User talk:Drjamesaustin

Pope Alexander IV
Reply on my talk page... Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 06:20, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

split infinitive
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia!

What was your reason for saying that Shakespeare's "to pitied be" wasn't a split infinitive? It looks like one according to the definition at the article. &mdash;JerryFriedman (Talk) 17:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)


 * You used the Talk page perfectly. I probably should have brought this up at Talk:Split infinitive with a note to you here to look there, and that's where I replied to you just now.  And thanks for your pleasant attitude about this, very different from some I've encountered on the 'pedia!  &mdash;JerryFriedman  (Talk) 23:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:10, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430  talk to me 13:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aeroflot Flight 593, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 21:31, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Aeroflot Flight 593. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 12:07, 20 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi Jetstreamer


 * Thanks for the interest in my edit. My previous reply to you on your page appears to have been deleted, so apologies if I'm repeating myself.


 * I am familiar with Wikipedia's policy for inline citations . I note in particular that it states "Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space."


 * In this instance, my addition doesn't constitute 'any material challenged or likely to be challenged' (except by your good self), nor is it a quotation. Moreover, the addition is self-referring: any skeptical reader can go and find the book 'Airframe' by Michael Crichton (with the publication date I gave) and verify the information for himself. To add an inline citation to the same book seems redundant; and to delete my addition for not having such a citation seems (if you'll forgive me saying so) more obsessed with form than with information.


 * I look forward to your further thoughts.


 * Drjamesaustin (talk) 21:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nangibotide has been accepted
 Nangibotide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Nangibotide help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

XKCD refs
Please read Xkcd_in_popular_culture and WP:IPCEXAMPLES. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)