User talk:Feezo/Archive 3

set game
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Set_%28game%29

You took off a lot of good set resources... I doubt you even know how to play the game. Among the links you took off are (a) the official set site and (b) several implementations of the game which are really neat. I don't know what you were doing. (You also left on the most worthless link--a place to buy the game.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samoht625 (talk • contribs)

RE: Alright, fair enough. I would add some of those links back in, even if not my link. I've had several academic papers link to my site, which they presumably found from Wikipedia. The resources now do not include a version of the game to be played, so users coming to the page cannot get an idea of how the real game works. Obviously, this is up to you. (Also, the last link is probably the worst spam of all the links that were listed.) At any rate, I'll leave the decision to you since I clearly have a COI. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.155.69 (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA_hash_functions
SHA1 reverse lookup databases SHA1search - reverses MD5 and SHA1 hashes (330 000+ strings)

Open the link and check agents your rollback! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.228.218.155 (talk) 00:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi freezo, I am sorry i am new to wikipedia so excuse me if this isn't the appropriate way to contact you. I am the developer who added hash-it.net to the SHA & MD5 pages. I did this because I believe it is beneficial to the community. The gtools hashing is slow, the hash-it hashing is instant. GTools is nearly an advertisement for their other tools, the md5 portion of the site is miniscule. hash-it.net has no ads, no links, and the UI is fully devoted to hashing. Yes, I made the site, but I have absolutely nothing to gain from people using it. That is why I do not understand you marking it as spam. As far as I can see it is merely an additional resource. Considering there is a heading for "Online Hash Calculators" with only one entry, I would expect you to welcome a new and useful online hash calculator.

Furthermore, may I inquire as to why gtools is on the MD5 page? The hashing site on the SHA page (hash 'em all) seems a much better choice. In my humble opinion hash 'em all and hash-it.net should both be linked to on the MD5 and SHA pages, and gtools should be out. Pages like gtools are a dime a dozen, while hash 'em all is significant because of it's wide support for hashing algorithms and hash-it.net is noteworthy for it's instant hashing.

Again, sorry if this is the wrong method of discussing the issue and I hope you can agree that hash-it.net is more useful than gtools.org for hashing purposes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.216.116.86 (talk) 15:08, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

File sync page
Hi there - I see you reverted a link I put into external sources on the File sync page. I may not be a definitive source but my article on the subject is factual and research based. The article on File sync File_synchronization is still marked as needing sources. I was trying to help. I'm writing mostly to say that your comment to me that I am "promoting my blog" felt rude to me. If my article does not meet the definitions for notability as defined by Wikipedians, that's fine. But you assume that I am self-promoting and not trying to help out - it can hurt the community if any of us participants do that, in my opinion.

I doubt you'll permit me to re-submit my article for inclusion in file synchronization until I am published by a major media outlet. So I won't try. But please don't jump the gun with other users, in assuming ill-intent.

I do greatly appreciate the hard work you are putting in to Wikipedia - we all benefit from that. And thank you for it.

Sincerely,

Stevemidgley (talk) 07:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Feezo,

It wasn't the reversion that felt like a slap in the face, my friend. I'm all for reversions when the content is not valid, even if it's my own. I'm not a definitive expert on what belongs in Wikipedia by any means. My feeling is that you were quite unnecessarily rude in assuming that I put the link there to logroll for my own site. My intention was to provide a valuable, researched report on Wikipedia. If it's not welcome, then it's fine to remove it.

My purpose in dialogue with you is to gently suggest that when you make editorial reversions (which I'm glad you are doing on Wikipedia - it's a valuable service) that you undertake them with some consideration of the other party. For example instead of saying "Please do not use Wikipedia to promote your blog" you could say "Users should not reference their own websites in external links." Same amount of typing, but a different effect. The latter statement is one of fact, which explains why the reversion was made. The former is a statement of opinion about the author's intention, and b/c it was not true in my case, it felt rude.

Hopefully I'm making sense. I hold hardworking Wikipedians such as yourself in high regard and want you to be successful in your work. Sincerely, Stevemidgley (talk) 23:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

my x86 & FBUI links
Feezo, Can you please stop removing useful external links to my content, which I am moving to a new server instead of comcast.net. Zack —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.152.57 (talk) 16:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Play fair
Feezo/Adam, The consensus you speak of was reached long ago: The x86 pages have linked to my content for over a year. There is no need for building a new consensus and your attempt at requiring that is unjust and uncivil. Furthermore given that the consensus exists already, to remove a good external link is indeed damage since it reduces the quality of Wikipedia, which I am sure is contrary to what they're paying you to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.152.57 (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
OK, I'll see if I have time for helping out. 71.175.152.57 (talk) 17:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)fbui

Incomplete reference
Hi there. Regarding this edit... if you see such an incomplete reference, I would encourage you to briefly check how it got like that. A quick check of the history would have shown that an IP user had indiscriminately removed material, so the correct action in this case would have been to undo the IP's edit rather than remove what was left. This is not meant to be a criticism of you, as your edit was clearly made in good faith, but as you unwittingly helped to remove referenced material I thought it might be worth letting you know for the future. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 01:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Incidentally, thanks for your improvements to King of Dragon Pass a few weeks back. --Kiz o r  07:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

External links killer
I have noticed you remove the link i added in Domain_Name_System for a web-based DNS tool. In the other hand, i have also noticed that several of your contributions consist in external links removing. But it seems obvious that people wondering information on DNS may wish a link for at least ONE of this tool, moreover a web-based one. You may be scary that external links posted by anonymes-IP user may not be reliable or may content malware. Feel free to discuss with me if this is what you mind, then use an uptdated security software on your computer and test the site you are about to suppress before doing so. This seems to be a fairest way to choose what have to be suppressed and what may answer to wikipedia users' needs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.147.191.183 (talk) 06:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I answer you on my talk page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.147.191.183 (talk) 18:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

RE:Move
✅. Cheers,  « Gonzo fan2007  (talk ♦ contribs) @  '' 04:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Harry
Replied on my talk page, to keep the discussion together. Hqb (talk) 21:26, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Lucid Dream Induction Drugs
I'm going to start a discussion on the talk page about them, see you there. Lil' Dice (yeah, I said it!) - talk 23:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Copyvio reports
Hi, don't forget to make sure that your reports are placed outside of the comment code, or they'll not be visible! Best, – Toon (talk)  00:44, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Hell- the Bible's viewpoint.
Apologies - whilst I was constucting the AfD for this (using TW) you were also PRODding it, and it appears your PROD has been removed in the process. I am happy to revert to your PROD if you so wish. I42 (talk) 08:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Bidushi Dash
Hello Feezo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bidushi Dash, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  13:04, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Nice turnaround on the speedy
Bravo on tagging this article with a speedy in two minutes. -- Gnowor TC 11:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! It's nice to be noticed. :) I use the Atom feed to monitor Special:Newpages. I'm thinking of writing a script to catch them live on IRC. Feezo (Talk) 11:41, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * There's got to be something floating around here already. Although I know that the Huggle filter has been broken for the past couple of revisions.  However you do it, it's obviously working.  Keep up the great work!  Oh, and have a cookie! -- Gnowor TC 11:46, 22 December 2010 (UTC)



Gnowor has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!


 * Mmmm, delicious! Feezo (Talk) 11:56, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

FYI
Thanks for patrolling new pages. Wiki/User:Ruckgerm was tagged by you, but without a specific CSD reason. You should have used db-g6, which includes pages that are "unambiguously created in error and/or in the wrong namespace." Thought you may want to know. Cheers. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 14:51, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, thank you. I wasn't sure. Feezo (Talk) 14:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

hi
hi i am tawheed from kashmir in india .what about you and are you boy or girl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmad842 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * As it says on my user page, I'm from California. Feezo (Talk) 21:26, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanx for help and more
Respectable Feezo thanx for your valuabe help,you have helped in Suratgarh tehsil,i hope whenever i will need u will help me.Thanx! Shemaroo (talk) 10:41, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Progressive India Development Forum - A grassroot level Political Party
Hello Feezo. I am just letting you know that I deleted Progressive India Development Forum - A grassroot level Political Party, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Ged UK  16:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I tagged it as hoax since there were no independent Google hits for it whatsoever Feezo (Talk) 18:21, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your help to me Leeliwiki (talk) 22:35, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Ian Christopher Hall
Hi Feezo. Just to let you know I have changed your db-hoax at Ian Christopher Hall to db-attack and blanked the page. It pays to read further - there were some nasty accusations. All the best for 2011 :) --Kudpung (talk) 07:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll keep that in mind next time! Feezo (Talk)</FONT> 10:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

DucKWortH-LEWI
Hey, leaving you a notice I changed the speedy criteria on DucKWortH-LEWI. You nominated the page under A1, but the article is not "very short". Large new unwikified articles are almost always copied from somewhere and can be deleted under G12. This one is a ruleset copied from an official cricket manual or somesuch and I have nominated it under G12 accordingly. Yoenit (talk) 10:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Ahh, oops. Forgot A1 requires 'very short' in addition to no context. Thanks for fixing it. Feezo <FONT SIZE="-2">(Talk)</FONT> 11:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Suspect Intersog
Hello Feezo I want to clarify situation. We have developed new open web resource and we want to let people know about it. If i made something wrong please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comboapp (talk • contribs) 12:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for being willing to discuss this. You should read our FAQ for organizations, particularly the section on linking to your own website. Note that repated violations of our spam policy can cause your site to be placed on the spam blacklist. If you genuinely think a link to your site will improve an article on Wikipedia, the best way to avoid a conflict of interest is to bring it up on that article's talk page. Feezo <FONT SIZE="-2">(Talk)</FONT> 12:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Seeking for your help right now
Dear Feezo i need your help right now in my favourite article Rawla Mandi.Plz dont delete material from this article.I have tried to make sections but unfortunately i failed to make in right way.You have just to SET SECTIONS which I HAVE MENTIONED THERE.I  will grateful to you. Shemaroo (talk) 13:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All done. The sections headings ==like this== have to be followed by a linebreak or they won't display properly. Let me know if you need more help. Feezo <FONT SIZE="-2">(Talk)</FONT> 13:57, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Feezo sorry i did not understand what do u mean by line break.Plz go to Rawla mandi and improve section heading specially section no. 6 Shemaroo (talk) 14:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanking u
I donot know how to thank u dear.U have done very kind act for me thanx thanx thanx dear.Shemaroo (talk) 14:12, 29 December 2010 (UTC)