University Would you mind considering one of your edits again? I have requested editors consider adding the following sentence to the section on Peter Ridd: “JCU appealed the Federal Circuit Court’s decision, arguing his firing was lawful, in part, because Ridd repeatedly breached JCU’s Code of Conduct, including by denigrating a colleague and disclosing confidential information.”

The rationale is on the Talk page. I have a declared COI so an independent editor should consider this request. Thank you.Mrssquiggle (talk) 04:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

sincere apologies
I seem to have deleted your afd comment - my apology - the edit conflict seems to have gone wrong. I reinstated your comment  JarrahTree 13:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

History of the fare zones
Note that:


 * https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/33976882?subject=Local%20transit%20--%20Western%20Australia%20--%20Perth%20--%20Maps.





indicate that the zones started somewhere between 1975 and 1983 - there may be a member of https://www.bpswa.org/  who is into the old timetables etc - I dont think they have a dedicated library... let me know if you want help JarrahTree 04:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Clarification
Hello. It would help if you'd clarify either A or B at the RFC's survey, that you've commented at :) GoodDay (talk) 23:22, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

It would help, if you chose either option or neither option, for clarity. GoodDay (talk) 23:47, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Clarification II
Can you clarify your comment here? If there was a consensus for one-at-a-time nomination, where was it discussed? Cheers,  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 04:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Epping, New South Wales
Hi there, I refer to your edit on the Wiki Article: Epping, New South Wales on the 31st of January 2022.

The photo you selected to represent the lede of the article is dated, and current buildings depicted in the photograph have changed since.

Although this may be subjective, the photograph taken at such angle, and the subject buildings in the photograph, are not representative of a suburb and it’s article, and leads to the idea of Epping being an industrial or strictly commercial area.

I’d suggest using a different, more representative photo for the article that represents the suburbs current environment, whether it’s the new high rise apartments, old heritage estates or both. HornsbyBbSyd (talk) 13:33, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

thanks
for your updates - good work, I flinch at the checking of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Australian_Queen%27s_Counsel category trust that someone has the time and energy - as there are bits of text and category that easily slip through the gaps... JarrahTree 00:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks - it's a good opportunity to fix up some of the formatting in various articles too. Deus et lex (talk) 00:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Updates
Cheers for updating the QC's, have you done everyone in that category or where did you get up to? I've done a huge chunk. Good opportunity for doing some updates anyway. MaxnaCarta (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Btw - if you chuck in a short description template that would also be so helpful. The below text inserted is good for Australian judges if you cannot be bothered changing the text to their specific court/title
 * { x2 Short description|Australian judge } x2   MaxnaCarta (talk) 09:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Interviews as sources for notability
Hi Deus et lex, I'm sorry I missed the continuing discussion in the | Adam Smith AfD. It would have been helpful had the participants there cited sources for their propositions beyond simply stating that interviews are unreliable. It feels like you and I have a similar understanding about interviews. If I come across any enlightening material I might take the liberty of posting it here for both our benefit. Nice work on the Michael SpPence page BTW. Cabrils (talk) 08:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * thanks - just a bit tired of it being lazily cited as a reason why articles should be deleted. Certainly there are some interviews that are not reliable sources but to just generalise it in AfD after AfD is not good. Deus et lex (talk) 01:30, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of judges of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Anti-Corruption Commission.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)