User talk:FF toho

November 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Izno (talk) 19:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Izno, in other news, the user just started a sock account in order to post propaganda for the Chinese government. It's pretty sad. Drmies (talk) 17:29, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I've submitted an unblock request almost a week ago, with no response.


 * Furthermore, it is extremely disrespectful and inappropriate for a Wikipedia administrator to make such a statement about another user without providing evidence to support their claim. Accusing someone of spreading propaganda for the Chinese government is a serious charge, and it should not be made lightly or without solid proof.


 * It is not acceptable behavior for a Wikipedia administrator to engage in personal attacks or make unproven allegations against other users. As an administrator, it is their responsibility to set a good example and uphold the highest standards of professionalism and respect for others. This type of behavior is not in line with the values and principles of Wikipedia, and it is important for all users, including administrators, to follow the guidelines and policies of the site in order to maintain a positive and respectful community.FF toho (talk) 17:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

No unblock request was submitted from this account. Evidence of the propaganda is this edit, by the sock account, User:Juche Necromancy. Drmies (talk) 17:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I submitted it via the unblock form, unless that somehow failed to send. Also, once again, it's extremely unprofessional and rude for a Wikipedia administrator to accuse people of spreading propaganda. Not only does it violate assume good faith, but it's also a personal attack. FF toho (talk) 17:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

FF toho (talk) 21:26, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

category:requests for unblock

Vandalism.
Okay, I just want to make it clear that I'm not affiliated with the guy that keeps vandalising this page, thanks for understanding. FF toho (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

 * Any explanation for the sockpuppetry? —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 07:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I have already explained my actions in the past, but I understand that you may have missed my previous explanation. I want to reiterate that the reason I created an alternate account to continue editing articles was not out of malicious intent. I was simply frustrated that my previous ban appeal had gone without response (or at least I thought I did, apparently it never sent) for an extended period of time and I wanted to continue contributing to the platform. I understand that creating an alternate account is not allowed and I regret my actions.


 * I also want to note that it seems you have been particularly attentive to all of my actions on Wikipedia. While I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of the platform, I hope that this is not an indication of any personal bias or vendetta towards me. I am committed to following the guidelines and rules of Wikipedia and hope to continue contributing to the platform in the future. — FF toho (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Do you object to unblocking? It seams to me this user deserves a WP:ROPE. Since you tagged this user as a "CU confirmed" sockmaster, I am asking for your permission to unblock (As I can see, there was one edit by a sock puppet, so maybe we can give a second chance).  Vanjagenije   (talk)  00:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * User:Vanjagenije, I don't think I mind, except for one thing: I need this user to respect our guidelines and stay away from the blatantly non-neutral edits and posts they made regarding the Uyghur matter, which we on Wikipedia, following reliable secondary sources, indeed qualify as a genocide. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 00:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Vanjagenije, I have no objections to unblocking if you believe they are sincere regarding their copyright understanding.
 * You should be aware of the other context to that block, which was Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1114 and on which I have no strong comment (well, I guess you're the admin that is taking the appeal ;). Drmies appears to have given you some thoughts along that dimension though. Izno (talk) 00:41, 8 March 2023 (UTC)