User talk:Famguy3

Thank you for experimenting with the page Zac Efron on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.  George Mon  e  y Talk   Contribs 20:14, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Frenchman113 (talk • contribs).

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Blanking your talk page will not remove the warnings from the page history. If you continue to blank your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. -- George Mon  e  y Talk   Contribs 19:46, 7 May 2006 (UTC) This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. -- GeorgeMoney T·C 00:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Stop
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- GeorgeMoney T·C 00:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Zack Andrew Struver, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 21:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jeff Reinhart
An editor has nominated Jeff Reinhart, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 09:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Saw 5
is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Rigg
As it is now, there's nothing on Rigg's article that isn't on the List of Saw characters article. Although he is going to play a role in Saw IV, we shouldn't be making an article for him until he becomes important enough to deserve one. As such, I redirected the page back to List of Saw characters, so the information that was on the article is still available in its history. Once his role is expanded upon and there's enough information to sustain its own article we can bring him back. Thanks.--CyberGhostface 00:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I know he's going to be an important character. I just feel at the moment that until we know more about him he shouldn't get an article. But if you want to, you can restore the article. I can promise that I won't touch it, but I don't know about the other users.--CyberGhostface 02:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * If you like, we don't have to wait until October rolls along...maybe if an interview or trailer that gives more information on Rigg comes out, we can add it then. How does that sound?--CyberGhostface 13:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Since a trailer still hasn't arrived, you could probably try restarting the Rigg article if you want.--CyberGhostface 20:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, go ahead and try restarting it. I'll go look to see if I can find any interviews.--CyberGhostface 21:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I've been thinking about making one as well. I've never made one before either, but I'll take a look at some other ones I'm a member of tomorrow.--CyberGhostface 02:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestion. I started one up at WikiProject Saw.--CyberGhostface 21:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * No offense, but you'd be an administrator in name only. Wikiprojects are for the most part public things where everyone has the same amount of freedom on the project.--CyberGhostface 02:33, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You can still do whatever you want on the project. Are there any tasks you'd like to take?--CyberGhostface 16:49, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

You da man Famguy3!
Your "The Shooting" article is very well made. Good Job!

The Shooting (Digital Short)
Another editor has added the  template to the article The Shooting (Digital Short), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Shooting (Digital Short)
An editor has nominated The Shooting (Digital Short), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saw October 2008 Newsletter

 * Actually, you probably shouldn't participate in the AFD now...apparently notifying you because you were interested is against the rules.--CyberGhostface (talk) 23:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of S.T.D. (Jonas Brothers Parody)
A tag has been placed on S.T.D. (Jonas Brothers Parody) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ChunkyStyle (talk contribs) 01:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

October 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.  RJC  TalkContribs 01:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Saw
Hello there, I noticed you are a member of the Saw task force, and therefore have foreknowledge of the Saw series, making you an editor with qualifications to review an article under the scope of Saw. I hope am I not bothering your editing, but I would like to bring to your attention that List of Saw media is currently being reviewed for a possible featured list status, but there is currently a major backlog in the amount of articles waiting to be reviewed. I would like to encourage you to participate in the discussion, found here, if you are interested. If you believe I am disrupting your editing or that my message was an attempt to sway your opinions per WP:Canvas, please let me know so I may fix my methods of bringing this conversation to editors attention, I am simply trying to prevent a backlog on the WP:FLC page. Happy edits, GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 05:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  05:25, 23 May 2015 (UTC)