User talk:Fadesga/Archives/2016/March

Proposal of a WikiProject Translation studies
Today I made a formal proposal for the creation of a WikiProject Translation studies. Want to join? Please, sign here.
 * Great news that this project is now up and running. Looking forward to helping out. --LaFolleCycliste 21:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Miklós Horthy has been nominated for discussion
Category:Miklós Horthy, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for weighing in on the nomination. I don't plan on nominating any of your other categories but I would take a look at WP:OCEPON before creating any more categories named after people. The bar is set pretty high for those.
 * Good luck and thanks for all your edits about Hungary! RevelationDirect (talk) 01:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:La Malinche
Greetings, Fadesga, a quick question. Any reason why you removed a Wikiproject from page? Thanks. Caballero / Historiador ⎌  19:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Turok: Son of Stone (2008 film)


Hello, Fadesga. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Turok: Son of Stone".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Qpalzmmzlapq &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  21:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Nyers) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Nyers, Fadesga!

Wikipedia editor Damibaru just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looking good. I might add that the word "nyers" is Hungarian for raw. Also its pronunciation, perhaps? (Similar to a Europeanized "ñairsh"). Link to wiki commons perhaps? Looking good otherwise!

To reply, leave a comment on Damibaru's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

March 2016
Hello, I'm TJRC. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Cay has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TJRC (talk) 16:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of PodOmatic


The article PodOmatic has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No content besides ad copy which may or may not also be a WP:COPYVIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolbasz (talk) 21:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Nadir Bouhmouch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nadir Bouhmouch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nadir Bouhmouch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 00:46, 13 March 2016 (UTC)