User talk:Doniago/Archive 59

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice on the article King Ralph
Thanks for the advice on the article King Ralph. I think this goof is significant enough to remain in the article, since Wikipedia is an educational encyclopedia. I will provide a source, when I can find it, for this section so that it can stay in that article, and for the actual Treason Act 1702 article itself, because there are no sources about the history ot this act. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.200.8.98 (talk) 17:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Please note that for film articles, the consensus has been that such things should only be mentioned if a source connects them to the film. In other words, we shouldn't list a goof just because we know it's a goof, but rather because it's a goof that a source made note of. This is discussed in broad strokes under WP:IINFO. Hope this helps! DonIago (talk) 18:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We'd like to invite you to participate in a user study closely related to SuggestBot. User:Another Article is seeking to understand more about the workflow and time commitment of contributors to the English Wikipedia. As part of this study you will occasionally be prompted to answer questions about your editing activity, and these questions should never take more than a minute or two to complete. The intended length of the study is two weeks, but your actual time commitment is totally up to you. If you would like to see more details you can read the project proposal at Research:Measuring editor time commitment and workflow (on meta), but if you are feeling bold and would like just like to sign up right now you can add the line  to your. Contact User:Another Article if you have any questions about this study!

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Unknown subject
Well, it was really good and pretty common knowledge. You don't cite the meaning of the word is, do you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.137.91 (talk) 13:29, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I would if I was asked to, per WP:BURDEN. DonIago (talk) 13:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Album ratings
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Album ratings. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Star Trek (2009)
Dude get it right. I saw the movie. Watch Star Trek (2009) and you will see the Enterprise firing on the Narada. Watch it if you don't believe me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.87.179.174 (talk) 04:32, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't believe that part of the plot is being disputed. DonIago (talk) 04:48, 5 October 2016 (UTC)