User talk:Fixer88/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --AW (talk) 18:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Category:Slovakian heavy metal musical groups has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:10, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

NFL Europe move
I concur fully with your move, as the "Europa" tag was only placed on the league for the one, final season.

The question that leads me to post here, though, is to ask what your thoughts are regarding merging the World League of American Football article with the NFL Europe article. The break between the two is not particularly clear enough, IMO, to support two articles, as the "World League" name was used for the Europe-only league upon it's revival. That says to me that they really were intended to be the same league. Your thoughts? oknazevad (talk) 18:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Asguard (band)
I have nominated Asguard (band), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Asguard (band). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 13:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

The Spectrum (Philadelphia) vs. Wachovia Spectrum
Hello Fixer. I see you moved the article from its corporate-sponsored name to a neutral one. I don't disagree with the move (in fact, I proposed it on the article's Talk page in December), but I've been unable to find any source that says Wachovia has ended their naming rights deal. In a discussion with another user (you can see part of it here, on my talk page), another frequent editor suggested waiting 'til the arena is razed. Other than its absence on this list, do you have any citable news that mentions the change in name?  Me Three  ( talk to me )  20:11, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Earl category CfD tags
I have removed the CfD tags from Category:Earl of Glencairn and Category:Earl of Sutherland. I did this because you didn't give any reason for the renames, and didn't make any nomination at Categories for discussion/Log/2011 April 13. If you think they are covered by any spedy criterion, feel free to tag them with and list them at Categories for discussion/Speedy. Otherwise, if you still think they should be renamed, feel free to retag them, and list them at Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 29. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Same with Category:Sports figures from Sonora and Category:Sports figures from Zacatecas. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:44, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stephan Görgl


The article Stephan Görgl has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 16:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Dementyev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrei Dementyev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

San Francisco meetup at WMF headquarters
Hi Fixer88,

I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the next wiki-meetup happening in SF. It'll be located at our very own Wikimedia Foundation offices, and we'd love it if some local editors who are new to the meetup scene came and got some free lunch with us :) Please sign up on the meetup page if you're interested in attending, and I hope to see you soon! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

== Best regards from Campora San Giovanni, and polite request for translation and enhancement of Campora San Giovanni in English, thank of true heart --Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 06:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC) ==


 * English

Good morning from Campora San Giovanni,

I am writing first to say hello and know how are you. Beyond this to wish you a Merry and Happy Weekend, which is prosperous and generous. I am writing to ask you a nice courtesy, that is, to improve and translate Campora San Giovanni in English on Spanish base (the latest). Of course when you have free time, in return you to translate an article of your interest in Italian and Sicilian, my official language. Well, waiting for a certain and your nice answer thank you in advance with my whole heart. a Bright Greeting from Campora San Giovanni.--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 06:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Español

Feliz Día desde Campora San Giovanni,

Escribo primero para saludarte y saber cómo estás. Más allá de esto para desearte un Feliz y Hermoso Fin de Semana, que sea próspero y munifico. Te escribo para pedirte un cortesía agradable, osea, para mejorar y traducir Campora San Giovanni en Inglés en sobre la base española (el mas acutualizado). Por supuesto, cuando tienes tiempo libre, en el que volver a traducir un artículo de tu interés en italiano y siciliano, mis idiomas oficiales. Bueno, en espera de una tuya contesta respuesta agradable, te agradezco de verdadero corazón. Un Luminoso Saluod desde Campora San Giovanni.--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 06:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alexander Filipenko


The article Alexander Filipenko has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 22:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Irina Gaidamachuk, Fixer88!

Wikipedia editor Andrewman327 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Good job on Irina Gaidamachuk. Remember that all citations, even ones in foreign languages, should use the proper citation format."

To reply, leave a comment on Andrewman327's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Battlecross for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battlecross is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Battlecross until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gtwfan52 (talk) 08:14, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diana Quijano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=613476734 your edit] to Gianmaria Bruni may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:58, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * | Class Wins = 2 ,

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aerolíneas Argentinas, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 22:18, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Sportspeople in Tallinn
Category:Sportspeople in Tallinn, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William 13:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:Male alpine skiers by nationality
Category:Male alpine skiers by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 08:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:Canadian sportspeople by ethnic or national origin
Category:Canadian sportspeople by ethnic or national origin, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 14:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:American people of Volga German descent
For info, Category:American people of Volga German descent has been emptied and tagged for deletion. – Fayenatic  L ondon 12:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Canton of Perreux
 * added a link pointing to Perreux


 * Canton of Saint-Germain-Laval
 * added a link pointing to Saint-Germain-Laval


 * Canton of Saint-Haon-le-Châtel
 * added a link pointing to Saint-Germain-Laval

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Advice
Even for obvious topics like these cantons, it is a very good idea to give some sort of a reference when you first submit the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Santiurde de Reinosa
Hi, I'm Arbustum. Fixer88, thanks for creating Santiurde de Reinosa!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please provide a reference for the population.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Arbustum (talk) 16:58, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve San Miguel de Aguayo, Cantabria
Hi, I'm Arbustum. Fixer88, thanks for creating San Miguel de Aguayo, Cantabria!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please provide a reference for the population.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Arbustum (talk) 17:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Britons in Egypt


The article Britons in Egypt has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources; no assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carlos Barra


The article Carlos Barra has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1   15:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello
I have seen you edited before Copa del Rey, maybe you can help me with this unique articles about Spanish Cup if you are interested : Copa del Rey Topscorers and Copa del Rey Topscorers by Season. Improve them a beat to be accepted, thank you.Alexiulian25 (talk) 20:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Populated places by year of establishment subcats
Several categories, including at least one which you created, have been nominated for possible merging. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Mistaken identity
This is absolutely fascinating. Please have a look at the edits of and read this discussion. They may strike a chord as to the identity of PCruiser. I recognise that Wikipedia rules say that you are not required to reveal any personal details about yourself and this may limit how much you can tell me about PCruiser but I would be really interested to hear if you have any ideas. Anything you email me will be treated with absolute confidence. The autoblock on your IP address will expire in 48 if not 24 hours. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd like some more information about PCruiser. A look at the timing of your edits and PCruiser's edit leads me to believe that this account is controlling PCruiser; for example, Fixer88 edits at 22:04, followed at 22:05 by the creation of a sandbox entry by PCruiser; that continues until 22:18, and then Fixer88 resumes at 22:25. Another similar series is 23:19, 23:36, 23:37, 23:38, 23:41. There's also a 100% match on other checkuser information. --jpgordon:==( o ) 00:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)


 * PCruiser looks to me not like someone lacking competence, but rather as a perfectly competent editor choosing to troll. That raises the question as to whether the same editor may have one or more other accounts in which he or she edits in an apparently constructive way: surprisingly common behaviour for trolls. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Here are the 2015-12-17 edits of the two accounts as listed by Jpgordon above with links made more precise and another edit added: F88 23:19, PC 23:36, F88 23:37, PC 23:38, PC 23:39 F88 23:41.

American films
Hello. Please do not remove. This is a non-diffusing category. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Movement of categories et. al. regarding Hollywood
Can you point me to the discussion where consensus was established to move all Hollywood, California articles to Hollywood, Los Angeles? Thanks! -- Jayron 32 15:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Caroline Iuel-Brockdorff


The article Caroline Iuel-Brockdorff has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dogsix (talk) 01:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Storm (Malagasy band)


The article Storm (Malagasy band) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No to confirm if it pass WP:NBANDS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Victão Lopes Fala! 18:37, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Storm (Malagasy band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Storm (Malagasy band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Storm (Malagasy band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Euryalus (talk) 07:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Serbian male golfers has been nominated for discussion
Category:Serbian male golfers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Unblocked
Following a successful appeal to arbcom, your account has been unblocked. This comes with a few cautions that are important to keep in mind:


 * 1) Communication is important. If people have concerns about your edits, you need to engage with them promptly.
 * 2) It appears that you did some logged-out editing while your account was blocked. This is called "block evasion" and is not allowed. If you've been blocked, there are problems serious enough that they have to be addressed before you continue editing.
 * 3) Although it is acceptable to edit while logged out if your account is not blocked, it is better to make it a habit to log in whenever you edit. This helps reduce confusion, especially if you are working from a shared location. If you are concerned about security, you can use a publicly declared alternate account for editing from less-secure locations.

Thanks and happy editing! Opabinia regalis (talk) 02:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carlos Barra


The article Carlos Barra has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Vítor (talk) 09:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello Fixer88. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 16:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Davidyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Davidson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Wrong Disambiguation.
You have "disambiguated" (Thruster#Spacecraft thrusters → Rocket engine) on many of my articles (JCSAT-1, JCSAT-2‎, JCSAT-3‎, Intelsat 26, Horizons-1‎‎, HS-393‎, SBS 6 (satellite)‎, Superbird-A2 and Superbird-C). It is inaccurate, it should not be done, and is technically wrong. Most thrusters are not even a rocket engine. They have no choking at the throat of the combustion chamber. And many of the thrusters are little more than simple solenoid valves. A Thruster is a use, rocket engine is a propulsion technology, intent vs mean or what vs how. – Baldusi (talk) 21:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Faizhaider. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Dafydd Alaw, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.  Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 14:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Intentional links to dab pages

 * Hi, regarding this edit: links that contain (disambiguation) in their title intentionally point to the disambiguation page. These should never be fixed, unless you have a good reason to. There's more info at WP:INTDAB. Thanks. Uanfala (talk) 18:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Now I've come across this edit: if you see a dablink tagged with dn, this means an editor has already tried to disambiguate the link and hasn't found enough information in the context (or in he sources given) to decide on the intended target. Most of the time this means that these links are usually very difficult to fix, so I'd caution against trying to, unless (of course) you're prepared to go to the trouble of hunting down further references and doing some detective work. Cheers. Uanfala (talk) 18:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Storm (Malagasy band)


The article Storm (Malagasy band) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails GNG and NBAND: Due-diligent BEFORE did not produce any demonstrably independent and reliable sources offering significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — swpb T 17:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Storm (Malagasy band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Storm (Malagasy band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Storm (Malagasy band)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — swpb T 13:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter
Hello ,


 * Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action. If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
 * Second set of eyes

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation. Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .
 * Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

Nomination of Kathryn Edwards for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathryn Edwards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kathryn Edwards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mymis (talk) 16:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)