User talk:EditWiki45

August 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Part of the basis of this block is your continued false claims that the images were your work, both on en.wiki and at Commons.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:15, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bbb23, I know I made a mistake and if you see my talk page edit history you will get to know that I apologized for my mistake and I myself reverted one kf those pics and I just once claimed that they are my work because I didn't knew about this. I even asked you for help on your commons talk page and I repeatedly apologized for my mistake. Please don't block me as I accepted my mistake and was trying to correct it. Please see if I can be unblocked. Because I have also made many good edits on this way. Hope you reply me positively. Regards, EditWiki45 (talk) 00:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Most of what you say above is untrue. You claimed that at least three images were your own work on Commons. I don't even know what "I didn't knew about this" means in this context. You obviously knew they were not your own work. Your uploads and your use of them on Wikipedia were a complete deception. You even edit-warred to keep them in and didn't self-revert until you were caught. As for your post on my Talk page at Commons, that was a transparent attempt to save yourself from adverse administrative action.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:08, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Bbb23 you say that I reverted after I got caught if you see the things happened in a very short interval of time. Please go and see my discussion section in User talk:FMSky named something like Why you reverted my edit. It is present at the very last untill now. You will get to know my point after reading the while convo. I was a little overconfident in starting but I later got your notices and I myself apologized. And as far as my msg on your commons talk page is concerned you can see that I wrote what I felt and if you feel (which you do) that I did that to avoid any action. Then sir you can check my edit history of my talk page. I have asked for help from admins even before. Please see all the sides and then reply me. EditWiki45 talk EditWiki45 (talk) 01:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi SpacemanSpiff Sir you can check the edit history of my talk page. I have asked for help from admins even before. And as I said I argued only on the matters that I was unknown to. But after realising mistakes I have also apologized. Please see all the sides and then reply me. Please go and see my discussion section in User talk:FMSky named something like Why you reverted my edit. It is present at the very last untill now. You will get to know my point after reading the while convo. I was a little overconfident in starting but I did the right thing before it could get worse. EditWiki45 talk EditWiki45 (talk) 01:38, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for pointing us toward the legal threat, I missed that while reviewing your unblock. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  02:16, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

SpacemanSpiff I mentioned it because the guy used a foul language and I said according to the times (rules mentioned times by mistake) of Wikipedia EditWiki45 (talk) 02:18, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * All of us have said what we need to, that you can't understand the problem is exactly why we're here. I'm revoking talk page access now. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:39, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 47307
has been closed. Noting legal threat was noted above. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 02:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

That was given because of foul language and I mentioned that it will be according to the rules of Wikipedia which meant a notice by one of you admins. What about my explanation?Deepfriedokra EditWiki45 (talk) 02:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Well I have explained much. But still I am telling this again as I have been told in my UTRS appeal. I made three edits which were wrong. After knowing that they violate policies here I reverted one edit and was about to revert others too. But as of now, all those are reverted. And to add to corrections, before getting blocked I nominated all the three pics I uploaded for speedy deletion and they are already deleted. I did my best to correct my mistake till tge time I was allowed to do. But now I am not able to do anything because of the block. If you admins think that this explanation is somewhat good to unblock me or reduce time of my block then please do it. And before signing off I would like to bring to your notice that I have made 500 edits. And 25-odd edits were reverted. Do its a 500:20 ratio. I think I deserve atleast 1 more chance to orove my worth. Rest depends on you guys.Bbb23, Deepfriedokra, SpacemanSpiff and all other admins of Wikipedia. Regards,  EditWiki45 talk EditWiki45 (talk) 06:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I've removed the personal attack and revoked TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:40, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 27 August 2021 (UTC)