User talk:Toon05

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Just to let you know
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 16:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)please ping me

Molotov Cocktail(magazine) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Molotov Cocktail(magazine). Since you had some involvement with the Molotov Cocktail(magazine) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:19, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FeelGoodDrinksCologo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FeelGoodDrinksCologo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

You’re back!
Hello and welcome back to Wikipedia! I see that you have edited recently, and wanted to let you know that I removed you from the list of missing Wikipedians. If you ever decide to take another wikibreak or retire (which I hope you don’t!), you can leave a message on your user page. Glad to see you’re back! Happy editing, Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Removing talk page heading stuff from User talk:Toon05/Archive 1
Hi! There's some talk page heading stuff in User_talk:Toon05/Archive_1, specifically:

Archive 1

I think all of that can be removed, but especially the first part (the MiszaBot template) causes your talk page archive to show up in Category:Pages where archive parameter is not a subpage, which I'm trying to clear out. Now I know that you have been desysopped for inactivity, but could you ask for it to be unprotected? Thanks! --rchard2scout (talk) 12:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Hope all is well!
Hello Toon05! I hope you are doing well. I just wanted to let you know that I added you to Missing Wikipedians. If you ever come back, or choose not to have your name on this list, just let me know. Hope you come back, even just to check in, Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 00:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Geographers on Film


The article Geographers on Film has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to fail WP:NFILM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  14:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Geographers on Film for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geographers on Film is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Geographers on Film until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Donald D23  talk to me  23:51, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

"King Kev" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=King_Kev&redirect=no King Kev] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie ( talk  •  contribs ) 13:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)