User talk:Ephert

Hello, Ephert, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place " " on this page and someone will drop by to help. You can also contact me if you wish by clicking "talk" to the right of my name. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Generalizing
Hello, Ephert. I just want to make clear that I don't have any issues with you. Not truly. I mean, at least you're sourcing a lot of your content with WP:Reliable sources. My only criticism would be that you attribute the sources more accurately. For example, you generalize with the sources quite a bit. This was the case for the gay male "tops" and "bottoms" information you added to the Physical attractiveness article, among other things. I tweaked the "tops" and "bottoms" information to this, so that it doesn't seem as though this applies to all or most gay men who identify as "only tops" or as "only bottoms." In cases like these, it is always best to attribute the information to the study.

Anyway, you are doing good work here. And I apologize for any way I may have recently offended you. Flyer22 (talk) 21:53, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Nyan Cat
sup. thanks for the good work on Nyan Cat. Badmachine (talk)

Kimchi
I know Melonbarmonster2 didn't actually explain in xyr edit summary, but, surprisingly (I have a long history of usually disagreeing with Mbm2), I agree with xyr revision of your addition. A long time back, either on Talk:Kimchi or possibly on a more general page like Japanese-Korean disputes, we looked into exactly what the TED pages were; I actually even contacted the TED organizer myself, by email. The end result is that those papers are basically just grad student papers written a little more nicely and put on the internet. They don't meet our reliable sources guidelines, and so can't be used to verify claims in articles. If you have any questions, probably the best place to raise them is on Talk:Kimchi. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Mongoloid race
Great work on this article! It is now looking fantasitc. Christopedia (talk) 08:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Nahuatl pronunciations
Hi Ephert, thanks for adding a lot of Nahuatl related changes. Great with the translations. However, I am not fully convinced by your soundfiles. It does not sound to me as if you are a fluent speaker - I might be wrong, but it doesn't sound like any dialect I have ever heard spoken. I am going to remove some of the pronunciations that sound the most unlike Nahuatl, and think that you probably shouldn't add anymore. At least not without prior discussion. I do appreciate the effort you've put into this and I mean no offense, I just think that if we should have pronounciations they should be as accurate as possible in order to be useful. Some of the things that sound strange with your pronunciations is the tl sound which has much too much friction, making it sound more like Greenlandic, and in some polysyllabic words you misplace the stress (e.g. in macuahuitl). Also your pronunciation of the long l is weird. ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 14:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I am very concerned with accuracy. Thank you for the ōllamaloni change. I have noted your observations about some of my "tl" sounds being too frictive, stress being on the wrong syllable, and "ll" sounding weird. I will try to remedy this in my future and past additions. I will use the talk page first as long as I get timely responses.--Ephert (talk) 21:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I guess the description of long l being weird wasn't very helpful. Most dialects I have heard pronounce it as an actual geminate l with double onset. You could try listening to some Nahuatl speakers at youtube. Basically I think that the best solution would be to get a native speaker to supply any recordings. I know a few I might ask at some point. I agree that any person canspeak any language, but since the usefulness of a pronunciation guide is to help readers a chieve a native like pronunciation - native speakers should be prefered.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 23:32, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Please find some native speakers who pronounce the "tl" like "tɬ" (not just "t" or just "ɬ") and have them record sound files.--Ephert (talk) 23:39, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Most speakers of central dialects still have [tɬ]. I work with those dialects professionally so I can definitely find speakers. Maybe we should compile a list of words requiring recording and then take them all in one fell swoop one day. ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 23:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I;'ve corrected some of your transcriptions - particularly you devoice w and l too frequently in posistions where only some dialects do this. I for example don't think that classical Nahuatl devoiced l before p, and only some modern dialects do this. Kʷ is a single phoneme and never devoices to kʍ which would be two different phonemes. Some dialects devoice kw to just plain k, classical Nahuatl probably also diod this but we can't be sure.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 15:38, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * This should be written in the IPA for Nahuatl.--Ephert (talk) 00:55, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Also please don't replace Spanish pronunciations of Mexican place names with original Nahuatl ones the Spanish names are way more useful for the reader since they are the names that are actually used for all of these places (e.g. Atlatlahucan). Its fine to add the Nahuatl, but keep the Spanish pronunciation in place.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 15:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm disagree with Maunus, I think you should add more pronunciations. --Giggette (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patolli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Convergence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Plurals
In classical Nahuatl inanimate nouns did not have plural forms. A word like inmatepuzcuauhuah is a possessed form and its the possessor that is pluralized. The plural of macuahuitl in the unpossessed form is "(miyac) macuahuitl".·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 15:35, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh I did not know that.--Ephert (talk) 22:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Nahuatl pronunciations
Hi Ephert, thanks for adding a lot of Nahuatl related changes, I saw your modifications, , without a previous discussion but I'd like to know if you want to add more pronounciations, for example "Xipe-Totec"?. --Giggette (talk) 00:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kat (pornographic actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm not surprised you weren't notified that this article is up for Afd. - Stillwaterising (talk) 03:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tlalcuahuitl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congruence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Mɑ̜̜ʼii listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mɑ̜̜ʼii. Since you had some involvement with the Mɑ̜̜ʼii redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:27, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

IPA for Nahuatl
You will get yourself into trouble if you start trying to show dialectal variation in the IPA article, different dialects have completely different phonological systems and the table will turn into a mess. The zacapoaxtla dialect for example cannot be said to realize tl as t, it simply has no tl, but only t - t sometimes corresponds to classical nahuatl t, but it is not the case that it is realized as t - that is something different. Some dialects have b instead of kw, some have l instead of tl in some positions and t in others. The IPA is only to give a pronunciation key to classical Nahuatl and the most commonly known central dialects. It is not the place to give a description of phonological variation in contemporary dialects.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 01:59, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * okay--Ephert (talk) 02:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I think I would have kept those two examples you removed - they were pretty general, but once you start citing single specific dialects it becomes too complex. I have no problems if you want to reinsert those two. Also good idea to introduce phonological restrictions.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 02:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Black God (Navajo mythology) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Crescent moon and Buckskin


 * Tamale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Maya and Mayan


 * List of English words from indigenous languages of the Americas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Cacao

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Graphemes
Lockhart does not write anything about graphemes on page 121 in Nahuatl as written. He correctly writes that Nahuatl words cannot begin or end with two consonants (i.e. two consonant phonemes). The word grapheme means a letter unit, vowel letters are also graphemes so obviously all written words begin with two graphemes. Secondly "grapheme" only applies to written languages and the phonology of the language is not determined by how it is written, but by the inventory of phonemes and the rules for how to combine them (phonology). The possible combinations of graphemes is governed by orthography which is something else entirely, and secondary. Thirdly Nahuatl words can begin and end with three consonant graphemes, and frequently do in colonial texts when Nahuatl scribes sometimes dropped final vowels in writing.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 02:25, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay.--Ephert (talk) 02:28, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:Aztec food animal
Category:Aztec food animal, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 16:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Coyote (Navajo mythology), Ephert!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"interesting article on native american mythology."

To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for July 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited STEM fields, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page General intelligence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=602304744 your edit] to Mongoloid may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:11, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * |Cartwright Tt|| 0.82 ± 0.007 || 0.014 ± 0.014 || ...
 * may have epicanthic folds, Down syndrome was widely called "Mongol" or "Mongoloid Idiocy". {{cite web |url=http://www.down-syndrome.info/library/periodicals/dsrp/06/1/019/DSRP-06-1-019-EN-GB.

Refs
Please use secondary sources and not primary sources per WP:MEDRS. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:18, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indigenous peoples of Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mazatec (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cuteness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardio. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mongoloid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robustness. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Mongoloid
Thanks very much for your edits to the Mongoloid article in response to my criticism! I'd also like to apologize if I came across as harsh or attacking you personally, since you've made a large number of edits to the article. Charlotte Aryanne (talk) 03:04, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Racial classification of Indian Americans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manko. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

"butt"
... is a very American expression that will puzzle many readers. Try to be aware of this sort of thing. Reverting. Johnbod (talk) 19:53, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Diablo
I think your edits are great additions, but they belong more at Diablo (series) to show the overarching and current plot of the universe. The page at Diablo (video game) should reflect the setting and plot as represented in the game, and not what was later changed or retconned for Diablo 2, and later more heavily for Diablo 3. -- ferret (talk) 21:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Natu Visinia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natu Visinia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Natu Visinia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Kimchi
Red pepper was not introduced by Portuguese. See Google book search.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International adoption of South Korean children, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Granite Tower
Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Ephert, thanks for creating The Granite Tower!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs references providing substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 20:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Koreans edit
Hi, after seeing you revert my most recent edit in the Koreans page, I'm sorry about that. I never knew it was no random selections of certain East Asian ethnicities. Aki (talk · contributions) 20:39 (UTC), June 18 2017 (Sunday).

Proposed deletion of The Donaldson Adoption Institute
Hello, Ephert. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Donaldson Adoption Institute, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Brad v  18:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Joshua Cooper Ramo Page
Hi Ephert. I temporarily removed your edits on the Joshua Cooper Ramo page because it seems that including individual tweets would not be in line WP:UNDUE. I would gladly restore them if we could determine that these tweets were of major significance. Please let me know what you think. Thank you. BlackRanger88 (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your addition of a table of genetic data on Finns
Hello. I have reverted your edit since there is no information whatsoever about what it's based on (other than that it's part of the Genographic Project), such as sample size, geographic distribution of samples (which is important in Finland since there are three different ethnic groups in Finland, Finns, Finland-Swedes and Sami, living in different parts of the country...), etc. So discuss it on the talk page of the article, and get support from other editors there, before adding it back again. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 10:20, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * In general tables of data are not proper encyclopedic material, since data are primary sources. Especially they are not useful for inclusion unless their data are both validated as being correct and representative and notable by reliable mainstream sources and there is a summary of their significance based on reliable sources. And in most cases the summary of their significance is the only part that is actually useful for the encyclopedia, and the data themselves can be left out. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 10:43, 15 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Similarly at Hmong people. I have removed the data table that you added - it is primary source, and there is absolutely no information for the average reader about what it means. Leschnei (talk) 17:58, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:JinHanjun1999Table2
Template:JinHanjun1999Table2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Watanabe2004Table6
Template:Watanabe2004Table6 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Inuit template
Hello, I see that you're the creator of the IPA-iu template and the Help:IPA/Inuktitut key. There already exists IPA-iku, which links to the same key and uses the 3-letter ISO 639 code, so it seems to me these templates should be merged. However, IPA-iu by default shows "Inuit pronunciation", not "Inuktitut pronunciation", which IPA-iku shows, despite linking to said key. Is there a specific reason the template says "Inuit", not "Inuktitut"? I'm not familiar with the Inuit languages and I'd appreciate if you could enlighten me. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 12:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

So I went WP:BOLD and merged the templates and changed the word "Inuit" to "Inuktitut" anyway. But if you have an input I would appreciate it too. Thanks. Nardog (talk) 13:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Requesting your participation
Hi. As a someone who contributed content to Asian Americans since June, I am seeking your input for a discussion about changes to the lead section that I started. I'm trying to set a good example of consensus-building, especially for the lead section. Your input would be most appreciated. Thanks! --Ishu (talk) 15:04, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Data table
This looks like it might be a copyright violation, are you sure it isn't? Doug Weller  talk 17:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * In regards to your question, please see Personal security practices.--Ephert (talk) 09:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * That's a very odd response. Yes, I know about personal information, I'm one of the few Admins who have the role of suppressing personal informatin that wasn't meant to be or shouldn't be revealed - this stops even other Admins from seeing it. I've also blocked editors who outed people and as a past member of the Arbitration Committee was involved in a number of issues involving personal information. Unfortunately as you won't or can't answer my question I've had to delete the material as a copyright violation. In this case other Admins can still see it. Doug Weller  talk 12:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I made this comment, because I read your comment wherein you used the word “sure,” and I would like to keep information about myself on Wikipedia which could potentially lead to identification of who I am outside of Wikipedia to a minimum. I reasoned that someone who would feel “sure” about copyright issues would be some type of legal expert, e.g. an attorney specializing in copyright issues. I do not want to divulge whether I would be such an expert, or would not be such an expert. Granted, that bit of information, in itself, would not lead to a Wikipedian’s identification, but, with enough bits of information, a Wikipedian could potentially be identified.--Ephert (talk) 18:03, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Another Administrator who works a lot on copyright issues has determined that there is one here and has deleted the template. Another issue has been raised however, and I need to ask you if WP:COI applies to you. Doug Weller  talk 18:42, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I do not believe WP:COI applies to me.--Ephert (talk) 15:08, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of deletion of templates
Hello, I have nominated most of the templates you created for deletion, which is being discussed here, in which you are invited to participate. Please note that this proposal is not to delete the content of the templates from the articles in which they are currently used, but to store the content in the articles themselves, because, as noted in our template guidelines, it is not the purpose of the template namespace to store article text. Nardog (talk) 00:48, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello Ephert. Please don't copy the material from your templates in to the related articles, as many of them contain copyright content that we are not allowed to host. Each template will need to be individually assessed for compliance with our copyright policy before they can be kept. Thank you, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:35, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Your addition to Mongoloid has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * It has been about a month since you removed my revision to the Mongoloid article wherein I added content cited to Joseph L. Graves Jr. (2009). Have you been working on a version of content cited to Joseph L. Graves Jr. (2009) to add to the Mongoloid article? If you have not been working on a version of content cited to Joseph L. Graves Jr. (2009), would you please write content cited to Joseph L. Graves Jr. (2009) and add it to the Mongoloid article?--Ephert (talk) 22:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry you will have to do that yourself. It's not part of the patrolling administrator's responsibility. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Boyd 1950 Table 38


A tag has been placed on Template:Boyd 1950 Table 38 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://dspace.gipe.ac.in/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10973/36009/GIPE-023934.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 21:01, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:PickeringBachman2009Table1


A tag has been placed on Template:PickeringBachman2009Table1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://books.google.se/books?id=V0JheWC85h4C&q=%22Table+1+Racial+Characteristics%22&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=%22Table%201%20Racial%20Characteristics%22&f=false. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 21:07, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Stavrianos2012Table1


A tag has been placed on Template:Stavrianos2012Table1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christos_Papadopoulos7/publication/270950801_Facial_Anatomy_and_Mapping_Across_Races/links/551334880cf23203199ba780.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Blumenfeld2000Table1


A tag has been placed on Template:Blumenfeld2000Table1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1137&context=totem. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 21:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Jain2013Table2.5


A tag has been placed on Template:Jain2013Table2.5 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://books.google.se/books?id=eXn63TbqTAQC&pg=PA30&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 21:25, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Tateno 2014 Figure 4


A tag has been placed on Template:Tateno 2014 Figure 4 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/6/3/466/576141. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 21:27, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:USCourtRaceIndian


A tag has been placed on Template:USCourtRaceIndian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20190727170227/http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/ncc375/rp/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 21:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Human genetics data tables


A tag has been placed on Category:Human genetics data tables requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Anthropometric data tables


A tag has been placed on Category:Anthropometric data tables requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)