User talk:Fcsuper

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 00:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Links in the article Bible
Just want you to know, a long list of internal links has recently been deleted from the article Bible because they basically all served the same purpose and were therefore redundant. If you wish to insert an additional link, I suggest you make your case on Talk:Bible before adding the link. Thank you. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 19:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Bible
I am all for compromise, but changing Jewish to Judaism doesn't solve the problem you seem to be concerned with - at best it is semantics, at worst it actually is worse because something can be Jewish (books by IB Singer, for example) without being associated with a religion called "Judaism." which is why I reverted. Slrubenstein  |  Talk 16:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I agree with that, but you reverted everything, not just that one word (which I did do separately in case of an issue). Do you have other concerns? --Fcsuper (talk) 17:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

No. I don't know what went wrong, my intention was to rever only one edit of yours! Slrubenstein  |  Talk 17:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Tech Coast
There were some coding problems in the AfD discussion. I fixed it for you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!) 23:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! --  f c s u p e r ( How's That?, That's How! ) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) 00:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Tags moving in "Jehovah's Witnesses" article
I'm just new here. I didn't see the previous tag was there. They do need to be in there, though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandmelon (talk • contribs) 05:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: 3RR
I am currently trying to get discussion about edits made by Cmmmm, who has so far not co-operated in the proper process for resolving the dispute at the Controversy page. As regards Mandmelon, though I disagree with some of her arguments, I do agree with her approach.--Jeffro77 (talk) 00:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC) if you need help with your reports just leave me a blog.--Mindoshawn (talk) 17:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Dicklyon (talk) 05:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Merge discussion
One of the articles that you have been involved in editing, Token-object reading, has been proposed for a merge with Psychometry. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. - Steve3849  11:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Timeline of the burrito
I'm afraid we have a bit of a problem. Just because the entries aren't explicit as to their importance, doesn't mean we remove them. In fact, it is just the opposite; you're supposed to look at the source and expand the entry. I've restored the entries you've removed because these deletions don't make any sense and I'm having trouble understanding why you removed them. Please continue the discussion on the talk page. Viriditas (talk) 07:57, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, I see how this isn't clear to the reader not familiar with the history. I'm in the process of filling in the blanks. Viriditas (talk) 08:11, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Please don't use tags like recentism in articles that don't require it. There is nothing "recent" in Timeline of the burrito, and timeline articles are supposed to cover current events. Viriditas (talk) 19:02, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Continuing to delete items from a list without trying to merge them per the discussion on the talk page is not helpful. One of the items you recently deleted was discussed while the other was not. Further, the rationale you provided in the edit summary was somewhat strange, as the date of publication is used as a historical data point on Wikipedia, such as in discipline by year lists. Here, we are talking about the food history of the burrito. If you are willing to help research and write the history section of the burrito article, great, otherwise, these edits are not helpful. Please remember that there is no strict, black and white rule that we use when we determine the merit of inclusion, but rather a flexible, shades of gray approach that requires looking at the big picture. It may help to use the talk page to describe your own vision of the timeline article, using other lists as support. Viriditas (talk) 20:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * See talk...keep discussion in one place. —  f c s u p e r ( How's That?, That's How! ) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) — 21:58, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * This isn't about the discussion. It's about your obsessive editing behavior which has ignored the discussion. Please familiarize yourself with WP:BRD.  You don't keep reverting, you stop and have a discussion, and many of the points I've raised you continue to ignore. Viriditas (talk) 22:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The only one obsessing is you over the WP voilations that you keep trying to introduce. —  f c s u p e r ( How's That?, That's How! ) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) — 17:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Fcsuper, I have not introduced any violations. You don't seem to be familiar with how we use talk pages for discussion nor are you familiar with the collaborative aspect of Wikipedia and the WP:BRD model for editing. The talk page shows that you asked a question, received an answer, and then ignored the answer, continuing to ask the same questions over and over again.  Your latest set of edits are the very definition of tendentious, disruptive editing.  Unless you are willing and able to do the research, discuss the merge proposal on the talk page, and help write articles, your continued behavior on this topic is not helping.  Viriditas (talk) 23:16, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Update: I've removed your petty, disruptive tagging of the timeline article and I've begun slowly merging notable data points.  The "multiple issues" template you added included many false allegations about the content, as did your edit summary.  Please use the talk page to discuss issues in an open, honest, and clear manner.  Falsely using template tags as "weapons" is not acceptable.  In case you are not aware, we are here on Wikipedia to write articles and to collaborate in  harmony with other editors.  Please stop using Wikipedia as a battleground and lay down your sword. Viriditas (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

ANI notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Fcsuper. Thank you. —Viriditas (talk) 05:18, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Viriditas
Please stop pointing out his misbehavior on the article talk page. If his behavior is bothering you, the ANI is open. It's clear that confronting him with his own misbehavior only makes the situation worse. --Ronz (talk) 22:14, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll refrain. I'll also leave it up to you and the others to comment at the ANI location as to any misbehavior by any editors in regards to Timeline of the burrito. —  f c s u p e r ( How's That?, That's How! ) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) —  23:13, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

SpaceClaim
Thanks for the help on the SpaceClaim page. Look any better now? Bcourter (talk) 21:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC) bcourter

Hey
In an attempt to get past the impasse that has been reached re the capitalisation of I in intro on the Star Trek into Darkness article, I have created two additional sub-sections where users can put their for/against argument comments in without getting caught up in Beating a dead horse. These sections are purely for providing reasons and not for arguing back and forth, although discussions are welcome to continue in the above section. If you could come and give your view that would be great. MisterShiney   ✉    21:14, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Voting has started http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Star_Trek_into_Darkness#Requested_move  I recommend stating your case.  Also, I did note that you left this same message in many places.  I know we all pretty much commented on the issue in the Talk page, but sometimes its better to just target one or two individuals and work with them. —  f c s u p e r ( How's That?, That's How! ) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) —  21:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah I made a point of putting the message in as many editors pages as possible who had taken part in the discussion already, whatever their view, so as I couldn't be accused of "canvassing" and "bias" if I just left it on the Pro change editors pages if that makes sense? MisterShiney    ✉    21:53, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Yield sign Straw Poll
Since you were involved in the move discussion for Yield sign, please checkout the straw poll over at Talk:Yield sign and share your thoughts. Thanks Tiggerjay (talk) 21:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:SolidWorks logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:SolidWorks logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Model-based definition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Defense (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Marlborough, Massachusetts, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Westborough is not a bordering town of Marlborough. Garchy (talk) 15:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 888 (band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 888 (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/888 (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 01:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Broomfield-colorado flag.gif


The file File:Broomfield-colorado flag.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Superseded by c:File:Flag of Broomfield County, Colorado.svg."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:16, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)